Equating context conditioning in Pavlovian incubation of US signal value
•The present study showed that subjects that received four conditioning and four extinction trials showed significantly greater responding than subjects that received only four conditioning trials.•Importantly, the present study had two important modifications that were absent in Goddard (2013).•Fir...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioural processes 2014-10, Vol.108, p.151-154 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 154 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 151 |
| container_title | Behavioural processes |
| container_volume | 108 |
| creator | Goddard, Murray J. |
| description | •The present study showed that subjects that received four conditioning and four extinction trials showed significantly greater responding than subjects that received only four conditioning trials.•Importantly, the present study had two important modifications that were absent in Goddard (2013).•First, the present study included a control condition in which rats received unpaired conditioning trials.•Second, the present study equated the number of food pellets delivered in conditioning and extinction.•The present study suggests trial number may not be the fundamental unit of learning.
The present study replicated the finding by Goddard (2013), that when a single food pellet unconditioned stimulus (US) signaled the delivery of three additional pellets, responding after the single US was significantly greater on a delayed, compared to an early, test. Importantly, the present study equated context conditioning by delivering the identical number of food pellets in both conditioning and testing and showed that responding was significantly reduced in control subjects that had received unpaired single food–triple food presentations. Implications for theories of conditioning are considered. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668270751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635714002460</els_id><sourcerecordid>1668270751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-2e1f07dbcda1d1f3dcdaa32557cc68cd15eb85ce2badc1afe627753b9b6b46613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhi0EotvCGyCUCxKXLGM7tpMLEqoKRaoEEvRs2eNJ5VXWaeNkVd4eR7uUG-I09u9vxvbH2BsOWw5cf9htPd1PI24F8KZEWwD1jG14a0TdSmifsw1Io2stlTlj5znvAIC3oF-yM6EaJcB0G3Z99bC4Oaa7Csc00-O81hDnOKY1jKn67g7DeIgulQ0u3q1H1dhXtz-qHO-SG6qDGxZ6xV70bsj0-lQv2O3nq5-X1_XNty9fLz_d1ChNM9eCeA8meAyOB97LUBZOCqUMom4xcEW-VUjCu4Dc9aSFMUr6zmvfaM3lBXt_nFv-_rBQnu0-ZqRhcInGJVuudSsMGPU_qOw600LXFbQ5ojiNOU_U2_sp7t30y3Kwq267s0fddtW9pkV3aXt7umHxewpPTX_8FuDdCXAZ3dBPLmHMf7kOhJZ65T4eOSrqDpEmmzFSQgpxIpxtGOO_X_IbwJigQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1639978099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equating context conditioning in Pavlovian incubation of US signal value</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Goddard, Murray J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Murray J.</creatorcontrib><description>•The present study showed that subjects that received four conditioning and four extinction trials showed significantly greater responding than subjects that received only four conditioning trials.•Importantly, the present study had two important modifications that were absent in Goddard (2013).•First, the present study included a control condition in which rats received unpaired conditioning trials.•Second, the present study equated the number of food pellets delivered in conditioning and extinction.•The present study suggests trial number may not be the fundamental unit of learning.
The present study replicated the finding by Goddard (2013), that when a single food pellet unconditioned stimulus (US) signaled the delivery of three additional pellets, responding after the single US was significantly greater on a delayed, compared to an early, test. Importantly, the present study equated context conditioning by delivering the identical number of food pellets in both conditioning and testing and showed that responding was significantly reduced in control subjects that had received unpaired single food–triple food presentations. Implications for theories of conditioning are considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25452079</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BPRODA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Animals ; Appetitive Behavior - physiology ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conditioning, Classical - physiology ; Extinction ; Extinction, Psychological - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Incubation ; Pavlovian conditioning ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Unconditioned stimulus</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2014-10, Vol.108, p.151-154</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-2e1f07dbcda1d1f3dcdaa32557cc68cd15eb85ce2badc1afe627753b9b6b46613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29026369$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Murray J.</creatorcontrib><title>Equating context conditioning in Pavlovian incubation of US signal value</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>•The present study showed that subjects that received four conditioning and four extinction trials showed significantly greater responding than subjects that received only four conditioning trials.•Importantly, the present study had two important modifications that were absent in Goddard (2013).•First, the present study included a control condition in which rats received unpaired conditioning trials.•Second, the present study equated the number of food pellets delivered in conditioning and extinction.•The present study suggests trial number may not be the fundamental unit of learning.
