Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?

Self‐inhibition of growth has been observed in different organisms, but an underlying common mechanism has not been proposed so far. Recently, extracellular DNA (exDNA) has been reported as species‐specific growth inhibitor in plants and proposed as an explanation of negative plant–soil feedback. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist 2015-04, Vol.206 (1), p.127-132
Hauptverfasser: Mazzoleni, Stefano, Cartenì, Fabrizio, Bonanomi, Giuliano, Senatore, Mauro, Termolino, Pasquale, Giannino, Francesco, Incerti, Guido, Rietkerk, Max, Lanzotti, Virginia, Chiusano, Maria Luisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 1
container_start_page 127
container_title The New phytologist
container_volume 206
creator Mazzoleni, Stefano
Cartenì, Fabrizio
Bonanomi, Giuliano
Senatore, Mauro
Termolino, Pasquale
Giannino, Francesco
Incerti, Guido
Rietkerk, Max
Lanzotti, Virginia
Chiusano, Maria Luisa
description Self‐inhibition of growth has been observed in different organisms, but an underlying common mechanism has not been proposed so far. Recently, extracellular DNA (exDNA) has been reported as species‐specific growth inhibitor in plants and proposed as an explanation of negative plant–soil feedback. In this work the effect of exDNA was tested on different species to assess the occurrence of such inhibition in organisms other than plants. Bioassays were performed on six species of different taxonomic groups, including bacteria, fungi, algae, plants, protozoa and insects. Treatments consisted in the addition to the growth substrate of conspecific and heterologous DNA at different concentration levels. Results showed that treatments with conspecific DNA always produced a concentration dependent growth inhibition, which instead was not observed in the case of heterologous DNA. Reported evidence suggests the generality of the observed phenomenon which opens new perspectives in the context of self‐inhibition processes. Moreover, the existence of a general species‐specific biological effect of exDNA raises interesting questions on its possible involvement in self‐recognition mechanisms. Further investigation at molecular level will be required to unravel the specific functioning of the observed inhibitory effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nph.13306
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668249328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>newphytologist.206.1.127</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>newphytologist.206.1.127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-d9aac2c4734e50690a37191c637ddc084246d8628e22558bcc112dffdcc1b4fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1O3DAURq0KVAbaRV-gRGIDi4D_YjtsKgQUkCit1CJ1ZzmOPZNRJp7aiWB2PALPyJP0QoBFpVb15npx7ufPOgh9IHifwDnolrN9whgWb9CEcFHmijC5hiYYU5ULLn5uoM2U5hjjshD0LdqgMBShfIK-XHSzpmr6EFeZ897ZPmXBZ-62j8a6th1aE7PkWv9wd39ydXSYmWzqOhdNm1VNaMO0sXBdxmBdSp_eoXVv2uTeP88tdP359MfxeX759ezi-Ogyt4JLkdelMZZaLhl3BRYlNkySkljBZF1brDjlolZQ0VFaFKqylhBae1_DpeK-Zltod8yFh38NLvV60aTHuqZzYUiaCKEoLxlV_4EWSmJZMAbozh_oPAyxg49oygvFCWYC_4uCLClLAc2B2hspG0NK0Xm9jM3CxJUmWD9K0yBNP0kD9uNz4lAtXP1KvlgC4GAEbprWrf6epK--nb9E5uPGPIHa143O3Sxnq_7JGxSnsEI0oRL47ZH3JmgzjU3S198pJgXGRIEmyn4DRDW4fA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1657796862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Mazzoleni, Stefano ; Cartenì, Fabrizio ; Bonanomi, Giuliano ; Senatore, Mauro ; Termolino, Pasquale ; Giannino, Francesco ; Incerti, Guido ; Rietkerk, Max ; Lanzotti, Virginia ; Chiusano, Maria Luisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazzoleni, Stefano ; Cartenì, Fabrizio ; Bonanomi, Giuliano ; Senatore, Mauro ; Termolino, Pasquale ; Giannino, Francesco ; Incerti, Guido ; Rietkerk, Max ; Lanzotti, Virginia ; Chiusano, Maria Luisa</creatorcontrib><description>Self‐inhibition of growth has been observed in different organisms, but an underlying common mechanism has not been proposed so far. Recently, extracellular DNA (exDNA) has been reported as species‐specific growth inhibitor in plants and proposed as an explanation of negative plant–soil feedback. In this work the effect of exDNA was tested on different species to assess the occurrence of such inhibition in organisms other than plants. Bioassays were performed on six species of different taxonomic groups, including bacteria, fungi, algae, plants, protozoa and insects. Treatments consisted in the addition to the growth substrate of conspecific and heterologous DNA at different concentration levels. Results showed that treatments with conspecific DNA always produced a concentration dependent growth inhibition, which instead was not observed in the case of heterologous DNA. Reported evidence suggests the generality of the observed phenomenon which opens new perspectives in the context of self‐inhibition processes. Moreover, the existence of a general species‐specific biological effect of exDNA raises interesting questions on its possible involvement in self‐recognition mechanisms. Further investigation at molecular level will be required to unravel the specific functioning of the observed inhibitory effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nph.13306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25628124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Academic Press</publisher><subject>Algae ; Animals ; Arabidopsis - genetics ; autotoxicity ; Bacillus subtilis - drug effects ; Bacillus subtilis - growth &amp; development ; bacteria ; Bio-assays ; Bioassay ; Bioassays ; Biological activity ; Biological effects ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA - pharmacology ; Ecosystem ; exDNA ; exDNA functions ; Extracellular ; Extracellular Space - genetics ; Fungi ; Growth ; growth retardation ; heterologous DNA ; Insects ; Physarum polycephalum - drug effects ; Physarum polycephalum - growth &amp; development ; Plant ecology ; Plant growth ; Plants ; Plants - drug effects ; Protozoa ; Rapid reports ; Sarcophagi ; Sarcophagidae - drug effects ; Sarcophagidae - growth &amp; development ; Scenedesmus - drug effects ; Scenedesmus - growth &amp; development ; self‐recognition ; Soil ; Soil ecology ; Species ; Species Specificity ; Substrates ; Synecology ; Tadpoles ; Trichoderma - drug effects ; Trichoderma - growth &amp; development</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2015-04, Vol.206 (1), p.127-132</ispartof><rights>2015 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2015 The Authors New Phytologist © 2015 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2015 The Authors New Phytologist © 2015 New Phytologist Trust.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 New Phytologist Trust</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-d9aac2c4734e50690a37191c637ddc084246d8628e22558bcc112dffdcc1b4fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-d9aac2c4734e50690a37191c637ddc084246d8628e22558bcc112dffdcc1b4fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/newphytologist.206.1.127$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/newphytologist.206.1.127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,1432,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazzoleni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartenì, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonanomi, Giuliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senatore, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Termolino, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannino, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incerti, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rietkerk, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzotti, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiusano, Maria Luisa</creatorcontrib><title>Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>Self‐inhibition of growth has been observed in different organisms, but an underlying common mechanism has not been proposed so far. Recently, extracellular DNA (exDNA) has been reported as species‐specific growth inhibitor in plants and proposed as an explanation of negative plant–soil feedback. In this work the effect of exDNA was tested on different species to assess the occurrence of such inhibition in organisms other than plants. Bioassays were performed on six species of different taxonomic groups, including bacteria, fungi, algae, plants, protozoa and insects. Treatments consisted in the addition to the growth substrate of conspecific and heterologous DNA at different concentration levels. Results showed that treatments with conspecific DNA always produced a concentration dependent growth inhibition, which instead was not observed in the case of heterologous DNA. Reported evidence suggests the generality of the observed phenomenon which opens new perspectives in the context of self‐inhibition processes. Moreover, the existence of a general species‐specific biological effect of exDNA raises interesting questions on its possible involvement in self‐recognition mechanisms. Further investigation at molecular level will be required to unravel the specific functioning of the observed inhibitory effects.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arabidopsis - genetics</subject><subject>autotoxicity</subject><subject>Bacillus subtilis - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacillus subtilis - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>bacteria</subject><subject>Bio-assays</subject><subject>Bioassay</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biological effects</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA - pharmacology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>exDNA</subject><subject>exDNA functions</subject><subject>Extracellular</subject><subject>Extracellular Space - genetics</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>growth retardation</subject><subject>heterologous DNA</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Physarum polycephalum - drug effects</subject><subject>Physarum polycephalum - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants - drug effects</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>Rapid reports</subject><subject>Sarcophagi</subject><subject>Sarcophagidae - drug effects</subject><subject>Sarcophagidae - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Scenedesmus - drug effects</subject><subject>Scenedesmus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>self‐recognition</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil ecology</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Tadpoles</subject><subject>Trichoderma - drug effects</subject><subject>Trichoderma - growth &amp; development</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1O3DAURq0KVAbaRV-gRGIDi4D_YjtsKgQUkCit1CJ1ZzmOPZNRJp7aiWB2PALPyJP0QoBFpVb15npx7ufPOgh9IHifwDnolrN9whgWb9CEcFHmijC5hiYYU5ULLn5uoM2U5hjjshD0LdqgMBShfIK-XHSzpmr6EFeZ897ZPmXBZ-62j8a6th1aE7PkWv9wd39ydXSYmWzqOhdNm1VNaMO0sXBdxmBdSp_eoXVv2uTeP88tdP359MfxeX759ezi-Ogyt4JLkdelMZZaLhl3BRYlNkySkljBZF1brDjlolZQ0VFaFKqylhBae1_DpeK-Zltod8yFh38NLvV60aTHuqZzYUiaCKEoLxlV_4EWSmJZMAbozh_oPAyxg49oygvFCWYC_4uCLClLAc2B2hspG0NK0Xm9jM3CxJUmWD9K0yBNP0kD9uNz4lAtXP1KvlgC4GAEbprWrf6epK--nb9E5uPGPIHa143O3Sxnq_7JGxSnsEI0oRL47ZH3JmgzjU3S198pJgXGRIEmyn4DRDW4fA</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Mazzoleni, Stefano</creator><creator>Cartenì, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Bonanomi, Giuliano</creator><creator>Senatore, Mauro</creator><creator>Termolino, Pasquale</creator><creator>Giannino, Francesco</creator><creator>Incerti, Guido</creator><creator>Rietkerk, Max</creator><creator>Lanzotti, Virginia</creator><creator>Chiusano, Maria Luisa</creator><general>Academic Press</general><general>New Phytologist Trust</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?