Route swapping in dynamic traffic networks

A dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) model typically consists of a traffic performance model and a route choice model. The traffic performance model describes how traffic propagates (over time) along routes connecting origin–destination (OD) pairs, examples being the cell transmission model, the verti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research. Part B: methodological 2011, Vol.45 (1), p.102-111
Hauptverfasser: Mounce, Richard, Carey, Malachy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111
container_issue 1
container_start_page 102
container_title Transportation research. Part B: methodological
container_volume 45
creator Mounce, Richard
Carey, Malachy
description A dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) model typically consists of a traffic performance model and a route choice model. The traffic performance model describes how traffic propagates (over time) along routes connecting origin–destination (OD) pairs, examples being the cell transmission model, the vertical queueing model and the travel time model. This is implemented in a dynamic network loading (DNL) algorithm, which uses the given route inflows to compute the link inflows (and hence link costs), which are then used to compute the route travel times (and hence route costs). A route swap process specifies the route inflows for tomorrow (at the next iteration) based on the route inflows today (at the current iteration). A dynamic user equilibrium (DUE), where each traveller on the network cannot reduce his or her cost of travel by switching to another route, can be sought by iterating between the DNL algorithm and the route swap process. The route swap process itself takes up very little computational time (although route set generation can be very computationally intensive for large networks). However, the choice of route swap process dramatically affects convergence and the speed of convergence. The paper details several route swap processes and considers whether they lead to a convergent system, assuming that the route cost vector is a monotone function of the route inflow vector.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.trb.2010.05.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671325410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0191261510000809</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671325410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-a49af4f52de65800322e82fe9dabe1b11e013b9f91376c58c1b30542731a9bdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLNDEQDKLg-vgB3vYiiDBrdzKZB54-xCeCIHoOmUxHs-7OzJfMKvvv7WXFo4fuIk1VdaeEOEGYIWBxMZ-NsZlJ4DfoGYDeEROsyjqTqih3xQSwxkwWqPfFQUpzAFA54EScP_erkabpyw5D6N6moZu2684ug5uO0XrP2NH41cePdCT2vF0kOv7BQ_F6c_1ydZc9Pt3eX_17zFxelWNm89r63GvZUqEr3iMlVdJT3dqGsEEkQNXUvkZVFk5XDhsFOpelQls3rVOH4mzrO8T-_4rSaJYhOVosbEf9KhksSlRS5whMxS3VxT6lSN4MMSxtXBsEs8nFzA3nYja5GNCGc2HNw1YTaSD3KyAi_nCXGvNplM01tzUXK5EhcG1w2CBIgzx9H5dsdvpzq03OLjw7uJB-TaWqpJagmHe55REH9xkomuQCdY7aEMmNpu3DHyd_A228j44</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671325410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Route swapping in dynamic traffic networks</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mounce, Richard ; Carey, Malachy</creator><creatorcontrib>Mounce, Richard ; Carey, Malachy</creatorcontrib><description>A dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) model typically consists of a traffic performance model and a route choice model. The traffic performance model describes how traffic propagates (over time) along routes connecting origin–destination (OD) pairs, examples being the cell transmission model, the vertical queueing model and the travel time model. This is implemented in a dynamic network loading (DNL) algorithm, which uses the given route inflows to compute the link inflows (and hence link costs), which are then used to compute the route travel times (and hence route costs). A route swap process specifies the route inflows for tomorrow (at the next iteration) based on the route inflows today (at the current iteration). A dynamic user equilibrium (DUE), where each traveller on the network cannot reduce his or her cost of travel by switching to another route, can be sought by iterating between the DNL algorithm and the route swap process. The route swap process itself takes up very little computational time (although route set generation can be very computationally intensive for large networks). However, the choice of route swap process dramatically affects convergence and the speed of convergence. The paper details several route swap processes and considers whether they lead to a convergent system, assuming that the route cost vector is a monotone function of the route inflow vector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.05.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRBMDY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Computer networks ; Convergence measure ; Convergence measure Dynamic traffic assignment Route swap process ; Costs ; Dynamic traffic assignment ; Exact sciences and technology ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Inflow ; Mathematical models ; Networks ; Route swap process ; Routing (telecommunications) ; Switching theory ; Traffic engineering ; Traffic flow ; Transportation planning, management and economics</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part B: methodological, 2011, Vol.45 (1), p.102-111</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-a49af4f52de65800322e82fe9dabe1b11e013b9f91376c58c1b30542731a9bdc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-a49af4f52de65800322e82fe9dabe1b11e013b9f91376c58c1b30542731a9bdc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2010.05.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23825203$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeetransb/v_3a45_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a102-111.