Inequality and Institutions: The Case of Economic Coordination

The understanding of observable associations between institutions and inequality today requires a better grasp of the process driving the selection of economic institutions, in particular wage bargaining centralization agreements, as the outcome of a distributive conflict in which inequality itself...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annual review of political science 2014-01, Vol.17 (1), p.251-271
Hauptverfasser: Beramendi, Pablo, Rueda, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 271
container_issue 1
container_start_page 251
container_title Annual review of political science
container_volume 17
creator Beramendi, Pablo
Rueda, David
description The understanding of observable associations between institutions and inequality today requires a better grasp of the process driving the selection of economic institutions, in particular wage bargaining centralization agreements, as the outcome of a distributive conflict in which inequality itself plays a prominent role. Low levels of inequality facilitated the adoption of encompassing wage centralization agreements during the early twentieth century in Europe, thereby creating a long-term association between low inequality and high centralization that, for a large subset of cases, remained stable throughout the century. We develop a theoretical argument as to why inequality should lead to lower levels of coordination and test it against competing hypotheses on the basis of a database on 11 OECD nations between the 1910s and the 1950s.
doi_str_mv 10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-210535
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667356181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1629330560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-9c3c51d36a964dff987d114b0fd55137f407b187d365bec391493b4c8ea63e6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMfoJv-h94I3kRzepK0ERSkTB0MvJnXIU1TjHTJ1rTC_r0d2w_w6sA5z3vgfQi5A_YAwOWjCWHs3S_dxs4n6ynDPAegOTCB4oxcg-CCgiiKczJjZc4REQp1MR2Y4jRXqK7ILKUfxpjM8_KavCyD242m88M-M6HJliENfhgHH0N6ytbfLqtMcllss4WNIW68zaoY-8YHc2BuyGVruuRuT3NOvt4W6-qDrj7fl9XrilpUbKDKohXQoDRK8qZtVVk0U5-atY0QgEXLWVHDtEQpajdlgCusuS2dkeikwTm5P_7d9nE3ujTozdTfdZ0JLo5Jg5QFCgkl_AOdNCATkk3o8xG1fUypd63e9n5j-r0Gpg--9cm3PvnWR9_66Bv_AHiFdgM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629330560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inequality and Institutions: The Case of Economic Coordination</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Beramendi, Pablo ; Rueda, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Beramendi, Pablo ; Rueda, David</creatorcontrib><description>The understanding of observable associations between institutions and inequality today requires a better grasp of the process driving the selection of economic institutions, in particular wage bargaining centralization agreements, as the outcome of a distributive conflict in which inequality itself plays a prominent role. Low levels of inequality facilitated the adoption of encompassing wage centralization agreements during the early twentieth century in Europe, thereby creating a long-term association between low inequality and high centralization that, for a large subset of cases, remained stable throughout the century. We develop a theoretical argument as to why inequality should lead to lower levels of coordination and test it against competing hypotheses on the basis of a database on 11 OECD nations between the 1910s and the 1950s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-2939</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0824333179</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780824333171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-210535</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>20th century ; Agreement ; Centralization ; Conflict ; Coordination ; Data Banks ; Europe ; Hypothesis ; Inequality ; Institutions ; Negotiation ; OECD ; Twentieth Century</subject><ispartof>Annual review of political science, 2014-01, Vol.17 (1), p.251-271</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-9c3c51d36a964dff987d114b0fd55137f407b187d365bec391493b4c8ea63e6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-9c3c51d36a964dff987d114b0fd55137f407b187d365bec391493b4c8ea63e6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beramendi, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueda, David</creatorcontrib><title>Inequality and Institutions: The Case of Economic Coordination</title><title>Annual review of political science</title><description>The understanding of observable associations between institutions and inequality today requires a better grasp of the process driving the selection of economic institutions, in particular wage bargaining centralization agreements, as the outcome of a distributive conflict in which inequality itself plays a prominent role. Low levels of inequality facilitated the adoption of encompassing wage centralization agreements during the early twentieth century in Europe, thereby creating a long-term association between low inequality and high centralization that, for a large subset of cases, remained stable throughout the century. We develop a theoretical argument as to why inequality should lead to lower levels of coordination and test it against competing hypotheses on the basis of a database on 11 OECD nations between the 1910s and the 1950s.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Agreement</subject><subject>Centralization</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Data Banks</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Hypothesis</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>OECD</subject><subject>Twentieth Century</subject><issn>1094-2939</issn><issn>1545-1577</issn><isbn>0824333179</isbn><isbn>9780824333171</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMfoJv-h94I3kRzepK0ERSkTB0MvJnXIU1TjHTJ1rTC_r0d2w_w6sA5z3vgfQi5A_YAwOWjCWHs3S_dxs4n6ynDPAegOTCB4oxcg-CCgiiKczJjZc4REQp1MR2Y4jRXqK7ILKUfxpjM8_KavCyD242m88M-M6HJliENfhgHH0N6ytbfLqtMcllss4WNIW68zaoY-8YHc2BuyGVruuRuT3NOvt4W6-qDrj7fl9XrilpUbKDKohXQoDRK8qZtVVk0U5-atY0QgEXLWVHDtEQpajdlgCusuS2dkeikwTm5P_7d9nE3ujTozdTfdZ0JLo5Jg5QFCgkl_AOdNCATkk3o8xG1fUypd63e9n5j-r0Gpg--9cm3PvnWR9_66Bv_AHiFdgM</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Beramendi, Pablo</creator><creator>Rueda, David</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Inequality and Institutions: The Case of Economic Coordination</title><author>Beramendi, Pablo ; Rueda, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-9c3c51d36a964dff987d114b0fd55137f407b187d365bec391493b4c8ea63e6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Agreement</topic><topic>Centralization</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Data Banks</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Hypothesis</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>OECD</topic><topic>Twentieth Century</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beramendi, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueda, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Annual review of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beramendi, Pablo</au><au>Rueda, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inequality and Institutions: The Case of Economic Coordination</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of political science</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>251-271</pages><issn>1094-2939</issn><eissn>1545-1577</eissn><isbn>0824333179</isbn><isbn>9780824333171</isbn><abstract>The understanding of observable associations between institutions and inequality today requires a better grasp of the process driving the selection of economic institutions, in particular wage bargaining centralization agreements, as the outcome of a distributive conflict in which inequality itself plays a prominent role. Low levels of inequality facilitated the adoption of encompassing wage centralization agreements during the early twentieth century in Europe, thereby creating a long-term association between low inequality and high centralization that, for a large subset of cases, remained stable throughout the century. We develop a theoretical argument as to why inequality should lead to lower levels of coordination and test it against competing hypotheses on the basis of a database on 11 OECD nations between the 1910s and the 1950s.</abstract><doi>10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-210535</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1094-2939
ispartof Annual review of political science, 2014-01, Vol.17 (1), p.251-271
issn 1094-2939
1545-1577
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667356181
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects 20th century
Agreement
Centralization
Conflict
Coordination
Data Banks
Europe
Hypothesis
Inequality
Institutions
Negotiation
OECD
Twentieth Century
title Inequality and Institutions: The Case of Economic Coordination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A07%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inequality%20and%20Institutions:%20The%20Case%20of%20Economic%20Coordination&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Beramendi,%20Pablo&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=251-271&rft.issn=1094-2939&rft.eissn=1545-1577&rft.isbn=0824333179&rft.isbn_list=9780824333171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-210535&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1629330560%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629330560&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true