Product harm crisis at the crossroads: monitoring recovery of replacement products
Company responses to product harm crises must include a decision as to whether product replacement is indicated. A model is provided to assist managers in making product replacement decisions on the basis of empirical standards. In addition, a monitoring mechanism is suggested to assess the efficacy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial crisis quarterly 1992, Vol.6 (4), p.279-294 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 294 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Industrial crisis quarterly |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Siomkos, George J. Kurzbard, Gary |
description | Company responses to product harm crises must include a decision as to whether product replacement is indicated. A model is provided to assist managers in making product replacement decisions on the basis of empirical standards. In addition, a monitoring mechanism is suggested to assess the efficacy of company responses after they have been undertaken. Both parts of the model, taken conjointly, provide an ongoing technique to help ensure new product replacement success. The model has the additional advantage of being generally applicable to all cases of product harm crisis management involving product recalls. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/108602669200600402 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671338278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26162827</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_108602669200600402</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26162827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8284f7aea9894d2dce486e5936c736a78ad97b34c5687920b60d234ce5382add3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKxDAUzULBcfQHBCFLN3XyaJPUnQy-YEARXYdMcjvToW3GJBXm741U3Aiu7r1wHvcchC4ouaZUygUlShAmRM0IEYSUhB2hGakZLRQl4gSdxrgjpGKKihl6fQnejTbhrQk9tqGNbcQm4bSFfPkYgzcu3uDeD23yoR02OID1nxAO2Dd533fGQg9DwvtJKZ6h48Z0Ec5_5hy939-9LR-L1fPD0_J2VVhWyVQopspGGjC1qkvHnIVSCahqLqzkwkhlXC3XvLSVUDJnWQviWD6h4ooZ5_gcXU262fhjhJh030YLXWcG8GPUVEjKM1aqDGUTdIoEjd6HtjfhoCnR36Xpv6Vl0mIiRbMBvfNjGHKc_xmXE2MXc1e_HkxQwfIf_AuBz3hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671338278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Product harm crisis at the crossroads: monitoring recovery of replacement products</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Siomkos, George J. ; Kurzbard, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Siomkos, George J. ; Kurzbard, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>Company responses to product harm crises must include a decision as to whether product replacement is indicated. A model is provided to assist managers in making product replacement decisions on the basis of empirical standards. In addition, a monitoring mechanism is suggested to assess the efficacy of company responses after they have been undertaken. Both parts of the model, taken conjointly, provide an ongoing technique to help ensure new product replacement success. The model has the additional advantage of being generally applicable to all cases of product harm crisis management involving product recalls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8106</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1086-0266</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/108602669200600402</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Industiral Crisis Institute Inc</publisher><subject>Capital costs ; Conflict management ; Consumer goods industries ; Corporate strategies ; Emergency management ; Empirical analysis ; Industrial management ; Management ; Market share ; Monitoring ; Organizations ; Product development ; Product management ; Product recalls ; Recall ; Recovery</subject><ispartof>Industrial crisis quarterly, 1992, Vol.6 (4), p.279-294</ispartof><rights>1992, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8284f7aea9894d2dce486e5936c736a78ad97b34c5687920b60d234ce5382add3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8284f7aea9894d2dce486e5936c736a78ad97b34c5687920b60d234ce5382add3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26162827$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26162827$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27902,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siomkos, George J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurzbard, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Product harm crisis at the crossroads: monitoring recovery of replacement products</title><title>Industrial crisis quarterly</title><description>Company responses to product harm crises must include a decision as to whether product replacement is indicated. A model is provided to assist managers in making product replacement decisions on the basis of empirical standards. In addition, a monitoring mechanism is suggested to assess the efficacy of company responses after they have been undertaken. Both parts of the model, taken conjointly, provide an ongoing technique to help ensure new product replacement success. The model has the additional advantage of being generally applicable to all cases of product harm crisis management involving product recalls.</description><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Conflict management</subject><subject>Consumer goods industries</subject><subject>Corporate strategies</subject><subject>Emergency management</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Industrial management</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Market share</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Product management</subject><subject>Product recalls</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><issn>0921-8106</issn><issn>1086-0266</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtKxDAUzULBcfQHBCFLN3XyaJPUnQy-YEARXYdMcjvToW3GJBXm741U3Aiu7r1wHvcchC4ouaZUygUlShAmRM0IEYSUhB2hGakZLRQl4gSdxrgjpGKKihl6fQnejTbhrQk9tqGNbcQm4bSFfPkYgzcu3uDeD23yoR02OID1nxAO2Dd533fGQg9DwvtJKZ6h48Z0Ec5_5hy939-9LR-L1fPD0_J2VVhWyVQopspGGjC1qkvHnIVSCahqLqzkwkhlXC3XvLSVUDJnWQviWD6h4ooZ5_gcXU262fhjhJh030YLXWcG8GPUVEjKM1aqDGUTdIoEjd6HtjfhoCnR36Xpv6Vl0mIiRbMBvfNjGHKc_xmXE2MXc1e_HkxQwfIf_AuBz3hw</recordid><startdate>1992</startdate><enddate>1992</enddate><creator>Siomkos, George J.</creator><creator>Kurzbard, Gary</creator><general>Industiral Crisis Institute Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1992</creationdate><title>Product harm crisis at the crossroads: monitoring recovery of replacement products</title><author>Siomkos, George J. ; Kurzbard, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8284f7aea9894d2dce486e5936c736a78ad97b34c5687920b60d234ce5382add3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Conflict management</topic><topic>Consumer goods industries</topic><topic>Corporate strategies</topic><topic>Emergency management</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Industrial management</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Market share</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Product management</topic><topic>Product recalls</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siomkos, George J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurzbard, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Industrial crisis quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siomkos, George J.</au><au>Kurzbard, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Product harm crisis at the crossroads: monitoring recovery of replacement products</atitle><jtitle>Industrial crisis quarterly</jtitle><date>1992</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>279-294</pages><issn>0921-8106</issn><issn>1086-0266</issn><abstract>Company responses to product harm crises must include a decision as to whether product replacement is indicated. A model is provided to assist managers in making product replacement decisions on the basis of empirical standards. In addition, a monitoring mechanism is suggested to assess the efficacy of company responses after they have been undertaken. Both parts of the model, taken conjointly, provide an ongoing technique to help ensure new product replacement success. The model has the additional advantage of being generally applicable to all cases of product harm crisis management involving product recalls.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Industiral Crisis Institute Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/108602669200600402</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-8106 |
ispartof | Industrial crisis quarterly, 1992, Vol.6 (4), p.279-294 |
issn | 0921-8106 1086-0266 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671338278 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Capital costs Conflict management Consumer goods industries Corporate strategies Emergency management Empirical analysis Industrial management Management Market share Monitoring Organizations Product development Product management Product recalls Recall Recovery |
title | Product harm crisis at the crossroads: monitoring recovery of replacement products |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A23%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Product%20harm%20crisis%20at%20the%20crossroads:%20monitoring%20recovery%20of%20replacement%20products&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20crisis%20quarterly&rft.au=Siomkos,%20George%20J.&rft.date=1992&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=279-294&rft.issn=0921-8106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/108602669200600402&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26162827%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671338278&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26162827&rft_sage_id=10.1177_108602669200600402&rfr_iscdi=true |