Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?
Self‐inhibition of growth has been observed in different organisms, but an underlying common mechanism has not been proposed so far. Recently, extracellular DNA (exDNA) has been reported as species‐specific growth inhibitor in plants and proposed as an explanation of negative plant–soil feedback. In...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New phytologist 2015-04, Vol.206 (1), p.127-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 132 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | The New phytologist |
container_volume | 206 |
creator | Mazzoleni, Stefano Cartenì, Fabrizio Bonanomi, Giuliano Senatore, Mauro Termolino, Pasquale Giannino, Francesco Incerti, Guido Rietkerk, Max Lanzotti, Virginia Chiusano, Maria Luisa |
description | Self‐inhibition of growth has been observed in different organisms, but an underlying common mechanism has not been proposed so far. Recently, extracellular DNA (exDNA) has been reported as species‐specific growth inhibitor in plants and proposed as an explanation of negative plant–soil feedback. In this work the effect of exDNA was tested on different species to assess the occurrence of such inhibition in organisms other than plants. Bioassays were performed on six species of different taxonomic groups, including bacteria, fungi, algae, plants, protozoa and insects. Treatments consisted in the addition to the growth substrate of conspecific and heterologous DNA at different concentration levels. Results showed that treatments with conspecific DNA always produced a concentration dependent growth inhibition, which instead was not observed in the case of heterologous DNA. Reported evidence suggests the generality of the observed phenomenon which opens new perspectives in the context of self‐inhibition processes. Moreover, the existence of a general species‐specific biological effect of exDNA raises interesting questions on its possible involvement in self‐recognition mechanisms. Further investigation at molecular level will be required to unravel the specific functioning of the observed inhibitory effects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nph.13306 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668249328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>newphytologist.206.1.127</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>newphytologist.206.1.127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-d9aac2c4734e50690a37191c637ddc084246d8628e22558bcc112dffdcc1b4fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1O3DAURq0KVAbaRV-gRGIDi4D_YjtsKgQUkCit1CJ1ZzmOPZNRJp7aiWB2PALPyJP0QoBFpVb15npx7ufPOgh9IHifwDnolrN9whgWb9CEcFHmijC5hiYYU5ULLn5uoM2U5hjjshD0LdqgMBShfIK-XHSzpmr6EFeZ897ZPmXBZ-62j8a6th1aE7PkWv9wd39ydXSYmWzqOhdNm1VNaMO0sXBdxmBdSp_eoXVv2uTeP88tdP359MfxeX759ezi-Ogyt4JLkdelMZZaLhl3BRYlNkySkljBZF1brDjlolZQ0VFaFKqylhBae1_DpeK-Zltod8yFh38NLvV60aTHuqZzYUiaCKEoLxlV_4EWSmJZMAbozh_oPAyxg49oygvFCWYC_4uCLClLAc2B2hspG0NK0Xm9jM3CxJUmWD9K0yBNP0kD9uNz4lAtXP1KvlgC4GAEbprWrf6epK--nb9E5uPGPIHa143O3Sxnq_7JGxSnsEI0oRL47ZH3JmgzjU3S198pJgXGRIEmyn4DRDW4fA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1657796862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Mazzoleni, Stefano ; Cartenì, Fabrizio ; Bonanomi, Giuliano ; Senatore, Mauro ; Termolino, Pasquale ; Giannino, Francesco ; Incerti, Guido ; Rietkerk, Max ; Lanzotti, Virginia ; Chiusano, Maria Luisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazzoleni, Stefano ; Cartenì, Fabrizio ; Bonanomi, Giuliano ; Senatore, Mauro ; Termolino, Pasquale ; Giannino, Francesco ; Incerti, Guido ; Rietkerk, Max ; Lanzotti, Virginia ; Chiusano, Maria Luisa</creatorcontrib><description>Self‐inhibition of growth has been observed in different organisms, but an underlying common mechanism has not been proposed so far. Recently, extracellular DNA (exDNA) has been reported as species‐specific growth inhibitor in plants and proposed as an explanation of negative plant–soil feedback. In this work the effect of exDNA was tested on different species to assess the occurrence of such inhibition in organisms other than plants. Bioassays were performed on six species of different taxonomic groups, including bacteria, fungi, algae, plants, protozoa and insects. Treatments consisted in the addition to the growth substrate of conspecific and heterologous DNA at different concentration levels. Results showed that treatments with conspecific DNA always produced a concentration dependent growth inhibition, which instead was not observed in the case of heterologous DNA. Reported evidence suggests the generality of the observed phenomenon which opens new perspectives in the context of self‐inhibition processes. Moreover, the existence of a general species‐specific biological effect of exDNA raises interesting questions on its possible involvement in self‐recognition mechanisms. Further investigation at molecular level will be required to unravel the specific functioning of the observed inhibitory effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nph.13306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25628124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Academic Press</publisher><subject>Algae ; Animals ; Arabidopsis - genetics ; autotoxicity ; Bacillus subtilis - drug effects ; Bacillus subtilis - growth & development ; bacteria ; Bio-assays ; Bioassay ; Bioassays ; Biological activity ; Biological effects ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA - pharmacology ; Ecosystem ; exDNA ; exDNA functions ; Extracellular ; Extracellular Space - genetics ; Fungi ; Growth ; growth retardation ; heterologous DNA ; Insects ; Physarum polycephalum - drug effects ; Physarum polycephalum - growth & development ; Plant ecology ; Plant growth ; Plants ; Plants - drug effects ; Protozoa ; Rapid reports ; Sarcophagi ; Sarcophagidae - drug effects ; Sarcophagidae - growth & development ; Scenedesmus - drug effects ; Scenedesmus - growth & development ; self‐recognition ; Soil ; Soil ecology ; Species ; Species Specificity ; Substrates ; Synecology ; Tadpoles ; Trichoderma - drug effects ; Trichoderma - growth & development</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2015-04, Vol.206 (1), p.127-132</ispartof><rights>2015 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2015 The Authors New Phytologist © 2015 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2015 The Authors New Phytologist © 2015 New Phytologist Trust.