Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness: A Catastrophic Relationship?

Objective: In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness. Background: Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human factors 2015-02, Vol.57 (1), p.163-176
Hauptverfasser: Naber, Andrew M., McDonald, Jennifer N., Asenuga, Olabisi A., Arthur, Winfred
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue 1
container_start_page 163
container_title Human factors
container_volume 57
creator Naber, Andrew M.
McDonald, Jennifer N.
Asenuga, Olabisi A.
Arthur, Winfred
description Objective: In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness. Background: Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder or facilitate the effectiveness of training for both individuals and the team as a collective. Interaction anxiety is an understudied individual difference that has been shown to be negatively related to training effectiveness in individual contexts. However, its effects in team-training contexts are yet to be investigated. Method: A sample of 492 students in 123 four-person teams was trained to operate a complex, computer-based team task. Results: Interaction anxiety negatively related to team cohesion and team-training effectiveness. A cusp catastrophe model fit the data and showed that teams with more than one high-interaction-anxiety member were negatively affected. Conclusion: Interaction anxiety inhibits the social activities of team training, in turn reducing team-training effectiveness when there is more than one high-interaction-anxiety individual on the training team. Application: These results highlight the importance of examining interaction anxiety as a training team compositional variable that may inhibit behaviors and team processes necessary to capitalize on the positive social activities on which team training depends since the interaction anxiety composition of training teams may serve as an important boundary condition on the effectiveness team-training interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0018720814538814
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669905825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0018720814538814</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1669905825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e7d1a596e4ca31b53a4dc47b59ea177c6b587297c1938b2b0a12c19309b4926e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9Kw0AQxhdRbK3ePUnAi5fobpL9dyylakHxUs9hdzMpKc2m7iZib76Gr-eTuKFVpCB4mRmY33zDN4PQOcHXhHB-gzERPMGCZDQVIR6gIaEZjwUR5BAN-3bc9wfoxPslxpjJlB6jQUK5xJSzIZrMQdXRI9QanP98_4hmtgWnTFs1NhrbtwraTaRsEfVcPHeqspVdRNOyhMC8ggXvT9FRqVYeznZ5hJ5vp_PJffzwdDebjB9ik1LSxsALoqhkkBmVEk1TlRUm45pKUMGMYZoGM5IbIlOhE40VSfoaS53JhEE6Qldb3bVrXjrwbV5X3sBqpSw0nc8JYzLYEgn9D0pJfwUZ0Ms9dNl0zgYjgaKUykywJFB4SxnXeO-gzNeuqpXb5ATn_S_y_V-EkYudcKdrKH4Gvo8fgHgLeLWAX1v_EvwC7leO-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655594862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness: A Catastrophic Relationship?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Naber, Andrew M. ; McDonald, Jennifer N. ; Asenuga, Olabisi A. ; Arthur, Winfred</creator><creatorcontrib>Naber, Andrew M. ; McDonald, Jennifer N. ; Asenuga, Olabisi A. ; Arthur, Winfred</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness. Background: Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder or facilitate the effectiveness of training for both individuals and the team as a collective. Interaction anxiety is an understudied individual difference that has been shown to be negatively related to training effectiveness in individual contexts. However, its effects in team-training contexts are yet to be investigated. Method: A sample of 492 students in 123 four-person teams was trained to operate a complex, computer-based team task. Results: Interaction anxiety negatively related to team cohesion and team-training effectiveness. A cusp catastrophe model fit the data and showed that teams with more than one high-interaction-anxiety member were negatively affected. Conclusion: Interaction anxiety inhibits the social activities of team training, in turn reducing team-training effectiveness when there is more than one high-interaction-anxiety individual on the training team. Application: These results highlight the importance of examining interaction anxiety as a training team compositional variable that may inhibit behaviors and team processes necessary to capitalize on the positive social activities on which team training depends since the interaction anxiety composition of training teams may serve as an important boundary condition on the effectiveness team-training interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0018720814538814</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25790576</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUFAA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety ; Behavior ; Boundary conditions ; Catastrophic failure analysis ; Composition effects ; Cooperative Behavior ; Correlation analysis ; Ergonomics ; Female ; Human factors ; Human performance ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Mathematical models ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Space life sciences ; Students ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Tasks ; Training ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 2015-02, Vol.57 (1), p.163-176</ispartof><rights>2014, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><rights>Copyright Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Feb 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e7d1a596e4ca31b53a4dc47b59ea177c6b587297c1938b2b0a12c19309b4926e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018720814538814$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018720814538814$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25790576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naber, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Jennifer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asenuga, Olabisi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Winfred</creatorcontrib><title>Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness: A Catastrophic Relationship?