The present study replicated the finding by Goddard (2013), that when a single food pellet unconditioned stimulus (US) signaled the delivery of three additional pellets, responding after the single US was significantly greater on a delayed, compared to an early, test. Importantly, the present study equated context conditioning by delivering the identical number of food pellets in both conditioning and testing and showed that responding was significantly reduced in control subjects that had received unpaired single food–triple food presentations. Implications for theories of conditioning are considered.</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Pavlovian conditioning</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Unconditioned stimulus</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhi0EotvCGyCUCxKXLGM7tpMLEqoKRaoEEvRs2eNJ5VXWaeNkVd4eR7uUG-I09u9vxvbH2BsOWw5cf9htPd1PI24F8KZEWwD1jG14a0TdSmifsw1Io2stlTlj5znvAIC3oF-yM6EaJcB0G3Z99bC4Oaa7Csc00-O81hDnOKY1jKn67g7DeIgulQ0u3q1H1dhXtz-qHO-SG6qDGxZ6xV70bsj0-lQv2O3nq5-X1_XNty9fLz_d1ChNM9eCeA8meAyOB97LUBZOCqUMom4xcEW-VUjCu4Dc9aSFMUr6zmvfaM3lBXt_nFv-_rBQnu0-ZqRhcInGJVuudSsMGPU_qOw600LXFbQ5ojiNOU_U2_sp7t30y3Kwq267s0fddtW9pkV3aXt7umHxewpPTX_8FuDdCXAZ3dBPLmHMf7kOhJZ65T4eOSrqDpEmmzFSQgpxIpxtGOO_X_IbwJigQg</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Goddard, Murray J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Equating context conditioning in Pavlovian incubation of US signal value</title><author>Goddard, Murray J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-2e1f07dbcda1d1f3dcdaa32557cc68cd15eb85ce2badc1afe627753b9b6b46613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Pavlovian conditioning</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Unconditioned stimulus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Murray J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goddard, Murray J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equating context conditioning in Pavlovian incubation of US signal value</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>108</volume><spage>151</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>151-154</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><coden>BPRODA</coden><abstract>•The present study showed that subjects that received four conditioning and four extinction trials showed significantly greater responding than subjects that received only four conditioning trials.•Importantly, the present study had two important modifications that were absent in Goddard (2013).•First, the present study included a control condition in which rats received unpaired conditioning trials.•Second, the present study equated the number of food pellets delivered in conditioning and extinction.•The present study suggests trial number may not be the fundamental unit of learning.
The present study replicated the finding by Goddard (2013), that when a single food pellet unconditioned stimulus (US) signaled the delivery of three additional pellets, responding after the single US was significantly greater on a delayed, compared to an early, test. Importantly, the present study equated context conditioning by delivering the identical number of food pellets in both conditioning and testing and showed that responding was significantly reduced in control subjects that had received unpaired single food–triple food presentations. Implications for theories of conditioning are considered.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25452079</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.005</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0376-6357 |
| ispartof | Behavioural processes, 2014-10, Vol.108, p.151-154 |
| issn | 0376-6357 1872-8308 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668270751 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Animal ethology Animals Appetitive Behavior - physiology Behavior, Animal - physiology Biological and medical sciences Conditioning, Classical - physiology Extinction Extinction, Psychological - physiology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Incubation Pavlovian conditioning Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Unconditioned stimulus |
| title | Equating context conditioning in Pavlovian incubation of US signal value |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A23%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equating%20context%20conditioning%20in%20Pavlovian%20incubation%20of%20US%20signal%20value&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=Goddard,%20Murray%20J.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=108&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=151-154&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft.coden=BPRODA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1668270751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1639978099&rft_id=info:pmid/25452079&rft_els_id=S0376635714002460&rfr_iscdi=true |