Analysis of child pick-up during daily routines and for daytime no-notice evacuations
► We examine child serving travel during daily routines and no-notice evacuations. ► Women are more responsible for child travel than men on normal days and evacuations. ► Both mothers and fathers are more likely to gather a child in emergency conditions. ► On normal days, increasing parent–child di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice Policy and practice, 2012, Vol.46 (1), p.48-67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 67 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 48 |
container_title | Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Liu, Sirui Murray-Tuite, Pamela Schweitzer, Lisa |
description | ► We examine child serving travel during daily routines and no-notice evacuations. ► Women are more responsible for child travel than men on normal days and evacuations.
► Both mothers and fathers are more likely to gather a child in emergency conditions. ► On normal days, increasing parent–child distance decreases probability of pick up. ► In an emergency, effects of distance were significant for women, but not men.
In a no-notice disaster (e.g., nuclear explosion, terrorist attack, or hazardous materials release), an evacuation may start immediately after the disaster strikes. When a no-notice evacuation occurs during the daytime, household members are scattered throughout the regional network, and some family members (e.g., children) may need to be picked up. This household pick-up and gathering behavior was seldom investigated in previous work due to insufficient data; this gap in our understanding about who within families handles child-gathering is addressed here. Three hundred fifteen interviews were conducted in the Chicago metropolitan area to ascertain how respondents planned their response to hypothetical no-notice emergency evacuation orders. This paper presents the influencing factors that affect household pick-up and gathering behavior/expectations and the logistic regression models developed to predict the probability that parents pick up a child in three situations: a normal weekday and two hypothetical emergency scenarios. The results showed that
both mothers and fathers were more likely to pick up a child under emergency conditions than they were on a normal weekday. For a normal weekday, increasing the distance between parents and children decreased the probability of parents picking up children; in other words, the farther parents are from their children, the less likely they will pick them up. In an emergency, effects of distance on pick-up behavior were significant for women, but not significant for men; that is, increasing the distance between parents and children decreased the probability that mothers pick up a child, but had a less significant effect on the fathers’ probability. Another significant factor affecting child pick-up behavior/expectations was household income when controlling for distance. The results of this study confirm that parents expect to gather children under emergency conditions, which needs to be accounted for in evacuation planning; failure to do so could cause difficulties in executing the pick-ups, lead to |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671284910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0965856411001364</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671284910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-612a2246a5734a57266986e02a17a0c071323329f35f1f228ece92f7fb8f87ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpoNu0P6A3XQq52BlJtmSRUwjNBwRyac5iIo8abbzSVrID--_rsKHHXGZgeN4Z5mHsh4BWgNDn23Yu2EoQogXbAqhPbCMGYxupTP-ZbcDqvhl63X1hX2vdAkCnjdywx8uE06HGynPg_jlOI99H_9Isez4uJaY_fMQ4HXjJyxwTVY5p5CGXdXyY4454yk3Kc_TE6RX9gnPMqX5jJwGnSt_f-yl7vP71--q2uX-4ubu6vG-8snJutJAoZaexN6pbi9TaDppAojAIHoxQUilpg-qDCFIO5MnKYMLTEAbjUZ2ys-Pefcl_F6qz28XqaZowUV6qE9oIOXRWwIqKI-pLrrVQcPsSd1gOToB7U-i2blXo3hQ6sG5VuGZ-vq_H6nEKBZOP9X9QdkZrA3rlLo4crb--Riqu-kjJ0xgL-dmNOX5w5R-20oW-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671284910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of child pick-up during daily routines and for daytime no-notice evacuations</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Liu, Sirui ; Murray-Tuite, Pamela ; Schweitzer, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Sirui ; Murray-Tuite, Pamela ; Schweitzer, Lisa</creatorcontrib><description>► We examine child serving travel during daily routines and no-notice evacuations. ► Women are more responsible for child travel than men on normal days and evacuations.
► Both mothers and fathers are more likely to gather a child in emergency conditions. ► On normal days, increasing parent–child distance decreases probability of pick up. ► In an emergency, effects of distance were significant for women, but not men.
