Different fates of camptothecin-induced replication fork-associated double-strand DNA breaks in mammalian cells

The S phase cytotoxicity of camptothecin (CPT) requires both the formation of a covalent topoisomerase I-DNA complex and ongoing DNA replication. The interaction of DNA synthesis and the drug-induced complexes results in the production of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) concentrated in replicating D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Carcinogenesis (New York) 1994-05, Vol.15 (5), p.823-828
Hauptverfasser: Ryan, Anderson J., Squires, Shoshana, Strutt, Helen L., Evans, Amanda, Johnson, Robert T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 828
container_issue 5
container_start_page 823
container_title Carcinogenesis (New York)
container_volume 15
creator Ryan, Anderson J.
Squires, Shoshana
Strutt, Helen L.
Evans, Amanda
Johnson, Robert T.
description The S phase cytotoxicity of camptothecin (CPT) requires both the formation of a covalent topoisomerase I-DNA complex and ongoing DNA replication. The interaction of DNA synthesis and the drug-induced complexes results in the production of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) concentrated in replicating DNA. These DSBs are likely to be extremely cytotoxic lesions and are likely to account for the S phase specificity of CPT. Here we show that a brief exposure to CPT results in replication-associated DSBs and, once formed, the fate of these DNA DSBs is different in human and Chinese hamster cell lines. In hamster CHO-KI, even at supra-lethal concentrations, CPT-induced DSBs in nascent DNA disappear within 5 h of drug removal. Those CHO-KI cells in S phase during treatment with toxic doses of CPT arrive at mitosis within 18 h, with potentially lethal chromatid aberrations. In human cells, CPT-induced DSBs are long lived, and are still detectable at least 24 h after drug removal. After toxic doses of CPT to S phase human cells, mitosis does not occur within 72 h of drug removal and there is an extended, perhaps permanent, cycle arrest in S/G2, possibly due to the presence of unrepaired DNA DSBs. These data, and the greater sensitivity of hamster than human cells to low doses of CPT, suggests that, besides the generation of replication fork-associated DNA DSBs, subsequent processing/repair of these lesions may modulate the sensitivity of cells to this important anti-tumour drug.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/carcin/15.5.823
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16677533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16677533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-211deacd7609db8ecead5b220244a4038c7d6ac9ae0d3256d532e4b9eab2c59e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtvEzEUhS1EVUJgzQrJC9TdJH7OY1m1lEIjYFEEYmPdse8Ik5lxsD0S_HtcJcrqLs53jq4-Qt5wtuGsk1sL0fp5y_VGb1ohn5EVVzWrBG_Zc7JiXMlKSqlekJcp_WaM11J3l-SyFYyxVqxIuPXDgBHnTAfImGgYqIXpkEP-hWW58rNbLDoa8TB6C9mHmQ4h7itIKVhfOo66sPQjVilHmB29_XxN-4iwT9TPdIJpgtHDTC2OY3pFLgYYE74-3TX5dvf-8ea-2n358PHmeldZ2bFc_ucOwbqmZp3rW7QITvdCMKEUKCZb27gabAfInBS6dloKVH2H0AurO5RrcnXcPcTwZ8GUzeTT0wcwY1iS4XXdNLqoWZPtEbQxpBRxMIfoJ4j_DGfmSbE5KjZcG22K4tJ4e5pe-gndmT85Lfm7Uw7JwjgUKdanM6ZYrbjWBauOmE8Z_55jiHtTN7LR5v7HT_O92X39JNWDeZT_AXYPlrc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16677533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different fates of camptothecin-induced replication fork-associated double-strand DNA breaks in mammalian cells</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ryan, Anderson J. ; Squires, Shoshana ; Strutt, Helen L. ; Evans, Amanda ; Johnson, Robert T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Anderson J. ; Squires, Shoshana ; Strutt, Helen L. ; Evans, Amanda ; Johnson, Robert T.</creatorcontrib><description>The S phase cytotoxicity of camptothecin (CPT) requires both the formation of a covalent topoisomerase I-DNA complex and ongoing DNA replication. The interaction of DNA synthesis and the drug-induced complexes results in the production of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) concentrated in replicating DNA. These DSBs are likely to be extremely cytotoxic lesions and are likely to account for the S phase specificity of CPT. Here we show that a brief exposure to CPT results in replication-associated DSBs and, once formed, the fate of these DNA DSBs is different in human and Chinese hamster cell lines. In hamster CHO-KI, even at supra-lethal concentrations, CPT-induced DSBs in nascent DNA disappear within 5 h of drug removal. Those CHO-KI cells in S phase during treatment with toxic doses of CPT arrive at mitosis within 18 h, with potentially lethal chromatid aberrations. In human cells, CPT-induced DSBs are long lived, and are still detectable at least 24 h after drug removal. After toxic doses of CPT to S phase human cells, mitosis does not occur within 72 h of drug removal and there is an extended, perhaps permanent, cycle arrest in S/G2, possibly due to the presence of unrepaired DNA DSBs. These data, and the greater sensitivity of hamster than human cells to low doses of CPT, suggests that, besides the generation of replication fork-associated DNA DSBs, subsequent processing/repair of these lesions may modulate the sensitivity of cells to this important anti-tumour drug.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-3334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2180</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/carcin/15.5.823</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8200082</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRNGDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antineoplastic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Caffeine - pharmacology ; Camptothecin - toxicity ; Cell Line ; CHO Cells ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Cricetinae ; DNA - drug effects ; DNA - metabolism ; DNA Damage ; DNA Replication - drug effects ; DNA, Neoplasm - drug effects ; DNA, Neoplasm - metabolism ; General aspects ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Mitosis - drug effects ; Mitosis - physiology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Skin - cytology ; Skin - drug effects ; Skin Physiological Phenomena ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - metabolism ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Carcinogenesis (New York), 1994-05, Vol.15 (5), p.823-828</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-211deacd7609db8ecead5b220244a4038c7d6ac9ae0d3256d532e4b9eab2c59e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4064155$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8200082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Anderson J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Squires, Shoshana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strutt, Helen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Robert T.</creatorcontrib><title>Different fates of camptothecin-induced replication fork-associated double-strand DNA breaks in mammalian cells</title><title>Carcinogenesis (New York)</title><addtitle>Carcinogenesis</addtitle><description>The S phase cytotoxicity of camptothecin (CPT) requires both the formation of a covalent topoisomerase I-DNA complex and ongoing DNA replication. The interaction of DNA synthesis and the drug-induced complexes results in the production of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) concentrated in replicating DNA. These DSBs are likely to be extremely cytotoxic lesions and are likely to account for the S phase specificity of CPT. Here we show that a brief exposure to CPT results in replication-associated DSBs and, once formed, the fate of these DNA DSBs is different in human and Chinese hamster cell lines. In hamster CHO-KI, even at supra-lethal concentrations, CPT-induced DSBs in nascent DNA disappear within 5 h of drug removal. Those CHO-KI cells in S phase during treatment with toxic doses of CPT arrive at mitosis within 18 h, with potentially lethal chromatid aberrations. In human cells, CPT-induced DSBs are long lived, and are still detectable at least 24 h after drug removal. After toxic doses of CPT to S phase human cells, mitosis does not occur within 72 h of drug removal and there is an extended, perhaps permanent, cycle arrest in S/G2, possibly due to the presence of unrepaired DNA DSBs. These data, and the greater sensitivity of hamster than human cells to low doses of CPT, suggests that, besides the generation of replication fork-associated DNA DSBs, subsequent processing/repair of these lesions may modulate the sensitivity of cells to this important anti-tumour drug.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Caffeine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Camptothecin - toxicity</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>CHO Cells</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Cricetinae</subject><subject>DNA - drug effects</subject><subject>DNA - metabolism</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>DNA Replication - drug effects</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - drug effects</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - metabolism</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mitosis - drug effects</subject><subject>Mitosis - physiology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Skin - cytology</subject><subject>Skin - drug effects</subject><subject>Skin Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><issn>0143-3334</issn><issn>1460-2180</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtvEzEUhS1EVUJgzQrJC9TdJH7OY1m1lEIjYFEEYmPdse8Ik5lxsD0S_HtcJcrqLs53jq4-Qt5wtuGsk1sL0fp5y_VGb1ohn5EVVzWrBG_Zc7JiXMlKSqlekJcp_WaM11J3l-SyFYyxVqxIuPXDgBHnTAfImGgYqIXpkEP-hWW58rNbLDoa8TB6C9mHmQ4h7itIKVhfOo66sPQjVilHmB29_XxN-4iwT9TPdIJpgtHDTC2OY3pFLgYYE74-3TX5dvf-8ea-2n358PHmeldZ2bFc_ucOwbqmZp3rW7QITvdCMKEUKCZb27gabAfInBS6dloKVH2H0AurO5RrcnXcPcTwZ8GUzeTT0wcwY1iS4XXdNLqoWZPtEbQxpBRxMIfoJ4j_DGfmSbE5KjZcG22K4tJ4e5pe-gndmT85Lfm7Uw7JwjgUKdanM6ZYrbjWBauOmE8Z_55jiHtTN7LR5v7HT_O92X39JNWDeZT_AXYPlrc</recordid><startdate>19940501</startdate><enddate>19940501</enddate><creator>Ryan, Anderson J.</creator><creator>Squires, Shoshana</creator><creator>Strutt, Helen L.</creator><creator>Evans, Amanda</creator><creator>Johnson, Robert T.