Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law

Background. Many stakeholders were interested in the potential economic impact of Pennsylvania's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA). This study focused on the examination of economic change subsequent to CIAA and, because CIAA allows certain venue exemptions among eating and drinking establishmen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health promotion practice 2014-07, Vol.15 (4), p.521-529
Hauptverfasser: Tauras, John A., Chaloupka, Frank J., Keith, Jennifer D., Brown, Deborah P., Meyer, Joy Blankley
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 529
container_issue 4
container_start_page 521
container_title Health promotion practice
container_volume 15
creator Tauras, John A.
Chaloupka, Frank J.
Keith, Jennifer D.
Brown, Deborah P.
Meyer, Joy Blankley
description Background. Many stakeholders were interested in the potential economic impact of Pennsylvania's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA). This study focused on the examination of economic change subsequent to CIAA and, because CIAA allows certain venue exemptions among eating and drinking establishments, if the allowance of exemptions influenced that impact. Policy analysis. Prais–Winsten regressions were employed to assess effects of CIAA and law exemptions on county–level quarterly taxable sales in restaurants and drinking establishments. Regressions controlled for general economic activity, trends in eating/drinking establishment sales, seasonality, and county characteristics. Findings. Across models, CIAA had no significant negative effects on taxable sales in full-/limited-service restaurants or drinking establishments and some positive effects. CIAA exemptions for drinking establishments do not offer a clear economic benefit. Restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales were strongly related to overall economic conditions and seasonality. Conclusion. After controlling for confounding factors, and consistent with the weight of the evidence from literature on the economic impact of smoke-free policies, our study concludes that the Pennsylvania CIAA had no negative effects on per capita restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales. High rates of drinking establishment exemptions were not economically beneficial. This study can inform efforts to make smoke-free laws more comprehensive.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1524839913516126
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669833017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26740608</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1524839913516126</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26740608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-82304611d3d7ec4503af98c25c26d636da9bee97852c9ed6bd92d0747dfef3a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EolDYWUAZWQL-iL_GqmqhUgUDMEeufYGUJg52AuLfkyoFJAamO-me95XuQeiM4CtCpLwmnGaKaU0YJ4JQsYeOCOc0FUzS_e1Os3R7H6HjGNcYYykzfIhGNGO65_ERUjPra1-VNllUjbFt4ovEJHe-tr5qArxAHct3SB4q_wrpPAAkkzIkS_Nxgg4Ks4lwuptj9DSfPU5v0-X9zWI6WaaWcd2mijKcCUIccxJsxjEzhVaWckuFE0w4o1cAWipOrQYnVk5Th2UmXQEFM4qN0eXQ2wT_1kFs86qMFjYbU4PvYk6E0IoxTGSP4gG1wccYoMibUFYmfOYE51tf-V9ffeRi196tKnA_gW9BPZAOQDTPkK99F-r-2_8Kzwd-HVsffvtEL15gxb4ASGh57w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1669833017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Tauras, John A. ; Chaloupka, Frank J. ; Keith, Jennifer D. ; Brown, Deborah P. ; Meyer, Joy Blankley</creator><creatorcontrib>Tauras, John A. ; Chaloupka, Frank J. ; Keith, Jennifer D. ; Brown, Deborah P. ; Meyer, Joy Blankley</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Many stakeholders were interested in the potential economic impact of Pennsylvania's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA). This study focused on the examination of economic change subsequent to CIAA and, because CIAA allows certain venue exemptions among eating and drinking establishments, if the allowance of exemptions influenced that impact. Policy analysis. Prais–Winsten regressions were employed to assess effects of CIAA and law exemptions on county–level quarterly taxable sales in restaurants and drinking establishments. Regressions controlled for general economic activity, trends in eating/drinking establishment sales, seasonality, and county characteristics. Findings. Across models, CIAA had no significant negative effects on taxable sales in full-/limited-service restaurants or drinking establishments and some positive effects. CIAA exemptions for drinking establishments do not offer a clear economic benefit. Restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales were strongly related to overall economic conditions and seasonality. Conclusion. After controlling for confounding factors, and consistent with the weight of the evidence from literature on the economic impact of smoke-free policies, our study concludes that the Pennsylvania CIAA had no negative effects on per capita restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales. High rates of drinking establishment exemptions were not economically beneficial. This study can inform efforts to make smoke-free laws more comprehensive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-8399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1524839913516126</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24396120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Alcohol Drinking - economics ; Humans ; Pennsylvania ; Restaurants - economics ; Seasons ; Smoke-Free Policy - economics ; Smoke-Free Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Tobacco Cessation ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><ispartof>Health promotion practice, 2014-07, Vol.15 (4), p.521-529</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Society for Public Health Education</rights><rights>2014 Society for Public Health Education</rights><rights>2014 Society for Public Health Education.