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 New Phytologist Trust</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-d9aac2c4734e50690a37191c637ddc084246d8628e22558bcc112dffdcc1b4fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-d9aac2c4734e50690a37191c637ddc084246d8628e22558bcc112dffdcc1b4fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/newphytologist.206.1.127$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/newphytologist.206.1.127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,1432,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazzoleni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartenì, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonanomi, Giuliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senatore, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Termolino, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannino, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incerti, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rietkerk, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzotti, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiusano, Maria Luisa</creatorcontrib><title>Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>Self‐inhibition of growth has been observed in different organisms, but an underlying common mechanism has not been proposed so far. Recently, extracellular DNA (exDNA) has been reported as species‐specific growth inhibitor in plants and proposed as an explanation of negative plant–soil feedback. In this work the effect of exDNA was tested on different species to assess the occurrence of such inhibition in organisms other than plants. Bioassays were performed on six species of different taxonomic groups, including bacteria, fungi, algae, plants, protozoa and insects. Treatments consisted in the addition to the growth substrate of conspecific and heterologous DNA at different concentration levels. Results showed that treatments with conspecific DNA always produced a concentration dependent growth inhibition, which instead was not observed in the case of heterologous DNA. Reported evidence suggests the generality of the observed phenomenon which opens new perspectives in the context of self‐inhibition processes. Moreover, the existence of a general species‐specific biological effect of exDNA raises interesting questions on its possible involvement in self‐recognition mechanisms. Further investigation at molecular level will be required to unravel the specific functioning of the observed inhibitory effects.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arabidopsis - genetics</subject><subject>autotoxicity</subject><subject>Bacillus subtilis - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacillus subtilis - growth & development</subject><subject>bacteria</subject><subject>Bio-assays</subject><subject>Bioassay</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biological effects</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA - pharmacology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>exDNA</subject><subject>exDNA functions</subject><subject>Extracellular</subject><subject>Extracellular Space - genetics</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>growth retardation</subject><subject>heterologous DNA</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Physarum polycephalum - drug effects</subject><subject>Physarum polycephalum - growth & development</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants - drug effects</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>Rapid reports</subject><subject>Sarcophagi</subject><subject>Sarcophagidae - drug effects</subject><subject>Sarcophagidae - growth & development</subject><subject>Scenedesmus - drug effects</subject><subject>Scenedesmus - growth & development</subject><subject>self‐recognition</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil ecology</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Tadpoles</subject><subject>Trichoderma - drug effects</subject><subject>Trichoderma - growth & development</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1O3DAURq0KVAbaRV-gRGIDi4D_YjtsKgQUkCit1CJ1ZzmOPZNRJp7aiWB2PALPyJP0QoBFpVb15npx7ufPOgh9IHifwDnolrN9whgWb9CEcFHmijC5hiYYU5ULLn5uoM2U5hjjshD0LdqgMBShfIK-XHSzpmr6EFeZ897ZPmXBZ-62j8a6th1aE7PkWv9wd39ydXSYmWzqOhdNm1VNaMO0sXBdxmBdSp_eoXVv2uTeP88tdP359MfxeX759ezi-Ogyt4JLkdelMZZaLhl3BRYlNkySkljBZF1brDjlolZQ0VFaFKqylhBae1_DpeK-Zltod8yFh38NLvV60aTHuqZzYUiaCKEoLxlV_4EWSmJZMAbozh_oPAyxg49oygvFCWYC_4uCLClLAc2B2hspG0NK0Xm9jM3CxJUmWD9K0yBNP0kD9uNz4lAtXP1KvlgC4GAEbprWrf6epK--nb9E5uPGPIHa143O3Sxnq_7JGxSnsEI0oRL47ZH3JmgzjU3S198pJgXGRIEmyn4DRDW4fA</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Mazzoleni, Stefano</creator><creator>Cartenì, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Bonanomi, Giuliano</creator><creator>Senatore, Mauro</creator><creator>Termolino, Pasquale</creator><creator>Giannino, Francesco</creator><creator>Incerti, Guido</creator><creator>Rietkerk, Max</creator><creator>Lanzotti, Virginia</creator><creator>Chiusano, Maria Luisa</creator><general>Academic Press</general><general>New Phytologist Trust</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?