Heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia at the landscape scale and consequences for environmental impact assessment
We examined the consequences of the spatial heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) by measuring and modelling NH3 concentrations and deposition at 25 m grid resolution for a rural landscape containing intensive poultry farming, agricultural grassland, woodland and moorland. The emission pattern...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental pollution (1987) 2013-08, Vol.179, p.120-131 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 131 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 120 |
| container_title | Environmental pollution (1987) |
| container_volume | 179 |
| creator | Vogt, Esther Dragosits, Ulrike Braban, Christine F. Theobald, Mark R. Dore, Anthony J. van Dijk, Netty Tang, Y. Sim McDonald, Chris Murray, Scott Rees, Robert M. Sutton, Mark A. |
| description | We examined the consequences of the spatial heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) by measuring and modelling NH3 concentrations and deposition at 25 m grid resolution for a rural landscape containing intensive poultry farming, agricultural grassland, woodland and moorland. The emission pattern gave rise to a high spatial variability of modelled mean annual NH3 concentrations and dry deposition. Largest impacts were predicted for woodland patches located within the agricultural area, while larger moorland areas were at low risk, due to atmospheric dispersion, prevailing wind direction and low NH3 background. These high resolution spatial details are lost in national scale estimates at 1 km resolution due to less detailed emission input maps. The results demonstrate how the spatial arrangement of sources and sinks is critical to defining the NH3 risk to semi-natural ecosystems. These spatial relationships provide the foundation for local spatial planning approaches to reduce environmental impacts of atmospheric NH3.
•Local farm inventory provided field-level emissions for high resolution modelling.•Model-derived concentrations were compared against intensive spatial measurements.•Spatial arrangement of NH3 sources and sinks is critical to environmental impact.•Average national emission factors were not appropriate for an NH3 risk assessment.•Modelling at 1 km resolution did not capture the full spatial variability of NH3.
Fine scale resolution modelling to reproduce the spatial heterogeneity of atmospheric NH3 concentrations and deposition is critical for NH3 risk assessment on sensitive ecosystems. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.014 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669857737</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749113002157</els_id><sourcerecordid>1365051822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d32d4b4b977b9f040111b6c095f6aaf9e77d75efa7609a4d26ca316f0dc93733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQQC1E1S6Ff4DAF6ReEvwVO74goYrSSpU4QM-W44xbr5I42NlK_fc4yhZuqBdbHr3xzPgZofeU1JRQ-Xlfw_Q4x6FmhPKaiJpQ8QrtaKt4JQUTr9GOMKkrJTQ9Q29y3hNCBOf8FJ0xLqUWku7QfA0LpHgPE4TlCUeP7TLGPD9ACg7bcYxTsCWGlwfAg5367OwMuKwD4HLELk4Zfh9gcpCxjwmXrkKK0wjTYgccxtm6BducIec19hadeDtkeHfcz9Hd1bdfl9fV7Y_vN5dfbyvXsHapVM9ZLzrRaaU67YkglNJOOqIbL631GpTqVQPeKkm0FT2TznIqPemd5orzc3Sx3TunWNrLixlDdjCUGSAesqHlBdpGqcK-ABVUt1K_AOWyIQ1tGSuo2FCXYs4JvJlTGG16MpSY1aDZm82gWQ0aIkwxWNI-HCscuhH6v0nPygrw6QjY1YJPdnIh_-OU4ELxtf7HjfM2GnufCnP3s1RqyjegjPO2EF82AoqHxwDJZBdWkX1I4BbTx_D_Xv8A3HjFyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1365051822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia at the landscape scale and consequences for environmental impact assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Vogt, Esther ; Dragosits, Ulrike ; Braban, Christine F. ; Theobald, Mark R. ; Dore, Anthony J. ; van Dijk, Netty ; Tang, Y. Sim ; McDonald, Chris ; Murray, Scott ; Rees, Robert M. ; Sutton, Mark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Esther ; Dragosits, Ulrike ; Braban, Christine F. ; Theobald, Mark R. ; Dore, Anthony J. ; van Dijk, Netty ; Tang, Y. Sim ; McDonald, Chris ; Murray, Scott ; Rees, Robert M. ; Sutton, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the consequences of the spatial heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) by measuring and modelling NH3 concentrations and deposition at 25 m grid resolution for a rural landscape containing intensive poultry farming, agricultural grassland, woodland and moorland. The emission pattern gave rise to a high spatial variability of modelled mean annual NH3 concentrations and dry deposition. Largest impacts were predicted for woodland patches located within the agricultural area, while larger moorland areas were at low risk, due to atmospheric dispersion, prevailing wind direction and low NH3 background. These high resolution spatial details are lost in national scale estimates at 1 km resolution due to less detailed emission input maps. The results demonstrate how the spatial arrangement of sources and sinks is critical to defining the NH3 risk to semi-natural ecosystems. These spatial relationships provide the foundation for local spatial planning approaches to reduce environmental impacts of atmospheric NH3.
