A validated algorithm to ascertain colorectal cancer recurrence using registry resources in Denmark
Colorectal cancer recurrences are difficult to ascertain accurately and efficiently. We developed and validated an algorithm to identify recurrences that uses Danish medical registries. The algorithm uses metastasis and chemotherapy codes in the Danish National Patient Registry and codes indicating...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of cancer 2015-05, Vol.136 (9), p.2210-2215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2215 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2210 |
container_title | International journal of cancer |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Lash, Timothy L. Riis, Anders H. Ostenfeld, Eva B. Erichsen, Rune Vyberg, Mogens Thorlacius‐Ussing, Ole |
description | Colorectal cancer recurrences are difficult to ascertain accurately and efficiently. We developed and validated an algorithm to identify recurrences that uses Danish medical registries. The algorithm uses metastasis and chemotherapy codes in the Danish National Patient Registry and codes indicating cancer recurrence in the Danish Pathology Registry. We applied the algorithm to a cohort (n = 21,246) of colorectal cancer patients diagnosed 2001–2011 and followed through 2012. In a cohort (n = 355) of two groups of actively followed patients, we compared the imputed recurrence data with recurrences diagnosed by regular follow‐up. We compared cumulative incidence curves of imputed recurrence in local and regional stage patients from the large cohort, and of imputed and diagnosed recurrences in the actively followed cohort. In the 355 members of the actively followed cohort, our algorithm correctly identified 60 of 63 recurrences [sensitivity = 95%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 87–99%] and misclassified only 10 of 292 without recurrence (specificity = 97%; 95% CI 94–98%). Cumulative incidence curves showed that members of the large cohort with regional disease had much higher incidence of imputed recurrence than those with local disease. In the actively followed cohort, the cumulative incidence of recurrence overlapped substantially when recurrence was imputed by our algorithm or using the follow‐up data. Despite some limitations regarding ambiguous pathology codes, our algorithm showed excellent performance against actively followed recurrence data, and the expected relation between recurrence risk and cancer stage. It can be used in the Danish registries and adapted to similar registries elsewhere.
What's new?
Steady gains in patient survival following the recurrence of tumors in colorectal cancer have brought into question the reliability of mortality as a surrogate of disease outcome. This study examined the ability of a newly developed algorithm to identify colorectal cancer recurrences using routinely collected registry data. The algorithm correctly identified 60 out of 63 recurrences in a Danish cohort of 355 patients under active surveillance. In cumulative incidence curves, it revealed an increased incidence of imputed recurrence in patients with regional versus local disease. The algorithm is applicable to settings where electronic health data are available. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ijc.29267 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668256184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3591961201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p3477-3e1e61e4e6fc298f37ab96392b7b03774e9719177845c1f2c9c7056db5f1812e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkT1PwzAQhi0EgvIx8AeQJRaWFJ8d2_GIyreQWGCOHPdSXNKk2Amo_x7TAgMTXvze3WNL772EHAMbA2P83M_dmBuu9BYZATM6YxzkNhmlGcs0CLVH9mOcMwYgWb5L9rgUTGuWj4i7oO-28VPb45TaZtYF378saN9RGx2G3vqWuq7pArreNtTZNnVpqoYQMGk6RN_OUmPmYx9WScRuCA4jTQ8vsV3Y8HpIdmrbRDz6vg_I8_XV0-Q2e3i8uZtcPGRLkWudCQRUgDmq2nFT1ELbyihheKUrJrTO0WgwoHWRSwc1d8ZpJtW0kjUUwFEckLPNv8vQvQ0Y-3Lhk4mmsS12QyxBqYJLBUX-D1RKzY1hIqGnf9B5ctgmI2uKp6NYok6-qaFa4LRcBp-sr8qfTSfgfAN8-AZXv3Ng5VeEZYqwXEdY3t1P1kJ8AmjOjKE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655222260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A validated algorithm to ascertain colorectal cancer recurrence using registry resources in Denmark</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lash, Timothy L. ; Riis, Anders H. ; Ostenfeld, Eva B. ; Erichsen, Rune ; Vyberg, Mogens ; Thorlacius‐Ussing, Ole</creator><creatorcontrib>Lash, Timothy L. ; Riis, Anders H. ; Ostenfeld, Eva B. ; Erichsen, Rune ; Vyberg, Mogens ; Thorlacius‐Ussing, Ole</creatorcontrib><description>Colorectal cancer recurrences are difficult to ascertain accurately and efficiently. We developed and validated an algorithm to identify recurrences that uses Danish medical registries. The algorithm uses metastasis and chemotherapy codes in the Danish National Patient Registry and codes indicating cancer recurrence in the Danish Pathology Registry. We applied the algorithm to a cohort (n = 21,246) of colorectal cancer patients diagnosed 2001–2011 and followed through 2012. In a cohort (n = 355) of two groups of actively followed patients, we compared the imputed recurrence data with recurrences diagnosed by regular follow‐up. We compared cumulative incidence curves of imputed recurrence in local and regional stage patients from the large cohort, and of imputed and diagnosed recurrences in the actively followed cohort. In the 355 members of the actively followed cohort, our algorithm correctly identified 60 of 63 recurrences [sensitivity = 95%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 87–99%] and misclassified only 10 of 292 without recurrence (specificity = 97%; 95% CI 94–98%). Cumulative incidence curves showed that members of the large cohort with regional disease had much higher incidence of imputed recurrence than those with local disease. In the actively followed cohort, the cumulative incidence of recurrence overlapped substantially when recurrence was imputed by our algorithm or using the follow‐up data. Despite some limitations regarding ambiguous pathology codes, our algorithm showed excellent performance against actively followed recurrence data, and the expected relation between recurrence risk and cancer stage. It can be used in the Danish registries and adapted to similar registries elsewhere.
