Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy

Purpose: To explore the use of EndoAnchors as an adjunct to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for prevention of proximal neck complications in patients with challenging neck anatomy. Methods: Over a 28-month period, 208 patients (159 men; mean age 72±8 years) were enrolled in the ANCHOR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endovascular therapy 2015-04, Vol.22 (2), p.163-170
Hauptverfasser: Jordan, William D., de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M., Ouriel, Kenneth, Mehta, Manish, Varnagy, David, Moore, William M., Arko, Frank R., Joye, James, Henretta, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 170
container_issue 2
container_start_page 163
container_title Journal of endovascular therapy
container_volume 22
creator Jordan, William D.
de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
Ouriel, Kenneth
Mehta, Manish
Varnagy, David
Moore, William M.
Arko, Frank R.
Joye, James
Henretta, John
description Purpose: To explore the use of EndoAnchors as an adjunct to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for prevention of proximal neck complications in patients with challenging neck anatomy. Methods: Over a 28-month period, 208 patients (159 men; mean age 72±8 years) were enrolled in the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01534819) for prophylaxis against proximal neck complications. Patients were eligible when, in the opinion of the investigators, they were at increased risk for type Ia endoleak or migration owing to a hostile neck (length 28 mm, angulation >60°, mural thrombus or calcium >2 mm in thickness or >180° in circumference, or conical shape). Overall, 123/157 (78.3%) patients met the criteria for a hostile neck according to core laboratory assessment of 157 adequate preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images. Results: Implantation of EndoAnchors was technically successful in 204/208 (98.1%) patients. The frequency of fracture was 0.3% (3/1118); there were no clinical sequelae associated with the fractures. Over the mean 14-month follow-up, 95.2% of patients were alive, and no deaths were attributable to EndoAnchors. There were no ruptures, migrations, or open surgical conversions. Aneurysm-related reinterventions were performed in 8 (3.8%) patients. Among 130 patients with postprocedure contrast CT studies, core laboratory analysis identified 2 (1.5%) patients with type Ia endoleaks. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased >5 mm in 42.9% of patients with CT scans at or beyond 1 year; 1.6% of patients developed sac enlargement >5 mm. Conclusion: Prophylactic EndoAnchor use for challenging aortic neck anatomy was associated with satisfactory midterm results.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1526602815574685
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667350869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1526602815574685</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1667350869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-a815b69e2d7ed5d7568e10e4806a2b9626b3f56ea006ed61823714c1a3562ba33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kclOwzAQhi0EYincOSEfuQS8xE56rCooSGwSII6Rk0xa08QutoPoY_DGuLRwQOI0M_q_-TULQseUnFGaZedUMCkJy6kQWSpzsYX2qUhFEmuyvcqZTFb6Hjrw_pUQRhmlu2iPiZwMuUj30eetrgO4Dt_3obIdYNvgC1Pbkalm1nncWIfDDPCDg3cwQVvzQ7Sg5liZGj-GKCQTp5qAb_XUqW9KG_wQsyh5_KLDDI9nqm3BTLWZRjf7oTvV4pF1QVf4Dqo5HhkVbLc8RDuNaj0cbeIAPV9ePI2vkpv7yfV4dJNUnGchUXHpUg6B1RnUos6EzIESSHMiFSuHksmSN0KCIkRCLWnOeEbTiiouJCsV5wN0uvZdOPvWgw9Fp30FbasM2N4XVMqMC5LLYUTJGq2c9d5BUyxcHN8tC0qK1SOKv4-ILScb977soP5t-Ll8BJI14NUUilfbOxO3_d_wC9KjkMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1667350869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Jordan, William D. ; de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M. ; Ouriel, Kenneth ; Mehta, Manish ; Varnagy, David ; Moore, William M. ; Arko, Frank R. ; Joye, James ; Henretta, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Jordan, William D. ; de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M. ; Ouriel, Kenneth ; Mehta, Manish ; Varnagy, David ; Moore, William M. ; Arko, Frank R. ; Joye, James ; Henretta, John</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To explore the use of EndoAnchors as an adjunct to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for prevention of proximal neck complications in patients with challenging neck anatomy. Methods: Over a 28-month period, 208 patients (159 men; mean age 72±8 years) were enrolled in the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01534819) for prophylaxis against proximal neck complications. Patients were eligible when, in the opinion of the investigators, they were at increased risk for type Ia endoleak or migration owing to a hostile neck (length &lt;10 mm, diameter &gt;28 mm, angulation &gt;60°, mural thrombus or calcium &gt;2 mm in thickness or &gt;180° in circumference, or conical shape). Overall, 123/157 (78.3%) patients met the criteria for a hostile neck according to core laboratory assessment of 157 adequate preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images. Results: Implantation of EndoAnchors was technically successful in 204/208 (98.1%) patients. The frequency of fracture was 0.3% (3/1118); there were no clinical sequelae associated with the fractures. Over the mean 14-month follow-up, 95.2% of patients were alive, and no deaths were attributable to EndoAnchors. There were no ruptures, migrations, or open surgical conversions. Aneurysm-related reinterventions were performed in 8 (3.8%) patients. Among 130 patients with postprocedure contrast CT studies, core laboratory analysis identified 2 (1.5%) patients with type Ia endoleaks. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased &gt;5 mm in 42.9% of patients with CT scans at or beyond 1 year; 1.6% of patients developed sac enlargement &gt;5 mm. Conclusion: Prophylactic EndoAnchor use for challenging aortic neck anatomy was associated with satisfactory midterm results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-6028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1526602815574685</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25809354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortography - methods ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Endoleak - etiology ; Endoleak - prevention &amp; control ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Female ; Foreign-Body Migration - etiology ; Foreign-Body Migration - prevention &amp; control ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Registries ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of endovascular therapy, 2015-04, Vol.22 (2), p.163-170</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-a815b69e2d7ed5d7568e10e4806a2b9626b3f56ea006ed61823714c1a3562ba33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-a815b69e2d7ed5d7568e10e4806a2b9626b3f56ea006ed61823714c1a3562ba33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1526602815574685$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1526602815574685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25809354$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jordan, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnagy, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arko, Frank R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joye, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henretta, John</creatorcontrib><title>Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy</title><title>Journal of endovascular therapy</title><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><description>Purpose: To explore the use of EndoAnchors as an adjunct to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for prevention of proximal neck complications in patients with challenging neck anatomy. Methods: Over a 28-month period, 208 patients (159 men; mean age 72±8 years) were enrolled in the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01534819) for prophylaxis against proximal neck complications. Patients were eligible when, in the opinion of the investigators, they were at increased risk for type Ia endoleak or migration owing to a hostile neck (length &lt;10 mm, diameter &gt;28 mm, angulation &gt;60°, mural thrombus or calcium &gt;2 mm in thickness or &gt;180° in circumference, or conical shape). Overall, 123/157 (78.3%) patients met the criteria for a hostile neck according to core laboratory assessment of 157 adequate preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images. Results: Implantation of EndoAnchors was technically successful in 204/208 (98.1%) patients. The frequency of fracture was 0.3% (3/1118); there were no clinical sequelae associated with the fractures. Over the mean 14-month follow-up, 95.2% of patients were alive, and no deaths were attributable to EndoAnchors. There were no ruptures, migrations, or open surgical conversions. Aneurysm-related reinterventions were performed in 8 (3.8%) patients. Among 130 patients with postprocedure contrast CT studies, core laboratory analysis identified 2 (1.5%) patients with type Ia endoleaks. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased &gt;5 mm in 42.9% of patients with CT scans at or beyond 1 year; 1.6% of patients developed sac enlargement &gt;5 mm. Conclusion: Prophylactic EndoAnchor use for challenging aortic neck anatomy was associated with satisfactory midterm results.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortography - methods</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Endoleak - etiology</subject><subject>Endoleak - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - etiology</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1526-6028</issn><issn>1545-1550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kclOwzAQhi0EYincOSEfuQS8xE56rCooSGwSII6Rk0xa08QutoPoY_DGuLRwQOI0M_q_-TULQseUnFGaZedUMCkJy6kQWSpzsYX2qUhFEmuyvcqZTFb6Hjrw_pUQRhmlu2iPiZwMuUj30eetrgO4Dt_3obIdYNvgC1Pbkalm1nncWIfDDPCDg3cwQVvzQ7Sg5liZGj-GKCQTp5qAb_XUqW9KG_wQsyh5_KLDDI9nqm3BTLWZRjf7oTvV4pF1QVf4Dqo5HhkVbLc8RDuNaj0cbeIAPV9ePI2vkpv7yfV4dJNUnGchUXHpUg6B1RnUos6EzIESSHMiFSuHksmSN0KCIkRCLWnOeEbTiiouJCsV5wN0uvZdOPvWgw9Fp30FbasM2N4XVMqMC5LLYUTJGq2c9d5BUyxcHN8tC0qK1SOKv4-ILScb977soP5t-Ll8BJI14NUUilfbOxO3_d_wC9KjkMY</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Jordan, William D.