Changing ovarian stimulation parameters in a subsequent cycle does not increase the number of euploid embryos

Objective To compare the euploidy outcome in patients that underwent 2 ovarian stimulation cycles with trophectoderm biopsy. Design Retrospective repeated-measures cohort study. Setting University-based fertility center. Patient(s) A total of 116 patients, from 2011 through 2013, that underwent 2 ov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2015-04, Vol.103 (4), p.947-953
Hauptverfasser: Hodes-Wertz, Brooke, M.D., M.P.H, McCulloh, David H., Ph.D, Berkeley, Alan S., M.D, Grifo, Jamie A., M.D., Ph.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 953
container_issue 4
container_start_page 947
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 103
creator Hodes-Wertz, Brooke, M.D., M.P.H
McCulloh, David H., Ph.D
Berkeley, Alan S., M.D
Grifo, Jamie A., M.D., Ph.D
description Objective To compare the euploidy outcome in patients that underwent 2 ovarian stimulation cycles with trophectoderm biopsy. Design Retrospective repeated-measures cohort study. Setting University-based fertility center. Patient(s) A total of 116 patients, from 2011 through 2013, that underwent 2 ovarian stimulation cycles followed by trophectoderm biopsy with array comparative genomic hybridization. Intervention(s) Days of stimulation, average diameter of the 2 lead follicles on day of trigger, dose of gonadotropins, type of cycle (gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist, GnRH-antagonist plus clomiphene citrate [CC], microdose GnRH agonist). Main Outcome Measure(s) Number of euploid embryos. Result(s) Patients were analyzed based on whether they had ≥1 euploid embryos in their first cycle vs. none. There was no increase in the number of euploid embryos with more days of stimulation or increases in the dose of gonadotropins in either group. Significantly more euploid embryos were seen in patients who had no euploid embryo(s) in the first cycle (Group 0) that had CC added to a GnRH-antagonist cycle (1.11 more euploid embryos) or were triggered when follicle sizes were 2 mm larger (0.40 euploid embryos), but these increases were not significant compared with a control group. Patients with euploid embryo(s) in the first cycle (Group 1) had significantly more euploid embryos when daily dose was increased by 75–149 international units, but this relationship was not significant compared with a control group with no increase in daily dose. Conclusion(s) No specific intervention increased the number of euploid embryos within the same patient any more than simply repeating a similar stimulation cycle. An attempt was made to control for interpatient variability, but individual patients have considerable intercycle variability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.126
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669833305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028214025576</els_id><sourcerecordid>1669833305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-66ce6c9a7bd047e601a879ffed74a9f0c5101cdc77e4a602629062ffb6e5892a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2P1DAMhiMEYoeFv4By5DKDkzZJe0GCEV_SShyAc5Sm7m6GNhnidKX592Q0C0ickCz7kNd-nceMcQE7AUK_PuwmzCVSqXknQbQ7IWvoR2wjlNJbpVXzmG0AhNqC7OQVe0Z0AAAtjHzKrqQyYJoWNmzZ37l4G-ItT_cuBxc5lbCssyshRX502S1YXYiHyB2ndSD8uWIs3J_8jHxMSDymUp99RkfIyx3yuC4DZp4mjutxTmHkuAz5lOg5ezK5mfDFQ71m3z-8_7b_tL358vHz_u3N1qu2L1utPWrfOzOM0BrUIFxn-mnC0bSun8CrSsGP3hhsnQapZQ9aTtOgUXW9dM01e3WZe8yprkvFLoE8zrOLmFayQuu-a5oGVJV2F6nPiSjjZI85LC6frAB7hm0P9i9se4Zthayha-vLB5d1WHD80_ibbhW8uwiw_vU-YLbkA0aPY8joix1T-B-XN_8M8XOIwbv5B56QDmnNsbK0wpK0YL-ej36-uWhBKmV08wvFDazz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1669833305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing ovarian stimulation parameters in a subsequent cycle does not increase the number of euploid embryos</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hodes-Wertz, Brooke, M.D., M.P.H ; McCulloh, David H., Ph.D ; Berkeley, Alan S., M.D ; Grifo, Jamie A., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodes-Wertz, Brooke, M.D., M.P.H ; McCulloh, David H., Ph.D ; Berkeley, Alan S., M.D ; Grifo, Jamie A., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare the euploidy outcome in patients that underwent 2 ovarian stimulation cycles with trophectoderm biopsy. Design Retrospective repeated-measures cohort study. Setting University-based fertility center. Patient(s) A total of 116 patients, from 2011 through 2013, that underwent 2 ovarian stimulation cycles followed by trophectoderm biopsy with array comparative genomic hybridization. Intervention(s) Days of stimulation, average diameter of the 2 lead follicles on day of trigger, dose of gonadotropins, type of cycle (gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist, GnRH-antagonist plus clomiphene citrate [CC], microdose GnRH agonist). Main Outcome Measure(s) Number of euploid embryos. Result(s) Patients were analyzed based on whether they had ≥1 euploid embryos in their first cycle vs. none. There was no increase in the number of euploid embryos with more days of stimulation or increases in the dose of gonadotropins in either group. Significantly more euploid embryos were seen in patients who had no euploid embryo(s) in the first cycle (Group 0) that had CC added to a GnRH-antagonist cycle (1.11 more euploid embryos) or were triggered when follicle sizes were 2 mm larger (0.40 euploid embryos), but these increases were not significant compared with a control group. Patients with euploid embryo(s) in the first cycle (Group 1) had significantly more euploid embryos when daily dose was increased by 75–149 international units, but this relationship was not significant compared with a control group with no increase in daily dose. Conclusion(s) No specific intervention increased the number of euploid embryos within the same patient any more than simply repeating a similar stimulation cycle. An attempt was made to control for interpatient variability, but individual patients have considerable intercycle variability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.126</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25707340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; array comparative genomic hybridization ; Biopsy ; Cell Count ; Comparative Genomic Hybridization ; controlled ovarian stimulation ; Embryo, Mammalian - cytology ; Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism ; Embryo, Mammalian - pathology ; Euploidy ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - methods ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Menstrual Cycle - physiology ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Oocyte Retrieval - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; Ploidies ; Pregnancy ; Preimplantation Diagnosis ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2015-04, Vol.103 (4), p.947-953</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-66ce6c9a7bd047e601a879ffed74a9f0c5101cdc77e4a602629062ffb6e5892a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-66ce6c9a7bd047e601a879ffed74a9f0c5101cdc77e4a602629062ffb6e5892a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028214025576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25707340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodes-Wertz, Brooke, M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCulloh, David H., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkeley, Alan S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grifo, Jamie A., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Changing ovarian stimulation parameters in a subsequent cycle does not increase the number of euploid embryos</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To compare the euploidy outcome in patients that underwent 2 ovarian stimulation cycles with trophectoderm biopsy. Design Retrospective repeated-measures cohort study. Setting University-based fertility center. Patient(s) A total of 116 patients, from 2011 through 2013, that underwent 2 ovarian stimulation cycles followed by trophectoderm biopsy with array comparative genomic hybridization. Intervention(s) Days of stimulation, average diameter of the 2 lead follicles on day of trigger, dose of gonadotropins, type of cycle (gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist, GnRH-antagonist plus clomiphene citrate [CC], microdose GnRH agonist). Main Outcome Measure(s) Number of euploid embryos. Result(s) Patients were analyzed based on whether they had ≥1 euploid embryos in their first cycle vs. none. There was no increase in the number of euploid embryos with more days of stimulation or increases in the dose of gonadotropins in either group. Significantly more euploid embryos were seen in patients who had no euploid embryo(s) in the first cycle (Group 0) that had CC added to a GnRH-antagonist cycle (1.11 more euploid embryos) or were triggered when follicle sizes were 2 mm larger (0.40 euploid embryos), but these increases were not significant compared with a control group. Patients with euploid embryo(s) in the first cycle (Group 1) had significantly more euploid embryos when daily dose was increased by 75–149 international units, but this relationship was not significant compared with a control group with no increase in daily dose. Conclusion(s) No specific intervention increased the number of euploid embryos within the same patient any more than simply repeating a similar stimulation cycle. An attempt was made to control for interpatient variability, but individual patients have considerable intercycle variability.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>array comparative genomic hybridization</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Comparative Genomic Hybridization</subject><subject>controlled ovarian stimulation</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - cytology</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - pathology</subject><subject>Euploidy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Menstrual Cycle - physiology</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>Ploidies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Preimplantation Diagnosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2P1DAMhiMEYoeFv4By5DKDkzZJe0GCEV_SShyAc5Sm7m6GNhnidKX592Q0C0ickCz7kNd-nceMcQE7AUK_PuwmzCVSqXknQbQ7IWvoR2wjlNJbpVXzmG0AhNqC7OQVe0Z0AAAtjHzKrqQyYJoWNmzZ37l4G-ItT_cuBxc5lbCssyshRX502S1YXYiHyB2ndSD8uWIs3J_8jHxMSDymUp99RkfIyx3yuC4DZp4mjutxTmHkuAz5lOg5ezK5mfDFQ71m3z-8_7b_tL358vHz_u3N1qu2L1utPWrfOzOM0BrUIFxn-mnC0bSun8CrSsGP3hhsnQapZQ9aTtOgUXW9dM01e3WZe8yprkvFLoE8zrOLmFayQuu-a5oGVJV2F6nPiSjjZI85LC6frAB7hm0P9i9se4Zthayha-vLB5d1WHD80_ibbhW8uwiw_vU-YLbkA0aPY8joix1T-B-XN_8M8XOIwbv5B56QDmnNsbK0wpK0YL-ej36-uWhBKmV08wvFDazz</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Hodes-Wertz, Brooke, M.D., M.P.H</creator><creator>McCulloh, David