Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation: Politano-Leadbetter versus Cohen technique

Objectives To compare the outcomes of the Politano–Leadbetter and Cohen techniques in laparoscopic pneumovesicum approach for ureteral reimplantation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 24 patients who underwent transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation during the period from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of urology 2015-04, Vol.22 (4), p.394-399
Hauptverfasser: Soh, Shigehiro, Kobori, Yoshitomo, Shin, Takeshi, Suzuki, Keisuke, Iwahata, Toshiyuki, Sadaoka, Yuko, Sato, Ryo, Nishi, Morihiro, Iwamura, Masatsugu, Okada, Hiroshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 399
container_issue 4
container_start_page 394
container_title International journal of urology
container_volume 22
creator Soh, Shigehiro
Kobori, Yoshitomo
Shin, Takeshi
Suzuki, Keisuke
Iwahata, Toshiyuki
Sadaoka, Yuko
Sato, Ryo
Nishi, Morihiro
Iwamura, Masatsugu
Okada, Hiroshi
description Objectives To compare the outcomes of the Politano–Leadbetter and Cohen techniques in laparoscopic pneumovesicum approach for ureteral reimplantation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 24 patients who underwent transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation during the period from 2007 to 2014. The patients were treated with either the Cohen or Politano–Leadbetter technique. Operative duration, duration of hospital stay, and success and complication rates were compared. Results Operative duration was 1 h longer for the Politano–Leadbetter technique than for the Cohen technique (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iju.12702
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669453851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1669453851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-9be3c446ff0e37538f0991cec678206a65d5d2867bca5109411d7bb860ded47f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1T2zAQhjUdOiXQHvoHGB_pwYkk68vcmJQE2gztIWmPGlleDwLHCpIdyL9HNIRb97KXZ5_dfRH6SvCYpJq4-2FMqMT0AxoRxmhOMaNHaIRLUuaKSHqMTmK8x5gUlKhP6JhyyRnjfIRWy2C6uIXorI_Wb5zNhgA9BNNmAdx605quN73z3UX227euN53PF2DqCvpEZVsIcYjZ1N9Bl_Vg7zr3OMBn9LExbYQvb_0UrWZXy-l1vvg1v5leLnLLlKJ5WUFhGRNNg6GQvFANLktiwQqpKBZG8JrXVAlZWcMJLhkhtawqJXANNZNNcYrO995N8Glt7PXaRQttOhr8EDURomTJy0lCv-1RG3yMARq9CW5twk4TrF9T1ClF_S_FxJ69aYdqDfU7eYgtAZM98ORa2P3fpG9-rA7KfD_hYg_P7xMmPGgh0-_67-1c3_6h32cz9VNfFy-upIwO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1669453851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation: Politano-Leadbetter versus Cohen technique</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Soh, Shigehiro ; Kobori, Yoshitomo ; Shin, Takeshi ; Suzuki, Keisuke ; Iwahata, Toshiyuki ; Sadaoka, Yuko ; Sato, Ryo ; Nishi, Morihiro ; Iwamura, Masatsugu ; Okada, Hiroshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Soh, Shigehiro ; Kobori, Yoshitomo ; Shin, Takeshi ; Suzuki, Keisuke ; Iwahata, Toshiyuki ; Sadaoka, Yuko ; Sato, Ryo ; Nishi, Morihiro ; Iwamura, Masatsugu ; Okada, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To compare the outcomes of the Politano–Leadbetter and Cohen techniques in laparoscopic pneumovesicum approach for ureteral reimplantation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 24 patients who underwent transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation during the period from 2007 to 2014. The patients were treated with either the Cohen or Politano–Leadbetter technique. Operative duration, duration of hospital stay, and success and complication rates were compared. Results Operative duration was 1 h longer for the Politano–Leadbetter technique than for the Cohen technique (P &lt; 0.05). Foley catheters were removed 2–3 days after the procedures. The mean hospital stay was 3.6 days. Reflux completely resolved in 21 patients (35 ureters, 94.6%), but not in two patients (2 ureters). There was no difference in the success rate or durations of catheterization or hospital stay between patients treated with the Politano–Leadbetter technique and those treated with the Cohen technique. Conclusions The Politano–Leadbetter and Cohen techniques are both reliable for transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation. Despite a longer operative time, because of the higher surgical complexity, the Politano–Leadbetter ureteral reimplantation offers important physiological advantages over other techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0919-8172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-2042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iju.12702</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25754455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; laparoscopic ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Length of Stay ; Operative Time ; pneumovesicum ; Replantation - adverse effects ; Replantation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; transvesical ; Treatment Outcome ; Ureter - surgery ; ureteral reimplantation ; Urinary Bladder ; Urinary Catheterization ; Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - surgery ; vesicoureteral reflux ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of urology, 2015-04, Vol.22 (4), p.394-399</ispartof><rights>2015 The Japanese Urological Association</rights><rights>2015 The Japanese Urological Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-9be3c446ff0e37538f0991cec678206a65d5d2867bca5109411d7bb860ded47f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-9be3c446ff0e37538f0991cec678206a65d5d2867bca5109411d7bb860ded47f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fiju.12702$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fiju.12702$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25754455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soh, Shigehiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobori, Yoshitomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwahata, Toshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadaoka, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishi, Morihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwamura, Masatsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><title>Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation: Politano-Leadbetter versus Cohen technique</title><title>International journal of urology</title><addtitle>Int J Urol</addtitle><description>Objectives To compare the outcomes of the Politano–Leadbetter and Cohen techniques in laparoscopic pneumovesicum approach for ureteral reimplantation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 24 patients who underwent transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation during the period from 2007 to 2014. The patients were treated with either the Cohen or Politano–Leadbetter technique. Operative duration, duration of hospital stay, and success and complication rates were compared. Results Operative duration was 1 h longer for the Politano–Leadbetter technique than for the Cohen technique (P &lt; 0.05). Foley catheters were removed 2–3 days after the procedures. The mean hospital stay was 3.6 days. Reflux completely resolved in 21 patients (35 ureters, 94.6%), but not in two patients (2 ureters). There was no difference in the success rate or durations of catheterization or hospital stay between patients treated with the Politano–Leadbetter technique and those treated with the Cohen technique. Conclusions The Politano–Leadbetter and Cohen techniques are both reliable for transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation. Despite a longer operative time, because of the higher surgical complexity, the Politano–Leadbetter ureteral reimplantation offers important physiological advantages over other techniques.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laparoscopic</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>pneumovesicum</subject><subject>Replantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Replantation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>transvesical</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ureter - surgery</subject><subject>ureteral reimplantation</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder</subject><subject>Urinary Catheterization</subject><subject>Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - surgery</subject><subject>vesicoureteral reflux</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0919-8172</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1T2zAQhjUdOiXQHvoHGB_pwYkk68vcmJQE2gztIWmPGlleDwLHCpIdyL9HNIRb97KXZ5_dfRH6SvCYpJq4-2FMqMT0AxoRxmhOMaNHaIRLUuaKSHqMTmK8x5gUlKhP6JhyyRnjfIRWy2C6uIXorI_Wb5zNhgA9BNNmAdx605quN73z3UX227euN53PF2DqCvpEZVsIcYjZ1N9Bl_Vg7zr3OMBn9LExbYQvb_0UrWZXy-l1vvg1v5leLnLLlKJ5WUFhGRNNg6GQvFANLktiwQqpKBZG8JrXVAlZWcMJLhkhtawqJXANNZNNcYrO995N8Glt7PXaRQttOhr8EDURomTJy0lCv-1RG3yMARq9CW5twk4TrF9T1ClF_S_FxJ69aYdqDfU7eYgtAZM98ORa2P3fpG9-rA7KfD_hYg_P7xMmPGgh0-_67-1c3_6h32cz9VNfFy-upIwO</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Soh, Shigehiro</creator><creator>Kobori, Yoshitomo</creator><creator>Shin, Takeshi</creator><creator>Suzuki, Keisuke</creator><creator>Iwahata, Toshiyuki</creator><creator>Sadaoka, Yuko</creator><creator>Sato, Ryo</creator><creator>Nishi, Morihiro</creator><creator>Iwamura, Masatsugu</creator><creator>Okada, Hiroshi</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation: Politano-Leadbetter versus