ESTIMATE OF THE ERROR IN MONITORING THE ENERGY RELEASE DISTRIBUTION ON THE BASIS OF A CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION DENSITY
It is shown by means of calculations and experiments that the generally accepted practice of using an unconditional instead of a conditional probability density distribution when estimating the error in monitoring the power in the fuel channels with the highest power density in the cores of a wide c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2007-11, Vol.103 (5), p.863-869 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 869 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 863 |
container_title | Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | ALEKSANDROV, S. I ZAITSEV, M. P IL'INA, L. I POSTNIKOV, V. V YURKIN, G. V YAKUNIN, I. S VLASOV, V. A |
description | It is shown by means of calculations and experiments that the generally accepted practice of using an unconditional instead of a conditional probability density distribution when estimating the error in monitoring the power in the fuel channels with the highest power density in the cores of a wide class of reactors with standard power monitoring error greater than 1.5% results in a systematic underestimation of the margin up to the limits for safe operation by up to approximately 5 and 10% for regimes with and without real-time optimization of the energy release distributions, respectively. This underestimation decreases to zero monotonically when the average power is used instead of the maximum power.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10512-007-0137-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671284195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671284195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-80e17293da5517e431d5245226de77355d33b3aa086d1f6499ecd11ad61d87233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9Lw0AQxYMoWKsfwNsiCF6iO7vZbHJM2227kCaSpIeeljXZQEv6x2x78OonN6FFUBiYx8xvHgPPcR4BvwLG_M0CZkDcTroYKHfZlTMAxqkbEMyuO4196nqEBbfOnbUbjHHoh8HA-RZ5IRdRIVA6RcVcIJFlaYZkghZpIos0k8nsPE9ENluhTMQiygWayLzI5GhZyDRBXfXIKMpl3vtEaJwmE9nvohi9Z-koGslYFqu_ZxOR5N3w3rmpdWPNw6UPneVUFOO5G6czOY5it6SUHd0AG-AkpJVmDLjxKFSMeIwQvzKcU8YqSj-o1jjwK6h9LwxNWQHoyocq4ITSofNy9j20-8-TsUe1XdvSNI3emf3JKvA5kMCDkHXo0z90sz-1u-47xVnAQ6_DOgjOUNnurW1NrQ7teqvbLwVY9aGocyiql30oqjd-vhhrW-qmbvWuXNvfQ4IJp4BD-gO9C3-d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>758794841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ESTIMATE OF THE ERROR IN MONITORING THE ENERGY RELEASE DISTRIBUTION ON THE BASIS OF A CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION DENSITY</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>ALEKSANDROV, S. I ; ZAITSEV, M. P ; IL'INA, L. I ; POSTNIKOV, V. V ; YURKIN, G. V ; YAKUNIN, I. S ; VLASOV, V. A</creator><creatorcontrib>ALEKSANDROV, S. I ; ZAITSEV, M. P ; IL'INA, L. I ; POSTNIKOV, V. V ; YURKIN, G. V ; YAKUNIN, I. S ; VLASOV, V. A</creatorcontrib><description>It is shown by means of calculations and experiments that the generally accepted practice of using an unconditional instead of a conditional probability density distribution when estimating the error in monitoring the power in the fuel channels with the highest power density in the cores of a wide class of reactors with standard power monitoring error greater than 1.5% results in a systematic underestimation of the margin up to the limits for safe operation by up to approximately 5 and 10% for regimes with and without real-time optimization of the energy release distributions, respectively. This underestimation decreases to zero monotonically when the average power is used instead of the maximum power.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-4258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10512-007-0137-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Channels ; Density ; Density distribution ; Energy distribution ; Errors ; Estimates ; Estimating ; Maximum power ; Monitoring ; Probability distribution ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.), 2007-11, Vol.103 (5), p.863-869</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-80e17293da5517e431d5245226de77355d33b3aa086d1f6499ecd11ad61d87233</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20273109$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ALEKSANDROV, S. I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZAITSEV, M. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IL'INA, L. I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POSTNIKOV, V. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YURKIN, G. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAKUNIN, I. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VLASOV, V. A</creatorcontrib><title>ESTIMATE OF THE ERROR IN MONITORING THE ENERGY RELEASE DISTRIBUTION ON THE BASIS OF A CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION DENSITY</title><title>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>It is shown by means of calculations and experiments that the generally accepted practice of using an unconditional instead of a conditional probability density distribution when estimating the error in monitoring the power in the fuel channels with the highest power density in the cores of a wide class of reactors with standard power monitoring error greater than 1.5% results in a systematic underestimation of the margin up to the limits for safe operation by up to approximately 5 and 10% for regimes with and without real-time optimization of the energy release distributions, respectively. This underestimation decreases to zero monotonically when the average power is used instead of the maximum power.