A survey of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) in the UK and Ireland

Summary A questionnaire designed to survey methods of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) was circulated to all surgical members of the Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 45 questionnaires were distributed yielding 30 respondents (66.6% response rate). 27 r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2015-04, Vol.68 (4), p.485-491
Hauptverfasser: Hodgins, N, Hoo, C, McGee, P, Hill, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 491
container_issue 4
container_start_page 485
container_title Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
container_volume 68
creator Hodgins, N
Hoo, C
McGee, P
Hill, C
description Summary A questionnaire designed to survey methods of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) was circulated to all surgical members of the Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 45 questionnaires were distributed yielding 30 respondents (66.6% response rate). 27 respondents performed surgery for both cleft and non-cleft forms of VPI. Multi-planar videofluroscopy and nasendoscopy were the most frequently used methods of assessing and diagnosing VPI. The most frequently utilised corrective surgical procedure was palatal re-repair, followed by the Hynes pharyngoplasty and the Furlow double opposing z-plasty technique. Orticochea and Jackson pharyngoplasties were less commonly performed. Splitting the palate during pharyngoplasty procedures was an inconsistent practice. 20 palatal surgeons referred patients to an otolaryngology specialist when tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy was indicated prior to their corrective palatal procedure. This was most frequently performed 3 months prior to palatal surgery. This survey identified normal patient speech as the criterion of success after correctional surgery for VPI. Assessment and management of VPI in Great Britain and Ireland is a highly varied practice. When a palatal procedure is indicated, surgical approaches are tailored to address each individual's pattern of velopharyngeal closure deficiency. The surgeons surveyed reported this as being most accurately demonstrated by direct nasendoscopic visualisation and dynamic multi-planar videofluoroscopic studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.12.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671209882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S174868151400713X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671209882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ddf5c05dc7680e0e1abf03f6c8cdd7c8e977d8d7ccbf3f9600a203d6a55ae9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EoqXwBTggH8shqSeOY0dCSFXVwqqVQKIgbsZrT1qH_MNOVtpvj9MtHDhwmrH93pPnN4S8BpYDg-qszbftFPOCQZlDkTOAJ-QYlFQZE7x-mnpZqqxSII7IixhbxkoOpXhOjgohKl7L8pj8OKdxCTvc07GhJkaMscdhpmZwtDeDucOHY3rcYTdO9ybshzs0HfWDHfsJZxws0tNvnzdv0xWd75F-vX5wbwJ2qb4kzxrTRXz1WE_I7dXl7cXH7ObTh83F-U1mS4A5c64RlglnZaUYMgSzbRhvKqusc9IqrKV0KnV22_CmrhgzBeOuMkIYrC0_IaeH2CmMvxaMs-59tNilL-C4RA2VhILVShVJWhykNowxBmz0FHyfBtPA9ApWt3oFq1ewGgqdwCbTm8f8Zduj-2v5QzIJ3h0EmIbceQw6Wr_CcT6gnbUb_f_z3_9jt50fvDXdT9xjbMclDAmfBh2TQX9ZV7tuFkrGJPDv_Dfue5-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671209882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) in the UK and Ireland</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hodgins, N ; Hoo, C ; McGee, P ; Hill, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, N ; Hoo, C ; McGee, P ; Hill, C</creatorcontrib><description>Summary A questionnaire designed to survey methods of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) was circulated to all surgical members of the Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 45 questionnaires were distributed yielding 30 respondents (66.6% response rate). 27 respondents performed surgery for both cleft and non-cleft forms of VPI. Multi-planar videofluroscopy and nasendoscopy were the most frequently used methods of assessing and diagnosing VPI. The most frequently utilised corrective surgical procedure was palatal re-repair, followed by the Hynes pharyngoplasty and the Furlow double opposing z-plasty technique. Orticochea and Jackson pharyngoplasties were less commonly performed. Splitting the palate during pharyngoplasty procedures was an inconsistent practice. 20 palatal surgeons referred patients to an otolaryngology specialist when tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy was indicated prior to their corrective palatal procedure. This was most frequently performed 3 months prior to palatal surgery. This survey identified normal patient speech as the criterion of success after correctional surgery for VPI. Assessment and management of VPI in Great Britain and Ireland is a highly varied practice. When a palatal procedure is indicated, surgical approaches are tailored to address each individual's pattern of velopharyngeal closure deficiency. The surgeons surveyed reported this as being most accurately demonstrated by direct nasendoscopic visualisation and dynamic multi-planar videofluoroscopic studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.12.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25563974</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessment ; Cleft Palate - surgery ; Endoscopy ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Ireland ; Management ; Plastic Surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - utilization ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment ; United Kingdom ; Velopharyngeal incompetence ; Velopharyngeal Insufficiency - diagnosis ; Velopharyngeal Insufficiency - surgery ; Videotape Recording ; VPI</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery, 2015-04, Vol.68 (4), p.485-491</ispartof><rights>British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>2014 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ddf5c05dc7680e0e1abf03f6c8cdd7c8e977d8d7ccbf3f9600a203d6a55ae9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ddf5c05dc7680e0e1abf03f6c8cdd7c8e977d8d7ccbf3f9600a203d6a55ae9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174868151400713X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563974$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoo, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGee, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, C</creatorcontrib><title>A survey of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) in the UK and Ireland</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Summary A questionnaire designed to survey methods of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) was circulated to all surgical members of the Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 45 questionnaires were distributed yielding 30 respondents (66.6% response rate). 