Min-Max Fairness Criteria for Transmission Fixed Cost Allocation

Conventionally, transmission fixed cost allocation is carried out on postage stamp basis. Amongst various other ways of solving the problem, the cost allocation under the "usage-based" domain has also been suggested, namely, based on proportionate tracing and recently, by optimization base...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on power systems 2007-11, Vol.22 (4), p.2094-2104
Hauptverfasser: Abhyankar, A.R., Soman, S.A., Khaparde, S.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2104
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2094
container_title IEEE transactions on power systems
container_volume 22
creator Abhyankar, A.R.
Soman, S.A.
Khaparde, S.A.
description Conventionally, transmission fixed cost allocation is carried out on postage stamp basis. Amongst various other ways of solving the problem, the cost allocation under the "usage-based" domain has also been suggested, namely, based on proportionate tracing and recently, by optimization based real power tracing. Changing the cost allocation regime from postage stamp basis to usage-based methods, though technically sound, can pose fairness issue. The fairness criteria in its simplest form would allocate cost in equitable manner on per unit basis while meeting the constraints. The optimization-based tracing provides room for defining an objective, leading to tracing compliant postage stamp method, that strikes a balance in allocation between conventional postage stamp and proportionate tracing-based methods. In this paper, we address this complex cost sharing problem by suggesting a min-max fairness algorithm, using optimization-based real power tracing. The min-max algorithm achieves fairness by equalizing allocations within constrained space and reaching an equilibrium where further balancing cannot be achieved. We show that computing min-max fair solution simply corresponds to solving a sequence of sparse LP problems for real power tracing. The algorithm satisfies the property of aggregate invariancy. Results on actual data of central transmission utility of Western Regional Grid of India, as well as IEEE 30-bus system, validate the claims. The results are compared with the tracing compliant postage stamp method.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907391
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671334428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4349051</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2334902431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-56457304129d2834761b5b60e427116340cf080c7f62673367e2ced01a5e42133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QLwsnrxsndl8bW6WYlVoUbTiMaTbLKRsNzXZQv33pq548DQw87wvw0PIJcIIEdTt4uXj9W1UAMiRAkkVHpEBcl7mIKQ6JgMoS56XisMpOYtxDQAiHQbkbu7afG722dS40NoYs0lwnQ3OZLUP2SKYNm5cjM632dTt7Sqb-Nhl46bxlenS9pyc1KaJ9uJ3Dsn79H4xecxnzw9Pk_Esr2jBu5wLxiUFhoVaFSVlUuCSLwVYVkhEQRlUNZRQyVoUQlIqpC0quwI0PCFI6ZDc9L3b4D93NnY6vVXZpjGt9buoUchEMZbKh-T6H7r2u9Cm73QpUhlXIBKEPVQFH2Owtd4GtzHhSyPog1L9o1QflOpeacpc9Rlnrf3jGWUKONJv-cdvTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>864215906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Min-Max Fairness Criteria for Transmission Fixed Cost Allocation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Abhyankar, A.R. ; Soman, S.A. ; Khaparde, S.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abhyankar, A.R. ; Soman, S.A. ; Khaparde, S.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Conventionally, transmission fixed cost allocation is carried out on postage stamp basis. Amongst various other ways of solving the problem, the cost allocation under the "usage-based" domain has also been suggested, namely, based on proportionate tracing and recently, by optimization based real power tracing. Changing the cost allocation regime from postage stamp basis to usage-based methods, though technically sound, can pose fairness issue. The fairness criteria in its simplest form would allocate cost in equitable manner on per unit basis while meeting the constraints. The optimization-based tracing provides room for defining an objective, leading to tracing compliant postage stamp method, that strikes a balance in allocation between conventional postage stamp and proportionate tracing-based methods. In this paper, we address this complex cost sharing problem by suggesting a min-max fairness algorithm, using optimization-based real power tracing. The min-max algorithm achieves fairness by equalizing allocations within constrained space and reaching an equilibrium where further balancing cannot be achieved. We show that computing min-max fair solution simply corresponds to solving a sequence of sparse LP problems for real power tracing. The algorithm satisfies the property of aggregate invariancy. Results on actual data of central transmission utility of Western Regional Grid of India, as well as IEEE 30-bus system, validate the claims. The results are compared with the tracing compliant postage stamp method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907391</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Aggregates ; Algorithms ; Allocations ; Contracts ; Cost function ; Criteria ; Load flow ; Multicommodity network flow ; network optimization ; Optimization ; Optimization methods ; Postage stamps ; power flow tracing ; Power generation economics ; Power industry ; Power transmission ; Pricing ; Propagation losses ; Strikes ; Studies ; transmission cost allocation ; Utilities</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2007-11, Vol.22 (4), p.2094-2104</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-56457304129d2834761b5b60e427116340cf080c7f62673367e2ced01a5e42133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-56457304129d2834761b5b60e427116340cf080c7f62673367e2ced01a5e42133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4349051$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4349051$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abhyankar, A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soman, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khaparde, S.