Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes
Talk is often suspended during medical consultations while the clinician interacts with the patient's records and other information. This study of four general practitioners (GPs) focused on these suspensions and the adjacent conversational turns. Conversation analysis revealed how GPs took act...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of human-computer studies 2010-06, Vol.68 (6), p.398-409 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 409 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 398 |
container_title | International journal of human-computer studies |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Newman, William Button, Graham Cairns, Paul |
description | Talk is often suspended during medical consultations while the clinician interacts with the patient's records and other information. This study of four general practitioners (GPs) focused on these suspensions and the adjacent conversational turns. Conversation analysis revealed how GPs took action to close conversations down prior to attending to the records, resulting in a ‘free turn’ that could be taken up by either GP or patient. The durations of the intervening pauses were also analysed, exposing a hitherto unobserved
10-second timeframe within which both GP and patient showed a preference for the conversation to be resumed. Resumption was more likely to be achieved within 10
s when the GP's records were paper-based rather than computer-based. Subsequent analysis of topic changes on resumption of talk has revealed a
5-second timeframe, also undocumented; when pauses exceed this timeframe, it is rare for the previous topic to be resumed without a restatement. Data recorded in the home suggest that these timeframes are also present in family conversations. We argue for considering the two timeframes when designing systems for use in medical consultations and other conversational settings, and discuss possible outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671237189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1071581909001232</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671237189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-9a120b59478ccedd947b34d6dd490dbc687c33d635a2388cd526b2c57e63427f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9qGzEQxpfSQN0kT5CLjr2sO1rt30IPISRNwNAekrOQR7O2jC1tJW0gt576An3DPEkkO-fCMJqRvt8w-oriisOSA2-_7pZmt8WwrACGZQ7gH4oFh6EpBwHwMdcdL5ueD5-KzyHsAKCrARbF319qDhSYsUw7jM6__vk3qWjIRobOPpMPqXPpdfbGbtLdYZojeZaob-xxS0xTMBvLcjKjQWWRmBtZ3JLxmTrigSmrmcKMK_uSJ0U3GWS4VXZD4aI4G9U-0OX7eV483d0-3tyXq58_Hm6uVyUK0cZyULyCdTPUXY9IWqdiLWrdal0PoNfY9l0S6lY0qhJ9j7qp2nWFTUetqKtuFOfFl9PcybvfM4UoDyYg7ffKkpuD5G3HK9HxfkhScZKidyF4GuXkzUH5F8lBZtflTh5dl9l1mQN4or6fKEq_eDbkZcBkZlrWeMIotTP_5d8Au0mQPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671237189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Newman, William ; Button, Graham ; Cairns, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Newman, William ; Button, Graham ; Cairns, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Talk is often suspended during medical consultations while the clinician interacts with the patient's records and other information. This study of four general practitioners (GPs) focused on these suspensions and the adjacent conversational turns. Conversation analysis revealed how GPs took action to close conversations down prior to attending to the records, resulting in a ‘free turn’ that could be taken up by either GP or patient. The durations of the intervening pauses were also analysed, exposing a hitherto unobserved
10-second timeframe within which both GP and patient showed a preference for the conversation to be resumed. Resumption was more likely to be achieved within 10
s when the GP's records were paper-based rather than computer-based. Subsequent analysis of topic changes on resumption of talk has revealed a
5-second timeframe, also undocumented; when pauses exceed this timeframe, it is rare for the previous topic to be resumed without a restatement. Data recorded in the home suggest that these timeframes are also present in family conversations. We argue for considering the two timeframes when designing systems for use in medical consultations and other conversational settings, and discuss possible outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-5819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>C (programming language) ; Consultancy services ; Conversation ; Conversational pauses ; Design engineering ; Exposure ; Medical ; Medical interaction ; Patients ; User interface design</subject><ispartof>International journal of human-computer studies, 2010-06, Vol.68 (6), p.398-409</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-9a120b59478ccedd947b34d6dd490dbc687c33d635a2388cd526b2c57e63427f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-9a120b59478ccedd947b34d6dd490dbc687c33d635a2388cd526b2c57e63427f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581909001232$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Newman, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Button, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairns, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes</title><title>International journal of human-computer studies</title><description>Talk is often suspended during medical consultations while the clinician interacts with the patient's records and other information. This study of four general practitioners (GPs) focused on these suspensions and the adjacent conversational turns. Conversation analysis revealed how GPs took action to close conversations down prior to attending to the records, resulting in a ‘free turn’ that could be taken up by either GP or patient. The durations of the intervening pauses were also analysed, exposing a hitherto unobserved
