coreceptor CD4 is expressed in distinct nanoclusters and does not colocalize with T-cell receptor and active protein tyrosine kinase p56lck

Significance Immune cell signaling is heavily associated with the spatial organization of molecules. Here, we examined the nanoscale organization of coreceptor CD4 and its relative spatial localization to the T-cell receptor and the active form of Src kinase p56lck (Lck), using two different superresolution microscopy techniques photoactivated localization microscopy and direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy in both living and fixed cells. With concurrent spatial analyses, we show that neither CD4/T-cell antigen receptor nor CD4/active Lck nanoclusters colocalize but only overlap at the interfaces. In activated T cells, the enhanced clustering of each kind results in increased seclusion from each other. Our observations here in molecular resolution may reveal the general roles that are played by nanoscale organization of critical components in immune cell signaling. CD4 molecules on the surface of T lymphocytes greatly augment the sensitivity and activation process of these cells, but how it functions is not fully understood. Here we studied the spatial organization of CD4, and its relationship to T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) and the active form of Src kinase p56lck (Lck) using single and dual-color photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) and direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM). In nonactivated T cells, CD4 molecules are clustered in small protein islands, as are TCR and Lck. By dual-color imaging, we find that CD4, TCR, and Lck are localized in their separate clusters with limited interactions in the interfaces between them. Upon T-cell activation, the TCR and CD4 begin clustering together, developing into microclusters, and undergo a larger scale redistribution to form supramolecluar activation clusters (SMACs). CD4 and Lck localize in the inner TCR region of the SMAC, but this redistribution of disparate cluster structures results in enhanced segregation from each other. In nonactivated cells these preclustered structures and the limited interactions between them may serve to limit spontaneous and random activation events. However, the small sizes of these island structures also ensure large interfacial surfaces for potential interactions and signal amplification when activation is initiated. In the later activation stages, the increasingly larger clusters and their segregation from each other reduce the interfacial surfaces and could have a dampening effect. These highly differentiated spatial distributions