•Local farm inventory provided field-level emissions for high resolution modelling.•Model-derived concentrations were compared against intensive spatial measurements.•Spatial arrangement of NH3 sources and sinks is critical to environmental impact.•Average national emission factors were not appropriate for an NH3 risk assessment.•Modelling at 1 km resolution did not capture the full spatial variability of NH3.
Fine scale resolution modelling to reproduce the spatial heterogeneity of atmospheric NH3 concentrations and deposition is critical for NH3 risk assessment on sensitive ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23669461</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENVPAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural development. Rural area planning ; Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Air Pollutants - analysis ; Ammonia ; Ammonia - analysis ; Applied sciences ; Atmosphere - chemistry ; Atmospheric pollution ; Atmospherics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Critical level ; Deposition ; Dispersion modelling ; dry deposition ; Ecosystem ; ecosystems ; Environment ; environmental assessment ; environmental impact ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; Farming ; farming systems ; Farms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; grasslands ; heathlands ; Heterogeneity ; Landscape scale ; Landscapes ; Mathematical models ; Models, Chemical ; planning ; Pollution ; poultry ; Risk ; Spatial planning ; wind direction ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2013-08, Vol.179, p.120-131</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d32d4b4b977b9f040111b6c095f6aaf9e77d75efa7609a4d26ca316f0dc93733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d32d4b4b977b9f040111b6c095f6aaf9e77d75efa7609a4d26ca316f0dc93733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27434732$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23669461$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dragosits, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braban, Christine F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theobald, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dore, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Netty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Y. Sim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia at the landscape scale and consequences for environmental impact assessment</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>We examined the consequences of the spatial heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) by measuring and modelling NH3 concentrations and deposition at 25 m grid resolution for a rural landscape containing intensive poultry farming, agricultural grassland, woodland and moorland. The emission pattern gave rise to a high spatial variability of modelled mean annual NH3 concentrations and dry deposition. Largest impacts were predicted for woodland patches located within the agricultural area, while larger moorland areas were at low risk, due to atmospheric dispersion, prevailing wind direction and low NH3 background. These high resolution spatial details are lost in national scale estimates at 1 km resolution due to less detailed emission input maps. The results demonstrate how the spatial arrangement of sources and sinks is critical to defining the NH3 risk to semi-natural ecosystems. These spatial relationships provide the foundation for local spatial planning approaches to reduce environmental impacts of atmospheric NH3.
•Local farm inventory provided field-level emissions for high resolution modelling.•Model-derived concentrations were compared against intensive spatial measurements.•Spatial arrangement of NH3 sources and sinks is critical to environmental impact.•Average national emission factors were not appropriate for an NH3 risk assessment.•Modelling at 1 km resolution did not capture the full spatial variability of NH3.
Fine scale resolution modelling to reproduce the spatial heterogeneity of atmospheric NH3 concentrations and deposition is critical for NH3 risk assessment on sensitive ecosystems.</description><subject>Agricultural development. Rural area planning</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Ammonia - analysis</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmosphere - chemistry</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Critical level</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Dispersion modelling</subject><subject>dry deposition</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>environmental assessment</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>farming systems</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>heathlands</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Landscape scale</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Models, Chemical</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>poultry</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Spatial planning</subject><subject>wind direction</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQQC1E1S6Ff4DAF6ReEvwVO74goYrSSpU4QM-W44xbr5I42NlK_fc4yhZuqBdbHr3xzPgZofeU1JRQ-Xlfw_Q4x6FmhPKaiJpQ8QrtaKt4JQUTr9GOMKkrJTQ9Q29y3hNCBOf8FJ0xLqUWku7QfA0LpHgPE4TlCUeP7TLGPD9ACg7bcYxTsCWGlwfAg5367OwMuKwD4HLELk4Zfh9gcpCxjwmXrkKK0wjTYgccxtm6BducIec19hadeDtkeHfcz9Hd1bdfl9fV7Y_vN5dfbyvXsHapVM9ZLzrRaaU67YkglNJOOqIbL631GpTqVQPeKkm0FT2TznIqPemd5orzc3Sx3TunWNrLixlDdjCUGSAesqHlBdpGqcK-ABVUt1K_AOWyIQ1tGSuo2FCXYs4JvJlTGG16MpSY1aDZm82gWQ0aIkwxWNI-HCscuhH6v0nPygrw6QjY1YJPdnIh_-OU4ELxtf7HjfM2GnufCnP3s1RqyjegjPO2EF82AoqHxwDJZBdWkX1I4BbTx_D_Xv8A3HjFyQ</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Vogt, Esther</creator><creator>Dragosits, Ulrike</creator><creator>Braban, Christine F.</creator><creator>Theobald, Mark R.</creator><creator>Dore, Anthony J.</creator><creator>van Dijk, Netty</creator><creator>Tang, Y. Sim</creator><creator>McDonald, Chris</creator><creator>Murray, Scott</creator><creator>Rees, Robert M.