10-second timeframe within which both GP and patient showed a preference for the conversation to be resumed. Resumption was more likely to be achieved within 10
s when the GP's records were paper-based rather than computer-based. Subsequent analysis of topic changes on resumption of talk has revealed a
5-second timeframe, also undocumented; when pauses exceed this timeframe, it is rare for the previous topic to be resumed without a restatement. Data recorded in the home suggest that these timeframes are also present in family conversations. We argue for considering the two timeframes when designing systems for use in medical consultations and other conversational settings, and discuss possible outcomes.</description><subject>C (programming language)</subject><subject>Consultancy services</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Conversational pauses</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Medical</subject><subject>Medical interaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>User interface design</subject><issn>1071-5819</issn><issn>1095-9300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9qGzEQxpfSQN0kT5CLjr2sO1rt30IPISRNwNAekrOQR7O2jC1tJW0gt576An3DPEkkO-fCMJqRvt8w-oriisOSA2-_7pZmt8WwrACGZQ7gH4oFh6EpBwHwMdcdL5ueD5-KzyHsAKCrARbF319qDhSYsUw7jM6__vk3qWjIRobOPpMPqXPpdfbGbtLdYZojeZaob-xxS0xTMBvLcjKjQWWRmBtZ3JLxmTrigSmrmcKMK_uSJ0U3GWS4VXZD4aI4G9U-0OX7eV483d0-3tyXq58_Hm6uVyUK0cZyULyCdTPUXY9IWqdiLWrdal0PoNfY9l0S6lY0qhJ9j7qp2nWFTUetqKtuFOfFl9PcybvfM4UoDyYg7ffKkpuD5G3HK9HxfkhScZKidyF4GuXkzUH5F8lBZtflTh5dl9l1mQN4or6fKEq_eDbkZcBkZlrWeMIotTP_5d8Au0mQPA</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Newman, William</creator><creator>Button, Graham</creator><creator>Cairns, Paul</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes</title><author>Newman, William ; Button, Graham ; Cairns, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-9a120b59478ccedd947b34d6dd490dbc687c33d635a2388cd526b2c57e63427f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>C (programming language)</topic><topic>Consultancy services</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Conversational pauses</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Medical</topic><topic>Medical interaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>User interface design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Newman, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Button, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairns, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of human-computer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Newman, William</au><au>Button, Graham</au><au>Cairns, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human-computer studies</jtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>398</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>398-409</pages><issn>1071-5819</issn><eissn>1095-9300</eissn><abstract>Talk is often suspended during medical consultations while the clinician interacts with the patient's records and other information. This study of four general practitioners (GPs) focused on these suspensions and the adjacent conversational turns. Conversation analysis revealed how GPs took action to close conversations down prior to attending to the records, resulting in a ‘free turn’ that could be taken up by either GP or patient. The durations of the intervening pauses were also analysed, exposing a hitherto unobserved
10-second timeframe within which both GP and patient showed a preference for the conversation to be resumed. Resumption was more likely to be achieved within 10
s when the GP's records were paper-based rather than computer-based. Subsequent analysis of topic changes on resumption of talk has revealed a
5-second timeframe, also undocumented; when pauses exceed this timeframe, it is rare for the previous topic to be resumed without a restatement. Data recorded in the home suggest that these timeframes are also present in family conversations. We argue for considering the two timeframes when designing systems for use in medical consultations and other conversational settings, and discuss possible outcomes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1071-5819 |
ispartof | International journal of human-computer studies, 2010-06, Vol.68 (6), p.398-409 |
issn | 1071-5819 1095-9300 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671237189 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | C (programming language) Consultancy services Conversation Conversational pauses Design engineering Exposure Medical Medical interaction Patients User interface design |
title | Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A05%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pauses%20in%20doctor%E2%80%93patient%20conversation%20during%20computer%20use:%20The%20design%20significance%20of%20their%20durations%20and%20accompanying%20topic%20changes&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human-computer%20studies&rft.au=Newman,%20William&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=398&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=398-409&rft.issn=1071-5819&rft.eissn=1095-9300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671237189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671237189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1071581909001232&rfr_iscdi=true |