Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words
Semantic ambiguity is typically measured by summing the number of senses or dictionary definitions that a word has. Such measures are somewhat subjective and may not adequately capture the full extent of variation in word meaning, particularly for polysemous words that can be used in many different...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavior Research Methods 2013-09, Vol.45 (3), p.718-730 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 730 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 718 |
container_title | Behavior Research Methods |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Hoffman, Paul Lambon Ralph, Matthew A. Rogers, Timothy T. |
description | Semantic ambiguity is typically measured by summing the number of senses or dictionary definitions that a word has. Such measures are somewhat subjective and may not adequately capture the full extent of variation in word meaning, particularly for polysemous words that can be used in many different ways, with subtle shifts in meaning. Here, we describe an alternative, computationally derived measure of ambiguity based on the proposal that the meanings of words vary continuously as a function of their contexts. On this view, words that appear in a wide range of contexts on diverse topics are more variable in meaning than those that appear in a restricted set of similar contexts. To quantify this variation, we performed latent semantic analysis on a large text corpus to estimate the semantic similarities of different linguistic contexts. From these estimates, we calculated the degree to which the different contexts associated with a given word vary in their meanings. We term this quantity a word’s
semantic diversity
(SemD). We suggest that this approach provides an objective way of quantifying the subtle, context-dependent variations in word meaning that are often present in language. We demonstrate that SemD is correlated with other measures of ambiguity and contextual variability, as well as with frequency and imageability. We also show that SemD is a strong predictor of performance in semantic judgments in healthy individuals and in patients with semantic deficits, accounting for unique variance beyond that of other predictors. SemD values for over 30,000 English words are provided as supplementary materials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667938187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714173530</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714173530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-ac3b41a199333a80c18c6b43bd64222858a9de4d26a3f5a9f2d77bde71132fa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1TAQhSMEoqXwA9ggS2zYpHj8iB12VxUvqRILYG1N4snFVR7FTsrtv8chLaqQ0JUXtsbfnBkdnaJ4CfxcGm3fJpBK2JKDKLkwtjw8Kk5Ba1VKLezjB--T4llKV5xLK0A9LU6EFLLmlTktwlcacJxDy3y4oZjCfPuO7dhAmJZIbOpYugdwaMJ-yQBrMJFn08huMAZsQr8Ww8jmH8TaaZzpMC_YsyXh_o_Eryn69Lx40mGf6MXdfVZ8__D-28Wn8vLLx88Xu8uy1RbmElvZKECoayklWt6CbatGycZXSghhtcXak_KiQtlprDvhjWk8GQApOgR5VrzZdK_j9HOhNLshpJb6HkealuSgqkwtLVhzHNVSWal0XuU4CtlUXRt7HFWi0qC44Rl9_Q96NS1xzPZkqqqV5rZaZ59v1B57cmHspjlim4-nIWS_qQu5vjOgwEgtV1nYGto4pRSpc9cxDBhvHXC3JsdtyXE5OW5Njjvknld3qyzNQP5vx31UMiA2IOWvcU_xwa7_Vf0N35zM5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1469450863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hoffman, Paul ; Lambon Ralph, Matthew A. ; Rogers, Timothy T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Paul ; Lambon Ralph, Matthew A. ; Rogers, Timothy T.</creatorcontrib><description>Semantic ambiguity is typically measured by summing the number of senses or dictionary definitions that a word has. Such measures are somewhat subjective and may not adequately capture the full extent of variation in word meaning, particularly for polysemous words that can be used in many different ways, with subtle shifts in meaning. Here, we describe an alternative, computationally derived measure of ambiguity based on the proposal that the meanings of words vary continuously as a function of their contexts. On this view, words that appear in a wide range of contexts on diverse topics are more variable in meaning than those that appear in a restricted set of similar contexts. To quantify this variation, we performed latent semantic analysis on a large text corpus to estimate the semantic similarities of different linguistic contexts. From these estimates, we calculated the degree to which the different contexts associated with a given word vary in their meanings. We term this quantity a word’s
semantic diversity
(SemD). We suggest that this approach provides an objective way of quantifying the subtle, context-dependent variations in word meaning that are often present in language. We demonstrate that SemD is correlated with other measures of ambiguity and contextual variability, as well as with frequency and imageability. We also show that SemD is a strong predictor of performance in semantic judgments in healthy individuals and in patients with semantic deficits, accounting for unique variance beyond that of other predictors. SemD values for over 30,000 English words are provided as supplementary materials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-3528</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1554-351X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-3528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23239067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis ; Aphasia - psychology ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Computational linguistics ; Humans ; Internet ; Judgment ; Language ; Language processing ; Linguistics ; Middle Aged ; Models, Psychological ; Natural language interfaces ; Perjury ; Psycholinguistics - methods ; Psychology ; Regression Analysis ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>Behavior Research Methods, 2013-09, Vol.45 (3), p.718-730</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-ac3b41a199333a80c18c6b43bd64222858a9de4d26a3f5a9f2d77bde71132fa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-ac3b41a199333a80c18c6b43bd64222858a9de4d26a3f5a9f2d77bde71132fa13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23239067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Timothy T.</creatorcontrib><title>Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words</title><title>Behavior Research Methods</title><addtitle>Behav Res</addtitle><addtitle>Behav Res Methods</addtitle><description>Semantic ambiguity is typically measured by summing the number of senses or dictionary definitions that a word has. Such measures are somewhat subjective and may not adequately capture the full extent of variation in word meaning, particularly for polysemous words that can be used in many different ways, with subtle shifts in meaning. Here, we describe an alternative, computationally derived measure of ambiguity based on the proposal that the meanings of words vary continuously as a function of their contexts. On this view, words that appear in a wide range of contexts on diverse topics are more variable in meaning than those that appear in a restricted set of similar contexts. To quantify this variation, we performed latent semantic analysis on a large text corpus to estimate the semantic similarities of different linguistic contexts. From these estimates, we calculated the degree to which the different contexts associated with a given word vary in their meanings. We term this quantity a word’s
