Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness: A Catastrophic Relationship?
Objective: In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness. Background: Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human factors 2015-02, Vol.57 (1), p.163-176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 176 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 163 |
container_title | Human factors |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Naber, Andrew M. McDonald, Jennifer N. Asenuga, Olabisi A. Arthur, Winfred |
description | Objective:
In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness.
Background:
Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder or facilitate the effectiveness of training for both individuals and the team as a collective. Interaction anxiety is an understudied individual difference that has been shown to be negatively related to training effectiveness in individual contexts. However, its effects in team-training contexts are yet to be investigated.
Method:
A sample of 492 students in 123 four-person teams was trained to operate a complex, computer-based team task.
Results:
Interaction anxiety negatively related to team cohesion and team-training effectiveness. A cusp catastrophe model fit the data and showed that teams with more than one high-interaction-anxiety member were negatively affected.
Conclusion:
Interaction anxiety inhibits the social activities of team training, in turn reducing team-training effectiveness when there is more than one high-interaction-anxiety individual on the training team.
Application:
These results highlight the importance of examining interaction anxiety as a training team compositional variable that may inhibit behaviors and team processes necessary to capitalize on the positive social activities on which team training depends since the interaction anxiety composition of training teams may serve as an important boundary condition on the effectiveness team-training interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0018720814538814 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669905825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0018720814538814</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1669905825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e7d1a596e4ca31b53a4dc47b59ea177c6b587297c1938b2b0a12c19309b4926e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9Kw0AQxhdRbK3ePUnAi5fobpL9dyylakHxUs9hdzMpKc2m7iZib76Gr-eTuKFVpCB4mRmY33zDN4PQOcHXhHB-gzERPMGCZDQVIR6gIaEZjwUR5BAN-3bc9wfoxPslxpjJlB6jQUK5xJSzIZrMQdXRI9QanP98_4hmtgWnTFs1NhrbtwraTaRsEfVcPHeqspVdRNOyhMC8ggXvT9FRqVYeznZ5hJ5vp_PJffzwdDebjB9ik1LSxsALoqhkkBmVEk1TlRUm45pKUMGMYZoGM5IbIlOhE40VSfoaS53JhEE6Qldb3bVrXjrwbV5X3sBqpSw0nc8JYzLYEgn9D0pJfwUZ0Ms9dNl0zgYjgaKUykywJFB4SxnXeO-gzNeuqpXb5ATn_S_y_V-EkYudcKdrKH4Gvo8fgHgLeLWAX1v_EvwC7leO-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655594862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness: A Catastrophic Relationship?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Naber, Andrew M. ; McDonald, Jennifer N. ; Asenuga, Olabisi A. ; Arthur, Winfred</creator><creatorcontrib>Naber, Andrew M. ; McDonald, Jennifer N. ; Asenuga, Olabisi A. ; Arthur, Winfred</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:
In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness.
Background:
Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder or facilitate the effectiveness of training for both individuals and the team as a collective. Interaction anxiety is an understudied individual difference that has been shown to be negatively related to training effectiveness in individual contexts. However, its effects in team-training contexts are yet to be investigated.
Method:
A sample of 492 students in 123 four-person teams was trained to operate a complex, computer-based team task.
Results:
Interaction anxiety negatively related to team cohesion and team-training effectiveness. A cusp catastrophe model fit the data and showed that teams with more than one high-interaction-anxiety member were negatively affected.
Conclusion:
Interaction anxiety inhibits the social activities of team training, in turn reducing team-training effectiveness when there is more than one high-interaction-anxiety individual on the training team.
Application:
These results highlight the importance of examining interaction anxiety as a training team compositional variable that may inhibit behaviors and team processes necessary to capitalize on the positive social activities on which team training depends since the interaction anxiety composition of training teams may serve as an important boundary condition on the effectiveness team-training interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0018720814538814</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25790576</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUFAA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety ; Behavior ; Boundary conditions ; Catastrophic failure analysis ; Composition effects ; Cooperative Behavior ; Correlation analysis ; Ergonomics ; Female ; Human factors ; Human performance ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Mathematical models ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Space life sciences ; Students ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Tasks ; Training ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 2015-02, Vol.57 (1), p.163-176</ispartof><rights>2014, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><rights>Copyright Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Feb 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e7d1a596e4ca31b53a4dc47b59ea177c6b587297c1938b2b0a12c19309b4926e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018720814538814$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018720814538814$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25790576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naber, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Jennifer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asenuga, Olabisi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Winfred</creatorcontrib><title>Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness: A Catastrophic Relationship?</title><title>Human factors</title><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><description>Objective:
In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness.
