Impact of harvest aid timing and machine spindle harvesting on neps in upland cotton
Neps are fiber entanglements created during the mechanical processing of cotton and are often associated with immature fibers. Even in small amounts neps can affect textile quality and cotton marketability. Machine harvesting, lower fiber linear density (fineness), and more immature bolls at harvest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Textile research journal 2013-04, Vol.83 (6), p.651-658 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 658 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 651 |
container_title | Textile research journal |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Bange, Michael P Long, Robert L |
description | Neps are fiber entanglements created during the mechanical processing of cotton and are often associated with immature fibers. Even in small amounts neps can affect textile quality and cotton marketability. Machine harvesting, lower fiber linear density (fineness), and more immature bolls at harvest are factors that contribute to neps. However, it is not clear whether differences in fiber linear density or immature bolls at harvest combine with harvest method to substantially affect neps. The aim of this study was to compare machine spindle and hand-harvested cotton collected from four field studies with treatments that differed in percentage of immature bolls and fiber linear density at harvest (resulting from differences in harvest aid timing) and to test for statistical interactions. By systematically varying the timing of harvest aids to cease crop growth, removing fruiting branches, or both, differences in the percentage of immature bolls and fiber linear density were generated. In all studies spindle harvesting increased neps, but there were no significant statistical interactions between the harvest method with harvest aid timing or branch removal treatments. When all measurements of neps were combined across studies there was a multiple regression that explained the level of neps with the harvest method and fiber linear density (R2 = 0.66). These responses supported the individual season analyses, finding no statistical interaction of harvest method with either variable. Spindle harvesting increased neps by an average of 53 count/g compared to hand harvesting. Identifying reasons for differences in nep levels between cotton growing regions may assist in developing strategies to reduce neps. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0040517512461704 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671304210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0040517512461704</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3039229451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-ac50b37b2491fa6352c6a4671b1fc0c058a07b33106b544a6eb33c517f752bbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQa8eKnONGnSPcrix8KCl_Vckmy6m6VNatMK_vemrIIInobh_ebx5hFyjXCHKOU9AIcCZYE5FyiBn5AZSi4yKXl5SmaTnE36ObmI8QAAZSnLGdms2k6ZgYaa7lX_YeNAldvSwbXO76jyW9oqs3fe0tg5v23sDzbJwVNvu0idp2PXTLAJwxD8JTmrVRPt1feck7enx83yJVu_Pq-WD-vMMJ4PmTIFaCZ1zhdYK8GK3AjFhUSNtQEDRalAasYQhC44V8KmxaQnalnkWls2J7dH364P72MKVbUuGtukKDaMscLkxYDnCAm9-YMewtj7lK5CjiVblHzBEgVHyvQhxt7WVde7VvWfFUI11Vz9rTmdZMeTqHb2l-l__Bdh4Xrm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1418398493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of harvest aid timing and machine spindle harvesting on neps in upland cotton</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Bange, Michael P ; Long, Robert L</creator><creatorcontrib>Bange, Michael P ; Long, Robert L</creatorcontrib><description>Neps are fiber entanglements created during the mechanical processing of cotton and are often associated with immature fibers. Even in small amounts neps can affect textile quality and cotton marketability. Machine harvesting, lower fiber linear density (fineness), and more immature bolls at harvest are factors that contribute to neps. However, it is not clear whether differences in fiber linear density or immature bolls at harvest combine with harvest method to substantially affect neps. The aim of this study was to compare machine spindle and hand-harvested cotton collected from four field studies with treatments that differed in percentage of immature bolls and fiber linear density at harvest (resulting from differences in harvest aid timing) and to test for statistical interactions. By systematically varying the timing of harvest aids to cease crop growth, removing fruiting branches, or both, differences in the percentage of immature bolls and fiber linear density were generated. In all studies spindle harvesting increased neps, but there were no significant statistical interactions between the harvest method with harvest aid timing or branch removal treatments. When all measurements of neps were combined across studies there was a multiple regression that explained the level of neps with the harvest method and fiber linear density (R2 = 0.66). These responses supported the individual season analyses, finding no statistical interaction of harvest method with either variable. Spindle harvesting increased neps by an average of 53 count/g compared to hand harvesting. Identifying reasons for differences in nep levels between cotton growing regions may assist in developing strategies to reduce neps.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-7748</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0040517512461704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cotton ; Density ; Entanglement ; Farm machinery ; Fibers ; Harvest ; Harvesting ; Impact analysis ; Quality ; Spindles ; Studies ; Textiles ; Time measurements</subject><ispartof>Textile research journal, 2013-04, Vol.83 (6), p.651-658</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav</rights><rights>Copyright Textile Research Institute Apr 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-ac50b37b2491fa6352c6a4671b1fc0c058a07b33106b544a6eb33c517f752bbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-ac50b37b2491fa6352c6a4671b1fc0c058a07b33106b544a6eb33c517f752bbe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0040517512461704$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0040517512461704$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bange, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Robert L</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of harvest aid timing and machine spindle harvesting on neps in upland cotton</title><title>Textile research journal</title><description>Neps are fiber entanglements created during the mechanical