Use of B-Spline in the Finite Element Analysis: Comparison With ANCF Geometry

This paper examines the limitations of using B-spline representation as an analysis tool by comparing its geometry with the nonlinear finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) geometry. It is shown that while both B-spline and ANCF geometries can be used to model nonstructural disc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics 2012-01, Vol.7 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Shabana, Ahmed A, Hamed, Ashraf M, Mohamed, Abdel - Nasser A, Jayakumar, Paramsothy, Letherwood, Michael D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics
container_volume 7
creator Shabana, Ahmed A
Hamed, Ashraf M
Mohamed, Abdel - Nasser A
Jayakumar, Paramsothy
Letherwood, Michael D
description This paper examines the limitations of using B-spline representation as an analysis tool by comparing its geometry with the nonlinear finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) geometry. It is shown that while both B-spline and ANCF geometries can be used to model nonstructural discontinuities using linear connectivity conditions, there are fundamental differences between B-spline and ANCF geometries. First, while B-spline geometry can always be converted to ANCF geometry, the converse is not true; that is, ANCF geometry cannot always be converted to B-spline geometry. Second, because of the rigid structure of the B-spline recurrence formula, there are restrictions on the order of the parameters and basis functions used in the polynomial interpolation; this in turn can lead to models that have significantly larger number of degrees of freedom as compared to those obtained using ANCF geometry. Third, in addition to the known fact that B-spline does not allow for straightforward modeling of T-junctions, B-spline representation cannot be used in a straightforward manner to model structural discontinuities. It is shown in this investigation that ANCF geometric description can be used to develop new spatial chain models governed by linear connectivity conditions which can be applied at a preprocessing stage allowing for an efficient elimination of the dependent variables. The modes of the deformations at the definition points of the joints that allow for rigid body rotations between ANCF finite elements are discussed. The use of the linear connectivity conditions with ANCF spatial finite elements leads to a constant inertia matrix and zero Coriolis and centrifugal forces. The fully parameterized structural ANCF finite elements used in this study allow for the deformation of the cross section and capture the coupling between this deformation and the stretch and bending. A new chain model that employs different degrees of continuity for different coordinates at the joint definition points is developed in this investigation. In the case of cubic polynomial approximation, C1 continuity conditions are used for the coordinate line along the joint axis; while C0 continuity conditions are used for the other coordinate lines. This allows for having arbitrary large rigid body rotation about the axis of the joint that connects two flexible links. Numerical examples are presented in order to demonstrate the use of the formulations developed in this paper.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4004377
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671235006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671235006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-376c280a91c981bef49ab7ee91a532a21ca9bb25ab371e174d1542069719f0b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90L1PwzAQBfAIgUQpDMwsXpBgSPH5I07YStQWpAIDVIyWEy6qqyQOdjr0vydVq053w--94UXRLdAJAMgnmAhKBVfqLBqBlDIGwfj56Qd5GV2FsBmMyFI5it5XAYmryEv81dW2RWJb0q-RzG1reySzGhtsezJtTb0LNjyT3DWd8Ta4lvzYfk2mH_mcLNA12PvddXRRmTrgzfGOo9V89p2_xsvPxVs-XcaGA-tjrpKSpdRkUGYpFFiJzBQKMQMjOTMMSpMVBZOm4AoQlPgFKRhNMgVZRYuEj6OHQ2_n3d8WQ68bG0qsa9Oi2wYNiQLGJaV7-nigpXcheKx0521j_E4D1fvJNOjjZIO9P9aaUJq68qYtbTgFWMIpVSAHd3dwJjSoN27rh3mCFolMBfB_kupw4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671235006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of B-Spline in the Finite Element Analysis: Comparison With ANCF Geometry</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Shabana, Ahmed A ; Hamed, Ashraf M ; Mohamed, Abdel - Nasser A ; Jayakumar, Paramsothy ; Letherwood, Michael D</creator><creatorcontrib>Shabana, Ahmed A ; Hamed, Ashraf M ; Mohamed, Abdel - Nasser A ; Jayakumar, Paramsothy ; Letherwood, Michael D</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the limitations of using B-spline representation as an analysis tool by comparing its geometry with the nonlinear finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) geometry. It is shown that while both B-spline and ANCF geometries can be used to model nonstructural discontinuities using linear connectivity conditions, there are fundamental differences between B-spline and ANCF geometries. First, while B-spline geometry can always be converted to ANCF geometry, the converse is not true; that is, ANCF geometry cannot always be converted to B-spline geometry. Second, because of the rigid structure of the B-spline recurrence formula, there are restrictions on the order of the parameters and basis functions used in the polynomial interpolation; this in turn can lead to models that have significantly larger number of degrees of freedom as compared to those obtained using ANCF geometry. Third, in addition to the known fact that B-spline does not allow for straightforward modeling of T-junctions, B-spline representation cannot be used in a straightforward manner to model structural discontinuities. It is shown in this investigation that ANCF geometric description can be used to develop new spatial chain models governed by linear connectivity conditions which can be applied at a preprocessing stage allowing for an efficient elimination of the dependent variables. The modes of the