Intensity Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Abstract Objective To investigate the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) intensity on corticospinal excitability and affected muscle activation in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design Single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study. Set...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2015-04, Vol.96 (4), p.S114-S121 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | S121 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | S114 |
| container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 96 |
| creator | Murray, Lynda M., PhD Edwards, Dylan J., PhD Ruffini, Giulio, PhD Labar, Douglas, MD, PhD Stampas, Argyrios, MD Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, MD, PhD Cortes, Mar, MD |
| description | Abstract Objective To investigate the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) intensity on corticospinal excitability and affected muscle activation in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design Single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study. Setting Medical research institute and rehabilitation hospital. Participants Volunteers (N=9) with chronic SCI and motor dysfunction in wrist extensor muscles. Interventions Three single session exposures to 20 minutes of a-tDCS (anode over the extensor carpi radialis [ECR] muscle representation on the left primary motor cortex, cathode over the right supraorbital area) using 1mA, 2mA, or sham stimulation, delivered at rest, with at least 1 week between sessions. Main Outcome Measures Corticospinal excitability was assessed with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the ECR muscle using surface electromyography after transcranial magnetic stimulation. Changes in spinal excitability, sensory threshold, and muscle strength were also investigated. Results Mean MEP amplitude significantly increased by approximately 40% immediately after 2mA a-tDCS (pre: 0.36±0.1mV; post: 0.47±0.11mV; P =.001), but not with 1mA or sham. Maximal voluntary contraction measures remained unaltered across all conditions. Sensory threshold significantly decreased over time after 1mA ( P =.002) and 2mA ( P =.039) a-tDCS and did not change with sham. F-wave persistence showed a nonsignificant trend for increase (pre: 32%±12%; post: 41%±10%; follow-up: 46%±12%) after 2mA stimulation. No adverse effects were reported with any of the experimental conditions. Conclusions The a-tDCS can transiently raise corticospinal excitability to affected muscles in patients with chronic SCI after 2mA stimulation. Sensory perception can improve with both 1 and 2mA stimulation. This study gives support to the safe and effective use of a-tDCS using small electrodes in patients with SCI and highlights the importance of stimulation intensity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667349362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003999314012660</els_id><sourcerecordid>1667349362</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c2699de64a789ad06fe65d72f2eb35290b556c8c7dfabe30d1095c68a4ef2edd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-L1DAYh4Mo7rjrF_AgPXppzZ8m04IIMjvqwIKH2QVvIU3eYmqb1CQV5-onN3VWD3tYCAnJ-7w_eJ8g9IrgimAi3g6VmqdQUUzqipAK4_oJ2hDOaNlQ8vUp2mCMWdm2LbtAL2Ic8lVwRp6jC8prQRrKN-j3wSVw0aZTcQ0zOAMuFfu-B51i4fviNigXdd6sGotrG_J7sVtCWLFjstMyqmS9K_La-ZCs9nG2LrP7X9om1dlxjba5-i14Z3VxPJczbIqDG5ZwukLPejVGeHl_XqK7j_vb3efy5sunw-7DTak5JanUVLStAVGrbdMqg0UPgpst7Sl0jNMWd5wL3eit6VUHDBuCW65Fo2rIiDHsEr05587B_1ggJjnZqGEclQO_REmE2LK6ZYJmlJ5RHXyMAXo5BzupcJIEy9W9HOTqXq7uJSEyu89Nr-_zl24C87_ln-wMvDsDkKf8aSHIqC04DeavV2m8fTz__YN2PdqsVI3f4QRx8EvIZvMcMlKJ5XH9_fXzSY0JFQKzP57OrTY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1667349362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intensity Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Murray, Lynda M., PhD ; Edwards, Dylan J., PhD ; Ruffini, Giulio, PhD ; Labar, Douglas, MD, PhD ; Stampas, Argyrios, MD ; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, MD, PhD ; Cortes, Mar, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Lynda M., PhD ; Edwards, Dylan J., PhD ; Ruffini, Giulio, PhD ; Labar, Douglas, MD, PhD ; Stampas, Argyrios, MD ; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, MD, PhD ; Cortes, Mar, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To investigate the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) intensity on corticospinal excitability and affected muscle activation in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design Single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study. Setting Medical research institute and rehabilitation hospital. Participants Volunteers (N=9) with chronic SCI and motor dysfunction in wrist extensor muscles. Interventions Three single session exposures to 20 minutes of a-tDCS (anode over the extensor carpi radialis [ECR] muscle representation on the left primary motor cortex, cathode over the right supraorbital area) using 1mA, 2mA, or sham stimulation, delivered at rest, with at least 1 week between sessions. Main Outcome Measures Corticospinal excitability was assessed with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the ECR muscle using surface electromyography after transcranial magnetic stimulation. Changes in spinal excitability, sensory threshold, and muscle strength were also investigated. Results Mean MEP amplitude significantly