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-82304611d3d7ec4503af98c25c26d636da9bee97852c9ed6bd92d0747dfef3a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-82304611d3d7ec4503af98c25c26d636da9bee97852c9ed6bd92d0747dfef3a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26740608$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26740608$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609,58004,58237</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24396120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tauras, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaloupka, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Jennifer D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Deborah P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Joy Blankley</creatorcontrib><title>Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law</title><title>Health promotion practice</title><addtitle>Health Promot Pract</addtitle><description>Background. Many stakeholders were interested in the potential economic impact of Pennsylvania's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA). This study focused on the examination of economic change subsequent to CIAA and, because CIAA allows certain venue exemptions among eating and drinking establishments, if the allowance of exemptions influenced that impact. Policy analysis. Prais–Winsten regressions were employed to assess effects of CIAA and law exemptions on county–level quarterly taxable sales in restaurants and drinking establishments. Regressions controlled for general economic activity, trends in eating/drinking establishment sales, seasonality, and county characteristics. Findings. Across models, CIAA had no significant negative effects on taxable sales in full-/limited-service restaurants or drinking establishments and some positive effects. CIAA exemptions for drinking establishments do not offer a clear economic benefit. Restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales were strongly related to overall economic conditions and seasonality. Conclusion. After controlling for confounding factors, and consistent with the weight of the evidence from literature on the economic impact of smoke-free policies, our study concludes that the Pennsylvania CIAA had no negative effects on per capita restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales. High rates of drinking establishment exemptions were not economically beneficial. This study can inform efforts to make smoke-free laws more comprehensive.</description><subject>Alcohol Drinking - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Restaurants - economics</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Smoke-Free Policy - economics</subject><subject>Smoke-Free Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Tobacco Cessation</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><issn>1524-8399</issn><issn>1552-6372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EolDYWUAZWQL-iL_GqmqhUgUDMEeufYGUJg52AuLfkyoFJAamO-me95XuQeiM4CtCpLwmnGaKaU0YJ4JQsYeOCOc0FUzS_e1Os3R7H6HjGNcYYykzfIhGNGO65_ERUjPra1-VNllUjbFt4ovEJHe-tr5qArxAHct3SB4q_wrpPAAkkzIkS_Nxgg4Ks4lwuptj9DSfPU5v0-X9zWI6WaaWcd2mijKcCUIccxJsxjEzhVaWckuFE0w4o1cAWipOrQYnVk5Th2UmXQEFM4qN0eXQ2wT_1kFs86qMFjYbU4PvYk6E0IoxTGSP4gG1wccYoMibUFYmfOYE51tf-V9ffeRi196tKnA_gW9BPZAOQDTPkK99F-r-2_8Kzwd-HVsffvtEL15gxb4ASGh57w</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Tauras, John A.</creator><creator>Chaloupka, Frank J.</creator><creator>Keith, Jennifer D.</creator><creator>Brown, Deborah P.</creator><creator>Meyer, Joy Blankley</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law</title><author>Tauras, John A. ; Chaloupka, Frank J. ; Keith, Jennifer D. ; Brown, Deborah P. ; Meyer, Joy Blankley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-82304611d3d7ec4503af98c25c26d636da9bee97852c9ed6bd92d0747dfef3a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alcohol Drinking - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Restaurants - economics</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Smoke-Free Policy - economics</topic><topic>Smoke-Free Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Tobacco Cessation</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tauras, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaloupka, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Jennifer D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Deborah P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Joy Blankley</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health promotion practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tauras, John A.</au><au>Chaloupka, Frank J.</au><au>Keith, Jennifer D.</au><au>Brown, Deborah P.</au><au>Meyer, Joy Blankley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law</atitle><jtitle>Health promotion practice</jtitle><addtitle>Health Promot Pract</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>521-529</pages><issn>1524-8399</issn><eissn>1552-6372</eissn><abstract>Background. Many stakeholders were interested in the potential economic impact of Pennsylvania's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA). This study focused on the examination of economic change subsequent to CIAA and, because CIAA allows certain venue exemptions among eating and drinking establishments, if the allowance of exemptions influenced that impact. Policy analysis. Prais–Winsten regressions were employed to assess effects of CIAA and law exemptions on county–level quarterly taxable sales in restaurants and drinking establishments. Regressions controlled for general economic activity, trends in eating/drinking establishment sales, seasonality, and county characteristics. Findings. Across models, CIAA had no significant negative effects on taxable sales in full-/limited-service restaurants or drinking establishments and some positive effects. CIAA exemptions for drinking establishments do not offer a clear economic benefit. Restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales were strongly related to overall economic conditions and seasonality. Conclusion. After controlling for confounding factors, and consistent with the weight of the evidence from literature on the economic impact of smoke-free policies, our study concludes that the Pennsylvania CIAA had no negative effects on per capita restaurant and drinking establishment taxable sales. High rates of drinking establishment exemptions were not economically beneficial. This study can inform efforts to make smoke-free laws more comprehensive.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>24396120</pmid><doi>10.1177/1524839913516126</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1524-8399
ispartof Health promotion practice, 2014-07, Vol.15 (4), p.521-529
issn 1524-8399
1552-6372
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669833017
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Alcohol Drinking - economics
Humans
Pennsylvania
Restaurants - economics
Seasons
Smoke-Free Policy - economics
Smoke-Free Policy - legislation & jurisprudence
Tobacco Cessation
Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence
title Economic Impact of a Noncomprehensive Smoke-Free Air Law
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A28%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20Impact%20of%20a%20Noncomprehensive%20Smoke-Free%20Air%20Law&rft.jtitle=Health%20promotion%20practice&rft.au=Tauras,%20John%20A.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=521-529&rft.issn=1524-8399&rft.eissn=1552-6372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1524839913516126&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26740608%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1669833017&rft_id=info:pmid/24396120&rft_jstor_id=26740608&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1524839913516126&rfr_iscdi=true