deformations at the definition points of the joints that allow for rigid body rotations between ANCF finite elements are discussed. The use of the linear connectivity conditions with ANCF spatial finite elements leads to a constant inertia matrix and zero Coriolis and centrifugal forces. The fully parameterized structural ANCF finite elements used in this study allow for the deformation of the cross section and capture the coupling between this deformation and the stretch and bending. A new chain model that employs different degrees of continuity for different coordinates at the joint definition points is developed in this investigation. In the case of cubic polynomial approximation, C1 continuity conditions are used for the coordinate line along the joint axis; while C0 continuity conditions are used for the other coordinate lines. This allows for having arbitrary large rigid body rotation about the axis of the joint that connects two flexible links. Numerical examples are presented in order to demonstrate the use of the formulations developed in this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1555-1415</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-1423</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4004377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: ASME</publisher><subject>Chains ; Continuity ; Deformation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Finite element method ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Physics ; Representations ; Rigid-body dynamics ; Solid dynamics (ballistics, collision, multibody system, stabilization...) ; Solid mechanics ; Static elasticity (thermoelasticity...) ; Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><ispartof>Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics, 2012-01, Vol.7 (1)</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-376c280a91c981bef49ab7ee91a532a21ca9bb25ab371e174d1542069719f0b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-376c280a91c981bef49ab7ee91a532a21ca9bb25ab371e174d1542069719f0b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27928,27929,27930,38525</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26300715$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shabana, Ahmed A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamed, Ashraf M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Abdel - Nasser A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayakumar, Paramsothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letherwood, Michael D</creatorcontrib><title>Use of B-Spline in the Finite Element Analysis: Comparison With ANCF Geometry</title><title>Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics</title><addtitle>J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam</addtitle><description>This paper examines the limitations of using B-spline representation as an analysis tool by comparing its geometry with the nonlinear finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) geometry. It is shown that while both B-spline and ANCF geometries can be used to model nonstructural discontinuities using linear connectivity conditions, there are fundamental differences between B-spline and ANCF geometries. First, while B-spline geometry can always be converted to ANCF geometry, the converse is not true; that is, ANCF geometry cannot always be converted to B-spline geometry. Second, because of the rigid structure of the B-spline recurrence formula, there are restrictions on the order of the parameters and basis functions used in the polynomial interpolation; this in turn can lead to models that have significantly larger number of degrees of freedom as compared to those obtained using ANCF geometry. Third, in addition to the known fact that B-spline does not allow for straightforward modeling of T-junctions, B-spline representation cannot be used in a straightforward manner to model structural discontinuities. It is shown in this investigation that ANCF geometric description can be used to develop new spatial chain models governed by linear connectivity conditions which can be applied at a preprocessing stage allowing for an efficient elimination of the dependent variables. The modes of the deformations at the definition points of the joints that allow for rigid body rotations between ANCF finite elements are discussed. The use of the linear connectivity conditions with ANCF spatial finite elements leads to a constant inertia matrix and zero Coriolis and centrifugal forces. The fully parameterized structural ANCF finite elements used in this study allow for the deformation of the cross section and capture the coupling between this deformation and the stretch and bending. A new chain model that employs different degrees of continuity for different coordinates at the joint definition points is developed in this investigation. In the case of cubic polynomial approximation, C1 continuity conditions are used for the coordinate line along the joint axis; while C0 continuity conditions are used for the other coordinate lines. This allows for having arbitrary large rigid body rotation about the axis of the joint that connects two flexible links. Numerical examples are presented in order to demonstrate the use of the formulations developed in this paper.</description><subject>Chains</subject><subject>Continuity</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Rigid-body dynamics</subject><subject>Solid dynamics (ballistics, collision, multibody system, stabilization...)</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Static elasticity (thermoelasticity...)