Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes

Talk is often suspended during medical consultations while the clinician interacts with the patient's records and other information. This study of four general practitioners (GPs) focused on these suspensions and the adjacent conversational turns. Conversation analysis revealed how GPs took act...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of human-computer studies 2010-06, Vol.68 (6), p.398-409
Hauptverfasser: Newman, William, Button, Graham, Cairns, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 409
container_issue 6
container_start_page 398
container_title International journal of human-computer studies
container_volume 68
creator Newman, William
Button, Graham
Cairns, Paul
description Talk is often suspended during medical consultations while the clinician interacts with the patient's records and other information. This study of four general practitioners (GPs) focused on these suspensions and the adjacent conversational turns. Conversation analysis revealed how GPs took action to close conversations down prior to attending to the records, resulting in a ‘free turn’ that could be taken up by either GP or patient. The durations of the intervening pauses were also analysed, exposing a hitherto unobserved 10-second timeframe within which both GP and patient showed a preference for the conversation to be resumed. Resumption was more likely to be achieved within 10 s when the GP's records were paper-based rather than computer-based. Subsequent analysis of topic changes on resumption of talk has revealed a 5-second timeframe, also undocumented; when pauses exceed this timeframe, it is rare for the previous topic to be resumed without a restatement. Data recorded in the home suggest that these timeframes are also present in family conversations. We argue for considering the two timeframes when designing systems for use in medical consultations and other conversational settings, and discuss possible outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671237189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1071581909001232</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671237189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-9a120b59478ccedd947b34d6dd490dbc687c33d635a2388cd526b2c57e63427f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9qGzEQxpfSQN0kT5CLjr2sO1rt30IPISRNwNAekrOQR7O2jC1tJW0gt576An3DPEkkO-fCMJqRvt8w-oriisOSA2-_7pZmt8WwrACGZQ7gH4oFh6EpBwHwMdcdL5ueD5-KzyHsAKCrARbF319qDhSYsUw7jM6__vk3qWjIRobOPpMPqXPpdfbGbtLdYZojeZaob-xxS0xTMBvLcjKjQWWRmBtZ3JLxmTrigSmrmcKMK_uSJ0U3GWS4VXZD4aI4G9U-0OX7eV483d0-3tyXq58_Hm6uVyUK0cZyULyCdTPUXY9IWqdiLWrdal0PoNfY9l0S6lY0qhJ9j7qp2nWFTUetqKtuFOfFl9PcybvfM4UoDyYg7ffKkpuD5G3HK9HxfkhScZKidyF4GuXkzUH5F8lBZtflTh5dl9l1mQN4or6fKEq_eDbkZcBkZlrWeMIotTP_5d8Au0mQPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671237189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Newman, William ; Button, Graham ; Cairns, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Newman, William ; Button, Graham ; Cairns, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Talk is often suspended during medical consultations while the clinician interacts with the patient's records and other information. This study of four general practitioners (GPs) focused on these suspensions and the adjacent conversational turns. Conversation analysis revealed how GPs took action to close conversations down prior to attending to the records, resulting in a ‘free turn’ that could be taken up by either GP or patient. The durations of the intervening pauses were also analysed, exposing a hitherto unobserved 10-second timeframe within which both GP and patient showed a preference for the conversation to be resumed. Resumption was more likely to be achieved within 10 s when the GP's records were paper-based rather than computer-based. Subsequent analysis of topic changes on resumption of talk has revealed a 5-second timeframe, also undocumented; when pauses exceed this timeframe, it is rare for the previous topic to be resumed without a restatement. Data recorded in the home suggest that these timeframes are also present in family conversations. We argue for considering the two timeframes when designing systems for use in medical consultations and other conversational settings, and discuss possible outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-5819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>C (programming language) ; Consultancy services ; Conversation ; Conversational pauses ; Design engineering ; Exposure ; Medical ; Medical interaction ; Patients ; User interface design</subject><ispartof>International journal of human-computer studies, 2010-06, Vol.68 (6), p.398-409</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-9a120b59478ccedd947b34d6dd490dbc687c33d635a2388cd526b2c57e63427f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-9a120b59478ccedd947b34d6dd490dbc687c33d635a2388cd526b2c57e63427f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581909001232$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Newman, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Button, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairns, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes</title><title>International journal of human-computer studies</title><description>Talk is often suspended during medical consultations while the clinician interacts with the patient's records and other information. This study of four general practitioners (GPs) focused on these suspensions and the adjacent conversational turns. Conversation analysis