</title><title>Human factors</title><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><description>Objective: In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness. Background: Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder or facilitate the effectiveness of training for both individuals and the team as a collective. Interaction anxiety is an understudied individual difference that has been shown to be negatively related to training effectiveness in individual contexts. However, its effects in team-training contexts are yet to be investigated. Method: A sample of 492 students in 123 four-person teams was trained to operate a complex, computer-based team task. Results: Interaction anxiety negatively related to team cohesion and team-training effectiveness. A cusp catastrophe model fit the data and showed that teams with more than one high-interaction-anxiety member were negatively affected. Conclusion: Interaction anxiety inhibits the social activities of team training, in turn reducing team-training effectiveness when there is more than one high-interaction-anxiety individual on the training team. Application: These results highlight the importance of examining interaction anxiety as a training team compositional variable that may inhibit behaviors and team processes necessary to capitalize on the positive social activities on which team training depends since the interaction anxiety composition of training teams may serve as an important boundary condition on the effectiveness team-training interventions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Catastrophic failure analysis</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9Kw0AQxhdRbK3ePUnAi5fobpL9dyylakHxUs9hdzMpKc2m7iZib76Gr-eTuKFVpCB4mRmY33zDN4PQOcHXhHB-gzERPMGCZDQVIR6gIaEZjwUR5BAN-3bc9wfoxPslxpjJlB6jQUK5xJSzIZrMQdXRI9QanP98_4hmtgWnTFs1NhrbtwraTaRsEfVcPHeqspVdRNOyhMC8ggXvT9FRqVYeznZ5hJ5vp_PJffzwdDebjB9ik1LSxsALoqhkkBmVEk1TlRUm45pKUMGMYZoGM5IbIlOhE40VSfoaS53JhEE6Qldb3bVrXjrwbV5X3sBqpSw0nc8JYzLYEgn9D0pJfwUZ0Ms9dNl0zgYjgaKUykywJFB4SxnXeO-gzNeuqpXb5ATn_S_y_V-EkYudcKdrKH4Gvo8fgHgLeLWAX1v_EvwC7leO-Q</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Naber, Andrew M.</creator><creator>McDonald, Jennifer N.</creator><creator>Asenuga, Olabisi A.</creator><creator>Arthur, Winfred</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness</title><author>Naber, Andrew M. ; McDonald, Jennifer N. ; Asenuga, Olabisi A. ; Arthur, Winfred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e7d1a596e4ca31b53a4dc47b59ea177c6b587297c1938b2b0a12c19309b4926e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Catastrophic failure analysis</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naber, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Jennifer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asenuga, Olabisi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Winfred</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naber, Andrew M.</au><au>McDonald, Jennifer N.</au><au>Asenuga, Olabisi A.</au><au>Arthur, Winfred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness: A Catastrophic Relationship?</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>163-176</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><coden>HUFAA6</coden><abstract>Objective: In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness. Background: Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder or facilitate the effectiveness of training for both individuals and the team as a collective. Interaction anxiety is an understudied individual difference that has been shown to be negatively related to training effectiveness in individual contexts. However, its effects in team-training contexts are yet to be investigated. Method: A sample of 492 students in 123 four-person teams was trained to operate a complex, computer-based team task. Results: Interaction anxiety negatively related to team cohesion and team-training effectiveness. A cusp catastrophe model fit the data and showed that teams with more than one high-interaction-anxiety member were negatively affected. Conclusion: Interaction anxiety inhibits the social activities of team training, in turn reducing team-training effectiveness when there is more than one high-interaction-anxiety individual on the training team. Application: These results highlight the importance of examining interaction anxiety as a training team compositional variable that may inhibit behaviors and team processes necessary to capitalize on the positive social activities on which team training depends since the interaction anxiety composition of training teams may serve as an important boundary condition on the effectiveness team-training interventions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>25790576</pmid><doi>10.1177/0018720814538814</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7208
ispartof Human factors, 2015-02, Vol.57 (1), p.163-176
issn 0018-7208
1547-8181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669905825
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Adult
Anxiety
Behavior
Boundary conditions
Catastrophic failure analysis
Composition effects
Cooperative Behavior
Correlation analysis
Ergonomics
Female
Human factors
Human performance
Humans
Intervention
Male
Mathematical models
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Space life sciences
Students
Task Performance and Analysis
Tasks
Training
Young Adult
title Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness: A Catastrophic Relationship?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T16%3A00%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Team%20Members%E2%80%99%20Interaction%20Anxiety%20and%20Team-Training%20Effectiveness:%20A%20Catastrophic%20Relationship?&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Naber,%20Andrew%20M.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=163-176&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft.coden=HUFAA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0018720814538814&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669905825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655594862&rft_id=info:pmid/25790576&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0018720814538814&rfr_iscdi=true