Cohen technique</title><author>Soh, Shigehiro ; Kobori, Yoshitomo ; Shin, Takeshi ; Suzuki, Keisuke ; Iwahata, Toshiyuki ; Sadaoka, Yuko ; Sato, Ryo ; Nishi, Morihiro ; Iwamura, Masatsugu ; Okada, Hiroshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-9be3c446ff0e37538f0991cec678206a65d5d2867bca5109411d7bb860ded47f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laparoscopic</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>pneumovesicum</topic><topic>Replantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Replantation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>transvesical</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ureter - surgery</topic><topic>ureteral reimplantation</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder</topic><topic>Urinary Catheterization</topic><topic>Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - surgery</topic><topic>vesicoureteral reflux</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soh, Shigehiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobori, Yoshitomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwahata, Toshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadaoka, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishi, Morihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwamura, Masatsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soh, Shigehiro</au><au>Kobori, Yoshitomo</au><au>Shin, Takeshi</au><au>Suzuki, Keisuke</au><au>Iwahata, Toshiyuki</au><au>Sadaoka, Yuko</au><au>Sato, Ryo</au><au>Nishi, Morihiro</au><au>Iwamura, Masatsugu</au><au>Okada, Hiroshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation: Politano-Leadbetter versus Cohen technique</atitle><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Urol</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>394-399</pages><issn>0919-8172</issn><eissn>1442-2042</eissn><abstract>Objectives To compare the outcomes of the Politano–Leadbetter and Cohen techniques in laparoscopic pneumovesicum approach for ureteral reimplantation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 24 patients who underwent transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation during the period from 2007 to 2014. The patients were treated with either the Cohen or Politano–Leadbetter technique. Operative duration, duration of hospital stay, and success and complication rates were compared. Results Operative duration was 1 h longer for the Politano–Leadbetter technique than for the Cohen technique (P &lt; 0.05). Foley catheters were removed 2–3 days after the procedures. The mean hospital stay was 3.6 days. Reflux completely resolved in 21 patients (35 ureters, 94.6%), but not in two patients (2 ureters). There was no difference in the success rate or durations of catheterization or hospital stay between patients treated with the Politano–Leadbetter technique and those treated with the Cohen technique. Conclusions The Politano–Leadbetter and Cohen techniques are both reliable for transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation. Despite a longer operative time, because of the higher surgical complexity, the Politano–Leadbetter ureteral reimplantation offers important physiological advantages over other techniques.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25754455</pmid><doi>10.1111/iju.12702</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0919-8172
ispartof International journal of urology, 2015-04, Vol.22 (4), p.394-399
issn 0919-8172
1442-2042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669453851
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
laparoscopic
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Laparoscopy - methods
Length of Stay
Operative Time
pneumovesicum
Replantation - adverse effects
Replantation - methods
Retrospective Studies
transvesical
Treatment Outcome
Ureter - surgery
ureteral reimplantation
Urinary Bladder
Urinary Catheterization
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - surgery
vesicoureteral reflux
Young Adult
title Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation: Politano-Leadbetter versus Cohen technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A19%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transvesicoscopic%20ureteral%20reimplantation:%20Politano-Leadbetter%20versus%20Cohen%20technique&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Soh,%20Shigehiro&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=394-399&rft.issn=0919-8172&rft.eissn=1442-2042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iju.12702&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669453851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1669453851&rft_id=info:pmid/25754455&rfr_iscdi=true