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Density distribution</subject><subject>Energy distribution</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Estimating</subject><subject>Maximum power</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Probability distribution</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1063-4258</issn><issn>1573-8205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9Lw0AQxYMoWKsfwNsiCF6iO7vZbHJM2227kCaSpIeeljXZQEv6x2x78OonN6FFUBiYx8xvHgPPcR4BvwLG_M0CZkDcTroYKHfZlTMAxqkbEMyuO4196nqEBbfOnbUbjHHoh8HA-RZ5IRdRIVA6RcVcIJFlaYZkghZpIos0k8nsPE9ENluhTMQiygWayLzI5GhZyDRBXfXIKMpl3vtEaJwmE9nvohi9Z-koGslYFqu_ZxOR5N3w3rmpdWPNw6UPneVUFOO5G6czOY5it6SUHd0AG-AkpJVmDLjxKFSMeIwQvzKcU8YqSj-o1jjwK6h9LwxNWQHoyocq4ITSofNy9j20-8-TsUe1XdvSNI3emf3JKvA5kMCDkHXo0z90sz-1u-47xVnAQ6_DOgjOUNnurW1NrQ7teqvbLwVY9aGocyiql30oqjd-vhhrW-qmbvWuXNvfQ4IJp4BD-gO9C3-d</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>ALEKSANDROV, S. I</creator><creator>ZAITSEV, M. P</creator><creator>IL'INA, L. I</creator><creator>POSTNIKOV, V. V</creator><creator>YURKIN, G. V</creator><creator>YAKUNIN, I. S</creator><creator>VLASOV, V. A</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>ESTIMATE OF THE ERROR IN MONITORING THE ENERGY RELEASE DISTRIBUTION ON THE BASIS OF A CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION DENSITY</title><author>ALEKSANDROV, S. I ; ZAITSEV, M. P ; IL'INA, L. I ; POSTNIKOV, V. V ; YURKIN, G. V ; YAKUNIN, I. S ; VLASOV, V. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-80e17293da5517e431d5245226de77355d33b3aa086d1f6499ecd11ad61d87233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Density distribution</topic><topic>Energy distribution</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Estimating</topic><topic>Maximum power</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Probability distribution</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ALEKSANDROV, S. I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZAITSEV, M. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IL'INA, L. I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POSTNIKOV, V. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YURKIN, G. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAKUNIN, I. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VLASOV, V. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ALEKSANDROV, S. I</au><au>ZAITSEV, M. P</au><au>IL'INA, L. I</au><au>POSTNIKOV, V. V</au><au>YURKIN, G. V</au><au>YAKUNIN, I. S</au><au>VLASOV, V. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ESTIMATE OF THE ERROR IN MONITORING THE ENERGY RELEASE DISTRIBUTION ON THE BASIS OF A CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION DENSITY</atitle><jtitle>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>863</spage><epage>869</epage><pages>863-869</pages><issn>1063-4258</issn><eissn>1573-8205</eissn><abstract>It is shown by means of calculations and experiments that the generally accepted practice of using an unconditional instead of a conditional probability density distribution when estimating the error in monitoring the power in the fuel channels with the highest power density in the cores of a wide class of reactors with standard power monitoring error greater than 1.5% results in a systematic underestimation of the margin up to the limits for safe operation by up to approximately 5 and 10% for regimes with and without real-time optimization of the energy release distributions, respectively. This underestimation decreases to zero monotonically when the average power is used instead of the maximum power.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10512-007-0137-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1063-4258 |
ispartof | Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.), 2007-11, Vol.103 (5), p.863-869 |
issn | 1063-4258 1573-8205 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671284195 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Channels Density Density distribution Energy distribution Errors Estimates Estimating Maximum power Monitoring Probability distribution Studies |
title | ESTIMATE OF THE ERROR IN MONITORING THE ENERGY RELEASE DISTRIBUTION ON THE BASIS OF A CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION DENSITY |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T20%3A50%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ESTIMATE%20OF%20THE%20ERROR%20IN%20MONITORING%20THE%20ENERGY%20RELEASE%20DISTRIBUTION%20ON%20THE%20BASIS%20OF%20A%20CONDITIONAL%20PROBABILITY%20DISTRIBUTION%20DENSITY&rft.jtitle=Atomic%20energy%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=ALEKSANDROV,%20S.%20I&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=863&rft.epage=869&rft.pages=863-869&rft.issn=1063-4258&rft.eissn=1573-8205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10512-007-0137-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671284195%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=758794841&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |