Determination of total antioxidant capacity of milk by CUPRAC and ABTS methods with separate characterisation of milk protein fractions

Most milk-applied antioxidant assays in literature are based on the isolation and quantification of individual antioxidative compounds, whereas total antioxidant capacity (TAC) gives a more holistic picture due to cooperative action of antioxidants. Recently, the cupric reducing antioxidant capacity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy research 2015-05, Vol.82 (2), p.177-184
Hauptverfasser: Çekiç, Sema Demirci, Demir, Aslı, Sözgen Başkan, Kevser, Tütem, Esma, Apak, Reşat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue 2
container_start_page 177
container_title Journal of dairy research
container_volume 82
creator Çekiç, Sema Demirci
Demir, Aslı
Sözgen Başkan, Kevser
Tütem, Esma
Apak, Reşat
description Most milk-applied antioxidant assays in literature are based on the isolation and quantification of individual antioxidative compounds, whereas total antioxidant capacity (TAC) gives a more holistic picture due to cooperative action of antioxidants. Recently, the cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) method has been modified to measure the antioxidant capacities of thiol-containing proteins, where the classical ammonium acetate buffer – that may otherwise precipitate proteins– was replaced with concentrated urea buffer (able to expose embedded thiol groups of proteins to oxidative attack) adjusted to pH 7.0. Thus, antioxidant capacity of milk was investigated with two competing TAC assays, namely CUPRAC and ABTS (2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid))/persulphate, because only these assays were capable of evaluating protein contribution to the observed TAC value. As milk fat caused turbidity, experiments were carried out with skim milk or defatted milk samples. To determine TAC, modified CUPRAC method was applied to whole milk, separated and redissolved protein fractions, and the remaining liquid phase after necessary operations. Both TAC methods were investigated for their dilution sensitivity and antioxidant power assessment of separate milk fractions such as casein and whey. Proteins like β-lactoglobulin and casein (but not simple thiols) exhibited enhanced CUPRAC reactivity with surfactant (SDS) addition. Addition of milk protein fractions to whole skim milk produced significant ‘negative-biased’ deviations (up to −26% relative standard error) from TAC absorbance additivity in the application of the ABTS method, as opposed to that of the CUPRAC method less affected by chemical deviations from Beer's law thereby producing much smaller deviations from additivity (i.e. the property of additivity is valid when the measured TAC of a mixture is equal to the sum of individual antioxidant capacities of its constituents).
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022029915000114
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669453823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022029915000114</cupid><sourcerecordid>3650504981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e249c879dd1e6b073b3f7388415584f1b6353232e9255c8b8295386b153a07333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gBsJuHEzmsckmSxrfUJB8bEeMpmMjc6jJinaX-DfNqNVRHF1uJzvnHvhArCL0SFGWBzdIkQIIlJihhDCOF0DQ5xymQhO5DoY9nbS-wOw5f1jRCiSfBMMCBMUMyGH4O3EBOMa26pguxZ2FQxdUDVUbZxfbRkVajVX2oZl7za2foLFEk7ur2_Gk4iVcHx8dwsbE2Zd6eGLDTPozVw5FQzUs6g6LrD-u_-jYe66YGwLq96Oht8GG5WqvdlZ6Qjcn53eTS6S6dX55WQ8TTQVNCSGpFJnQpYlNrxAgha0EjTLUsxYlla44JRRQomRhDGdFRmRjGa8wIyqSFM6AgefvfGC54XxIW-s16auVWu6hc8x5zKNEdKj-7_Qx27h2nhdpATBiBMhIoU_Ke06752p8rmzjXLLHKO8_1L-50sxs7dqXhSNKb8TX2-JAF2VqqZwtnwwP3b_W_sOJXia3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1672106277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of total antioxidant capacity of milk by CUPRAC and ABTS methods with separate characterisation of milk protein fractions</title><source>Cambridge Core</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Çekiç, Sema Demirci ; Demir, Aslı ; Sözgen Başkan, Kevser ; Tütem, Esma ; Apak, Reşat</creator><creatorcontrib>Çekiç, Sema Demirci ; Demir, Aslı ; Sözgen Başkan, Kevser ; Tütem, Esma ; Apak, Reşat</creatorcontrib><description>Most milk-applied antioxidant assays in literature are based on the isolation and quantification of individual antioxidative compounds, whereas total antioxidant capacity (TAC) gives a more holistic picture due to cooperative action of antioxidants. Recently, the cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) method has been modified to measure the antioxidant capacities of thiol-containing proteins, where the classical ammonium acetate buffer – that may otherwise precipitate proteins– was replaced with concentrated urea buffer (able to expose embedded thiol groups of proteins to oxidative attack) adjusted to pH 7.0. Thus, antioxidant capacity of milk was investigated with two competing TAC assays, namely CUPRAC and ABTS (2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid))/persulphate, because only these assays were capable of evaluating protein contribution to the observed TAC value. As milk fat caused turbidity, experiments were carried out with skim milk or defatted milk samples. To determine TAC, modified CUPRAC method was applied to whole milk, separated and redissolved protein fractions, and the remaining liquid phase after necessary operations. Both TAC methods were investigated for their dilution sensitivity and antioxidant power assessment of separate milk fractions such as casein and whey. Proteins like β-lactoglobulin and casein (but not simple thiols) exhibited enhanced CUPRAC reactivity with surfactant (SDS) addition. Addition of milk protein fractions to whole skim milk produced significant ‘negative-biased’ deviations (up to −26% relative standard error) from TAC absorbance additivity in the application of the ABTS method, as opposed to that of the CUPRAC method less affected by chemical deviations from Beer's law thereby producing much smaller deviations from additivity (i.e. the property of additivity is valid when the measured TAC of a mixture is equal to the sum of individual antioxidant capacities of its constituents).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022029915000114</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25731579</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Ammonium ; Animals ; Antioxidants ; Antioxidants - chemistry ; Benzothiazoles - chemistry ; Caseins - chemistry ; Copper - chemistry ; Female ; Milk ; Milk - chemistry ; Milk Proteins - chemistry ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Proteins ; Sulfonic Acids - chemistry ; Turbidity ; Urea ; Whey - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy research, 2015-05, Vol.82 (2), p.177-184</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e249c879dd1e6b073b3f7388415584f1b6353232e9255c8b8295386b153a07333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e249c879dd1e6b073b3f7388415584f1b6353232e9255c8b8295386b153a07333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022029915000114/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25731579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Çekiç, Sema Demirci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Aslı</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sözgen Başkan, Kevser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tütem, Esma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apak, Reşat</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of total antioxidant capacity of milk by CUPRAC and ABTS methods with separate characterisation of milk protein fractions</title><title>Journal of dairy research</title><addtitle>Journal of Dairy Research</addtitle><description>Most milk-applied antioxidant assays in literature are based on the isolation and quantification of individual antioxidative compounds, whereas total antioxidant capacity (TAC) gives a more holistic picture due to cooperative action of antioxidants. Recently, the cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) method has been modified to measure the antioxidant capacities of thiol-containing proteins, where the classical ammonium acetate buffer – that may otherwise precipitate proteins– was replaced with concentrated urea buffer (able to expose embedded thiol groups of proteins to oxidative attack) adjusted to pH 7.0. Thus, antioxidant capacity of milk was investigated with two competing TAC assays, namely CUPRAC and ABTS (2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid))/persulphate, because only these assays were capable of evaluating protein contribution to the observed TAC value. As milk fat caused turbidity, experiments were carried out with skim milk or defatted milk samples. To determine TAC, modified CUPRAC method was applied to whole milk, separated and redissolved protein fractions, and the remaining liquid phase after necessary operations. Both TAC methods were investigated for their dilution sensitivity and antioxidant power assessment of separate milk fractions such as casein and whey. Proteins like β-lactoglobulin and casein (but not simple thiols) exhibited enhanced CUPRAC reactivity with surfactant (SDS) addition. Addition of milk protein fractions to whole skim milk produced significant ‘negative-biased’ deviations (up to −26% relative standard error) from TAC absorbance additivity in the application of the ABTS method, as opposed to that of the CUPRAC method less affected by chemical deviations from Beer's law thereby producing much smaller deviations from additivity (i.e. the property of additivity is valid when the measured TAC of a mixture is equal to the sum of individual antioxidant capacities of its constituents).</description><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>Antioxidants - chemistry</subject><subject>Benzothiazoles - chemistry</subject><subject>Caseins - chemistry</subject><subject>Copper - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Milk - chemistry</subject><subject>Milk Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Sulfonic Acids - chemistry</subject><subject>Turbidity</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>Whey - chemistry</subject><issn>0022-0299</issn><issn>1469-7629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gBsJuHEzmsckmSxrfUJB8bEeMpmMjc6jJinaX-DfNqNVRHF1uJzvnHvhArCL0SFGWBzdIkQIIlJihhDCOF0DQ5xymQhO5DoY9nbS-wOw5f1jRCiSfBMMCBMUMyGH4O3EBOMa26pguxZ2FQxdUDVUbZxfbRkVajVX2oZl7za2foLFEk7ur2_Gk4iVcHx8dwsbE2Zd6eGLDTPozVw5FQzUs6g6LrD-u_-jYe66YGwLq96Oht8GG5WqvdlZ6Qjcn53eTS6S6dX55WQ8TTQVNCSGpFJnQpYlNrxAgha0EjTLUsxYlla44JRRQomRhDGdFRmRjGa8wIyqSFM6AgefvfGC54XxIW-s16auVWu6hc8x5zKNEdKj-7_Qx27h2nhdpATBiBMhIoU_Ke06752p8rmzjXLLHKO8_1L-50sxs7dqXhSNKb8TX2-JAF2VqqZwtnwwP3b_W_sOJXia3w</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Çekiç, Sema