Analysis and assessment of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident: Lessons learnt
A devastating crude oil vapor explosion accident, which killed 62 people and injured 136, occurred on November 22, 2013. It was one of the most disastrous vapor cloud explosion accidents that happened in Qingdao's storm drains in China. It was noted that blast overpressure and flying debris wer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2015-01, Vol.33, p.289-303 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 303 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 289 |
container_title | Journal of loss prevention in the process industries |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Zhu, Yi Qian, Xin-ming Liu, Zhen-yi Huang, Ping Yuan, Meng-qi |
description | A devastating crude oil vapor explosion accident, which killed 62 people and injured 136, occurred on November 22, 2013. It was one of the most disastrous vapor cloud explosion accidents that happened in Qingdao's storm drains in China. It was noted that blast overpressure and flying debris were the main causes of human deaths, personal injuries and structure damages. Two months after the accident, it was reported that there were three contentious issues in the investigation report. First issue was the discrepancy between the temperature of the crude oil vapor explosive limits which were measured by the investigation panel and the temperature reported by the local fire department. Second issue was the contradiction between the upper explosive limit and vapor pressure of the crude oil vapor. The last issue was the location of the ignition source which led to the explosion.
In the present study some specific features of this accident and various causes led to the explosion, high casualties and severe damages were analyzed. Three contentious issues in the official investigation report were investigated and tested in detail. The first element tested was the explosive limits and limiting oxygen concentration of the crude oil vapor at different temperatures. Based on theoretical analysis and field investigations, the last two elements in the report were analyzed from multiple perspectives. Based on the TNO Multi-Energy model and PROBIT equations, damage probability of affected people at the leaking site was also estimated. The investigation concluded with a result that precautions need to be taken to prevent flammable gas explosions in the drainage systems. Key steps were explicitly discussed for improving the hazard identification and risk assessment of similar accidents in the future.
•Some special features of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident are identified.•Various causes which lead the explosion, high casualties and severe damages are analyzed.•Three contentious issues in the official investigation report are tested and investigated.•Lessons learnt and preventive measures suggested for Qingdao-like accidents are discussed.•Some critical and interesting issues need to be further studied about Qingdao accident are put forward. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669858182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0950423015000054</els_id><sourcerecordid>1669858182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6fba05fa52ef7bf4e99a4b7de192f85022c37ba9aa597f2d167ad59b824700383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkT9v1TAURy0EEo-WD8BmiYUl6bUTxzZMVcWfSk9CldqByXLsa3CUFwc7r6LfHj89JgbEdJdz7nB-hLxh0DJgw9XUTvPacmCiBdYC9M_IjinZNV0n-HOyAy2g6XkHL8mrUiYAJkHJHfl2vdj5qcRC7eKpLQVLOeCy0RTo9gPpXVy-e5uoy0ePNMWZPto1ZYq_1jmVmBZqnYu-Gu_pvrppKXRGm5ftkrwIdi74-s-9IA-fPt7ffGn2Xz_f3lzvG9dztTVDGC2IYAXHIMfQo9a2H6VHpnlQAjh3nRyttlZoGbhng7Re6FHxXgJ0qrsg785_15x-HrFs5hCLw3m2C6ZjMWwYtBKKKf4_KPS1JpzQt3-hUzrm2upEiV4PNa6oFDtTLqdSMgaz5niw-ckwMKddzGTqLua0iwFm6i7V-XB2sEZ5jJhNcREXhz5mdJvxKf7D_g06ApT5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1654961875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis and assessment of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident: Lessons learnt</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Zhu, Yi ; Qian, Xin-ming ; Liu, Zhen-yi ; Huang, Ping ; Yuan, Meng-qi</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yi ; Qian, Xin-ming ; Liu, Zhen-yi ; Huang, Ping ; Yuan, Meng-qi</creatorcontrib><description>A devastating crude oil vapor explosion accident, which killed 62 people and injured 136, occurred on November 22, 2013. It was one of the most disastrous vapor cloud explosion accidents that happened in Qingdao's storm drains in China. It was noted that blast overpressure and flying debris were the main causes of human deaths, personal injuries and structure damages. Two months after the accident, it was reported that there were three contentious issues in the investigation report. First issue was the discrepancy between the temperature of the crude oil vapor explosive limits which were measured by the investigation panel and the temperature reported by the local fire department. Second issue was the contradiction between the upper explosive limit and vapor pressure of the crude oil vapor. The last issue was the location of the ignition source which led to the explosion.