In a no-notice disaster (e.g., nuclear explosion, terrorist attack, or hazardous materials release), an evacuation may start immediately after the disaster strikes. When a no-notice evacuation occurs during the daytime, household members are scattered throughout the regional network, and some family members (e.g., children) may need to be picked up. This household pick-up and gathering behavior was seldom investigated in previous work due to insufficient data; this gap in our understanding about who within families handles child-gathering is addressed here. Three hundred fifteen interviews were conducted in the Chicago metropolitan area to ascertain how respondents planned their response to hypothetical no-notice emergency evacuation orders. This paper presents the influencing factors that affect household pick-up and gathering behavior/expectations and the logistic regression models developed to predict the probability that parents pick up a child in three situations: a normal weekday and two hypothetical emergency scenarios. The results showed that
both mothers and fathers were more likely to pick up a child under emergency conditions than they were on a normal weekday. For a normal weekday, increasing the distance between parents and children decreased the probability of parents picking up children; in other words, the farther parents are from their children, the less likely they will pick them up. In an emergency, effects of distance on pick-up behavior were significant for women, but not significant for men; that is, increasing the distance between parents and children decreased the probability that mothers pick up a child, but had a less significant effect on the fathers’ probability. Another significant factor affecting child pick-up behavior/expectations was household income when controlling for distance. The results of this study confirm that parents expect to gather children under emergency conditions, which needs to be accounted for in evacuation planning; failure to do so could cause difficulties in executing the pick-ups, lead to considerable queuing and rerouting, and extend the time citizens are exposed to high levels of risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-8564</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Child-chauffeuring ; Children ; Emergencies ; Evacuation routing ; Exact sciences and technology ; Family-gathering ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Households ; Human behavior ; Logistic regression ; Mathematical models ; No-notice evacuations ; Parents ; Picks ; Terrorist attacks</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice, 2012, Vol.46 (1), p.48-67</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-612a2246a5734a57266986e02a17a0c071323329f35f1f228ece92f7fb8f87ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-612a2246a5734a57266986e02a17a0c071323329f35f1f228ece92f7fb8f87ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856411001364$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24766706$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Sirui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray-Tuite, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, Lisa</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of child pick-up during daily routines and for daytime no-notice evacuations</title><title>Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice</title><description>► We examine child serving travel during daily routines and no-notice evacuations. ► Women are more responsible for child travel than men on normal days and evacuations.
► Both mothers and fathers are more likely to gather a child in emergency conditions. ► On normal days, increasing parent–child distance decreases probability of pick up. ► In an emergency, effects of distance were significant for women, but not men.
In a no-notice disaster (e.g., nuclear explosion, terrorist attack, or hazardous materials release), an evacuation may start immediately after the disaster strikes. When a no-notice evacuation occurs during the daytime, household members are scattered throughout the regional network, and some family members (e.g., children) may need to be picked up. This household pick-up and gathering behavior was seldom investigated in previous work due to insufficient data; this gap in our understanding about who within families handles child-gathering is addressed here. Three hundred fifteen interviews were conducted in the Chicago metropolitan area to ascertain how respondents planned their response to hypothetical no-notice emergency evacuation orders. This paper presents the influencing factors that affect household pick-up and gathering behavior/expectations and the logistic regression models developed to predict the probability that parents pick up a child in three situations: a normal weekday and two hypothetical emergency scenarios. The results showed that
both mothers and fathers were more likely to pick up a child under emergency conditions than they were on a normal weekday. For a normal weekday, increasing the distance between parents and children decreased the probability of parents picking up children; in other words, the farther parents are from their children, the less likely they will pick them up. In an emergency, effects of distance on pick-up behavior were significant for women, but not significant for men; that is, increasing the distance between parents and children decreased the probability that mothers pick up a child, but had a less significant effect on the fathers’ probability. Another significant factor affecting child pick-up behavior/expectations was household income when controlling for distance. The results of this study confirm that parents expect to gather children under emergency conditions, which needs to be accounted for in evacuation planning; failure to do so could cause difficulties in executing the pick-ups, lead to considerable queuing and rerouting, and extend the time citizens are exposed to high levels of risk.