revealed how GPs took action to close conversations down prior to attending to the records, resulting in a ‘free turn’ that could be taken up by either GP or patient. The durations of the intervening pauses were also analysed, exposing a hitherto unobserved 10-second timeframe within which both GP and patient showed a preference for the conversation to be resumed. Resumption was more likely to be achieved within 10 s when the GP's records were paper-based rather than computer-based. Subsequent analysis of topic changes on resumption of talk has revealed a 5-second timeframe, also undocumented; when pauses exceed this timeframe, it is rare for the previous topic to be resumed without a restatement. Data recorded in the home suggest that these timeframes are also present in family conversations. We argue for considering the two timeframes when designing systems for use in medical consultations and other conversational settings, and discuss possible outcomes.</description><subject>C (programming language)</subject><subject>Consultancy services</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Conversational pauses</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Medical</subject><subject>Medical interaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>User interface design</subject><issn>1071-5819</issn><issn>1095-9300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9qGzEQxpfSQN0kT5CLjr2sO1rt30IPISRNwNAekrOQR7O2jC1tJW0gt576An3DPEkkO-fCMJqRvt8w-oriisOSA2-_7pZmt8WwrACGZQ7gH4oFh6EpBwHwMdcdL5ueD5-KzyHsAKCrARbF319qDhSYsUw7jM6__vk3qWjIRobOPpMPqXPpdfbGbtLdYZojeZaob-xxS0xTMBvLcjKjQWWRmBtZ3JLxmTrigSmrmcKMK_uSJ0U3GWS4VXZD4aI4G9U-0OX7eV483d0-3tyXq58_Hm6uVyUK0cZyULyCdTPUXY9IWqdiLWrdal0PoNfY9l0S6lY0qhJ9j7qp2nWFTUetqKtuFOfFl9PcybvfM4UoDyYg7ffKkpuD5G3HK9HxfkhScZKidyF4GuXkzUH5F8lBZtflTh5dl9l1mQN4or6fKEq_eDbkZcBkZlrWeMIotTP_5d8Au0mQPA</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Newman, William</creator><creator>Button, Graham</creator><creator>Cairns, Paul</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes</title><author>Newman, William ; Button, Graham ; Cairns, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-9a120b59478ccedd947b34d6dd490dbc687c33d635a2388cd526b2c57e63427f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>C (programming language)</topic><topic>Consultancy services</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Conversational pauses</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Medical</topic><topic>Medical interaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>User interface design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Newman, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Button, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairns, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of human-computer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Newman, William</au><au>Button, Graham</au><au>Cairns, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human-computer studies</jtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>398</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>398-409</pages><issn>1071-5819</issn><eissn>1095-9300</eissn><abstract>Talk is often suspended during medical consultations while the clinician interacts with the patient's records and other information. This study of four general practitioners (GPs) focused on these suspensions and the adjacent conversational turns. Conversation analysis revealed how GPs took action to close conversations down prior to attending to the records, resulting in a ‘free turn’ that could be taken up by either GP or patient. The durations of the intervening pauses were also analysed, exposing a hitherto unobserved 10-second timeframe within which both GP and patient showed a preference for the conversation to be resumed. Resumption was more likely to be achieved within 10 s when the GP's records were paper-based rather than computer-based. Subsequent analysis of topic changes on resumption of talk has revealed a 5-second timeframe, also undocumented; when pauses exceed this timeframe, it is rare for the previous topic to be resumed without a restatement. Data recorded in the home suggest that these timeframes are also present in family conversations. We argue for considering the two timeframes when designing systems for use in medical consultations and other conversational settings, and discuss possible outcomes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-5819
ispartof International journal of human-computer studies, 2010-06, Vol.68 (6), p.398-409
issn 1071-5819
1095-9300
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671237189
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects C (programming language)
Consultancy services
Conversation
Conversational pauses
Design engineering
Exposure
Medical
Medical interaction
Patients
User interface design
title Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A05%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pauses%20in%20doctor%E2%80%93patient%20conversation%20during%20computer%20use:%20The%20design%20significance%20of%20their%20durations%20and%20accompanying%20topic%20changes&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human-computer%20studies&rft.au=Newman,%20William&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=398&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=398-409&rft.issn=1071-5819&rft.eissn=1095-9300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671237189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671237189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1071581909001232&rfr_iscdi=true