</creator><creator>de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.</creator><creator>Ouriel, Kenneth</creator><creator>Mehta, Manish</creator><creator>Varnagy, David</creator><creator>Moore, William M.</creator><creator>Arko, Frank R.</creator><creator>Joye, James</creator><creator>Henretta, John</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy</title><author>Jordan, William D. ; de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M. ; Ouriel, Kenneth ; Mehta, Manish ; Varnagy, David ; Moore, William M. ; Arko, Frank R. ; Joye, James ; Henretta, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-a815b69e2d7ed5d7568e10e4806a2b9626b3f56ea006ed61823714c1a3562ba33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortography - methods</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Endoleak - etiology</topic><topic>Endoleak - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - etiology</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jordan, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnagy, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arko, Frank R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joye, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henretta, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jordan, William D.</au><au>de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.</au><au>Ouriel, Kenneth</au><au>Mehta, Manish</au><au>Varnagy, David</au><au>Moore, William M.</au><au>Arko, Frank R.</au><au>Joye, James</au><au>Henretta, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>163-170</pages><issn>1526-6028</issn><eissn>1545-1550</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To explore the use of EndoAnchors as an adjunct to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for prevention of proximal neck complications in patients with challenging neck anatomy. Methods: Over a 28-month period, 208 patients (159 men; mean age 72±8 years) were enrolled in the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01534819) for prophylaxis against proximal neck complications. Patients were eligible when, in the opinion of the investigators, they were at increased risk for type Ia endoleak or migration owing to a hostile neck (length &lt;10 mm, diameter &gt;28 mm, angulation &gt;60°, mural thrombus or calcium &gt;2 mm in thickness or &gt;180° in circumference, or conical shape). Overall, 123/157 (78.3%) patients met the criteria for a hostile neck according to core laboratory assessment of 157 adequate preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images. Results: Implantation of EndoAnchors was technically successful in 204/208 (98.1%) patients. The frequency of fracture was 0.3% (3/1118); there were no clinical sequelae associated with the fractures. Over the mean 14-month follow-up, 95.2% of patients were alive, and no deaths were attributable to EndoAnchors. There were no ruptures, migrations, or open surgical conversions. Aneurysm-related reinterventions were performed in 8 (3.8%) patients. Among 130 patients with postprocedure contrast CT studies, core laboratory analysis identified 2 (1.5%) patients with type Ia endoleaks. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased &gt;5 mm in 42.9% of patients with CT scans at or beyond 1 year; 1.6% of patients developed sac enlargement &gt;5 mm. Conclusion: Prophylactic EndoAnchor use for challenging aortic neck anatomy was associated with satisfactory midterm results.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>25809354</pmid><doi>10.1177/1526602815574685</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-6028
ispartof Journal of endovascular therapy, 2015-04, Vol.22 (2), p.163-170
issn 1526-6028
1545-1550
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667350869
source MEDLINE; SAGE Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Aortography - methods
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation
Endoleak - etiology
Endoleak - prevention & control
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation
Female
Foreign-Body Migration - etiology
Foreign-Body Migration - prevention & control
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Registries
Risk Factors
Stents
Time Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
title Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Midterm%20Outcome%20of%20EndoAnchors%20for%20the%20Prevention%20of%20Endoleak%20and%20Stent-Graft%20Migration%20in%20Patients%20With%20Challenging%20Proximal%20Aortic%20Neck%20Anatomy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endovascular%20therapy&rft.au=Jordan,%20William%20D.&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=163-170&rft.issn=1526-6028&rft.eissn=1545-1550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1526602815574685&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1667350869%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1667350869&rft_id=info:pmid/25809354&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1526602815574685&rfr_iscdi=true