Comparative Study on Design of Experiment in Frequency-Based Response Surface Methodology for Damage Detection
This paper investigates the performance of design of experiment (DOE) in response surface methodology (RSM) for vibration-based damage detection. The ability of three major types of DOE, namely central composite design (CCD), Box-Behnken (BBD) and D-optimal (Dopt) for damage detection based on modal...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied Mechanics and Materials 2015-02, Vol.735 (Technology and Engineering Reviews and Research Advances I), p.168-173 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 173 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Technology and Engineering Reviews and Research Advances I |
| container_start_page | 168 |
| container_title | Applied Mechanics and Materials |
| container_volume | 735 |
| creator | Umar, Sarehati Bakhary, Norhisham Mohd Yassin, Airil Yasreen |
| description | This paper investigates the performance of design of experiment (DOE) in response surface methodology (RSM) for vibration-based damage detection. The ability of three major types of DOE, namely central composite design (CCD), Box-Behnken (BBD) and D-optimal (Dopt) for damage detection based on modal frequency are investigated and compared. A procedure comprising three main stages—sampling, response surface (RS) modelling and model updating—are employed for damage localisation and quantification. By considering Young’s modulus and modal frequency as respective input and output, a set of samples is generated from each DOE. Full quadratic functions are considered in RS modelling while model updating is performed for damage detection. The performances of DOE are compared based on damage detectability. A numerical simply supported beam is used as case study by considering several single damage cases. The results show that CCD provides better prediction compared to other DOEs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.735.168 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669855069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1669855069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2348-3d79ada347bf9962e09e3b921362ebcd1d3fd2432e280de808b5a731dce530043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoNWsK3-h4Ag3sw0XzOT3Ih1-6HQpeDHdcgmZ7Ypu8mYZFz33xu7gtKrXiWQN885vA9CbylpBWHybLfbtdl6CMWP3rYBytn5ctkOvGtpL5-hY9r3rBmEZM_RCSdc8k5QRo4eHkijOO9fopOc7wnpBRXyGIVF3E4mmeJ_Av5aZrfHMeALyH4dcBzx5a8Jkt_WidgHfJXgxwzB7puPJoPDXyBPMeT6c06jsYCXUO6ii5u43uMxJnxhtmYNlVfAFh_DK_RiNJsMr_-ep-j71eW3xafm5vb68-L8prGMC9lwNyjjDBfDalSqZ0AU8JVilNf7yjrq-OiY4AyYJA4kkavODJw6Cx0nRPBT9O7AnVKsG-eitz5b2GxMgDhnXetQsutIr2r0zaPofZxTqNvVVCeHQamur6n3h5RNMecEo55qLSbtNSX6jxtd3eh_bnR1o6sbXd1UjqyADwdASSbkWsfdf3OehvgN5PGe2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1658779956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study on Design of Experiment in Frequency-Based Response Surface Methodology for Damage Detection</title><source>Scientific.net Journals</source><creator>Umar, Sarehati ; Bakhary, Norhisham ; Mohd Yassin, Airil Yasreen</creator><creatorcontrib>Umar, Sarehati ; Bakhary, Norhisham ; Mohd Yassin, Airil Yasreen</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the performance of design of experiment (DOE) in response surface methodology (RSM) for vibration-based damage detection. The ability of three major types of DOE, namely central composite design (CCD), Box-Behnken (BBD) and D-optimal (Dopt) for damage detection based on modal frequency are investigated and compared. A procedure comprising three main stages—sampling, response surface (RS) modelling and model updating—are employed for damage localisation and quantification. By considering Young’s modulus and modal frequency as respective input and output, a set of samples is generated from each DOE. Full quadratic functions are considered in RS modelling while model updating is performed for damage detection. The performances of DOE are compared based on damage detectability. A numerical simply supported beam is used as case study by considering several single damage cases. The results show that CCD provides better prediction compared to other DOEs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-9336</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1662-7482</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3038354120</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783038354123</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-7482</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.735.168</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zurich: Trans Tech Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Charge coupled devices ; Damage ; Damage detection ; Design of experiments ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Response surface methodology</subject><ispartof>Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2015-02, Vol.735 (Technology and Engineering Reviews and Research Advances I), p.168-173</ispartof><rights>2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Feb 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2348-3d79ada347bf9962e09e3b921362ebcd1d3fd2432e280de808b5a731dce530043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2348-3d79ada347bf9962e09e3b921362ebcd1d3fd2432e280de808b5a731dce530043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.scientific.net/Image/TitleCover/3824?width=600</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Umar, Sarehati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakhary, Norhisham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohd Yassin, Airil Yasreen</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study on Design of Experiment in Frequency-Based Response Surface Methodology for Damage Detection</title><title>Applied Mechanics and Materials</title><description>This paper investigates the performance of design of experiment (DOE) in response surface methodology (RSM) for vibration-based damage detection. The ability of three major types of DOE, namely central composite design (CCD), Box-Behnken (BBD) and D-optimal (Dopt) for damage detection based on modal frequency are investigated and compared. A procedure comprising three main stages—sampling, response surface (RS) modelling and model updating—are employed for damage localisation and quantification. By considering Young’s modulus and modal frequency as respective input and output, a set of samples is generated from each DOE. Full quadratic functions are considered in RS modelling while model updating is performed for damage detection. The performances of DOE are compared based on damage detectability. A numerical simply supported beam is used as case study by considering several single damage cases. The results show that CCD provides better prediction compared to other DOEs.