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940501</creationdate><title>Different fates of camptothecin-induced replication fork-associated double-strand DNA breaks in mammalian cells</title><author>Ryan, Anderson J. ; Squires, Shoshana ; Strutt, Helen L. ; Evans, Amanda ; Johnson, Robert T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-211deacd7609db8ecead5b220244a4038c7d6ac9ae0d3256d532e4b9eab2c59e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Caffeine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Camptothecin - toxicity</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>CHO Cells</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Cricetinae</topic><topic>DNA - drug effects</topic><topic>DNA - metabolism</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>DNA Replication - drug effects</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - drug effects</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - metabolism</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mitosis - drug effects</topic><topic>Mitosis - physiology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Skin - cytology</topic><topic>Skin - drug effects</topic><topic>Skin Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Anderson J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Squires, Shoshana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strutt, Helen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Robert T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Carcinogenesis (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ryan, Anderson J.</au><au>Squires, Shoshana</au><au>Strutt, Helen L.</au><au>Evans, Amanda</au><au>Johnson, Robert T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different fates of camptothecin-induced replication fork-associated double-strand DNA breaks in mammalian cells</atitle><jtitle>Carcinogenesis (New York)</jtitle><addtitle>Carcinogenesis</addtitle><date>1994-05-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>828</epage><pages>823-828</pages><issn>0143-3334</issn><eissn>1460-2180</eissn><coden>CRNGDP</coden><abstract>The S phase cytotoxicity of camptothecin (CPT) requires both the formation of a covalent topoisomerase I-DNA complex and ongoing DNA replication. The interaction of DNA synthesis and the drug-induced complexes results in the production of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) concentrated in replicating DNA. These DSBs are likely to be extremely cytotoxic lesions and are likely to account for the S phase specificity of CPT. Here we show that a brief exposure to CPT results in replication-associated DSBs and, once formed, the fate of these DNA DSBs is different in human and Chinese hamster cell lines. In hamster CHO-KI, even at supra-lethal concentrations, CPT-induced DSBs in nascent DNA disappear within 5 h of drug removal. Those CHO-KI cells in S phase during treatment with toxic doses of CPT arrive at mitosis within 18 h, with potentially lethal chromatid aberrations. In human cells, CPT-induced DSBs are long lived, and are still detectable at least 24 h after drug removal. After toxic doses of CPT to S phase human cells, mitosis does not occur within 72 h of drug removal and there is an extended, perhaps permanent, cycle arrest in S/G2, possibly due to the presence of unrepaired DNA DSBs. These data, and the greater sensitivity of hamster than human cells to low doses of CPT, suggests that, besides the generation of replication fork-associated DNA DSBs, subsequent processing/repair of these lesions may modulate the sensitivity of cells to this important anti-tumour drug.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>8200082</pmid><doi>10.1093/carcin/15.5.823</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-3334
ispartof Carcinogenesis (New York), 1994-05, Vol.15 (5), p.823-828
issn 0143-3334
1460-2180
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16677533
source Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive legacy; MEDLINE
subjects Animals
Antineoplastic agents
Biological and medical sciences
Caffeine - pharmacology
Camptothecin - toxicity
Cell Line
CHO Cells
Chromosome Aberrations
Cricetinae
DNA - drug effects
DNA - metabolism
DNA Damage
DNA Replication - drug effects
DNA, Neoplasm - drug effects
DNA, Neoplasm - metabolism
General aspects
Humans
Medical sciences
Mitosis - drug effects
Mitosis - physiology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Sensitivity and Specificity
Skin - cytology
Skin - drug effects
Skin Physiological Phenomena
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - metabolism
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - physiopathology
title Different fates of camptothecin-induced replication fork-associated double-strand DNA breaks in mammalian cells
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A48%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20fates%20of%20camptothecin-induced%20replication%20fork-associated%20double-strand%20DNA%20breaks%20in%20mammalian%20cells&rft.jtitle=Carcinogenesis%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Ryan,%20Anderson%20J.&rft.date=1994-05-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=828&rft.pages=823-828&rft.issn=0143-3334&rft.eissn=1460-2180&rft.coden=CRNGDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/carcin/15.5.823&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16677533%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16677533&rft_id=info:pmid/8200082&rfr_iscdi=true