</creator><creator>Sutton, Mark A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia at the landscape scale and consequences for environmental impact assessment</title><author>Vogt, Esther ; Dragosits, Ulrike ; Braban, Christine F. ; Theobald, Mark R. ; Dore, Anthony J. ; van Dijk, Netty ; Tang, Y. Sim ; McDonald, Chris ; Murray, Scott ; Rees, Robert M. ; Sutton, Mark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d32d4b4b977b9f040111b6c095f6aaf9e77d75efa7609a4d26ca316f0dc93733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural development. Rural area planning</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Ammonia - analysis</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmosphere - chemistry</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Critical level</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Dispersion modelling</topic><topic>dry deposition</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>environmental assessment</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>farming systems</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>heathlands</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Landscape scale</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Models, Chemical</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>poultry</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Spatial planning</topic><topic>wind direction</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dragosits, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braban, Christine F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theobald, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dore, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Netty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Y. Sim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vogt, Esther</au><au>Dragosits, Ulrike</au><au>Braban, Christine F.</au><au>Theobald, Mark R.</au><au>Dore, Anthony J.</au><au>van Dijk, Netty</au><au>Tang, Y. Sim</au><au>McDonald, Chris</au><au>Murray, Scott</au><au>Rees, Robert M.</au><au>Sutton, Mark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia at the landscape scale and consequences for environmental impact assessment</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>179</volume><spage>120</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>120-131</pages><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><coden>ENVPAF</coden><abstract>We examined the consequences of the spatial heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) by measuring and modelling NH3 concentrations and deposition at 25 m grid resolution for a rural landscape containing intensive poultry farming, agricultural grassland, woodland and moorland. The emission pattern gave rise to a high spatial variability of modelled mean annual NH3 concentrations and dry deposition. Largest impacts were predicted for woodland patches located within the agricultural area, while larger moorland areas were at low risk, due to atmospheric dispersion, prevailing wind direction and low NH3 background. These high resolution spatial details are lost in national scale estimates at 1 km resolution due to less detailed emission input maps. The results demonstrate how the spatial arrangement of sources and sinks is critical to defining the NH3 risk to semi-natural ecosystems. These spatial relationships provide the foundation for local spatial planning approaches to reduce environmental impacts of atmospheric NH3.
•Local farm inventory provided field-level emissions for high resolution modelling.•Model-derived concentrations were compared against intensive spatial measurements.•Spatial arrangement of NH3 sources and sinks is critical to environmental impact.•Average national emission factors were not appropriate for an NH3 risk assessment.•Modelling at 1 km resolution did not capture the full spatial variability of NH3.
Fine scale resolution modelling to reproduce the spatial heterogeneity of atmospheric NH3 concentrations and deposition is critical for NH3 risk assessment on sensitive ecosystems.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23669461</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.014</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0269-7491 |
| ispartof | Environmental pollution (1987), 2013-08, Vol.179, p.120-131 |
| issn | 0269-7491 1873-6424 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669857737 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Agricultural development. Rural area planning Agriculture Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Air Pollutants - analysis Ammonia Ammonia - analysis Applied sciences Atmosphere - chemistry Atmospheric pollution Atmospherics Biological and medical sciences Critical level Deposition Dispersion modelling dry deposition Ecosystem ecosystems Environment environmental assessment environmental impact Environmental Monitoring Exact sciences and technology Farming farming systems Farms Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping General agronomy. Plant production Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development grasslands heathlands Heterogeneity Landscape scale Landscapes Mathematical models Models, Chemical planning Pollution poultry Risk Spatial planning wind direction Woodlands |
| title | Heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia at the landscape scale and consequences for environmental impact assessment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A31%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heterogeneity%20of%20atmospheric%20ammonia%20at%20the%20landscape%20scale%20and%20consequences%20for%20environmental%20impact%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Vogt,%20Esther&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=179&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=120-131&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft.coden=ENVPAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1365051822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1365051822&rft_id=info:pmid/23669461&rft_els_id=S0269749113002157&rfr_iscdi=true |