The potentials and challenges of algae based biofuels: A review of the techno-economic, life cycle, and resource assessment modeling
[Display omitted] •Lipid growth modeling ranges between 2.3 and 136.9m3ha−1yr−1.•Economic assessments report selling cost of fuel between $1.64 and over $30gal−1.•Life cycle assessments report GHGs of −95.7 to 534g-CO2-eqMJ−1.•Resource assessments show need for multi-resource consideration.•Need for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioresource Technology 2015-05, Vol.184, p.444-452 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 452 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 444 |
container_title | Bioresource Technology |
container_volume | 184 |
creator | Quinn, Jason C. Davis, Ryan |
description | [Display omitted]
•Lipid growth modeling ranges between 2.3 and 136.9m3ha−1yr−1.•Economic assessments report selling cost of fuel between $1.64 and over $30gal−1.•Life cycle assessments report GHGs of −95.7 to 534g-CO2-eqMJ−1.•Resource assessments show need for multi-resource consideration.•Need for harmonization of resource, life cycle and techno-economic assessments.
Microalgae biofuel production has been extensively evaluated through resource, economic and life cycle assessments. Resource assessments consistently identify land as non-limiting and highlight the need to consider siting based on combined geographical constraints of land and other critical resources such as water and carbon dioxide. Economic assessments report a selling cost of fuel that ranges between $1.64 and over $30gal−1 consistent with large variability reported in the life cycle literature, −75 to 534gCO2-eqMJ−1. Large drivers behind such variability stem from differences in productivity assumptions, pathway technologies, and system boundaries. Productivity represents foundational units in these assessments with current assumed yields in various assessments varying by a factor of 60. A review of the literature in these areas highlights the need for harmonized assessments such that direct comparisons of alternative processing technologies can be made on the metrics of resource requirements, economic feasibility, and environmental impact. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.075 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1665495303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960852414014977</els_id><sourcerecordid>1665495303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-3ad20f643a83f6c54a6c0b632116dce54e52161d7767e528a2f18c151980bdb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCK1QWKxbN4J_YSVhRVRSQKrEpa8uxb2Y8cuzBToq658GxmZYtK1tX3z3n6B6ELinZUkLlh8N2dDEtYPZbRmhbhlvSiRdoQ_uON2zo5Eu0IYMkTS9Ye4bOcz4QQjjt2Gt0xkQreMuHDfp9vwd8jAuExWmfsQ4Wm732HsIOMo4T1n6nAY86g8XFc1rB54_4Gid4cPCrEkuRqElCbMDEEGdnrrB3E2DzaDxc_RVNkOOaDGCdM-Q8F0M8Rwvehd0b9Goq5vD26b1AP24_3998be6-f_l2c33XGEH50nBtGZlky3XPJ2lEq6Uho-SMUmkNiBYEo5LarpNd-faaTbQ3VNChJ6MdKb9A7066MS9OZeNq6pI4gFkUZYxILgr0_gQdU_y5Ql7U7LIB73WAuGZFpRTtIDjhBZUn1KSYc4JJHZObdXpUlKhakzqo55pUranOS01l8fLJYx1nsP_WnnspwKcTUI5d75xqWggGrEs1rI3ufx5_AABQp1k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1665495303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The potentials and challenges of algae based biofuels: A review of the techno-economic, life cycle, and resource assessment modeling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Quinn, Jason C. ; Davis, Ryan</creator><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Jason C. ; Davis, Ryan ; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Lipid growth modeling ranges between 2.3 and 136.9m3ha−1yr−1.•Economic assessments report selling cost of fuel between $1.64 and over $30gal−1.•Life cycle assessments report GHGs of −95.7 to 534g-CO2-eqMJ−1.•Resource assessments show need for multi-resource consideration.•Need for harmonization of resource, life cycle and techno-economic assessments.