increased by approximately 40% immediately after 2mA a-tDCS (pre: 0.36±0.1mV; post: 0.47±0.11mV; P =.001), but not with 1mA or sham. Maximal voluntary contraction measures remained unaltered across all conditions. Sensory threshold significantly decreased over time after 1mA ( P =.002) and 2mA ( P =.039) a-tDCS and did not change with sham. F-wave persistence showed a nonsignificant trend for increase (pre: 32%±12%; post: 41%±10%; follow-up: 46%±12%) after 2mA stimulation. No adverse effects were reported with any of the experimental conditions. Conclusions The a-tDCS can transiently raise corticospinal excitability to affected muscles in patients with chronic SCI after 2mA stimulation. Sensory perception can improve with both 1 and 2mA stimulation. This study gives support to the safe and effective use of a-tDCS using small electrodes in patients with SCI and highlights the importance of stimulation intensity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25461825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anodal stimulation transcranial direct current stimulation ; Chronic Disease ; Cross-Over Studies ; Electromyography ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Physical Therapy Modalities ; Pyramidal Tracts - physiopathology ; Rehabilitation ; Single-Blind Method ; Spinal cord injuries ; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation ; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - adverse effects ; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods ; Upper extremity ; Wrist - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015-04, Vol.96 (4), p.S114-S121</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c2699de64a789ad06fe65d72f2eb35290b556c8c7dfabe30d1095c68a4ef2edd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c2699de64a789ad06fe65d72f2eb35290b556c8c7dfabe30d1095c68a4ef2edd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25461825$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Lynda M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Dylan J., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruffini, Giulio, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labar, Douglas, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stampas, Argyrios, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Mar, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Intensity Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To investigate the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) intensity on corticospinal excitability and affected muscle activation in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design Single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study. Setting Medical research institute and rehabilitation hospital. Participants Volunteers (N=9) with chronic SCI and motor dysfunction in wrist extensor muscles. Interventions Three single session exposures to 20 minutes of a-tDCS (anode over the extensor carpi radialis [ECR] muscle representation on the left primary motor cortex, cathode over the right supraorbital area) using 1mA, 2mA, or sham stimulation, delivered at rest, with at least 1 week between sessions. Main Outcome Measures Corticospinal excitability was assessed with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the ECR muscle using surface electromyography after transcranial magnetic stimulation. Changes in spinal excitability, sensory threshold, and muscle strength were also investigated. Results Mean MEP amplitude significantly increased by approximately 40% immediately after 2mA a-tDCS (pre: 0.36±0.1mV; post: 0.47±0.11mV; P =.001), but not with 1mA or sham. Maximal voluntary contraction measures remained unaltered across all conditions. Sensory threshold significantly decreased over time after 1mA ( P =.002) and 2mA ( P =.039) a-tDCS and did not change with sham. F-wave persistence showed a nonsignificant trend for increase (pre: 32%±12%; post: 41%±10%; follow-up: 46%±12%) after 2mA stimulation. No adverse effects were reported with any of the experimental conditions. Conclusions The a-tDCS can transiently raise corticospinal excitability to affected muscles in patients with chronic SCI after 2mA stimulation. Sensory perception can improve with both 1 and 2mA stimulation. This study gives support to the safe and effective use of a-tDCS using small electrodes in patients with SCI and highlights the importance of stimulation intensity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anodal stimulation transcranial direct current stimulation</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities</subject><subject>Pyramidal Tracts - physiopathology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Upper extremity</subject><subject>Wrist - physiopathology</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-L1DAYh4Mo7rjrF_AgPXppzZ8m04IIMjvqwIKH2QVvIU3eYmqb1CQV5-onN3VWD3tYCAnJ-7w_eJ8g9IrgimAi3g6VmqdQUUzqipAK4_oJ2hDOaNlQ8vUp2mCMWdm2LbtAL2Ic8lVwRp6jC8prQRrKN-j3wSVw0aZTcQ0zOAMuFfu-B51i4fviNigXdd6sGotrG_J7sVtCWLFjstMyqmS9K_La-ZCs9nG2LrP7X9om1dlxjba5-i14Z3VxPJczbIqDG5ZwukLPejVGeHl_XqK7j_vb3efy5sunw-7DTak5JanUVLStAVGrbdMqg0UPgpst7Sl0jNMWd5wL3eit6VUHDBuCW65Fo2rIiDHsEr05587B_1ggJjnZqGEclQO_REmE2LK6ZYJmlJ5RHXyMAXo5BzupcJIEy9W9HOTqXq7uJSEyu89Nr-_zl24C87_ln-wMvDsDkKf8aSHIqC04DeavV2m8fTz__YN2PdqsVI3f4QRx8EvIZvMcMlKJ5XH9_fXzSY0JFQKzP57OrTY</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Murray, Lynda M., PhD</creator><creator>Edwards, Dylan