Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy systems: Comparison of photovoltaic and water thermal heater at domestic scale

This study is concerned with the results of a Life Cycle Assessment comparison between photovoltaic – silicon based modules and thin film modules – and solar thermal systems, as technologies which are usually installed for partially covering household energy demand. Several studies focused on energy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy (Oxford) 2014-12, Vol.77, p.434-446
Hauptverfasser: Carnevale, E., Lombardi, L., Zanchi, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 446
container_issue
container_start_page 434
container_title Energy (Oxford)
container_volume 77
creator Carnevale, E.
Lombardi, L.
Zanchi, L.
description This study is concerned with the results of a Life Cycle Assessment comparison between photovoltaic – silicon based modules and thin film modules – and solar thermal systems, as technologies which are usually installed for partially covering household energy demand. Several studies focused on energy and environmental performances of photovoltaic and solar thermal collectors, however they have been always analysed separately. This study proposes the comparison of different systems to exploit the solar energy, producing different energy types. The comparison was done referring to one square meter of roof surface occupied by the equipment. The environmental burdens were calculated according to the indicators proposed by Eco-indicator'95 method. The results showed that the system based on thermal solar collector obtained the major number of more favourable indicators: eight out of ten, in the case of no-recycling of materials after dismantling phase, and six out of ten in the case of recycling of materials after dismantling phase. The thin film modules and solar thermal collector showed the lowest values of energy payback time and CO2eq payback time. Results clearly show that photovoltaic and solar thermal collector can effectively provide comparable environmental and energy benefits as regard to domestic scale installation. •Photovoltaic and solar thermal were compared by Life Cycle Assessment.•For a domestic roof which is the best option for solar energy exploitation?•Results show that solar thermal system collects the major number of best scores.•If materials are recycled at the end-of-life photovoltaic results are improved.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669869361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544214010846</els_id><sourcerecordid>1669869361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7ad3d9449b54148c6ea1da90db5fc7b79cafbc8d8e66379f1d9b8aa15ac8d3523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv2zAMhX1YgWXd_kEPugzYJZ5ky4q0Q4EgaLsBAXZZzwIt0Y0C20pFpUX-fZ056HHYiSDxPZJ4ryhuBC8FF-r7vsQR09OprLiQJTclr_SHYsFrxZeNlNXH4hPRnnPeaGMWRd6GDtnm5HpkayIkGnDMLHaMYg-JzcsYnSjjQD_YJg4HSIHieGYOu5jjS-wzBMdg9OwVMiaWd5gG6NkO_7aQmY8DUp4gctDj5-Kqg57wy6VeF4_3d382P5fb3w-_Nuvt0klZ5-UKfO2NlKZtpJDaKQThwXDfNp1btSvjoGud9hqVqlemE960GkA0MA3rpqqvi2_z3kOKz8fpATsEctj3MGI8khVKGa1MrcT_oLpSopJ8QuWMuhSJEnb2kMIA6WQFt-cM7N7OttlzBpYbO2Uwyb5eLsDZhC7B6AK9ayttVCUaOXG3M4eTMy8BkyUXcHToQ0KXrY_h34feAClDox0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1668261240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy systems: Comparison of photovoltaic and water thermal heater at domestic scale</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Carnevale, E. ; Lombardi, L. ; Zanchi, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carnevale, E. ; Lombardi, L. ; Zanchi, L.</creatorcontrib><description>This study is concerned with the results of a Life Cycle Assessment comparison between photovoltaic – silicon based modules and thin film modules – and solar thermal systems, as technologies which are usually installed for partially covering household energy demand. Several studies focused on energy and environmental performances of photovoltaic and solar thermal collectors, however they have been always analysed separately. This study proposes the comparison of different systems to exploit the solar energy, producing different energy types. The comparison was done referring to one square meter of roof surface occupied by the equipment. The environmental burdens were calculated according to the indicators proposed by Eco-indicator'95 method. The results showed that the system based on thermal solar collector obtained the major number of more favourable indicators: eight out of ten, in the case of no-recycling of materials after dismantling phase, and six out of ten in the case of recycling of materials after dismantling phase. The thin film modules and solar thermal collector showed the lowest values of energy payback time and CO2eq payback time. Results clearly show that photovoltaic and solar thermal collector can effectively provide comparable environmental and energy benefits as regard to domestic scale installation. •Photovoltaic and solar thermal were compared by Life Cycle Assessment.•For a domestic roof which is the best option for solar energy exploitation?•Results show that solar thermal system collects the major number of best scores.•If materials are recycled at the end-of-life photovoltaic results are improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.028</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENEYDS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Domestic scale ; Energy ; Equipments, installations and applications ; Exact sciences and technology ; Indicators ; Life Cycle Assessment ; Modules ; Natural energy ; Photovoltaic ; Photovoltaic cells ; Photovoltaic conversion ; Solar cells ; Solar collectors ; Solar energy ; Thermal collector ; Thin films</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2014-12, Vol.77, p.434-446</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7ad3d9449b54148c6ea1da90db5fc7b79cafbc8d8e66379f1d9b8aa15ac8d3523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7ad3d9449b54148c6ea1da90db5fc7b79cafbc8d8e66379f1d9b8aa15ac8d3523</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4166-5768</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214010846$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28962154$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carnevale, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanchi, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy systems: Comparison of photovoltaic and water thermal heater at domestic scale</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>This study is concerned with the results of a Life Cycle Assessment comparison between photovoltaic – silicon based modules and thin film modules – and solar thermal systems, as technologies which are usually installed for partially covering household energy demand. Several studies focused on energy and environmental performances of photovoltaic and solar thermal collectors, however they have been always analysed separately. This study proposes the comparison of different systems to exploit the solar energy, producing different energy types. The comparison was done referring to one square meter of roof surface occupied by the equipment. The environmental burdens were calculated according to the indicators proposed by Eco-indicator'95 method. The results showed that the system based on thermal solar collector obtained the major number of more favourable indicators: eight out of ten, in the case of no-recycling of materials after dismantling phase, and six out of ten in the case of recycling of materials after dismantling phase. The thin film modules and solar thermal collector showed the lowest values of energy payback time and CO2eq payback time. Results clearly show that photovoltaic and solar thermal collector can effectively provide comparable environmental and energy benefits as regard to domestic scale installation. •Photovoltaic and solar thermal were compared by Life Cycle Assessment.