A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading
This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the main currently published fatigue prediction models for estimating the multiaxial fatigue limit. The set of analyzed criteria comprises 17 different methods, which are tested on a series of 407 experiments. The methods are briefly described and the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of fatigue 2011-02, Vol.33 (2), p.153-165 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 165 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 153 |
| container_title | International journal of fatigue |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Papuga, Jan |
| description | This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the main currently published fatigue prediction models for estimating the multiaxial fatigue limit. The set of analyzed criteria comprises 17 different methods, which are tested on a series of 407 experiments. The methods are briefly described and the overall tendencies of their prediction capabilities are commented on, including some properties common to certain groups of criteria. The set of experiments refers to the publicly available FatLim database. The computation results were achieved using the PragTic freeware fatigue solver. The Papuga PCr method is the best solution at present. Some possible ways of further improving the methods are proposed here. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.001 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671321467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0142112310001672</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671321467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e54b0f30b512526f8f8c66eeca11669b029380b207adb81445e18d9d7f4f44133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFO3DAQhq2KSl0oz1BfkLhkmbEdxzmuUGmRkLjA2XKcMXjlTaidrMrbk9WuuHIaafT9_2g-xn4hrBFQ32zXcRvcFF9mWgtYtmDWAPiNrdA0bSVVLc7YClCJClHIH-y8lC0AtNDUK7bZ8DLnPb3zceC0d2leqoYXPr0SP7XyFHdx4vPQU-a7OU3R_Y8u8TS6fkF_su_BpUKXp3nBnu9-P93-rR4e_9zfbh4qLxszVVSrDoKErkZRCx1MMF5rIu8QtW47EK000AloXN8ZVKomNH3bN0EFpVDKC3Z97H3L47-ZymR3sXhKyQ00zsWiblAKVLpZ0OaI-jyWkinYtxx3Lr9bBHuQZrf2U5o9SLNg7CJtSV6djrjiXQrZDT6Wz7iQstZoDtzmyNHy8T5StsVHGjz1MZOfbD_GL299AMtrhfM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671321467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Papuga, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Papuga, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the main currently published fatigue prediction models for estimating the multiaxial fatigue limit. The set of analyzed criteria comprises 17 different methods, which are tested on a series of 407 experiments. The methods are briefly described and the overall tendencies of their prediction capabilities are commented on, including some properties common to certain groups of criteria. The set of experiments refers to the publicly available FatLim database. The computation results were achieved using the PragTic freeware fatigue solver. The Papuga PCr method is the best solution at present. Some possible ways of further improving the methods are proposed here.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-1123</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJFADB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Computation ; Criteria ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fatigue ; Fatigue (materials) ; Fatigue limit ; Freeware ; Mathematical models ; Mean stress effect ; Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology ; Metals. Metallurgy ; Multiaxial fatigue ; Non-proportional loading ; Solvers</subject><ispartof>International journal of fatigue, 2011-02, Vol.33 (2), p.153-165</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e54b0f30b512526f8f8c66eeca11669b029380b207adb81445e18d9d7f4f44133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e54b0f30b512526f8f8c66eeca11669b029380b207adb81445e18d9d7f4f44133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23356181$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papuga, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading</title><title>International journal of fatigue</title><description>This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the main currently published fatigue prediction models for estimating the multiaxial fatigue limit. The set of analyzed criteria comprises 17 different methods, which are tested on a series of 407 experiments. The methods are briefly described and the overall tendencies of their prediction capabilities are commented on, including some properties common to certain groups of criteria. The set of experiments refers to the publicly available FatLim database. The computation results were achieved using the PragTic freeware fatigue solver. The Papuga PCr method is the best solution at present. Some possible ways of further improving the methods are proposed here.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue (materials)</subject><subject>Fatigue limit</subject><subject>Freeware</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mean stress effect</subject><subject>Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology</subject><subject>Metals. Metallurgy</subject><subject>Multiaxial fatigue</subject><subject>Non-proportional loading</subject><subject>Solvers</subject><issn>0142-1123</issn><issn>1879-3452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFO3DAQhq2KSl0oz1BfkLhkmbEdxzmuUGmRkLjA2XKcMXjlTaidrMrbk9WuuHIaafT9_2g-xn4hrBFQ32zXcRvcFF9mWgtYtmDWAPiNrdA0bSVVLc7YClCJClHIH-y8lC0AtNDUK7bZ8DLnPb3zceC0d2leqoYXPr0SP7XyFHdx4vPQU-a7OU3R_Y8u8TS6fkF_su_BpUKXp3nBnu9-P93-rR4e_9zfbh4qLxszVVSrDoKErkZRCx1MMF5rIu8QtW47EK000AloXN8ZVKomNH3bN0EFpVDKC3Z97H3L47-ZymR3sXhKyQ00zsWiblAKVLpZ0OaI-jyWkinYtxx3Lr9bBHuQZrf2U5o9SLNg7CJtSV6djrjiXQrZDT6Wz7iQstZoDtzmyNHy8T5StsVHGjz1MZOfbD_GL299AMtrhfM</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Papuga, Jan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading</title><author>Papuga, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e54b0f30b512526f8f8c66eeca11669b029380b207adb81445e18d9d7f4f44133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue (materials)</topic><topic>Fatigue limit</topic><topic>Freeware</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mean stress effect</topic><topic>Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology</topic><topic>Metals. Metallurgy</topic><topic>Multiaxial fatigue</topic><topic>Non-proportional loading</topic><topic>Solvers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papuga, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>International journal of fatigue</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papuga, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading</atitle><jtitle>International journal of fatigue</jtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>153-165</pages><issn>0142-1123</issn><eissn>1879-3452</eissn><coden>IJFADB</coden><abstract>This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the main currently published fatigue prediction models for estimating the multiaxial fatigue limit. The set of analyzed criteria comprises 17 different methods, which are tested on a series of 407 experiments. The methods are briefly described and the overall tendencies of their prediction capabilities are commented on, including some properties common to certain groups of criteria. The set of experiments refers to the publicly available FatLim database. The computation results were achieved using the PragTic freeware fatigue solver. The Papuga PCr method is the best solution at present. Some possible ways of further improving the methods are proposed here.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.001</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0142-1123 |
| ispartof | International journal of fatigue, 2011-02, Vol.33 (2), p.153-165 |
| issn | 0142-1123 1879-3452 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671321467 |
| source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Applied sciences Computation Criteria Exact sciences and technology Fatigue Fatigue (materials) Fatigue limit Freeware Mathematical models Mean stress effect Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology Metals. Metallurgy Multiaxial fatigue Non-proportional loading Solvers |
| title | A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A37%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20on%20evaluating%20the%20fatigue%20limit%20under%20multiaxial%20loading&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20fatigue&rft.au=Papuga,%20Jan&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=153-165&rft.issn=0142-1123&rft.eissn=1879-3452&rft.coden=IJFADB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671321467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671321467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0142112310001672&rfr_iscdi=true |