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mounce, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Malachy</creatorcontrib><title>Route swapping in dynamic traffic networks</title><title>Transportation research. Part B: methodological</title><description>A dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) model typically consists of a traffic performance model and a route choice model. The traffic performance model describes how traffic propagates (over time) along routes connecting origin–destination (OD) pairs, examples being the cell transmission model, the vertical queueing model and the travel time model. This is implemented in a dynamic network loading (DNL) algorithm, which uses the given route inflows to compute the link inflows (and hence link costs), which are then used to compute the route travel times (and hence route costs). A route swap process specifies the route inflows for tomorrow (at the next iteration) based on the route inflows today (at the current iteration). A dynamic user equilibrium (DUE), where each traveller on the network cannot reduce his or her cost of travel by switching to another route, can be sought by iterating between the DNL algorithm and the route swap process. The route swap process itself takes up very little computational time (although route set generation can be very computationally intensive for large networks). However, the choice of route swap process dramatically affects convergence and the speed of convergence. The paper details several route swap processes and considers whether they lead to a convergent system, assuming that the route cost vector is a monotone function of the route inflow vector.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Computer networks</subject><subject>Convergence measure</subject><subject>Convergence measure Dynamic traffic assignment Route swap process</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Dynamic traffic assignment</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Inflow</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Route swap process</subject><subject>Routing (telecommunications)</subject><subject>Switching theory</subject><subject>Traffic engineering</subject><subject>Traffic flow</subject><subject>Transportation planning, management and economics</subject><issn>0191-2615</issn><issn>1879-2367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UEtLNDEQDKLg-vgB3vYiiDBrdzKZB54-xCeCIHoOmUxHs-7OzJfMKvvv7WXFo4fuIk1VdaeEOEGYIWBxMZ-NsZlJ4DfoGYDeEROsyjqTqih3xQSwxkwWqPfFQUpzAFA54EScP_erkabpyw5D6N6moZu2684ug5uO0XrP2NH41cePdCT2vF0kOv7BQ_F6c_1ydZc9Pt3eX_17zFxelWNm89r63GvZUqEr3iMlVdJT3dqGsEEkQNXUvkZVFk5XDhsFOpelQls3rVOH4mzrO8T-_4rSaJYhOVosbEf9KhksSlRS5whMxS3VxT6lSN4MMSxtXBsEs8nFzA3nYja5GNCGc2HNw1YTaSD3KyAi_nCXGvNplM01tzUXK5EhcG1w2CBIgzx9H5dsdvpzq03OLjw7uJB-TaWqpJagmHe55REH9xkomuQCdY7aEMmNpu3DHyd_A228j44</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Mounce, Richard</creator><creator>Carey, Malachy</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Route swapping in dynamic traffic networks</title><author>Mounce, Richard ; Carey, Malachy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-a49af4f52de65800322e82fe9dabe1b11e013b9f91376c58c1b30542731a9bdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Computer networks</topic><topic>Convergence measure</topic><topic>Convergence measure Dynamic traffic assignment Route swap process</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Dynamic traffic assignment</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Inflow</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Route swap process</topic><topic>Routing (telecommunications)</topic><topic>Switching theory</topic><topic>Traffic engineering</topic><topic>Traffic flow</topic><topic>Transportation planning, management and economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mounce, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Malachy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part B: methodological</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mounce, Richard</au><au>Carey, Malachy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Route swapping in dynamic traffic networks</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part B: methodological</jtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>102-111</pages><issn>0191-2615</issn><eissn>1879-2367</eissn><coden>TRBMDY</coden><abstract>A dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) model typically consists of a traffic performance model and a route choice model. The traffic performance model describes how traffic propagates (over time) along routes connecting origin–destination (OD) pairs, examples being the cell transmission model, the vertical queueing model and the travel time model. This is implemented in a dynamic network loading (DNL) algorithm, which uses the given route inflows to compute the link inflows (and hence link costs), which are then used to compute the route travel times (and hence route costs). A route swap process specifies the route inflows for tomorrow (at the next iteration) based on the route inflows today (at the current iteration). A dynamic user equilibrium (DUE), where each traveller on the network cannot reduce his or her cost of travel by switching to another route, can be sought by iterating between the DNL algorithm and the route swap process. The route swap process itself takes up very little computational time (although route set generation can be very computationally intensive for large networks). However, the choice of route swap process dramatically affects convergence and the speed of convergence. The paper details several route swap processes and considers whether they lead to a convergent system, assuming that the route cost vector is a monotone function of the route inflow vector.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.trb.2010.05.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2615
ispartof Transportation research. Part B: methodological, 2011, Vol.45 (1), p.102-111
issn 0191-2615
1879-2367
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671325410
source RePEc; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Applied sciences
Computer networks
Convergence measure
Convergence measure Dynamic traffic assignment Route swap process
Costs
Dynamic traffic assignment
Exact sciences and technology
Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction
Inflow
Mathematical models
Networks
Route swap process
Routing (telecommunications)
Switching theory
Traffic engineering
Traffic flow
Transportation planning, management and economics
title Route swapping in dynamic traffic networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A14%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Route%20swapping%20in%20dynamic%20traffic%20networks&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20B:%20methodological&rft.au=Mounce,%20Richard&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=102-111&rft.issn=0191-2615&rft.eissn=1879-2367&rft.coden=TRBMDY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trb.2010.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671325410%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671325410&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0191261510000809&rfr_iscdi=true