Immunohistochemical assessment of PTEN in vulvar cancer: Best practices for tissue staining, evaluation, and clinical association

Pten encodes a well-characterized protein that is important in several cancers due to its tumor suppressor function. Yet, the detection and evaluation of PTEN by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for clinical practice have not been standardized. Thus, in this study, we performed a literature review of prot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Methods (San Diego, Calif.) Calif.), 2015-05, Vol.77-78, p.20-24
Hauptverfasser: Lavorato-Rocha, A.M., Anjos, L.G., Cunha, I.W., Vassallo, J., Soares, F.A., Rocha, R.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue
container_start_page 20
container_title Methods (San Diego, Calif.)
container_volume 77-78
creator Lavorato-Rocha, A.M.
Anjos, L.G.
Cunha, I.W.
Vassallo, J.
Soares, F.A.
Rocha, R.M.
description Pten encodes a well-characterized protein that is important in several cancers due to its tumor suppressor function. Yet, the detection and evaluation of PTEN by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for clinical practice have not been standardized. Thus, in this study, we performed a literature review of protocols for PTEN assessment by IHC and the possible differences in evaluation, based on our experience with vulvar carcinomas. Also, we report some of our most recent findings regarding the clinical impact of PTEN in this type of tumor. In total, 150 FFPE vulvar carcinoma samples in a tissue microarray were examined by IHC with regard to PTEN, PI3K, AKT, and mTOR. All evaluations were performed by slide digitalization and quantification using APERIO ImageScope software. All measurements were converted into HScore values for the statistical analysis. Sharp and specific PTEN expression was observed in the nuclei and cytoplasmic compartments. Its HScore values ranged from 3.5 to 226, with a median of 92.5. mTOR expression was robust in all cases (mean HScore=248.1). AKT and PI3K had median HScore values of 200.5 and 156.5, respectively. In addition, PTEN expression was associated with higher rates of patient survival. The preanalytical step is the first issue in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PTEN. With regard to the analytical procedure, the antigen retrieval step yielded better stains for protocols with high-pH buffers, and antibody clone 6H2.1 effected the most reliable results. PTEN is a good prognostic marker for vulvar cancer, correlating with higher rates of patient survival. Our data underscore the importance of technical standardization to ensure more reliable and reproducible evaluation of PTEN in clinical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.12.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671219733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1046202314004319</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671219733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-422a40dfc168967c0513bf055589c4f797b6cfbcb4cca0176599d2540baf71b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFv1DAQhSMEoqXwC5CQjxyaYDtxHCNxKFWBShVwKGfLmdisV4m9eJyVeuSf4-0uHDnNSPPevJmvql4z2jDK-nfb5mGxedNwyrqG8YYy-aQ6Z1SJWrGWPj30XV9zytuz6gXillLKuByeV2dciJ7Lbjivft8uyxrixmOOsLGLBzMTg2gRFxsyiY58v7_5Snwg-3Xem0TABLDpPfloMZNdMpA9WCQuJpI94moJZuODDz8vid2beTXZx3BJTJgIzGVwSojgHycvq2fOzGhfnepF9ePTzf31l_ru2-fb66u7Glqhct1xbjo6OWD9oHoJVLB2dFQIMSjonFRy7MGNMHYApqDohVITFx0djZNsHNqL6u1x7y7FX2s5Xi8ewc6zCTauqFkvGWdKtm2RtkcppIiYrNO75BeTHjSj-sBeb_Uje31grxnXJbC43pwC1nGx0z_PX9hF8OEosOXNvbdJI3hbaE4-Wch6iv6_AX8AXPuYdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671219733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immunohistochemical assessment of PTEN in vulvar cancer: Best practices for tissue staining, evaluation, and clinical association</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Lavorato-Rocha, A.M. ; Anjos, L.G. ; Cunha, I.W. ; Vassallo, J. ; Soares, F.A. ; Rocha, R.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lavorato-Rocha, A.M. ; Anjos, L.G. ; Cunha, I.W. ; Vassallo, J. ; Soares, F.A. ; Rocha, R.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Pten encodes a well-characterized protein that is important in several cancers due to its tumor suppressor function. Yet, the detection and evaluation of PTEN by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for clinical practice have not been standardized. Thus, in this study, we performed a literature review of protocols for PTEN assessment by IHC and the possible differences in evaluation, based on our experience with vulvar carcinomas. Also, we report some of our most recent findings regarding the clinical impact of PTEN in this type of tumor. In total, 150 FFPE vulvar carcinoma samples in a tissue microarray were examined by IHC with regard to PTEN, PI3K, AKT, and mTOR. All evaluations were performed by slide digitalization and quantification using APERIO ImageScope software. All measurements were converted into HScore values for the statistical analysis. Sharp and specific PTEN expression was observed in the nuclei and cytoplasmic compartments. Its HScore values ranged from 3.5 to 226, with a median of 92.5. mTOR expression was robust in all cases (mean HScore=248.1). AKT and PI3K had median HScore values of 200.5 and 156.5, respectively. In addition, PTEN expression was associated with higher rates of patient survival. The preanalytical step is the first issue in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PTEN. With regard to the analytical procedure, the antigen retrieval step yielded better stains for protocols with high-pH buffers, and antibody clone 6H2.1 effected the most reliable results. PTEN is a good prognostic marker for vulvar cancer, correlating with higher rates of patient survival. Our data underscore the importance of technical standardization to ensure more reliable and reproducible evaluation of PTEN in clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-2023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.12.