processing of cotton and are often associated with immature fibers. Even in small amounts neps can affect textile quality and cotton marketability. Machine harvesting, lower fiber linear density (fineness), and more immature bolls at harvest are factors that contribute to neps. However, it is not clear whether differences in fiber linear density or immature bolls at harvest combine with harvest method to substantially affect neps. The aim of this study was to compare machine spindle and hand-harvested cotton collected from four field studies with treatments that differed in percentage of immature bolls and fiber linear density at harvest (resulting from differences in harvest aid timing) and to test for statistical interactions. By systematically varying the timing of harvest aids to cease crop growth, removing fruiting branches, or both, differences in the percentage of immature bolls and fiber linear density were generated. In all studies spindle harvesting increased neps, but there were no significant statistical interactions between the harvest method with harvest aid timing or branch removal treatments. When all measurements of neps were combined across studies there was a multiple regression that explained the level of neps with the harvest method and fiber linear density (R2 = 0.66). These responses supported the individual season analyses, finding no statistical interaction of harvest method with either variable. Spindle harvesting increased neps by an average of 53 count/g compared to hand harvesting. Identifying reasons for differences in nep levels between cotton growing regions may assist in developing strategies to reduce neps.</description><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Entanglement</subject><subject>Farm machinery</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Spindles</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Textiles</subject><subject>Time measurements</subject><issn>0040-5175</issn><issn>1746-7748</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQa8eKnONGnSPcrix8KCl_Vckmy6m6VNatMK_vemrIIInobh_ebx5hFyjXCHKOU9AIcCZYE5FyiBn5AZSi4yKXl5SmaTnE36ObmI8QAAZSnLGdms2k6ZgYaa7lX_YeNAldvSwbXO76jyW9oqs3fe0tg5v23sDzbJwVNvu0idp2PXTLAJwxD8JTmrVRPt1feck7enx83yJVu_Pq-WD-vMMJ4PmTIFaCZ1zhdYK8GK3AjFhUSNtQEDRalAasYQhC44V8KmxaQnalnkWls2J7dH364P72MKVbUuGtukKDaMscLkxYDnCAm9-YMewtj7lK5CjiVblHzBEgVHyvQhxt7WVde7VvWfFUI11Vz9rTmdZMeTqHb2l-l__Bdh4Xrm</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Bange, Michael P</creator><creator>Long, Robert L</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Impact of harvest aid timing and machine spindle harvesting on neps in upland cotton</title><author>Bange, Michael P ; Long, Robert L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-ac50b37b2491fa6352c6a4671b1fc0c058a07b33106b544a6eb33c517f752bbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Entanglement</topic><topic>Farm machinery</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Spindles</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Textiles</topic><topic>Time measurements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bange, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Robert L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Textile research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bange, Michael P</au><au>Long, Robert L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of harvest aid timing and machine spindle harvesting on neps in upland cotton</atitle><jtitle>Textile research journal</jtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>651</spage><epage>658</epage><pages>651-658</pages><issn>0040-5175</issn><eissn>1746-7748</eissn><abstract>Neps are fiber entanglements created during the mechanical processing of cotton and are often associated with immature fibers. Even in small amounts neps can affect textile quality and cotton marketability. Machine harvesting, lower fiber linear density (fineness), and more immature bolls at harvest are factors that contribute to neps. However, it is not clear whether differences in fiber linear density or immature bolls at harvest combine with harvest method to substantially affect neps. The aim of this study was to compare machine spindle and hand-harvested cotton collected from four field studies with treatments that differed in percentage of immature bolls and fiber linear density at harvest (resulting from differences in harvest aid timing) and to test for statistical interactions. By systematically varying the timing of harvest aids to cease crop growth, removing fruiting branches, or both, differences in the percentage of immature bolls and fiber linear density were generated. In all studies spindle harvesting increased neps, but there were no significant statistical interactions between the harvest method with harvest aid timing or branch removal treatments. When all measurements of neps were combined across studies there was a multiple regression that explained the level of neps with the harvest method and fiber linear density (R2 = 0.66). These responses supported the individual season analyses, finding no statistical interaction of harvest method with either variable. Spindle harvesting increased neps by an average of 53 count/g compared to hand harvesting. Identifying reasons for differences in nep levels between cotton growing regions may assist in developing strategies to reduce neps.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0040517512461704</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-5175 |
ispartof | Textile research journal, 2013-04, Vol.83 (6), p.651-658 |
issn | 0040-5175 1746-7748 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671304210 |
source | Access via SAGE |
subjects | Cotton Density Entanglement Farm machinery Fibers Harvest Harvesting Impact analysis Quality Spindles Studies Textiles Time measurements |
title | Impact of harvest aid timing and machine spindle harvesting on neps in upland cotton |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T23%3A59%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20harvest%20aid%20timing%20and%20machine%20spindle%20harvesting%20on%20neps%20in%20upland%20cotton&rft.jtitle=Textile%20research%20journal&rft.au=Bange,%20Michael%20P&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=658&rft.pages=651-658&rft.issn=0040-5175&rft.eissn=1746-7748&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0040517512461704&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3039229451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1418398493&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0040517512461704&rfr_iscdi=true |