In the present study some specific features of this accident and various causes led to the explosion, high casualties and severe damages were analyzed. Three contentious issues in the official investigation report were investigated and tested in detail. The first element tested was the explosive limits and limiting oxygen concentration of the crude oil vapor at different temperatures. Based on theoretical analysis and field investigations, the last two elements in the report were analyzed from multiple perspectives. Based on the TNO Multi-Energy model and PROBIT equations, damage probability of affected people at the leaking site was also estimated. The investigation concluded with a result that precautions need to be taken to prevent flammable gas explosions in the drainage systems. Key steps were explicitly discussed for improving the hazard identification and risk assessment of similar accidents in the future.
•Some special features of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident are identified.•Various causes which lead the explosion, high casualties and severe damages are analyzed.•Three contentious issues in the official investigation report are tested and investigated.•Lessons learnt and preventive measures suggested for Qingdao-like accidents are discussed.•Some critical and interesting issues need to be further studied about Qingdao accident are put forward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-4230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accident analysis ; Accidents ; Casualties ; Clouds ; Confined vapor cloud explosion ; Crude oil ; Crude oil vapor ; Damage ; Deflagration ; Detonation ; Explosions ; Gas explosions ; Industrial accidents ; Injuries ; Oxygen ; Precautions ; Risk assessment ; Urban storm drain</subject><ispartof>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 2015-01, Vol.33, p.289-303</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6fba05fa52ef7bf4e99a4b7de192f85022c37ba9aa597f2d167ad59b824700383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6fba05fa52ef7bf4e99a4b7de192f85022c37ba9aa597f2d167ad59b824700383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Xin-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhen-yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Meng-qi</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis and assessment of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident: Lessons learnt</title><title>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries</title><description>A devastating crude oil vapor explosion accident, which killed 62 people and injured 136, occurred on November 22, 2013. It was one of the most disastrous vapor cloud explosion accidents that happened in Qingdao's storm drains in China. It was noted that blast overpressure and flying debris were the main causes of human deaths, personal injuries and structure damages. Two months after the accident, it was reported that there were three contentious issues in the investigation report. First issue was the discrepancy between the temperature of the crude oil vapor explosive limits which were measured by the investigation panel and the temperature reported by the local fire department. Second issue was the contradiction between the upper explosive limit and vapor pressure of the crude oil vapor. The last issue was the location of the ignition source which led to the explosion.
In the present study some specific features of this accident and various causes led to the explosion, high casualties and severe damages were analyzed. Three contentious issues in the official investigation report were investigated and tested in detail. The first element tested was the explosive limits and limiting oxygen concentration of the crude oil vapor at different temperatures. Based on theoretical analysis and field investigations, the last two elements in the report were analyzed from multiple perspectives. Based on the TNO Multi-Energy model and PROBIT equations, damage probability of affected people at the leaking site was also estimated. The investigation concluded with a result that precautions need to be taken to prevent flammable gas explosions in the drainage systems. Key steps were explicitly discussed for improving the hazard identification and risk assessment of similar accidents in the future.
