Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy
Purpose: To explore the use of EndoAnchors as an adjunct to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for prevention of proximal neck complications in patients with challenging neck anatomy. Methods: Over a 28-month period, 208 patients (159 men; mean age 72±8 years) were enrolled in the ANCHOR...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endovascular therapy 2015-04, Vol.22 (2), p.163-170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 170 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 163 |
container_title | Journal of endovascular therapy |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Jordan, William D. de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M. Ouriel, Kenneth Mehta, Manish Varnagy, David Moore, William M. Arko, Frank R. Joye, James Henretta, John |
description | Purpose: To explore the use of EndoAnchors as an adjunct to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for prevention of proximal neck complications in patients with challenging neck anatomy. Methods: Over a 28-month period, 208 patients (159 men; mean age 72±8 years) were enrolled in the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01534819) for prophylaxis against proximal neck complications. Patients were eligible when, in the opinion of the investigators, they were at increased risk for type Ia endoleak or migration owing to a hostile neck (length 28 mm, angulation >60°, mural thrombus or calcium >2 mm in thickness or >180° in circumference, or conical shape). Overall, 123/157 (78.3%) patients met the criteria for a hostile neck according to core laboratory assessment of 157 adequate preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images. Results: Implantation of EndoAnchors was technically successful in 204/208 (98.1%) patients. The frequency of fracture was 0.3% (3/1118); there were no clinical sequelae associated with the fractures. Over the mean 14-month follow-up, 95.2% of patients were alive, and no deaths were attributable to EndoAnchors. There were no ruptures, migrations, or open surgical conversions. Aneurysm-related reinterventions were performed in 8 (3.8%) patients. Among 130 patients with postprocedure contrast CT studies, core laboratory analysis identified 2 (1.5%) patients with type Ia endoleaks. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased >5 mm in 42.9% of patients with CT scans at or beyond 1 year; 1.6% of patients developed sac enlargement >5 mm. Conclusion: Prophylactic EndoAnchor use for challenging aortic neck anatomy was associated with satisfactory midterm results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1526602815574685 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667350869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1526602815574685</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1667350869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-a815b69e2d7ed5d7568e10e4806a2b9626b3f56ea006ed61823714c1a3562ba33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kclOwzAQhi0EYincOSEfuQS8xE56rCooSGwSII6Rk0xa08QutoPoY_DGuLRwQOI0M_q_-TULQseUnFGaZedUMCkJy6kQWSpzsYX2qUhFEmuyvcqZTFb6Hjrw_pUQRhmlu2iPiZwMuUj30eetrgO4Dt_3obIdYNvgC1Pbkalm1nncWIfDDPCDg3cwQVvzQ7Sg5liZGj-GKCQTp5qAb_XUqW9KG_wQsyh5_KLDDI9nqm3BTLWZRjf7oTvV4pF1QVf4Dqo5HhkVbLc8RDuNaj0cbeIAPV9ePI2vkpv7yfV4dJNUnGchUXHpUg6B1RnUos6EzIESSHMiFSuHksmSN0KCIkRCLWnOeEbTiiouJCsV5wN0uvZdOPvWgw9Fp30FbasM2N4XVMqMC5LLYUTJGq2c9d5BUyxcHN8tC0qK1SOKv4-ILScb977soP5t-Ll8BJI14NUUilfbOxO3_d_wC9KjkMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1667350869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Jordan, William D. ; de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M. ; Ouriel, Kenneth ; Mehta, Manish ; Varnagy, David ; Moore, William M. ; Arko, Frank R. ; Joye, James ; Henretta, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Jordan, William D. ; de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M. ; Ouriel, Kenneth ; Mehta, Manish ; Varnagy, David ; Moore, William M. ; Arko, Frank R. ; Joye, James ; Henretta, John</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To explore the use of EndoAnchors as an adjunct to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for prevention of proximal neck complications in patients with challenging neck anatomy. Methods: Over a 28-month period, 208 patients (159 men; mean age 72±8 years) were enrolled in the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01534819) for prophylaxis against proximal neck complications. Patients were eligible when, in the opinion of the investigators, they were at increased risk for type Ia endoleak or migration owing to a hostile neck (length <10 mm, diameter >28 mm, angulation >60°, mural thrombus or calcium >2 mm in thickness or >180° in circumference, or conical shape). Overall, 123/157 (78.3%) patients met the criteria for a hostile neck according to core laboratory assessment of 157 adequate preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images. Results: Implantation of EndoAnchors was technically successful in 204/208 (98.1%) patients. The frequency of fracture was 0.3% (3/1118); there were no clinical sequelae associated with the fractures. Over the mean 14-month follow-up, 95.2% of patients were alive, and no deaths were attributable to EndoAnchors. There were no ruptures, migrations, or open surgical conversions. Aneurysm-related reinterventions were performed in 8 (3.8%) patients. Among 130 patients with postprocedure contrast CT studies, core laboratory analysis identified 2 (1.5%) patients with type Ia endoleaks. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased >5 mm in 42.9% of patients with CT scans at or beyond 1 year; 1.6% of patients developed sac enlargement >5 mm. Conclusion: Prophylactic EndoAnchor use for challenging aortic neck anatomy was associated with satisfactory midterm results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-6028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1526602815574685</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25809354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortography - methods ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Endoleak - etiology ; Endoleak - prevention & control ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Female ; Foreign-Body Migration - etiology ; Foreign-Body Migration - prevention & control ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Registries ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of endovascular therapy, 2015-04, Vol.22 (2), p.163-170</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-a815b69e2d7ed5d7568e10e4806a2b9626b3f56ea006ed61823714c1a3562ba33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-a815b69e2d7ed5d7568e10e4806a2b9626b3f56ea006ed61823714c1a3562ba33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1526602815574685$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1526602815574685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25809354$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jordan, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnagy, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arko, Frank R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joye, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henretta, John</creatorcontrib><title>Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy</title><title>Journal of endovascular therapy</title><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><description>Purpose: To explore the use of EndoAnchors as an adjunct to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for prevention of proximal neck complications in patients with challenging neck anatomy. Methods: Over a 28-month period, 208 patients (159 men; mean age 72±8 years) were enrolled in the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01534819) for prophylaxis against proximal neck complications. Patients were eligible when, in the opinion of the investigators, they were at increased risk for type Ia endoleak or migration owing to a hostile neck (length <10 mm, diameter >28 mm, angulation >60°, mural thrombus or calcium >2 mm in thickness or >180° in circumference, or conical shape). Overall, 123/157 (78.3%) patients met the criteria for a hostile neck according to core laboratory assessment of 157 adequate preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images. Results: Implantation of EndoAnchors was technically successful in 204/208 (98.1%) patients. The frequency of fracture was 0.3% (3/1118); there were no clinical sequelae associated with the fractures. Over the mean 14-month follow-up, 95.2% of patients were alive, and no deaths were attributable to EndoAnchors. There were no ruptures, migrations, or open surgical conversions. Aneurysm-related reinterventions were performed in 8 (3.8%) patients. Among 130 patients with postprocedure contrast CT studies, core laboratory analysis identified 2 (1.5%) patients with type Ia endoleaks. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased >5 mm in 42.9% of patients with CT scans at or beyond 1 year; 1.6% of patients developed sac enlargement >5 mm. Conclusion: Prophylactic EndoAnchor use for challenging aortic neck anatomy was associated with satisfactory midterm results.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortography - methods</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Endoleak - etiology</subject><subject>Endoleak - prevention & control</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - etiology</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1526-6028</issn><issn>1545-1550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kclOwzAQhi0EYincOSEfuQS8xE56rCooSGwSII6Rk0xa08QutoPoY_DGuLRwQOI0M_q_-TULQseUnFGaZedUMCkJy6kQWSpzsYX2qUhFEmuyvcqZTFb6Hjrw_pUQRhmlu2iPiZwMuUj30eetrgO4Dt_3obIdYNvgC1Pbkalm1nncWIfDDPCDg3cwQVvzQ7Sg5liZGj-GKCQTp5qAb_XUqW9KG_wQsyh5_KLDDI9nqm3BTLWZRjf7oTvV4pF1QVf4Dqo5HhkVbLc8RDuNaj0cbeIAPV9ePI2vkpv7yfV4dJNUnGchUXHpUg6B1RnUos6EzIESSHMiFSuHksmSN0KCIkRCLWnOeEbTiiouJCsV5wN0uvZdOPvWgw9Fp30FbasM2N4XVMqMC5LLYUTJGq2c9d5BUyxcHN8tC0qK1SOKv4-ILScb977soP5t-Ll8BJI14NUUilfbOxO3_d_wC9KjkMY</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Jordan, William D.</creator><creator>de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.</creator><creator>Ouriel, Kenneth</creator><creator>Mehta, Manish</creator><creator>Varnagy, David</creator><creator>Moore, William M.</creator><creator>Arko, Frank R.</creator><creator>Joye, James</creator><creator>Henretta, John</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy</title><author>Jordan, William D. ; de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M. ; Ouriel, Kenneth ; Mehta, Manish ; Varnagy, David ; Moore, William M. ; Arko, Frank R. ; Joye, James ; Henretta, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-a815b69e2d7ed5d7568e10e4806a2b9626b3f56ea006ed61823714c1a3562ba33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortography - methods</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Endoleak - etiology</topic><topic>Endoleak - prevention & control</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - etiology</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jordan, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnagy, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arko, Frank R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joye, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henretta, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jordan, William D.</au><au>de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.</au><au>Ouriel, Kenneth</au><au>Mehta, Manish</au><au>Varnagy, David</au><au>Moore, William M.</au><au>Arko, Frank R.</au><au>Joye, James</au><au>Henretta, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>163-170</pages><issn>1526-6028</issn><eissn>1545-1550</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To explore the use of EndoAnchors as an adjunct to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for prevention of proximal neck complications in patients with challenging neck anatomy. Methods: Over a 28-month period, 208 patients (159 men; mean age 72±8 years) were enrolled in the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01534819) for prophylaxis against proximal neck complications. Patients were eligible when, in the opinion of the investigators, they were at increased risk for type Ia endoleak or migration owing to a hostile neck (length <10 mm, diameter >28 mm, angulation >60°, mural thrombus or calcium >2 mm in thickness or >180° in circumference, or conical shape). Overall, 123/157 (78.3%) patients met the criteria for a hostile neck according to core laboratory assessment of 157 adequate preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images. Results: Implantation of EndoAnchors was technically successful in 204/208 (98.1%) patients. The frequency of fracture was 0.3% (3/1118); there were no clinical sequelae associated with the fractures. Over the mean 14-month follow-up, 95.2% of patients were alive, and no deaths were attributable to EndoAnchors. There were no ruptures, migrations, or open surgical conversions. Aneurysm-related reinterventions were performed in 8 (3.8%) patients. Among 130 patients with postprocedure contrast CT studies, core laboratory analysis identified 2 (1.5%) patients with type Ia endoleaks. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased >5 mm in 42.9% of patients with CT scans at or beyond 1 year; 1.6% of patients developed sac enlargement >5 mm. Conclusion: Prophylactic EndoAnchor use for challenging aortic neck anatomy was associated with satisfactory midterm results.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>25809354</pmid><doi>10.1177/1526602815574685</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-6028 |
ispartof | Journal of endovascular therapy, 2015-04, Vol.22 (2), p.163-170 |
issn | 1526-6028 1545-1550 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667350869 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery Aortography - methods Blood Vessel Prosthesis Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation Endoleak - etiology Endoleak - prevention & control Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation Female Foreign-Body Migration - etiology Foreign-Body Migration - prevention & control Humans Male Middle Aged Prosthesis Design Prosthesis Failure Registries Risk Factors Stents Time Factors Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome |
title | Midterm Outcome of EndoAnchors for the Prevention of Endoleak and Stent-Graft Migration in Patients With Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Midterm%20Outcome%20of%20EndoAnchors%20for%20the%20Prevention%20of%20Endoleak%20and%20Stent-Graft%20Migration%20in%20Patients%20With%20Challenging%20Proximal%20Aortic%20Neck%20Anatomy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endovascular%20therapy&rft.au=Jordan,%20William%20D.&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=163-170&rft.issn=1526-6028&rft.eissn=1545-1550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1526602815574685&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1667350869%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1667350869&rft_id=info:pmid/25809354&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1526602815574685&rfr_iscdi=true |