</title><author>Mazzoleni, Stefano ; Cartenì, Fabrizio ; Bonanomi, Giuliano ; Senatore, Mauro ; Termolino, Pasquale ; Giannino, Francesco ; Incerti, Guido ; Rietkerk, Max ; Lanzotti, Virginia ; Chiusano, Maria Luisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-d9aac2c4734e50690a37191c637ddc084246d8628e22558bcc112dffdcc1b4fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arabidopsis - genetics</topic><topic>autotoxicity</topic><topic>Bacillus subtilis - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacillus subtilis - growth & development</topic><topic>bacteria</topic><topic>Bio-assays</topic><topic>Bioassay</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biological effects</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA - pharmacology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>exDNA</topic><topic>exDNA functions</topic><topic>Extracellular</topic><topic>Extracellular Space - genetics</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>growth retardation</topic><topic>heterologous DNA</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Physarum polycephalum - drug effects</topic><topic>Physarum polycephalum - growth & development</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants - drug effects</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>Rapid reports</topic><topic>Sarcophagi</topic><topic>Sarcophagidae - drug effects</topic><topic>Sarcophagidae - growth & development</topic><topic>Scenedesmus - drug effects</topic><topic>Scenedesmus - growth & development</topic><topic>self‐recognition</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil ecology</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Tadpoles</topic><topic>Trichoderma - drug effects</topic><topic>Trichoderma - growth & development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazzoleni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartenì, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonanomi, Giuliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senatore, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Termolino, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannino, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incerti, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rietkerk, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzotti, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiusano, Maria Luisa</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazzoleni, Stefano</au><au>Cartenì, Fabrizio</au><au>Bonanomi, Giuliano</au><au>Senatore, Mauro</au><au>Termolino, Pasquale</au><au>Giannino, Francesco</au><au>Incerti, Guido</au><au>Rietkerk, Max</au><au>Lanzotti, Virginia</au><au>Chiusano, Maria Luisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process?</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>206</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>127-132</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>Self‐inhibition of growth has been observed in different organisms, but an underlying common mechanism has not been proposed so far. Recently, extracellular DNA (exDNA) has been reported as species‐specific growth inhibitor in plants and proposed as an explanation of negative plant–soil feedback. In this work the effect of exDNA was tested on different species to assess the occurrence of such inhibition in organisms other than plants. Bioassays were performed on six species of different taxonomic groups, including bacteria, fungi, algae, plants, protozoa and insects. Treatments consisted in the addition to the growth substrate of conspecific and heterologous DNA at different concentration levels. Results showed that treatments with conspecific DNA always produced a concentration dependent growth inhibition, which instead was not observed in the case of heterologous DNA. Reported evidence suggests the generality of the observed phenomenon which opens new perspectives in the context of self‐inhibition processes. Moreover, the existence of a general species‐specific biological effect of exDNA raises interesting questions on its possible involvement in self‐recognition mechanisms. Further investigation at molecular level will be required to unravel the specific functioning of the observed inhibitory effects.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Academic Press</pub><pmid>25628124</pmid><doi>10.1111/nph.13306</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-646X |
ispartof | The New phytologist, 2015-04, Vol.206 (1), p.127-132 |
issn | 0028-646X 1469-8137 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668249328 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Algae Animals Arabidopsis - genetics autotoxicity Bacillus subtilis - drug effects Bacillus subtilis - growth & development bacteria Bio-assays Bioassay Bioassays Biological activity Biological effects Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA - pharmacology Ecosystem exDNA exDNA functions Extracellular Extracellular Space - genetics Fungi Growth growth retardation heterologous DNA Insects Physarum polycephalum - drug effects Physarum polycephalum - growth & development Plant ecology Plant growth Plants Plants - drug effects Protozoa Rapid reports Sarcophagi Sarcophagidae - drug effects Sarcophagidae - growth & development Scenedesmus - drug effects Scenedesmus - growth & development self‐recognition Soil Soil ecology Species Species Specificity Substrates Synecology Tadpoles Trichoderma - drug effects Trichoderma - growth & development |
title | Inhibitory effects of extracellular self‐DNA: a general biological process? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A37%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inhibitory%20effects%20of%20extracellular%20self%E2%80%90DNA:%20a%20general%20biological%20process?&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Mazzoleni,%20Stefano&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=206&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=127-132&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nph.13306&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3Enewphytologist.206.1.127%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1657796862&rft_id=info:pmid/25628124&rft_jstor_id=newphytologist.206.1.127&rfr_iscdi=true |