</description><subject>Charge coupled devices</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Damage detection</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><issn>1660-9336</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><isbn>3038354120</isbn><isbn>9783038354123</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoNWsK3-h4Ag3sw0XzOT3Ih1-6HQpeDHdcgmZ7Ypu8mYZFz33xu7gtKrXiWQN885vA9CbylpBWHybLfbtdl6CMWP3rYBytn5ctkOvGtpL5-hY9r3rBmEZM_RCSdc8k5QRo4eHkijOO9fopOc7wnpBRXyGIVF3E4mmeJ_Av5aZrfHMeALyH4dcBzx5a8Jkt_WidgHfJXgxwzB7puPJoPDXyBPMeT6c06jsYCXUO6ii5u43uMxJnxhtmYNlVfAFh_DK_RiNJsMr_-ep-j71eW3xafm5vb68-L8prGMC9lwNyjjDBfDalSqZ0AU8JVilNf7yjrq-OiY4AyYJA4kkavODJw6Cx0nRPBT9O7AnVKsG-eitz5b2GxMgDhnXetQsutIr2r0zaPofZxTqNvVVCeHQamur6n3h5RNMecEo55qLSbtNSX6jxtd3eh_bnR1o6sbXd1UjqyADwdASSbkWsfdf3OehvgN5PGe2g</recordid><startdate>20150225</startdate><enddate>20150225</enddate><creator>Umar, Sarehati</creator><creator>Bakhary, Norhisham</creator><creator>Mohd Yassin, Airil Yasreen</creator><general>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150225</creationdate><title>Comparative Study on Design of Experiment in Frequency-Based Response Surface Methodology for Damage Detection</title><author>Umar, Sarehati ; Bakhary, Norhisham ; Mohd Yassin, Airil Yasreen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2348-3d79ada347bf9962e09e3b921362ebcd1d3fd2432e280de808b5a731dce530043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Charge coupled devices</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Damage detection</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Umar, Sarehati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakhary, Norhisham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohd Yassin, Airil Yasreen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Applied Mechanics and Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Umar, Sarehati</au><au>Bakhary, Norhisham</au><au>Mohd Yassin, Airil Yasreen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study on Design of Experiment in Frequency-Based Response Surface Methodology for Damage Detection</atitle><jtitle>Applied Mechanics and Materials</jtitle><date>2015-02-25</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>735</volume><issue>Technology and Engineering Reviews and Research Advances I</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>168-173</pages><issn>1660-9336</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><eissn>1662-7482</eissn><isbn>3038354120</isbn><isbn>9783038354123</isbn><abstract>This paper investigates the performance of design of experiment (DOE) in response surface methodology (RSM) for vibration-based damage detection. The ability of three major types of DOE, namely central composite design (CCD), Box-Behnken (BBD) and D-optimal (Dopt) for damage detection based on modal frequency are investigated and compared. A procedure comprising three main stages—sampling, response surface (RS) modelling and model updating—are employed for damage localisation and quantification. By considering Young’s modulus and modal frequency as respective input and output, a set of samples is generated from each DOE. Full quadratic functions are considered in RS modelling while model updating is performed for damage detection. The performances of DOE are compared based on damage detectability. A numerical simply supported beam is used as case study by considering several single damage cases. The results show that CCD provides better prediction compared to other DOEs.</abstract><cop>Zurich</cop><pub>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.735.168</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-9336 |
| ispartof | Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2015-02, Vol.735 (Technology and Engineering Reviews and Research Advances I), p.168-173 |
| issn | 1660-9336 1662-7482 1662-7482 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669855069 |
| source | Scientific.net Journals |
| subjects | Charge coupled devices Damage Damage detection Design of experiments Mathematical models Modelling Response surface methodology |
| title | Comparative Study on Design of Experiment in Frequency-Based Response Surface Methodology for Damage Detection |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T14%3A52%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20on%20Design%20of%20Experiment%20in%20Frequency-Based%20Response%20Surface%20Methodology%20for%20Damage%20Detection&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Mechanics%20and%20Materials&rft.au=Umar,%20Sarehati&rft.date=2015-02-25&rft.volume=735&rft.issue=Technology%20and%20Engineering%20Reviews%20and%20Research%20Advances%20I&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=168-173&rft.issn=1660-9336&rft.eissn=1662-7482&rft.isbn=3038354120&rft.isbn_list=9783038354123&rft_id=info:doi/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.735.168&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669855069%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1658779956&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |