Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law
Background. Many stakeholders were interested in the potential economic impact of Pennsylvania's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA). This study focused on the examination of economic change subsequent to CIAA and, because CIAA allows certain venue exemptions among eating and drinking establishmen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health promotion practice 2014-07, Vol.15 (4), p.521-529 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 529 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 521 |
container_title | Health promotion practice |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Tauras, John A. Chaloupka, Frank J. Keith, Jennifer D. Brown, Deborah P. Meyer, Joy Blankley |
description | Background. Many stakeholders were interested in the potential economic impact of Pennsylvania's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA). This study focused on the examination of economic change subsequent to CIAA and, because CIAA allows certain venue exemptions among eating and drinking establishments, if the allowance of exemptions influenced that impact. Policy analysis. Prais–Winsten regressions were employed to assess effects of CIAA and law exemptions on county–level quarterly taxable sales in restaurants and drinking establishments. Regressions controlled for general economic activity, trends in eating/drinking establishment sales, seasonality, and county characteristics. Findings. Across models, CIAA had no significant negative effects on taxable sales in full-/limited-service restaurants or drinking establishments and some positive effects. CIAA exemptions for drinking establishments do not offer a clear economic benefit. Restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales were strongly related to overall economic conditions and seasonality. Conclusion. After controlling for confounding factors, and consistent with the weight of the evidence from literature on the economic impact of smoke-free policies, our study concludes that the Pennsylvania CIAA had no negative effects on per capita restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales. High rates of drinking establishment exemptions were not economically beneficial. This study can inform efforts to make smoke-free laws more comprehensive. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1524839913516126 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669833017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26740608</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1524839913516126</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26740608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-82304611d3d7ec4503af98c25c26d636da9bee97852c9ed6bd92d0747dfef3a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EolDYWUAZWQL-iL_GqmqhUgUDMEeufYGUJg52AuLfkyoFJAamO-me95XuQeiM4CtCpLwmnGaKaU0YJ4JQsYeOCOc0FUzS_e1Os3R7H6HjGNcYYykzfIhGNGO65_ERUjPra1-VNllUjbFt4ovEJHe-tr5qArxAHct3SB4q_wrpPAAkkzIkS_Nxgg4Ks4lwuptj9DSfPU5v0-X9zWI6WaaWcd2mijKcCUIccxJsxjEzhVaWckuFE0w4o1cAWipOrQYnVk5Th2UmXQEFM4qN0eXQ2wT_1kFs86qMFjYbU4PvYk6E0IoxTGSP4gG1wccYoMibUFYmfOYE51tf-V9ffeRi196tKnA_gW9BPZAOQDTPkK99F-r-2_8Kzwd-HVsffvtEL15gxb4ASGh57w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1669833017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Tauras, John A. ; Chaloupka, Frank J. ; Keith, Jennifer D. ; Brown, Deborah P. ; Meyer, Joy Blankley</creator><creatorcontrib>Tauras, John A. ; Chaloupka, Frank J. ; Keith, Jennifer D. ; Brown, Deborah P. ; Meyer, Joy Blankley</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Many stakeholders were interested in the potential economic impact of Pennsylvania's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA). This study focused on the examination of economic change subsequent to CIAA and, because CIAA allows certain venue exemptions among eating and drinking establishments, if the allowance of exemptions influenced that impact. Policy analysis. Prais–Winsten regressions were employed to assess effects of CIAA and law exemptions on county–level quarterly taxable sales in restaurants and drinking establishments. Regressions controlled for general economic activity, trends in eating/drinking establishment sales, seasonality, and county characteristics. Findings. Across models, CIAA had no significant negative effects on taxable sales in full-/limited-service restaurants or drinking establishments and some positive effects. CIAA exemptions for drinking establishments do not offer a clear economic benefit. Restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales were strongly related to overall economic conditions and seasonality. Conclusion. After controlling for confounding factors, and consistent with the weight of the evidence from literature on the economic impact of smoke-free policies, our study concludes that the Pennsylvania CIAA had no negative effects on per capita restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales. High rates of drinking establishment exemptions were not economically beneficial. This study can inform efforts to make smoke-free laws more comprehensive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-8399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1524839913516126</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24396120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Alcohol Drinking - economics ; Humans ; Pennsylvania ; Restaurants - economics ; Seasons ; Smoke-Free Policy - economics ; Smoke-Free Policy - legislation & jurisprudence ; Tobacco Cessation ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><ispartof>Health promotion practice, 2014-07, Vol.15 (4), p.521-529</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Society for Public Health Education</rights><rights>2014 Society for Public Health Education</rights><rights>2014 Society for Public Health Education.