27 respondents performed surgery for both cleft and non-cleft forms of VPI. Multi-planar videofluroscopy and nasendoscopy were the most frequently used methods of assessing and diagnosing VPI. The most frequently utilised corrective surgical procedure was palatal re-repair, followed by the Hynes pharyngoplasty and the Furlow double opposing z-plasty technique. Orticochea and Jackson pharyngoplasties were less commonly performed. Splitting the palate during pharyngoplasty procedures was an inconsistent practice. 20 palatal surgeons referred patients to an otolaryngology specialist when tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy was indicated prior to their corrective palatal procedure. This was most frequently performed 3 months prior to palatal surgery. This survey identified normal patient speech as the criterion of success after correctional surgery for VPI. Assessment and management of VPI in Great Britain and Ireland is a highly varied practice. When a palatal procedure is indicated, surgical approaches are tailored to address each individual's pattern of velopharyngeal closure deficiency. The surgeons surveyed reported this as being most accurately demonstrated by direct nasendoscopic visualisation and dynamic multi-planar videofluoroscopic studies.</description><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ireland</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - utilization</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Velopharyngeal incompetence</subject><subject>Velopharyngeal Insufficiency - diagnosis</subject><subject>Velopharyngeal Insufficiency - surgery</subject><subject>Videotape Recording</subject><subject>VPI</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EoqXwBTggH8shqSeOY0dCSFXVwqqVQKIgbsZrT1qH_MNOVtpvj9MtHDhwmrH93pPnN4S8BpYDg-qszbftFPOCQZlDkTOAJ-QYlFQZE7x-mnpZqqxSII7IixhbxkoOpXhOjgohKl7L8pj8OKdxCTvc07GhJkaMscdhpmZwtDeDucOHY3rcYTdO9ybshzs0HfWDHfsJZxws0tNvnzdv0xWd75F-vX5wbwJ2qb4kzxrTRXz1WE_I7dXl7cXH7ObTh83F-U1mS4A5c64RlglnZaUYMgSzbRhvKqusc9IqrKV0KnV22_CmrhgzBeOuMkIYrC0_IaeH2CmMvxaMs-59tNilL-C4RA2VhILVShVJWhykNowxBmz0FHyfBtPA9ApWt3oFq1ewGgqdwCbTm8f8Zduj-2v5QzIJ3h0EmIbceQw6Wr_CcT6gnbUb_f_z3_9jt50fvDXdT9xjbMclDAmfBh2TQX9ZV7tuFkrGJPDv_Dfue5-A</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Hodgins, N</creator><creator>Hoo, C</creator><creator>McGee, P</creator><creator>Hill, C</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>A survey of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) in the UK and Ireland</title><author>Hodgins, N ; Hoo, C ; McGee, P ; Hill, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ddf5c05dc7680e0e1abf03f6c8cdd7c8e977d8d7ccbf3f9600a203d6a55ae9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ireland</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - utilization</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Velopharyngeal incompetence</topic><topic>Velopharyngeal Insufficiency - diagnosis</topic><topic>Velopharyngeal Insufficiency - surgery</topic><topic>Videotape Recording</topic><topic>VPI</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoo, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGee, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodgins, N</au><au>Hoo, C</au><au>McGee, P</au><au>Hill, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) in the UK and Ireland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>485-491</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>Summary A questionnaire designed to survey methods of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) was circulated to all surgical members of the Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 45 questionnaires were distributed yielding 30 respondents (66.6% response rate). 27 respondents performed surgery for both cleft and non-cleft forms of VPI. Multi-planar videofluroscopy and nasendoscopy were the most frequently used methods of assessing and diagnosing VPI. The most frequently utilised corrective surgical procedure was palatal re-repair, followed by the Hynes pharyngoplasty and the Furlow double opposing z-plasty technique. Orticochea and Jackson pharyngoplasties were less commonly performed. Splitting the palate during pharyngoplasty procedures was an inconsistent practice. 20 palatal surgeons referred patients to an otolaryngology specialist when tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy was indicated prior to their corrective palatal procedure. This was most frequently performed 3 months prior to palatal surgery. This survey identified normal patient speech as the criterion of success after correctional surgery for VPI. Assessment and management of VPI in Great Britain and Ireland is a highly varied practice. When a palatal procedure is indicated, surgical approaches are tailored to address each individual's pattern of velopharyngeal closure deficiency. The surgeons surveyed reported this as being most accurately demonstrated by direct nasendoscopic visualisation and dynamic multi-planar videofluoroscopic studies.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25563974</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2014.12.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-6815
ispartof Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2015-04, Vol.68 (4), p.485-491
issn 1748-6815
1878-0539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671209882
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Assessment
Cleft Palate - surgery
Endoscopy
Fluoroscopy
Humans
Ireland
Management
Plastic Surgery
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - utilization
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment
United Kingdom
Velopharyngeal incompetence
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency - diagnosis
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency - surgery
Videotape Recording
VPI
title A survey of assessment and management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) in the UK and Ireland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A14%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20of%20assessment%20and%20management%20of%20velopharyngeal%20incompetence%20(VPI)%20in%20the%20UK%20and%20Ireland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Hodgins,%20N&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=485-491&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.12.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671209882%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671209882&rft_id=info:pmid/25563974&rft_els_id=S174868151400713X&rfr_iscdi=true