semantic diversity
(SemD). We suggest that this approach provides an objective way of quantifying the subtle, context-dependent variations in word meaning that are often present in language. We demonstrate that SemD is correlated with other measures of ambiguity and contextual variability, as well as with frequency and imageability. We also show that SemD is a strong predictor of performance in semantic judgments in healthy individuals and in patients with semantic deficits, accounting for unique variance beyond that of other predictors. SemD values for over 30,000 English words are provided as supplementary materials.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aphasia - psychology</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Computational linguistics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language processing</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Natural language interfaces</subject><subject>Perjury</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics - methods</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>1554-3528</issn><issn>1554-351X</issn><issn>1554-3528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv1TAQhSMEoqXwA9ggS2zYpHj8iB12VxUvqRILYG1N4snFVR7FTsrtv8chLaqQ0JUXtsbfnBkdnaJ4CfxcGm3fJpBK2JKDKLkwtjw8Kk5Ba1VKLezjB--T4llKV5xLK0A9LU6EFLLmlTktwlcacJxDy3y4oZjCfPuO7dhAmJZIbOpYugdwaMJ-yQBrMJFn08huMAZsQr8Ww8jmH8TaaZzpMC_YsyXh_o_Eryn69Lx40mGf6MXdfVZ8__D-28Wn8vLLx88Xu8uy1RbmElvZKECoayklWt6CbatGycZXSghhtcXak_KiQtlprDvhjWk8GQApOgR5VrzZdK_j9HOhNLshpJb6HkealuSgqkwtLVhzHNVSWal0XuU4CtlUXRt7HFWi0qC44Rl9_Q96NS1xzPZkqqqV5rZaZ59v1B57cmHspjlim4-nIWS_qQu5vjOgwEgtV1nYGto4pRSpc9cxDBhvHXC3JsdtyXE5OW5Njjvknld3qyzNQP5vx31UMiA2IOWvcU_xwa7_Vf0N35zM5w</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Hoffman, Paul</creator><creator>Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.</creator><creator>Rogers, Timothy T.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words</title><author>Hoffman, Paul ; Lambon Ralph, Matthew A. ; Rogers, Timothy T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-ac3b41a199333a80c18c6b43bd64222858a9de4d26a3f5a9f2d77bde71132fa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aphasia - psychology</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Computational linguistics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language processing</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Natural language interfaces</topic><topic>Perjury</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics - methods</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Timothy T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Behavior Research Methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoffman, Paul</au><au>Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.</au><au>Rogers, Timothy T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words</atitle><jtitle>Behavior Research Methods</jtitle><stitle>Behav Res</stitle><addtitle>Behav Res Methods</addtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>718</spage><epage>730</epage><pages>718-730</pages><issn>1554-3528</issn><issn>1554-351X</issn><eissn>1554-3528</eissn><abstract>Semantic ambiguity is typically measured by summing the number of senses or dictionary definitions that a word has. Such measures are somewhat subjective and may not adequately capture the full extent of variation in word meaning, particularly for polysemous words that can be used in many different ways, with subtle shifts in meaning. Here, we describe an alternative, computationally derived measure of ambiguity based on the proposal that the meanings of words vary continuously as a function of their contexts. On this view, words that appear in a wide range of contexts on diverse topics are more variable in meaning than those that appear in a restricted set of similar contexts. To quantify this variation, we performed latent semantic analysis on a large text corpus to estimate the semantic similarities of different linguistic contexts. From these estimates, we calculated the degree to which the different contexts associated with a given word vary in their meanings. We term this quantity a word’s
semantic diversity
(SemD). We suggest that this approach provides an objective way of quantifying the subtle, context-dependent variations in word meaning that are often present in language. We demonstrate that SemD is correlated with other measures of ambiguity and contextual variability, as well as with frequency and imageability. We also show that SemD is a strong predictor of performance in semantic judgments in healthy individuals and in patients with semantic deficits, accounting for unique variance beyond that of other predictors. SemD values for over 30,000 English words are provided as supplementary materials.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>23239067</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1554-3528 |
ispartof | Behavior Research Methods, 2013-09, Vol.45 (3), p.718-730 |
issn | 1554-3528 1554-351X 1554-3528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667938187 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Analysis Aphasia - psychology Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Computational linguistics Humans Internet Judgment Language Language processing Linguistics Middle Aged Models, Psychological Natural language interfaces Perjury Psycholinguistics - methods Psychology Regression Analysis Semantics |
title | Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A17%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Semantic%20diversity:%20A%20measure%20of%20semantic%20ambiguity%20based%20on%20variability%20in%20the%20contextual%20usage%20of%20words&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20Research%20Methods&rft.au=Hoffman,%20Paul&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=718&rft.epage=730&rft.pages=718-730&rft.issn=1554-3528&rft.eissn=1554-3528&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714173530%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1469450863&rft_id=info:pmid/23239067&rft_galeid=A714173530&rfr_iscdi=true |