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25562748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis ; Female ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Protocol ; PTEN ; PTEN Phosphohydrolase - analysis ; PTEN Phosphohydrolase - biosynthesis ; Staining and Labeling - methods ; Survival Rate - trends ; Tumor Suppressor Proteins - analysis ; Vulvar cancer ; Vulvar Neoplasms - metabolism ; Vulvar Neoplasms - mortality ; Vulvar Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2015-05, Vol.77-78, p.20-24</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-422a40dfc168967c0513bf055589c4f797b6cfbcb4cca0176599d2540baf71b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-422a40dfc168967c0513bf055589c4f797b6cfbcb4cca0176599d2540baf71b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.12.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25562748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lavorato-Rocha, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anjos, L.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, I.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassallo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, F.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, R.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Immunohistochemical assessment of PTEN in vulvar cancer: Best practices for tissue staining, evaluation, and clinical association</title><title>Methods (San Diego, Calif.)</title><addtitle>Methods</addtitle><description>Pten encodes a well-characterized protein that is important in several cancers due to its tumor suppressor function. Yet, the detection and evaluation of PTEN by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for clinical practice have not been standardized. Thus, in this study, we performed a literature review of protocols for PTEN assessment by IHC and the possible differences in evaluation, based on our experience with vulvar carcinomas. Also, we report some of our most recent findings regarding the clinical impact of PTEN in this type of tumor. In total, 150 FFPE vulvar carcinoma samples in a tissue microarray were examined by IHC with regard to PTEN, PI3K, AKT, and mTOR. All evaluations were performed by slide digitalization and quantification using APERIO ImageScope software. All measurements were converted into HScore values for the statistical analysis. Sharp and specific PTEN expression was observed in the nuclei and cytoplasmic compartments. Its HScore values ranged from 3.5 to 226, with a median of 92.5. mTOR expression was robust in all cases (mean HScore=248.1). AKT and PI3K had median HScore values of 200.5 and 156.5, respectively. In addition, PTEN expression was associated with higher rates of patient survival. The preanalytical step is the first issue in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PTEN. With regard to the analytical procedure, the antigen retrieval step yielded better stains for protocols with high-pH buffers, and antibody clone 6H2.1 effected the most reliable results. PTEN is a good prognostic marker for vulvar cancer, correlating with higher rates of patient survival. Our data underscore the importance of technical standardization to ensure more reliable and reproducible evaluation of PTEN in clinical practice.</description><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>PTEN</subject><subject>PTEN Phosphohydrolase - analysis</subject><subject>PTEN Phosphohydrolase - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling - methods</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Tumor Suppressor Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Vulvar cancer</subject><subject>Vulvar Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Vulvar Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Vulvar Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>1046-2023</issn><issn>1095-9130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFv1DAQhSMEoqXwC5CQjxyaYDtxHCNxKFWBShVwKGfLmdisV4m9eJyVeuSf4-0uHDnNSPPevJmvql4z2jDK-nfb5mGxedNwyrqG8YYy-aQ6Z1SJWrGWPj30XV9zytuz6gXillLKuByeV2dciJ7Lbjivft8uyxrixmOOsLGLBzMTg2gRFxsyiY58v7_5Snwg-3Xem0TABLDpPfloMZNdMpA9WCQuJpI94moJZuODDz8vid2beTXZx3BJTJgIzGVwSojgHycvq2fOzGhfnepF9ePTzf31l_ru2-fb66u7Glqhct1xbjo6OWD9oHoJVLB2dFQIMSjonFRy7MGNMHYApqDohVITFx0djZNsHNqL6u1x7y7FX2s5Xi8ewc6zCTauqFkvGWdKtm2RtkcppIiYrNO75BeTHjSj-sBeb_Uje31grxnXJbC43pwC1nGx0z_PX9hF8OEosOXNvbdJI3hbaE4-Wch6iv6_AX8AXPuYdg</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Lavorato-Rocha, A.M.</creator><creator>Anjos, L.G.</creator><creator>Cunha, I.W.</creator><creator>Vassallo, J.</creator><creator>Soares, F.A.</creator><creator>Rocha, R.