What's new?
Steady gains in patient survival following the recurrence of tumors in colorectal cancer have brought into question the reliability of mortality as a surrogate of disease outcome. This study examined the ability of a newly developed algorithm to identify colorectal cancer recurrences using routinely collected registry data. The algorithm correctly identified 60 out of 63 recurrences in a Danish cohort of 355 patients under active surveillance. In cumulative incidence curves, it revealed an increased incidence of imputed recurrence in patients with regional versus local disease. The algorithm is applicable to settings where electronic health data are available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29267</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25307704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Cancer ; Colorectal cancer ; colorectal neoplasms ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Confidence intervals ; Denmark - epidemiology ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Incidence ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Registries ; Risk ; Risk Factors ; secondary</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2015-05, Vol.136 (9), p.2210-2215</ispartof><rights>2014 UICC</rights><rights>2014 UICC.</rights><rights>2015 UICC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.29267$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.29267$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25307704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lash, Timothy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riis, Anders H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostenfeld, Eva B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erichsen, Rune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vyberg, Mogens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorlacius‐Ussing, Ole</creatorcontrib><title>A validated algorithm to ascertain colorectal cancer recurrence using registry resources in Denmark</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>Colorectal cancer recurrences are difficult to ascertain accurately and efficiently. We developed and validated an algorithm to identify recurrences that uses Danish medical registries. The algorithm uses metastasis and chemotherapy codes in the Danish National Patient Registry and codes indicating cancer recurrence in the Danish Pathology Registry. We applied the algorithm to a cohort (n = 21,246) of colorectal cancer patients diagnosed 2001–2011 and followed through 2012. In a cohort (n = 355) of two groups of actively followed patients, we compared the imputed recurrence data with recurrences diagnosed by regular follow‐up. We compared cumulative incidence curves of imputed recurrence in local and regional stage patients from the large cohort, and of imputed and diagnosed recurrences in the actively followed cohort. In the 355 members of the actively followed cohort, our algorithm correctly identified 60 of 63 recurrences [sensitivity = 95%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 87–99%] and misclassified only 10 of 292 without recurrence (specificity = 97%; 95% CI 94–98%). Cumulative incidence curves showed that members of the large cohort with regional disease had much higher incidence of imputed recurrence than those with local disease. In the actively followed cohort, the cumulative incidence of recurrence overlapped substantially when recurrence was imputed by our algorithm or using the follow‐up data. Despite some limitations regarding ambiguous pathology codes, our algorithm showed excellent performance against actively followed recurrence data, and the expected relation between recurrence risk and cancer stage. It can be used in the Danish registries and adapted to similar registries elsewhere.
What's new?
Steady gains in patient survival following the recurrence of tumors in colorectal cancer have brought into question the reliability of mortality as a surrogate of disease outcome. This study examined the ability of a newly developed algorithm to identify colorectal cancer recurrences using routinely collected registry data. The algorithm correctly identified 60 out of 63 recurrences in a Danish cohort of 355 patients under active surveillance. In cumulative incidence curves, it revealed an increased incidence of imputed recurrence in patients with regional versus local disease. The algorithm is applicable to settings where electronic health data are available.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>colorectal neoplasms</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Denmark - epidemiology</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>secondary</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkT1PwzAQhi0EgvIx8AeQJRaWFJ8d2_GIyreQWGCOHPdSXNKk2Amo_x7TAgMTXvze3WNL772EHAMbA2P83M_dmBuu9BYZATM6YxzkNhmlGcs0CLVH9mOcMwYgWb5L9rgUTGuWj4i7oO-28VPb45TaZtYF378saN9RGx2G3vqWuq7pArreNtTZNnVpqoYQMGk6RN_OUmPmYx9WScRuCA4jTQ8vsV3Y8HpIdmrbRDz6vg_I8_XV0-Q2e3i8uZtcPGRLkWudCQRUgDmq2nFT1ELbyihheKUrJrTO0WgwoHWRSwc1d8ZpJtW0kjUUwFEckLPNv8vQvQ0Y-3Lhk4mmsS12QyxBqYJLBUX-D1RKzY1hIqGnf9B5ctgmI2uKp6NYok6-qaFa4LRcBp-sr8qfTSfgfAN8-AZXv3Ng5VeEZYqwXEdY3t1P1kJ8AmjOjKE</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Lash, Timothy L.</creator><creator>Riis, Anders H.</creator><creator>Ostenfeld, Eva B.</creator><creator>Erichsen, Rune</creator><creator>Vyberg, Mogens</creator><creator>Thorlacius‐Ussing, Ole</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>A validated algorithm to ascertain colorectal cancer recurrence using registry resources in Denmark</title><author>Lash, Timothy L. ; Riis, Anders H. ; Ostenfeld, Eva B. ; Erichsen, Rune ; Vyberg, Mogens ; Thorlacius‐Ussing, Ole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p3477-3e1e61e4e6fc298f37ab96392b7b03774e9719177845c1f2c9c7056db5f1812e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>colorectal neoplasms</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Denmark - epidemiology</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>secondary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lash, Timothy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riis, Anders H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostenfeld, Eva B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erichsen, Rune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vyberg, Mogens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorlacius‐Ussing, Ole</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lash, Timothy L.</au><au>Riis, Anders H.</au><au>Ostenfeld, Eva B.</au><au>Erichsen, Rune</au><au>Vyberg, Mogens</au><au>Thorlacius‐Ussing, Ole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A validated algorithm to ascertain colorectal cancer recurrence using registry resources in Denmark</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2210</spage><epage>2215</epage><pages>2210-2215</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><abstract>Colorectal cancer recurrences are difficult to ascertain accurately and efficiently. We developed and validated an algorithm to identify recurrences that uses Danish medical registries. The algorithm uses metastasis and chemotherapy codes in the Danish National Patient Registry and codes indicating cancer recurrence in the Danish Pathology Registry. We applied the algorithm to a cohort (n = 21,246) of colorectal cancer patients diagnosed 2001–2011 and followed through 2012. In a cohort (n = 355) of two groups of actively followed patients, we compared the imputed recurrence data with recurrences diagnosed by regular follow‐up. We compared cumulative incidence curves of imputed recurrence in local and regional stage patients from the large cohort, and of imputed and diagnosed recurrences in the actively followed cohort. In the 355 members of the actively followed cohort, our algorithm correctly identified 60 of 63 recurrences [sensitivity = 95%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 87–99%] and misclassified only 10 of 292 without recurrence (specificity = 97%; 95% CI 94–98%). Cumulative incidence curves showed that members of the large cohort with regional disease had much higher incidence of imputed recurrence than those with local disease. In the actively followed cohort, the cumulative incidence of recurrence overlapped substantially when recurrence was imputed by our algorithm or using the follow‐up data. Despite some limitations regarding ambiguous pathology codes, our algorithm showed excellent performance against actively followed recurrence data, and the expected relation between recurrence risk and cancer stage. It can be used in the Danish registries and adapted to similar registries elsewhere.
What's new?
Steady gains in patient survival following the recurrence of tumors in colorectal cancer have brought into question the reliability of mortality as a surrogate of disease outcome. This study examined the ability of a newly developed algorithm to identify colorectal cancer recurrences using routinely collected registry data. The algorithm correctly identified 60 out of 63 recurrences in a Danish cohort of 355 patients under active surveillance. In cumulative incidence curves, it revealed an increased incidence of imputed recurrence in patients with regional versus local disease. The algorithm is applicable to settings where electronic health data are available.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>25307704</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.29267</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7136 |
ispartof | International journal of cancer, 2015-05, Vol.136 (9), p.2210-2215 |
issn | 0020-7136 1097-0215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668256184 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Algorithms Cancer Colorectal cancer colorectal neoplasms Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Confidence intervals Denmark - epidemiology epidemiology Humans Incidence Medical research Middle Aged Mortality Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology Neoplasm Staging - methods Registries Risk Risk Factors secondary |
title | A validated algorithm to ascertain colorectal cancer recurrence using registry resources in Denmark |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T06%3A56%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20validated%20algorithm%20to%20ascertain%20colorectal%20cancer%20recurrence%20using%20registry%20resources%20in%20Denmark&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Lash,%20Timothy%20L.&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2210&rft.epage=2215&rft.pages=2210-2215&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.29267&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3591961201%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655222260&rft_id=info:pmid/25307704&rfr_iscdi=true |