•Some special features of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident are identified.•Various causes which lead the explosion, high casualties and severe damages are analyzed.•Three contentious issues in the official investigation report are tested and investigated.•Lessons learnt and preventive measures suggested for Qingdao-like accidents are discussed.•Some critical and interesting issues need to be further studied about Qingdao accident are put forward.</description><subject>Accident analysis</subject><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Casualties</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Confined vapor cloud explosion</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Crude oil vapor</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Deflagration</subject><subject>Detonation</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Gas explosions</subject><subject>Industrial accidents</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Precautions</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Urban storm drain</subject><issn>0950-4230</issn><issn>1873-3352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkT9v1TAURy0EEo-WD8BmiYUl6bUTxzZMVcWfSk9CldqByXLsa3CUFwc7r6LfHj89JgbEdJdz7nB-hLxh0DJgw9XUTvPacmCiBdYC9M_IjinZNV0n-HOyAy2g6XkHL8mrUiYAJkHJHfl2vdj5qcRC7eKpLQVLOeCy0RTo9gPpXVy-e5uoy0ePNMWZPto1ZYq_1jmVmBZqnYu-Gu_pvrppKXRGm5ftkrwIdi74-s-9IA-fPt7ffGn2Xz_f3lzvG9dztTVDGC2IYAXHIMfQo9a2H6VHpnlQAjh3nRyttlZoGbhng7Re6FHxXgJ0qrsg785_15x-HrFs5hCLw3m2C6ZjMWwYtBKKKf4_KPS1JpzQt3-hUzrm2upEiV4PNa6oFDtTLqdSMgaz5niw-ckwMKddzGTqLua0iwFm6i7V-XB2sEZ5jJhNcREXhz5mdJvxKf7D_g06ApT5</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Zhu, Yi</creator><creator>Qian, Xin-ming</creator><creator>Liu, Zhen-yi</creator><creator>Huang, Ping</creator><creator>Yuan, Meng-qi</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Analysis and assessment of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident: Lessons learnt</title><author>Zhu, Yi ; Qian, Xin-ming ; Liu, Zhen-yi ; Huang, Ping ; Yuan, Meng-qi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6fba05fa52ef7bf4e99a4b7de192f85022c37ba9aa597f2d167ad59b824700383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accident analysis</topic><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Casualties</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Confined vapor cloud explosion</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Crude oil vapor</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Deflagration</topic><topic>Detonation</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Gas explosions</topic><topic>Industrial accidents</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Precautions</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Urban storm drain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Xin-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhen-yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Meng-qi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Yi</au><au>Qian, Xin-ming</au><au>Liu, Zhen-yi</au><au>Huang, Ping</au><au>Yuan, Meng-qi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis and assessment of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident: Lessons learnt</atitle><jtitle>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries</jtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>33</volume><spage>289</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>289-303</pages><issn>0950-4230</issn><eissn>1873-3352</eissn><abstract>A devastating crude oil vapor explosion accident, which killed 62 people and injured 136, occurred on November 22, 2013. It was one of the most disastrous vapor cloud explosion accidents that happened in Qingdao's storm drains in China. It was noted that blast overpressure and flying debris were the main causes of human deaths, personal injuries and structure damages. Two months after the accident, it was reported that there were three contentious issues in the investigation report. First issue was the discrepancy between the temperature of the crude oil vapor explosive limits which were measured by the investigation panel and the temperature reported by the local fire department. Second issue was the contradiction between the upper explosive limit and vapor pressure of the crude oil vapor. The last issue was the location of the ignition source which led to the explosion.
In the present study some specific features of this accident and various causes led to the explosion, high casualties and severe damages were analyzed. Three contentious issues in the official investigation report were investigated and tested in detail. The first element tested was the explosive limits and limiting oxygen concentration of the crude oil vapor at different temperatures. Based on theoretical analysis and field investigations, the last two elements in the report were analyzed from multiple perspectives. Based on the TNO Multi-Energy model and PROBIT equations, damage probability of affected people at the leaking site was also estimated. The investigation concluded with a result that precautions need to be taken to prevent flammable gas explosions in the drainage systems. Key steps were explicitly discussed for improving the hazard identification and risk assessment of similar accidents in the future.
•Some special features of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident are identified.•Various causes which lead the explosion, high casualties and severe damages are analyzed.•Three contentious issues in the official investigation report are tested and investigated.•Lessons learnt and preventive measures suggested for Qingdao-like accidents are discussed.•Some critical and interesting issues need to be further studied about Qingdao accident are put forward.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.004</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-4230 |
ispartof | Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 2015-01, Vol.33, p.289-303 |
issn | 0950-4230 1873-3352 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669858182 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Accident analysis Accidents Casualties Clouds Confined vapor cloud explosion Crude oil Crude oil vapor Damage Deflagration Detonation Explosions Gas explosions Industrial accidents Injuries Oxygen Precautions Risk assessment Urban storm drain |
title | Analysis and assessment of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident: Lessons learnt |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T15%3A17%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20and%20assessment%20of%20the%20Qingdao%20crude%20oil%20vapor%20explosion%20accident:%20Lessons%20learnt&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20loss%20prevention%20in%20the%20process%20industries&rft.au=Zhu,%20Yi&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=33&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=289-303&rft.issn=0950-4230&rft.eissn=1873-3352&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669858182%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1654961875&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0950423015000054&rfr_iscdi=true |