</title><author>Mazzoleni, Stefano ; Cartenì, Fabrizio ; Bonanomi, Giuliano ; Senatore, Mauro ; Termolino, Pasquale ; Giannino, Francesco ; Incerti, Guido ; Rietkerk, Max ; Lanzotti, Virginia ; Chiusano, Maria Luisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-d9aac2c4734e50690a37191c637ddc084246d8628e22558bcc112dffdcc1b4fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arabidopsis - genetics</topic><topic>autotoxicity</topic><topic>Bacillus subtilis - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacillus subtilis - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>bacteria</topic><topic>Bio-assays</topic><topic>Bioassay</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biological effects</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA - pharmacology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>exDNA</topic><topic>exDNA functions</topic><topic>Extracellular</topic><topic>Extracellular Space - genetics</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>growth retardation</topic><topic>heterologous DNA</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Physarum polycephalum - drug effects</topic><topic>Physarum polycephalum - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants - drug effects</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>Rapid reports</topic><topic>Sarcophagi</topic><topic>Sarcophagidae - drug effects</topic><topic>Sarcophagidae - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Scenedesmus - drug effects</topic><topic>Scenedesmus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>self‐recognition</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil ecology</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Tadpoles</topic><topic>Trichoderma - drug effects</topic><topic>Trichoderma - growth &amp; development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazzoleni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartenì, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonanomi, Giuliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senatore, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Termolino, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannino, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incerti, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rietkerk, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzotti, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiusano, Maria Luisa</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazzoleni, Stefano</au><au>Cartenì, Fabrizio</au><au>Bonanomi, Giuliano</au><au>Senatore, Mauro</au><au>Termolino, Pasquale</au><au>Giannino, Francesco</au><au>Incerti, Guido</au><au>Rietkerk, Max</au><au>Lanzotti, Virginia</au><au>Chiusano, Maria Luisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>206</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>127-132</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>Self‐inhibition of growth has been observed in different organisms, but an underlying common mechanism has not been proposed so far. Recently, extracellular DNA (exDNA) has been reported as species‐specific growth inhibitor in plants and proposed as an explanation of negative plant–soil feedback. In this work the effect of exDNA was tested on different species to assess the occurrence of such inhibition in organisms other than plants. Bioassays were performed on six species of different taxonomic groups, including bacteria, fungi, algae, plants, protozoa and insects. Treatments consisted in the addition to the growth substrate of conspecific and heterologous DNA at different concentration levels. Results showed that treatments with conspecific DNA always produced a concentration dependent growth inhibition, which instead was not observed in the case of heterologous DNA. Reported evidence suggests the generality of the observed phenomenon which opens new perspectives in the context of self‐inhibition processes. Moreover, the existence of a general species‐specific biological effect of exDNA raises interesting questions on its possible involvement in self‐recognition mechanisms. Further investigation at molecular level will be required to unravel the specific functioning of the observed inhibitory effects.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Academic Press</pub><pmid>25628124</pmid><doi>10.1111/nph.13306</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-646X
ispartof The New phytologist, 2015-04, Vol.206 (1), p.127-132
issn 0028-646X
1469-8137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668249328
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Algae
Animals
Arabidopsis - genetics
autotoxicity
Bacillus subtilis - drug effects
Bacillus subtilis - growth & development
bacteria
Bio-assays
Bioassay
Bioassays
Biological activity
Biological effects
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA - pharmacology
Ecosystem
exDNA
exDNA functions
Extracellular
Extracellular Space - genetics
Fungi
Growth
growth retardation
heterologous DNA
Insects
Physarum polycephalum - drug effects
Physarum polycephalum - growth & development
Plant ecology
Plant growth
Plants
Plants - drug effects
Protozoa
Rapid reports
Sarcophagi
Sarcophagidae - drug effects
Sarcophagidae - growth & development
Scenedesmus - drug effects
Scenedesmus - growth & development
self‐recognition
Soil
Soil ecology
Species
Species Specificity
Substrates
Synecology
Tadpoles
Trichoderma - drug effects
Trichoderma - growth & development
title Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A37%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inhibitory%20effects%20of%20extracellular%20self%E2%80%90DNA:%20a%20general%20biological%20process?&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Mazzoleni,%20Stefano&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=206&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=127-132&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nph.13306&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3Enewphytologist.206.1.127%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1657796862&rft_id=info:pmid/25628124&rft_jstor_id=newphytologist.206.1.127&rfr_iscdi=true