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Immunohistochemical assessment of PTEN in vulvar cancer: Best practices for tissue staining, evaluation, and clinical association</title><author>Lavorato-Rocha, A.M. ; Anjos, L.G. ; Cunha, I.W. ; Vassallo, J. ; Soares, F.A. ; Rocha, R.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-422a40dfc168967c0513bf055589c4f797b6cfbcb4cca0176599d2540baf71b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>PTEN</topic><topic>PTEN Phosphohydrolase - analysis</topic><topic>PTEN Phosphohydrolase - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling - methods</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Tumor Suppressor Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Vulvar cancer</topic><topic>Vulvar Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Vulvar Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Vulvar Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lavorato-Rocha, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anjos, L.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, I.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassallo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, F.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, R.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Methods (San Diego, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lavorato-Rocha, A.M.</au><au>Anjos, L.G.</au><au>Cunha, I.W.</au><au>Vassallo, J.</au><au>Soares, F.A.</au><au>Rocha, R.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immunohistochemical assessment of PTEN in vulvar cancer: Best practices for tissue staining, evaluation, and clinical association</atitle><jtitle>Methods (San Diego, Calif.)</jtitle><addtitle>Methods</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>77-78</volume><spage>20</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>20-24</pages><issn>1046-2023</issn><eissn>1095-9130</eissn><abstract>Pten encodes a well-characterized protein that is important in several cancers due to its tumor suppressor function. Yet, the detection and evaluation of PTEN by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for clinical practice have not been standardized. Thus, in this study, we performed a literature review of protocols for PTEN assessment by IHC and the possible differences in evaluation, based on our experience with vulvar carcinomas. Also, we report some of our most recent findings regarding the clinical impact of PTEN in this type of tumor. In total, 150 FFPE vulvar carcinoma samples in a tissue microarray were examined by IHC with regard to PTEN, PI3K, AKT, and mTOR. All evaluations were performed by slide digitalization and quantification using APERIO ImageScope software. All measurements were converted into HScore values for the statistical analysis. Sharp and specific PTEN expression was observed in the nuclei and cytoplasmic compartments. Its HScore values ranged from 3.5 to 226, with a median of 92.5. mTOR expression was robust in all cases (mean HScore=248.1). AKT and PI3K had median HScore values of 200.5 and 156.5, respectively. In addition, PTEN expression was associated with higher rates of patient survival. The preanalytical step is the first issue in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PTEN. With regard to the analytical procedure, the antigen retrieval step yielded better stains for protocols with high-pH buffers, and antibody clone 6H2.1 effected the most reliable results. PTEN is a good prognostic marker for vulvar cancer, correlating with higher rates of patient survival. Our data underscore the importance of technical standardization to ensure more reliable and reproducible evaluation of PTEN in clinical practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25562748</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.12.017</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1046-2023
ispartof Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2015-05, Vol.77-78, p.20-24
issn 1046-2023
1095-9130
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671219733
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis
Female
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Protocol
PTEN
PTEN Phosphohydrolase - analysis
PTEN Phosphohydrolase - biosynthesis
Staining and Labeling - methods
Survival Rate - trends
Tumor Suppressor Proteins - analysis
Vulvar cancer
Vulvar Neoplasms - metabolism
Vulvar Neoplasms - mortality
Vulvar Neoplasms - pathology
title Immunohistochemical assessment of PTEN in vulvar cancer: Best practices for tissue staining, evaluation, and clinical association
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T09%3A15%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immunohistochemical%20assessment%20of%20PTEN%20in%20vulvar%20cancer:%20Best%20practices%20for%20tissue%20staining,%20evaluation,%20and%20clinical%20association&rft.jtitle=Methods%20(San%20Diego,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Lavorato-Rocha,%20A.M.&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=77-78&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=20-24&rft.issn=1046-2023&rft.eissn=1095-9130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.12.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671219733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671219733&rft_id=info:pmid/25562748&rft_els_id=S1046202314004319&rfr_iscdi=true