Demirci</creator><creator>Demir, Aslı</creator><creator>Sözgen Başkan, Kevser</creator><creator>Tütem, Esma</creator><creator>Apak, Reşat</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Determination of total antioxidant capacity of milk by CUPRAC and ABTS methods with separate characterisation of milk protein fractions</title><author>Çekiç, Sema Demirci ; Demir, Aslı ; Sözgen Başkan, Kevser ; Tütem, Esma ; Apak, Reşat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e249c879dd1e6b073b3f7388415584f1b6353232e9255c8b8295386b153a07333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>Antioxidants - chemistry</topic><topic>Benzothiazoles - chemistry</topic><topic>Caseins - chemistry</topic><topic>Copper - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Milk - chemistry</topic><topic>Milk Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Sulfonic Acids - chemistry</topic><topic>Turbidity</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>Whey - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Çekiç, Sema Demirci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Aslı</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sözgen Başkan, Kevser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tütem, Esma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apak, Reşat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Çekiç, Sema Demirci</au><au>Demir, Aslı</au><au>Sözgen Başkan, Kevser</au><au>Tütem, Esma</au><au>Apak, Reşat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of total antioxidant capacity of milk by CUPRAC and ABTS methods with separate characterisation of milk protein fractions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy research</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Dairy Research</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>177-184</pages><issn>0022-0299</issn><eissn>1469-7629</eissn><abstract>Most milk-applied antioxidant assays in literature are based on the isolation and quantification of individual antioxidative compounds, whereas total antioxidant capacity (TAC) gives a more holistic picture due to cooperative action of antioxidants. Recently, the cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) method has been modified to measure the antioxidant capacities of thiol-containing proteins, where the classical ammonium acetate buffer – that may otherwise precipitate proteins– was replaced with concentrated urea buffer (able to expose embedded thiol groups of proteins to oxidative attack) adjusted to pH 7.0. Thus, antioxidant capacity of milk was investigated with two competing TAC assays, namely CUPRAC and ABTS (2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid))/persulphate, because only these assays were capable of evaluating protein contribution to the observed TAC value. As milk fat caused turbidity, experiments were carried out with skim milk or defatted milk samples. To determine TAC, modified CUPRAC method was applied to whole milk, separated and redissolved protein fractions, and the remaining liquid phase after necessary operations. Both TAC methods were investigated for their dilution sensitivity and antioxidant power assessment of separate milk fractions such as casein and whey. Proteins like β-lactoglobulin and casein (but not simple thiols) exhibited enhanced CUPRAC reactivity with surfactant (SDS) addition. Addition of milk protein fractions to whole skim milk produced significant ‘negative-biased’ deviations (up to −26% relative standard error) from TAC absorbance additivity in the application of the ABTS method, as opposed to that of the CUPRAC method less affected by chemical deviations from Beer's law thereby producing much smaller deviations from additivity (i.e. the property of additivity is valid when the measured TAC of a mixture is equal to the sum of individual antioxidant capacities of its constituents).</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>25731579</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0022029915000114</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0299
ispartof Journal of dairy research, 2015-05, Vol.82 (2), p.177-184
issn 0022-0299
1469-7629
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669453823
source Cambridge Core; MEDLINE
subjects Ammonium
Animals
Antioxidants
Antioxidants - chemistry
Benzothiazoles - chemistry
Caseins - chemistry
Copper - chemistry
Female
Milk
Milk - chemistry
Milk Proteins - chemistry
Oxidation-Reduction
Proteins
Sulfonic Acids - chemistry
Turbidity
Urea
Whey - chemistry
title Determination of total antioxidant capacity of milk by CUPRAC and ABTS methods with separate characterisation of milk protein fractions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A00%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20total%20antioxidant%20capacity%20of%20milk%20by%20CUPRAC%20and%20ABTS%20methods%20with%20separate%20characterisation%20of%20milk%20protein%20fractions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20research&rft.au=%C3%87eki%C3%A7,%20Sema%20Demirci&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=177-184&rft.issn=0022-0299&rft.eissn=1469-7629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022029915000114&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3650504981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1672106277&rft_id=info:pmid/25731579&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022029915000114&rfr_iscdi=true