The validation of a diagnostic rule for gout without joint fluid analysis: a prospective study

The gold standard for diagnosing gout is the identification of MSU crystals in joint fluid. In secondary care, the facilities or expertise to analyse joint fluid are not always available and gout is diagnosed clinically. To improve the predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of gout in secondary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rheumatology (Oxford, England) England), 2015-04, Vol.54 (4), p.609-614
Hauptverfasser: Kienhorst, Laura B E, Janssens, Hein J E M, Fransen, Jaap, Janssen, Matthijs
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 614
container_issue 4
container_start_page 609
container_title Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
container_volume 54
creator Kienhorst, Laura B E
Janssens, Hein J E M
Fransen, Jaap
Janssen, Matthijs
description The gold standard for diagnosing gout is the identification of MSU crystals in joint fluid. In secondary care, the facilities or expertise to analyse joint fluid are not always available and gout is diagnosed clinically. To improve the predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of gout in secondary care, a diagnostic rule developed in primary care could be helpful. The aim of this study was to validate this diagnostic rule in a secondary care population with the gold standard as reference test. Three hundred and ninety patients with monoarthritis were included. The variables of the diagnostic rule (male sex, previous arthritis attack, onset 5.88 mg/dl) were collected and scored. The affected joint was aspirated and joint fluid was analysed for the presence of MSU crystals. In 219 patients (56%) MSU crystals were found. The positive predictive value of a score of ≥8 points was 0.87, the negative predictive value of a score of ≤4 points was 0.95. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnostic rule was 0.86 (95% CI 0.82, 0.89). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the difference between the expected and the observed probability was non-significant (P = 0.64), indicating good agreement. An easy-to-use diagnostic rule for gout developed in primary care shows good performance in secondary care and improves the predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of gout when joint fluid analysis is not available.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rheumatology/keu378
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667351622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1667351622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-da555d2ac60470e9d867eaa646dd2541d7041fa817526f50a2dd70ea446d98b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwC5CQj1xC_YidhBuqeEmVuPRMtI2d1sWJS2wX5d-TqqXiNKvVzO7oQ-iWkgdKCj7t1jo2EJx1q376pSPP8jM0pqlkCeGcnZ9mlo7QlfcbQoigPL9EIyYYpzQrxuhzsdZ4B9YoCMa12NUYsDKwap0PpsJdtBrXrsMrFwP-MWG9140zbcC1jUZhaMH23vjHIbjtnN_qKpidxj5E1V-jixqs1zdHnaDFy_Ni9pbMP17fZ0_zpOKChESBEEIxqCRJM6ILlctMA8hUKsVESlVGUlpDTjPBZC0IMDWsNKSDociXfILuD2eHAt9R-1A2xlfaWmi1i76kUmZcUMnYYOUHazV09Z2uy21nGuj6kpJyz7X8z7U8cB1Sd8cHcdlodcr8geS_7GZ5_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1667351622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The validation of a diagnostic rule for gout without joint fluid analysis: a prospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kienhorst, Laura B E ; Janssens, Hein J E M ; Fransen, Jaap ; Janssen, Matthijs</creator><creatorcontrib>Kienhorst, Laura B E ; Janssens, Hein J E M ; Fransen, Jaap ; Janssen, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><description>The gold standard for diagnosing gout is the identification of MSU crystals in joint fluid. In secondary care, the facilities or expertise to analyse joint fluid are not always available and gout is diagnosed clinically. To improve the predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of gout in secondary care, a diagnostic rule developed in primary care could be helpful. The aim of this study was to validate this diagnostic rule in a secondary care population with the gold standard as reference test. Three hundred and ninety patients with monoarthritis were included. The variables of the diagnostic rule (male sex, previous arthritis attack, onset &lt;1 day, joint redness, involvement of the first MTP joint, hypertension or one or more cardiovascular disease, and serum uric acid &gt;5.88 mg/dl) were collected and scored. The affected joint was aspirated and joint fluid was analysed for the presence of MSU crystals. In 219 patients (56%) MSU crystals were found. The positive predictive value of a score of ≥8 points was 0.87, the negative predictive value of a score of ≤4 points was 0.95. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnostic rule was 0.86 (95% CI 0.82, 0.89). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the difference between the expected and the observed probability was non-significant (P = 0.64), indicating good agreement. An easy-to-use diagnostic rule for gout developed in primary care shows good performance in secondary care and improves the predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of gout when joint fluid analysis is not available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-0324</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-0332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu378</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25231179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiovascular Diseases - complications ; Decision Support Techniques ; Erythema - etiology ; Female ; Gout - complications ; Gout - diagnosis ; Humans ; Hypertension - complications ; Male ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Prospective Studies ; Secondary Care ; Sex Factors ; Synovial Fluid - chemistry ; Uric Acid - analysis</subject><ispartof>Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2015-04, Vol.54 (4), p.609-614</ispartof><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-da555d2ac60470e9d867eaa646dd2541d7041fa817526f50a2dd70ea446d98b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-da555d2ac60470e9d867eaa646dd2541d7041fa817526f50a2dd70ea446d98b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25231179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kienhorst, Laura B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, Hein J E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fransen, Jaap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><title>The validation of a diagnostic rule for gout without joint fluid analysis: a prospective study</title><title>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford)</addtitle><description>The gold standard for diagnosing gout is the identification of MSU crystals in joint fluid. In secondary care, the facilities or expertise to analyse joint fluid are not always available and gout is diagnosed clinically. To improve the predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of gout in secondary care, a diagnostic rule developed in primary care could be helpful. The aim of this study was to validate this diagnostic rule in a secondary care population with the gold standard as reference test. Three hundred and ninety patients with monoarthritis were included. The variables of the diagnostic rule (male sex, previous arthritis attack, onset &lt;1 day, joint redness, involvement of the first MTP joint, hypertension or one or more cardiovascular disease, and serum uric acid &gt;5.88 mg/dl) were collected and scored. The affected joint was aspirated and joint fluid was analysed for the presence of MSU crystals. In 219 patients (56%) MSU crystals were found. The positive predictive value of a score of ≥8 points was 0.87, the negative predictive value of a score of ≤4 points was 0.95. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnostic rule was 0.86 (95% CI 0.82, 0.89). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the difference between the expected and the observed probability was non-significant (P = 0.64), indicating good agreement. An easy-to-use diagnostic rule for gout developed in primary care shows good performance in secondary care and improves the predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of gout when joint fluid analysis is not available.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Erythema - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gout - complications</subject><subject>Gout - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension - complications</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Secondary Care</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Synovial Fluid - chemistry</subject><subject>Uric Acid - analysis</subject><issn>1462-0324</issn><issn>1462-0332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwC5CQj1xC_YidhBuqeEmVuPRMtI2d1sWJS2wX5d-TqqXiNKvVzO7oQ-iWkgdKCj7t1jo2EJx1q376pSPP8jM0pqlkCeGcnZ9mlo7QlfcbQoigPL9EIyYYpzQrxuhzsdZ4B9YoCMa12NUYsDKwap0PpsJdtBrXrsMrFwP-MWG9140zbcC1jUZhaMH23vjHIbjtnN_qKpidxj5E1V-jixqs1zdHnaDFy_Ni9pbMP17fZ0_zpOKChESBEEIxqCRJM6ILlctMA8hUKsVESlVGUlpDTjPBZC0IMDWsNKSDociXfILuD2eHAt9R-1A2xlfaWmi1i76kUmZcUMnYYOUHazV09Z2uy21nGuj6kpJyz7X8z7U8cB1Sd8cHcdlodcr8geS_7GZ5_Q</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Kienhorst, Laura B E</creator><creator>Janssens, Hein J E M</creator><creator>Fransen, Jaap</creator><creator>Janssen, Matthijs</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>The validation of a diagnostic rule for gout without joint fluid analysis: a prospective study</title><author>Kienhorst, Laura B E ; Janssens, Hein J E M ; Fransen, Jaap ; Janssen, Matthijs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-da555d2ac60470e9d867eaa646dd2541d7041fa817526f50a2dd70ea446d98b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Erythema - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gout - complications</topic><topic>Gout - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension - complications</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Secondary Care</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Synovial Fluid - chemistry</topic><topic>Uric Acid - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kienhorst, Laura B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, Hein J E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fransen, Jaap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kienhorst, Laura B E</au><au>Janssens, Hein J E M</au><au>Fransen, Jaap</au><au>Janssen, Matthijs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The validation of a diagnostic rule for gout without joint fluid analysis: a prospective study</atitle><jtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford)</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>614</epage><pages>609-614</pages><issn>1462-0324</issn><eissn>1462-0332</eissn><abstract>The gold standard for diagnosing gout is the identification of MSU crystals in joint fluid. In secondary care, the facilities or expertise to analyse joint fluid are not always available and gout is diagnosed clinically. To improve the predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of gout in secondary care, a diagnostic rule developed in primary care could be helpful. The aim of this study was to validate this diagnostic rule in a secondary care population with the gold standard as reference test. Three hundred and ninety patients with monoarthritis were included. The variables of the diagnostic rule (male sex, previous arthritis attack, onset &lt;1 day, joint redness, involvement of the first MTP joint, hypertension or one or more cardiovascular disease, and serum uric acid &gt;5.88 mg/dl) were collected and scored. The affected joint was aspirated and joint fluid was analysed for the presence of MSU crystals. In 219 patients (56%) MSU crystals were found. The positive predictive value of a score of ≥8 points was 0.87, the negative predictive value of a score of ≤4 points was 0.95. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnostic rule was 0.86 (95% CI 0.82, 0.89). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the difference between the expected and the observed probability was non-significant (P = 0.64), indicating good agreement. An easy-to-use diagnostic rule for gout developed in primary care shows good performance in secondary care and improves the predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of gout when joint fluid analysis is not available.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>25231179</pmid><doi>10.1093/rheumatology/keu378</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-0324
ispartof Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2015-04, Vol.54 (4), p.609-614
issn 1462-0324
1462-0332
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667351622
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Cardiovascular Diseases - complications
Decision Support Techniques
Erythema - etiology
Female
Gout - complications
Gout - diagnosis
Humans
Hypertension - complications
Male
Metatarsophalangeal Joint
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Prospective Studies
Secondary Care
Sex Factors
Synovial Fluid - chemistry
Uric Acid - analysis
title The validation of a diagnostic rule for gout without joint fluid analysis: a prospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A15%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20validation%20of%20a%20diagnostic%20rule%20for%20gout%20without%20joint%20fluid%20analysis:%20a%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Rheumatology%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Kienhorst,%20Laura%20B%20E&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=614&rft.pages=609-614&rft.issn=1462-0324&rft.eissn=1462-0332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rheumatology/keu378&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1667351622%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1667351622&rft_id=info:pmid/25231179&rfr_iscdi=true