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Min-Max Fairness Criteria for Transmission Fixed Cost Allocation</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>Conventionally, transmission fixed cost allocation is carried out on postage stamp basis. Amongst various other ways of solving the problem, the cost allocation under the "usage-based" domain has also been suggested, namely, based on proportionate tracing and recently, by optimization based real power tracing. Changing the cost allocation regime from postage stamp basis to usage-based methods, though technically sound, can pose fairness issue. The fairness criteria in its simplest form would allocate cost in equitable manner on per unit basis while meeting the constraints. The optimization-based tracing provides room for defining an objective, leading to tracing compliant postage stamp method, that strikes a balance in allocation between conventional postage stamp and proportionate tracing-based methods. In this paper, we address this complex cost sharing problem by suggesting a min-max fairness algorithm, using optimization-based real power tracing. The min-max algorithm achieves fairness by equalizing allocations within constrained space and reaching an equilibrium where further balancing cannot be achieved. We show that computing min-max fair solution simply corresponds to solving a sequence of sparse LP problems for real power tracing. The algorithm satisfies the property of aggregate invariancy. Results on actual data of central transmission utility of Western Regional Grid of India, as well as IEEE 30-bus system, validate the claims. The results are compared with the tracing compliant postage stamp method.</description><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Allocations</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Cost function</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Load flow</subject><subject>Multicommodity network flow</subject><subject>network optimization</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization methods</subject><subject>Postage stamps</subject><subject>power flow tracing</subject><subject>Power generation economics</subject><subject>Power industry</subject><subject>Power transmission</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>Propagation losses</subject><subject>Strikes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>transmission cost allocation</subject><subject>Utilities</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QLwsnrxsndl8bW6WYlVoUbTiMaTbLKRsNzXZQv33pq548DQw87wvw0PIJcIIEdTt4uXj9W1UAMiRAkkVHpEBcl7mIKQ6JgMoS56XisMpOYtxDQAiHQbkbu7afG722dS40NoYs0lwnQ3OZLUP2SKYNm5cjM632dTt7Sqb-Nhl46bxlenS9pyc1KaJ9uJ3Dsn79H4xecxnzw9Pk_Esr2jBu5wLxiUFhoVaFSVlUuCSLwVYVkhEQRlUNZRQyVoUQlIqpC0quwI0PCFI6ZDc9L3b4D93NnY6vVXZpjGt9buoUchEMZbKh-T6H7r2u9Cm73QpUhlXIBKEPVQFH2Owtd4GtzHhSyPog1L9o1QflOpeacpc9Rlnrf3jGWUKONJv-cdvTA</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>Abhyankar, A.R.</creator><creator>Soman, S.A.</creator><creator>Khaparde, S.A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Min-Max Fairness Criteria for Transmission Fixed Cost Allocation</title><author>Abhyankar, A.R. ; Soman, S.A. ; Khaparde, S.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-56457304129d2834761b5b60e427116340cf080c7f62673367e2ced01a5e42133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Allocations</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Cost function</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Load flow</topic><topic>Multicommodity network flow</topic><topic>network optimization</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization methods</topic><topic>Postage stamps</topic><topic>power flow tracing</topic><topic>Power generation economics</topic><topic>Power industry</topic><topic>Power transmission</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>Propagation losses</topic><topic>Strikes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>transmission cost allocation</topic><topic>Utilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abhyankar, A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soman, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khaparde, S.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abhyankar, A.R.</au><au>Soman, S.A.</au><au>Khaparde, S.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Min-Max Fairness Criteria for Transmission Fixed Cost Allocation</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2094</spage><epage>2104</epage><pages>2094-2104</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>Conventionally, transmission fixed cost allocation is carried out on postage stamp basis. Amongst various other ways of solving the problem, the cost allocation under the "usage-based" domain has also been suggested, namely, based on proportionate tracing and recently, by optimization based real power tracing. Changing the cost allocation regime from postage stamp basis to usage-based methods, though technically sound, can pose fairness issue. The fairness criteria in its simplest form would allocate cost in equitable manner on per unit basis while meeting the constraints. The optimization-based tracing provides room for defining an objective, leading to tracing compliant postage stamp method, that strikes a balance in allocation between conventional postage stamp and proportionate tracing-based methods. In this paper, we address this complex cost sharing problem by suggesting a min-max fairness algorithm, using optimization-based real power tracing. The min-max algorithm achieves fairness by equalizing allocations within constrained space and reaching an equilibrium where further balancing cannot be achieved. We show that computing min-max fair solution simply corresponds to solving a sequence of sparse LP problems for real power tracing. The algorithm satisfies the property of aggregate invariancy. Results on actual data of central transmission utility of Western Regional Grid of India, as well as IEEE 30-bus system, validate the claims. The results are compared with the tracing compliant postage stamp method.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907391</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0885-8950
ispartof IEEE transactions on power systems, 2007-11, Vol.22 (4), p.2094-2104
issn 0885-8950
1558-0679
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671334428
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Aggregates
Algorithms
Allocations
Contracts
Cost function
Criteria
Load flow
Multicommodity network flow
network optimization
Optimization
Optimization methods
Postage stamps
power flow tracing
Power generation economics
Power industry
Power transmission
Pricing
Propagation losses
Strikes
Studies
transmission cost allocation
Utilities
title Min-Max Fairness Criteria for Transmission Fixed Cost Allocation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A26%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Min-Max%20Fairness%20Criteria%20for%20Transmission%20Fixed%20Cost%20Allocation&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Abhyankar,%20A.R.&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2094&rft.epage=2104&rft.pages=2094-2104&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907391&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2334902431%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=864215906&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4349051&rfr_iscdi=true