</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><issn>1555-1415</issn><issn>1555-1423</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90L1PwzAQBfAIgUQpDMwsXpBgSPH5I07YStQWpAIDVIyWEy6qqyQOdjr0vydVq053w--94UXRLdAJAMgnmAhKBVfqLBqBlDIGwfj56Qd5GV2FsBmMyFI5it5XAYmryEv81dW2RWJb0q-RzG1reySzGhtsezJtTb0LNjyT3DWd8Ta4lvzYfk2mH_mcLNA12PvddXRRmTrgzfGOo9V89p2_xsvPxVs-XcaGA-tjrpKSpdRkUGYpFFiJzBQKMQMjOTMMSpMVBZOm4AoQlPgFKRhNMgVZRYuEj6OHQ2_n3d8WQ68bG0qsa9Oi2wYNiQLGJaV7-nigpXcheKx0521j_E4D1fvJNOjjZIO9P9aaUJq68qYtbTgFWMIpVSAHd3dwJjSoN27rh3mCFolMBfB_kupw4w</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Shabana, Ahmed A</creator><creator>Hamed, Ashraf M</creator><creator>Mohamed, Abdel - Nasser A</creator><creator>Jayakumar, Paramsothy</creator><creator>Letherwood, Michael D</creator><general>ASME</general><general>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Use of B-Spline in the Finite Element Analysis: Comparison With ANCF Geometry</title><author>Shabana, Ahmed A ; Hamed, Ashraf M ; Mohamed, Abdel - Nasser A ; Jayakumar, Paramsothy ; Letherwood, Michael D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-376c280a91c981bef49ab7ee91a532a21ca9bb25ab371e174d1542069719f0b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Chains</topic><topic>Continuity</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Rigid-body dynamics</topic><topic>Solid dynamics (ballistics, collision, multibody system, stabilization...)</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Static elasticity (thermoelasticity...)</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shabana, Ahmed A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamed, Ashraf M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Abdel - Nasser A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayakumar, Paramsothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letherwood, Michael D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shabana, Ahmed A</au><au>Hamed, Ashraf M</au><au>Mohamed, Abdel - Nasser A</au><au>Jayakumar, Paramsothy</au><au>Letherwood, Michael D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of B-Spline in the Finite Element Analysis: Comparison With ANCF Geometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics</jtitle><stitle>J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam</stitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1555-1415</issn><eissn>1555-1423</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the limitations of using B-spline representation as an analysis tool by comparing its geometry with the nonlinear finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) geometry. It is shown that while both B-spline and ANCF geometries can be used to model nonstructural discontinuities using linear connectivity conditions, there are fundamental differences between B-spline and ANCF geometries. First, while B-spline geometry can always be converted to ANCF geometry, the converse is not true; that is, ANCF geometry cannot always be converted to B-spline geometry. Second, because of the rigid structure of the B-spline recurrence formula, there are restrictions on the order of the parameters and basis functions used in the polynomial interpolation; this in turn can lead to models that have significantly larger number of degrees of freedom as compared to those obtained using ANCF geometry. Third, in addition to the known fact that B-spline does not allow for straightforward modeling of T-junctions, B-spline representation cannot be used in a straightforward manner to model structural discontinuities. It is shown in this investigation that ANCF geometric description can be used to develop new spatial chain models governed by linear connectivity conditions which can be applied at a preprocessing stage allowing for an efficient elimination of the dependent variables. The modes of the deformations at the definition points of the joints that allow for rigid body rotations between ANCF finite elements are discussed. The use of the linear connectivity conditions with ANCF spatial finite elements leads to a constant inertia matrix and zero Coriolis and centrifugal forces. The fully parameterized structural ANCF finite elements used in this study allow for the deformation of the cross section and capture the coupling between this deformation and the stretch and bending. A new chain model that employs different degrees of continuity for different coordinates at the joint definition points is developed in this investigation. In the case of cubic polynomial approximation, C1 continuity conditions are used for the coordinate line along the joint axis; while C0 continuity conditions are used for the other coordinate lines. This allows for having arbitrary large rigid body rotation about the axis of the joint that connects two flexible links. Numerical examples are presented in order to demonstrate the use of the formulations developed in this paper.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.4004377</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1555-1415
ispartof Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics, 2012-01, Vol.7 (1)
issn 1555-1415
1555-1423
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671235006
source ASME Transactions Journals (Current)
subjects Chains
Continuity
Deformation
Exact sciences and technology
Finite element method
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Physics
Representations
Rigid-body dynamics
Solid dynamics (ballistics, collision, multibody system, stabilization...)
Solid mechanics
Static elasticity (thermoelasticity...)
Structural and continuum mechanics
title Use of B-Spline in the Finite Element Analysis: Comparison With ANCF Geometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T10%3A34%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20B-Spline%20in%20the%20Finite%20Element%20Analysis:%20Comparison%20With%20ANCF%20Geometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computational%20and%20nonlinear%20dynamics&rft.au=Shabana,%20Ahmed%20A&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1555-1415&rft.eissn=1555-1423&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4004377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671235006%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671235006&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true