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-82304611d3d7ec4503af98c25c26d636da9bee97852c9ed6bd92d0747dfef3a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-82304611d3d7ec4503af98c25c26d636da9bee97852c9ed6bd92d0747dfef3a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26740608$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26740608$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609,58004,58237</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24396120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tauras, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaloupka, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Jennifer D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Deborah P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Joy Blankley</creatorcontrib><title>Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law</title><title>Health promotion practice</title><addtitle>Health Promot Pract</addtitle><description>Background. Many stakeholders were interested in the potential economic impact of Pennsylvania's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA). This study focused on the examination of economic change subsequent to CIAA and, because CIAA allows certain venue exemptions among eating and drinking establishments, if the allowance of exemptions influenced that impact. Policy analysis. Prais–Winsten regressions were employed to assess effects of CIAA and law exemptions on county–level quarterly taxable sales in restaurants and drinking establishments. Regressions controlled for general economic activity, trends in eating/drinking establishment sales, seasonality, and county characteristics. Findings. Across models, CIAA had no significant negative effects on taxable sales in full-/limited-service restaurants or drinking establishments and some positive effects. CIAA exemptions for drinking establishments do not offer a clear economic benefit. Restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales were strongly related to overall economic conditions and seasonality. Conclusion. After controlling for confounding factors, and consistent with the weight of the evidence from literature on the economic impact of smoke-free policies, our study concludes that the Pennsylvania CIAA had no negative effects on per capita restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales. High rates of drinking establishment exemptions were not economically beneficial. This study can inform efforts to make smoke-free laws more comprehensive.</description><subject>Alcohol Drinking - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Restaurants - economics</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Smoke-Free Policy - economics</subject><subject>Smoke-Free Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Tobacco Cessation</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><issn>1524-8399</issn><issn>1552-6372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EolDYWUAZWQL-iL_GqmqhUgUDMEeufYGUJg52AuLfkyoFJAamO-me95XuQeiM4CtCpLwmnGaKaU0YJ4JQsYeOCOc0FUzS_e1Os3R7H6HjGNcYYykzfIhGNGO65_ERUjPra1-VNllUjbFt4ovEJHe-tr5qArxAHct3SB4q_wrpPAAkkzIkS_Nxgg4Ks4lwuptj9DSfPU5v0-X9zWI6WaaWcd2mijKcCUIccxJsxjEzhVaWckuFE0w4o1cAWipOrQYnVk5Th2UmXQEFM4qN0eXQ2wT_1kFs86qMFjYbU4PvYk6E0IoxTGSP4gG1wccYoMibUFYmfOYE51tf-V9ffeRi196tKnA_gW9BPZAOQDTPkK99F-r-2_8Kzwd-HVsffvtEL15gxb4ASGh57w</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Tauras, John A.</creator><creator>Chaloupka, Frank J.</creator><creator>Keith, Jennifer D.</creator><creator>Brown, Deborah P.</creator><creator>Meyer, Joy Blankley</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law</title><author>Tauras, John A. ; Chaloupka, Frank J. ; Keith, Jennifer D. ; Brown, Deborah P. ; Meyer, Joy Blankley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-82304611d3d7ec4503af98c25c26d636da9bee97852c9ed6bd92d0747dfef3a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alcohol Drinking - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Restaurants - economics</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Smoke-Free Policy - economics</topic><topic>Smoke-Free Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Tobacco Cessation</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tauras, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaloupka, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Jennifer D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Deborah P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Joy Blankley</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health promotion practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tauras, John A.</au><au>Chaloupka, Frank J.</au><au>Keith, Jennifer D.</au><au>Brown, Deborah P.</au><au>Meyer, Joy Blankley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law</atitle><jtitle>Health promotion practice</jtitle><addtitle>Health Promot Pract</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>521-529</pages><issn>1524-8399</issn><eissn>1552-6372</eissn><abstract>Background. Many stakeholders were interested in the potential economic impact of Pennsylvania's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA). This study focused on the examination of economic change subsequent to CIAA and, because CIAA allows certain venue exemptions among eating and drinking establishments, if the allowance of exemptions influenced that impact. Policy analysis. Prais–Winsten regressions were employed to assess effects of CIAA and law exemptions on county–level quarterly taxable sales in restaurants and drinking establishments. Regressions controlled for general economic activity, trends in eating/drinking establishment sales, seasonality, and county characteristics. Findings. Across models, CIAA had no significant negative effects on taxable sales in full-/limited-service restaurants or drinking establishments and some positive effects. CIAA exemptions for drinking establishments do not offer a clear economic benefit. Restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales were strongly related to overall economic conditions and seasonality. Conclusion. After controlling for confounding factors, and consistent with the weight of the evidence from literature on the economic impact of smoke-free policies, our study concludes that the Pennsylvania CIAA had no negative effects on per capita restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales. High rates of drinking establishment exemptions were not economically beneficial. This study can inform efforts to make smoke-free laws more comprehensive.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>24396120</pmid><doi>10.1177/1524839913516126</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1524-8399 |
ispartof | Health promotion practice, 2014-07, Vol.15 (4), p.521-529 |
issn | 1524-8399 1552-6372 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669833017 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Alcohol Drinking - economics Humans Pennsylvania Restaurants - economics Seasons Smoke-Free Policy - economics Smoke-Free Policy - legislation & jurisprudence Tobacco Cessation Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence |
title | Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A28%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20Impact%20of%20a%20Noncomprehensive%20Smoke-Free%20Air%20Law&rft.jtitle=Health%20promotion%20practice&rft.au=Tauras,%20John%20A.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=521-529&rft.issn=1524-8399&rft.eissn=1552-6372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1524839913516126&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26740608%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1669833017&rft_id=info:pmid/24396120&rft_jstor_id=26740608&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1524839913516126&rfr_iscdi=true |