J., PhD</creator><creator>Ruffini, Giulio, PhD</creator><creator>Labar, Douglas, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Stampas, Argyrios, MD</creator><creator>Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Cortes, Mar, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Intensity Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury</title><author>Murray, Lynda M., PhD ; Edwards, Dylan J., PhD ; Ruffini, Giulio, PhD ; Labar, Douglas, MD, PhD ; Stampas, Argyrios, MD ; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, MD, PhD ; Cortes, Mar, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c2699de64a789ad06fe65d72f2eb35290b556c8c7dfabe30d1095c68a4ef2edd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anodal stimulation transcranial direct current stimulation</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities</topic><topic>Pyramidal Tracts - physiopathology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Upper extremity</topic><topic>Wrist - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Lynda M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Dylan J., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruffini, Giulio, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labar, Douglas, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stampas, Argyrios, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Mar, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Lynda M., PhD</au><au>Edwards, Dylan J., PhD</au><au>Ruffini, Giulio, PhD</au><au>Labar, Douglas, MD, PhD</au><au>Stampas, Argyrios, MD</au><au>Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, MD, PhD</au><au>Cortes, Mar, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intensity Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>S114</spage><epage>S121</epage><pages>S114-S121</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To investigate the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) intensity on corticospinal excitability and affected muscle activation in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design Single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study. Setting Medical research institute and rehabilitation hospital. Participants Volunteers (N=9) with chronic SCI and motor dysfunction in wrist extensor muscles. Interventions Three single session exposures to 20 minutes of a-tDCS (anode over the extensor carpi radialis [ECR] muscle representation on the left primary motor cortex, cathode over the right supraorbital area) using 1mA, 2mA, or sham stimulation, delivered at rest, with at least 1 week between sessions. Main Outcome Measures Corticospinal excitability was assessed with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the ECR muscle using surface electromyography after transcranial magnetic stimulation. Changes in spinal excitability, sensory threshold, and muscle strength were also investigated. Results Mean MEP amplitude significantly increased by approximately 40% immediately after 2mA a-tDCS (pre: 0.36±0.1mV; post: 0.47±0.11mV; P =.001), but not with 1mA or sham. Maximal voluntary contraction measures remained unaltered across all conditions. Sensory threshold significantly decreased over time after 1mA ( P =.002) and 2mA ( P =.039) a-tDCS and did not change with sham. F-wave persistence showed a nonsignificant trend for increase (pre: 32%±12%; post: 41%±10%; follow-up: 46%±12%) after 2mA stimulation. No adverse effects were reported with any of the experimental conditions. Conclusions The a-tDCS can transiently raise corticospinal excitability to affected muscles in patients with chronic SCI after 2mA stimulation. Sensory perception can improve with both 1 and 2mA stimulation. This study gives support to the safe and effective use of a-tDCS using small electrodes in patients with SCI and highlights the importance of stimulation intensity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25461825</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.004</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
| ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015-04, Vol.96 (4), p.S114-S121 |
| issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667349362 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Adult Anodal stimulation transcranial direct current stimulation Chronic Disease Cross-Over Studies Electromyography Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology Female Humans Male Middle Aged Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Physical Therapy Modalities Pyramidal Tracts - physiopathology Rehabilitation Single-Blind Method Spinal cord injuries Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - adverse effects Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods Upper extremity Wrist - physiopathology |
| title | Intensity Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T16%3A14%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intensity%20Dependent%20Effects%20of%20Transcranial%20Direct%20Current%20Stimulation%20on%20Corticospinal%20Excitability%20in%20Chronic%20Spinal%20Cord%20Injury&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Murray,%20Lynda%20M.,%20PhD&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=S114&rft.epage=S121&rft.pages=S114-S121&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1667349362%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1667349362&rft_id=info:pmid/25461825&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003999314012660&rfr_iscdi=true |