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Child-chauffeuring</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Evacuation routing</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Family-gathering</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human behavior</subject><subject>Logistic regression</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>No-notice evacuations</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Picks</subject><subject>Terrorist attacks</subject><issn>0965-8564</issn><issn>1879-2375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpoNu0P6A3XQq52BlJtmSRUwjNBwRyac5iIo8abbzSVrID--_rsKHHXGZgeN4Z5mHsh4BWgNDn23Yu2EoQogXbAqhPbCMGYxupTP-ZbcDqvhl63X1hX2vdAkCnjdywx8uE06HGynPg_jlOI99H_9Isez4uJaY_fMQ4HXjJyxwTVY5p5CGXdXyY4454yk3Kc_TE6RX9gnPMqX5jJwGnSt_f-yl7vP71--q2uX-4ubu6vG-8snJutJAoZaexN6pbi9TaDppAojAIHoxQUilpg-qDCFIO5MnKYMLTEAbjUZ2ys-Pefcl_F6qz28XqaZowUV6qE9oIOXRWwIqKI-pLrrVQcPsSd1gOToB7U-i2blXo3hQ6sG5VuGZ-vq_H6nEKBZOP9X9QdkZrA3rlLo4crb--Riqu-kjJ0xgL-dmNOX5w5R-20oW-</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Liu, Sirui</creator><creator>Murray-Tuite, Pamela</creator><creator>Schweitzer, Lisa</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Analysis of child pick-up during daily routines and for daytime no-notice evacuations</title><author>Liu, Sirui ; Murray-Tuite, Pamela ; Schweitzer, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-612a2246a5734a57266986e02a17a0c071323329f35f1f228ece92f7fb8f87ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Child-chauffeuring</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Evacuation routing</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Family-gathering</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human behavior</topic><topic>Logistic regression</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>No-notice evacuations</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Picks</topic><topic>Terrorist attacks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Sirui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray-Tuite, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, Lisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Sirui</au><au>Murray-Tuite, Pamela</au><au>Schweitzer, Lisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of child pick-up during daily routines and for daytime no-notice evacuations</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice</jtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>48-67</pages><issn>0965-8564</issn><eissn>1879-2375</eissn><abstract>► We examine child serving travel during daily routines and no-notice evacuations. ► Women are more responsible for child travel than men on normal days and evacuations.
► Both mothers and fathers are more likely to gather a child in emergency conditions. ► On normal days, increasing parent–child distance decreases probability of pick up. ► In an emergency, effects of distance were significant for women, but not men.
In a no-notice disaster (e.g., nuclear explosion, terrorist attack, or hazardous materials release), an evacuation may start immediately after the disaster strikes. When a no-notice evacuation occurs during the daytime, household members are scattered throughout the regional network, and some family members (e.g., children) may need to be picked up. This household pick-up and gathering behavior was seldom investigated in previous work due to insufficient data; this gap in our understanding about who within families handles child-gathering is addressed here. Three hundred fifteen interviews were conducted in the Chicago metropolitan area to ascertain how respondents planned their response to hypothetical no-notice emergency evacuation orders. This paper presents the influencing factors that affect household pick-up and gathering behavior/expectations and the logistic regression models developed to predict the probability that parents pick up a child in three situations: a normal weekday and two hypothetical emergency scenarios. The results showed that
both mothers and fathers were more likely to pick up a child under emergency conditions than they were on a normal weekday. For a normal weekday, increasing the distance between parents and children decreased the probability of parents picking up children; in other words, the farther parents are from their children, the less likely they will pick them up. In an emergency, effects of distance on pick-up behavior were significant for women, but not significant for men; that is, increasing the distance between parents and children decreased the probability that mothers pick up a child, but had a less significant effect on the fathers’ probability. Another significant factor affecting child pick-up behavior/expectations was household income when controlling for distance. The results of this study confirm that parents expect to gather children under emergency conditions, which needs to be accounted for in evacuation planning; failure to do so could cause difficulties in executing the pick-ups, lead to considerable queuing and rerouting, and extend the time citizens are exposed to high levels of risk.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.003</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-8564 |
ispartof | Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice, 2012, Vol.46 (1), p.48-67 |
issn | 0965-8564 1879-2375 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671284910 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Applied sciences Child-chauffeuring Children Emergencies Evacuation routing Exact sciences and technology Family-gathering Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction Households Human behavior Logistic regression Mathematical models No-notice evacuations Parents Picks Terrorist attacks |
title | Analysis of child pick-up during daily routines and for daytime no-notice evacuations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A27%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20child%20pick-up%20during%20daily%20routines%20and%20for%20daytime%20no-notice%20evacuations&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20A,%20Policy%20and%20practice&rft.au=Liu,%20Sirui&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=48-67&rft.issn=0965-8564&rft.eissn=1879-2375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671284910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671284910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0965856411001364&rfr_iscdi=true |