Background:
Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder or facilitate the effectiveness of training for both individuals and the team as a collective. Interaction anxiety is an understudied individual difference that has been shown to be negatively related to training effectiveness in individual contexts. However, its effects in team-training contexts are yet to be investigated.
Method:
A sample of 492 students in 123 four-person teams was trained to operate a complex, computer-based team task.
Results:
Interaction anxiety negatively related to team cohesion and team-training effectiveness. A cusp catastrophe model fit the data and showed that teams with more than one high-interaction-anxiety member were negatively affected.
Conclusion:
Interaction anxiety inhibits the social activities of team training, in turn reducing team-training effectiveness when there is more than one high-interaction-anxiety individual on the training team.
Application:
These results highlight the importance of examining interaction anxiety as a training team compositional variable that may inhibit behaviors and team processes necessary to capitalize on the positive social activities on which team training depends since the interaction anxiety composition of training teams may serve as an important boundary condition on the effectiveness team-training interventions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Catastrophic failure analysis</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9Kw0AQxhdRbK3ePUnAi5fobpL9dyylakHxUs9hdzMpKc2m7iZib76Gr-eTuKFVpCB4mRmY33zDN4PQOcHXhHB-gzERPMGCZDQVIR6gIaEZjwUR5BAN-3bc9wfoxPslxpjJlB6jQUK5xJSzIZrMQdXRI9QanP98_4hmtgWnTFs1NhrbtwraTaRsEfVcPHeqspVdRNOyhMC8ggXvT9FRqVYeznZ5hJ5vp_PJffzwdDebjB9ik1LSxsALoqhkkBmVEk1TlRUm45pKUMGMYZoGM5IbIlOhE40VSfoaS53JhEE6Qldb3bVrXjrwbV5X3sBqpSw0nc8JYzLYEgn9D0pJfwUZ0Ms9dNl0zgYjgaKUykywJFB4SxnXeO-gzNeuqpXb5ATn_S_y_V-EkYudcKdrKH4Gvo8fgHgLeLWAX1v_EvwC7leO-Q</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Naber, Andrew M.</creator><creator>McDonald, Jennifer N.</creator><creator>Asenuga, Olabisi A.</creator><creator>Arthur, Winfred</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness</title><author>Naber, Andrew M. ; McDonald, Jennifer N. ; Asenuga, Olabisi A. ; Arthur, Winfred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e7d1a596e4ca31b53a4dc47b59ea177c6b587297c1938b2b0a12c19309b4926e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Catastrophic failure analysis</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naber, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Jennifer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asenuga, Olabisi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Winfred</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naber, Andrew M.</au><au>McDonald, Jennifer N.</au><au>Asenuga, Olabisi A.</au><au>Arthur, Winfred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness: A Catastrophic Relationship?</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>163-176</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><coden>HUFAA6</coden><abstract>Objective:
In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness.
Background:
Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder or facilitate the effectiveness of training for both individuals and the team as a collective. Interaction anxiety is an understudied individual difference that has been shown to be negatively related to training effectiveness in individual contexts. However, its effects in team-training contexts are yet to be investigated.
Method:
A sample of 492 students in 123 four-person teams was trained to operate a complex, computer-based team task.
Results:
Interaction anxiety negatively related to team cohesion and team-training effectiveness. A cusp catastrophe model fit the data and showed that teams with more than one high-interaction-anxiety member were negatively affected.
Conclusion:
Interaction anxiety inhibits the social activities of team training, in turn reducing team-training effectiveness when there is more than one high-interaction-anxiety individual on the training team.
Application:
These results highlight the importance of examining interaction anxiety as a training team compositional variable that may inhibit behaviors and team processes necessary to capitalize on the positive social activities on which team training depends since the interaction anxiety composition of training teams may serve as an important boundary condition on the effectiveness team-training interventions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>25790576</pmid><doi>10.1177/0018720814538814</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-7208 |
ispartof | Human factors, 2015-02, Vol.57 (1), p.163-176 |
issn | 0018-7208 1547-8181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669905825 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Adult Anxiety Behavior Boundary conditions Catastrophic failure analysis Composition effects Cooperative Behavior Correlation analysis Ergonomics Female Human factors Human performance Humans Intervention Male Mathematical models Middle Aged Models, Theoretical Space life sciences Students Task Performance and Analysis Tasks Training Young Adult |
title | Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness: A Catastrophic Relationship? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T16%3A00%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Team%20Members%E2%80%99%20Interaction%20Anxiety%20and%20Team-Training%20Effectiveness:%20A%20Catastrophic%20Relationship?&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Naber,%20Andrew%20M.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=163-176&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft.coden=HUFAA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0018720814538814&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669905825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655594862&rft_id=info:pmid/25790576&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0018720814538814&rfr_iscdi=true |