H., Ph.D</creator><creator>Berkeley, Alan S., M.D</creator><creator>Grifo, Jamie A., M.D., Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Changing ovarian stimulation parameters in a subsequent cycle does not increase the number of euploid embryos</title><author>Hodes-Wertz, Brooke, M.D., M.P.H ; McCulloh, David H., Ph.D ; Berkeley, Alan S., M.D ; Grifo, Jamie A., M.D., Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-66ce6c9a7bd047e601a879ffed74a9f0c5101cdc77e4a602629062ffb6e5892a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>array comparative genomic hybridization</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Comparative Genomic Hybridization</topic><topic>controlled ovarian stimulation</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - cytology</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - pathology</topic><topic>Euploidy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Menstrual Cycle - physiology</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>Ploidies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Preimplantation Diagnosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodes-Wertz, Brooke, M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCulloh, David H., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkeley, Alan S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grifo, Jamie A., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodes-Wertz, Brooke, M.D., M.P.H</au><au>McCulloh, David H., Ph.D</au><au>Berkeley, Alan S., M.D</au><au>Grifo, Jamie A., M.D., Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changing ovarian stimulation parameters in a subsequent cycle does not increase the number of euploid embryos</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>947</spage><epage>953</epage><pages>947-953</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><abstract>Objective To compare the euploidy outcome in patients that underwent 2 ovarian stimulation cycles with trophectoderm biopsy. Design Retrospective repeated-measures cohort study. Setting University-based fertility center. Patient(s) A total of 116 patients, from 2011 through 2013, that underwent 2 ovarian stimulation cycles followed by trophectoderm biopsy with array comparative genomic hybridization. Intervention(s) Days of stimulation, average diameter of the 2 lead follicles on day of trigger, dose of gonadotropins, type of cycle (gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist, GnRH-antagonist plus clomiphene citrate [CC], microdose GnRH agonist). Main Outcome Measure(s) Number of euploid embryos. Result(s) Patients were analyzed based on whether they had ≥1 euploid embryos in their first cycle vs. none. There was no increase in the number of euploid embryos with more days of stimulation or increases in the dose of gonadotropins in either group. Significantly more euploid embryos were seen in patients who had no euploid embryo(s) in the first cycle (Group 0) that had CC added to a GnRH-antagonist cycle (1.11 more euploid embryos) or were triggered when follicle sizes were 2 mm larger (0.40 euploid embryos), but these increases were not significant compared with a control group. Patients with euploid embryo(s) in the first cycle (Group 1) had significantly more euploid embryos when daily dose was increased by 75–149 international units, but this relationship was not significant compared with a control group with no increase in daily dose. Conclusion(s) No specific intervention increased the number of euploid embryos within the same patient any more than simply repeating a similar stimulation cycle. An attempt was made to control for interpatient variability, but individual patients have considerable intercycle variability.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25707340</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.126</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2015-04, Vol.103 (4), p.947-953
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669833305
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
array comparative genomic hybridization
Biopsy
Cell Count
Comparative Genomic Hybridization
controlled ovarian stimulation
Embryo, Mammalian - cytology
Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism
Embryo, Mammalian - pathology
Euploidy
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - methods
Humans
Internal Medicine
Menstrual Cycle - physiology
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Oocyte Retrieval - statistics & numerical data
Ovulation Induction - methods
Ploidies
Pregnancy
Preimplantation Diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
title Changing ovarian stimulation parameters in a subsequent cycle does not increase the number of euploid embryos
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20ovarian%20stimulation%20parameters%20in%20a%20subsequent%20cycle%20does%20not%20increase%20the%20number%20of%20euploid%20embryos&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Hodes-Wertz,%20Brooke,%20M.D.,%20M.P.H&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=947&rft.epage=953&rft.pages=947-953&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.126&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669833305%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1669833305&rft_id=info:pmid/25707340&rft_els_id=S0015028214025576&rfr_iscdi=true