•For a domestic roof which is the best option for solar energy exploitation?•Results show that solar thermal system collects the major number of best scores.•If materials are recycled at the end-of-life photovoltaic results are improved.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Domestic scale</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Equipments, installations and applications</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Life Cycle Assessment</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Photovoltaic</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Photovoltaic conversion</subject><subject>Solar cells</subject><subject>Solar collectors</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Thermal collector</subject><subject>Thin films</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUFv2zAMhX1YgWXd_kEPugzYJZ5ky4q0Q4EgaLsBAXZZzwIt0Y0C20pFpUX-fZ056HHYiSDxPZJ4ryhuBC8FF-r7vsQR09OprLiQJTclr_SHYsFrxZeNlNXH4hPRnnPeaGMWRd6GDtnm5HpkayIkGnDMLHaMYg-JzcsYnSjjQD_YJg4HSIHieGYOu5jjS-wzBMdg9OwVMiaWd5gG6NkO_7aQmY8DUp4gctDj5-Kqg57wy6VeF4_3d382P5fb3w-_Nuvt0klZ5-UKfO2NlKZtpJDaKQThwXDfNp1btSvjoGud9hqVqlemE960GkA0MA3rpqqvi2_z3kOKz8fpATsEctj3MGI8khVKGa1MrcT_oLpSopJ8QuWMuhSJEnb2kMIA6WQFt-cM7N7OttlzBpYbO2Uwyb5eLsDZhC7B6AK9ayttVCUaOXG3M4eTMy8BkyUXcHToQ0KXrY_h34feAClDox0</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Carnevale, E.</creator><creator>Lombardi, L.</creator><creator>Zanchi, L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-5768</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy systems: Comparison of photovoltaic and water thermal heater at domestic scale</title><author>Carnevale, E. ; Lombardi, L. ; Zanchi, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7ad3d9449b54148c6ea1da90db5fc7b79cafbc8d8e66379f1d9b8aa15ac8d3523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Domestic scale</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Equipments, installations and applications</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Life Cycle Assessment</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Photovoltaic</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Photovoltaic conversion</topic><topic>Solar cells</topic><topic>Solar collectors</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Thermal collector</topic><topic>Thin films</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carnevale, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanchi, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carnevale, E.</au><au>Lombardi, L.</au><au>Zanchi, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy systems: Comparison of photovoltaic and water thermal heater at domestic scale</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>77</volume><spage>434</spage><epage>446</epage><pages>434-446</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><coden>ENEYDS</coden><abstract>This study is concerned with the results of a Life Cycle Assessment comparison between photovoltaic – silicon based modules and thin film modules – and solar thermal systems, as technologies which are usually installed for partially covering household energy demand. Several studies focused on energy and environmental performances of photovoltaic and solar thermal collectors, however they have been always analysed separately. This study proposes the comparison of different systems to exploit the solar energy, producing different energy types. The comparison was done referring to one square meter of roof surface occupied by the equipment. The environmental burdens were calculated according to the indicators proposed by Eco-indicator'95 method. The results showed that the system based on thermal solar collector obtained the major number of more favourable indicators: eight out of ten, in the case of no-recycling of materials after dismantling phase, and six out of ten in the case of recycling of materials after dismantling phase. The thin film modules and solar thermal collector showed the lowest values of energy payback time and CO2eq payback time. Results clearly show that photovoltaic and solar thermal collector can effectively provide comparable environmental and energy benefits as regard to domestic scale installation. •Photovoltaic and solar thermal were compared by Life Cycle Assessment.•For a domestic roof which is the best option for solar energy exploitation?•Results show that solar thermal system collects the major number of best scores.•If materials are recycled at the end-of-life photovoltaic results are improved.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.028</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-5768</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-5442
ispartof Energy (Oxford), 2014-12, Vol.77, p.434-446
issn 0360-5442
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669869361
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Domestic scale
Energy
Equipments, installations and applications
Exact sciences and technology
Indicators
Life Cycle Assessment
Modules
Natural energy
Photovoltaic
Photovoltaic cells
Photovoltaic conversion
Solar cells
Solar collectors
Solar energy
Thermal collector
Thin films
title Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy systems: Comparison of photovoltaic and water thermal heater at domestic scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T22%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20Cycle%20Assessment%20of%20solar%20energy%20systems:%20Comparison%20of%20photovoltaic%20and%20water%20thermal%20heater%20at%20domestic%20scale&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Carnevale,%20E.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=77&rft.spage=434&rft.epage=446&rft.pages=434-446&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.coden=ENEYDS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669869361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1668261240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360544214010846&rfr_iscdi=true