Microalgae biofuel production has been extensively evaluated through resource, economic and life cycle assessments. Resource assessments consistently identify land as non-limiting and highlight the need to consider siting based on combined geographical constraints of land and other critical resources such as water and carbon dioxide. Economic assessments report a selling cost of fuel that ranges between $1.64 and over $30gal−1 consistent with large variability reported in the life cycle literature, −75 to 534gCO2-eqMJ−1. Large drivers behind such variability stem from differences in productivity assumptions, pathway technologies, and system boundaries. Productivity represents foundational units in these assessments with current assumed yields in various assessments varying by a factor of 60. A review of the literature in these areas highlights the need for harmonized assessments such that direct comparisons of alternative processing technologies can be made on the metrics of resource requirements, economic feasibility, and environmental impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25453439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>09 BIOMASS FUELS ; Biofuels ; Biofuels - microbiology ; Biotechnology - economics ; Biotechnology - methods ; Environment ; Life cycle assessment ; Microalgae ; Microalgae - metabolism ; Models, Theoretical ; Natural Resources ; Productivity potential ; Techno-economic assessment</subject><ispartof>Bioresource Technology, 2015-05, Vol.184, p.444-452</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-3ad20f643a83f6c54a6c0b632116dce54e52161d7767e528a2f18c151980bdb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-3ad20f643a83f6c54a6c0b632116dce54e52161d7767e528a2f18c151980bdb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852414014977$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,881,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25453439$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1220635$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Jason C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>The potentials and challenges of algae based biofuels: A review of the techno-economic, life cycle, and resource assessment modeling</title><title>Bioresource Technology</title><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><description>[Display omitted]
•Lipid growth modeling ranges between 2.3 and 136.9m3ha−1yr−1.•Economic assessments report selling cost of fuel between $1.64 and over $30gal−1.•Life cycle assessments report GHGs of −95.7 to 534g-CO2-eqMJ−1.•Resource assessments show need for multi-resource consideration.•Need for harmonization of resource, life cycle and techno-economic assessments.
Microalgae biofuel production has been extensively evaluated through resource, economic and life cycle assessments. Resource assessments consistently identify land as non-limiting and highlight the need to consider siting based on combined geographical constraints of land and other critical resources such as water and carbon dioxide. Economic assessments report a selling cost of fuel that ranges between $1.64 and over $30gal−1 consistent with large variability reported in the life cycle literature, −75 to 534gCO2-eqMJ−1. Large drivers behind such variability stem from differences in productivity assumptions, pathway technologies, and system boundaries. Productivity represents foundational units in these assessments with current assumed yields in various assessments varying by a factor of 60. A review of the literature in these areas highlights the need for harmonized assessments such that direct comparisons of alternative processing technologies can be made on the metrics of resource requirements, economic feasibility, and environmental impact.</description><subject>09 BIOMASS FUELS</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biofuels - microbiology</subject><subject>Biotechnology - economics</subject><subject>Biotechnology - methods</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Microalgae</subject><subject>Microalgae - metabolism</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Natural Resources</subject><subject>Productivity potential</subject><subject>Techno-economic assessment</subject><issn>0960-8524</issn><issn>1873-2976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCK1QWKxbN4J_YSVhRVRSQKrEpa8uxb2Y8cuzBToq658GxmZYtK1tX3z3n6B6ELinZUkLlh8N2dDEtYPZbRmhbhlvSiRdoQ_uON2zo5Eu0IYMkTS9Ye4bOcz4QQjjt2Gt0xkQreMuHDfp9vwd8jAuExWmfsQ4Wm732HsIOMo4T1n6nAY86g8XFc1rB54_4Gid4cPCrEkuRqElCbMDEEGdnrrB3E2DzaDxc_RVNkOOaDGCdM-Q8F0M8Rwvehd0b9Goq5vD26b1AP24_3998be6-f_l2c33XGEH50nBtGZlky3XPJ2lEq6Uho-SMUmkNiBYEo5LarpNd-faaTbQ3VNChJ6MdKb9A7066MS9OZeNq6pI4gFkUZYxILgr0_gQdU_y5Ql7U7LIB73WAuGZFpRTtIDjhBZUn1KSYc4JJHZObdXpUlKhakzqo55pUranOS01l8fLJYx1nsP_WnnspwKcTUI5d75xqWggGrEs1rI3ufx5_AABQp1k</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Quinn, Jason C.</creator><creator>Davis, Ryan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>The potentials and challenges of algae based biofuels: A review of the techno-economic, life cycle, and resource assessment modeling</title><author>Quinn, Jason C. ; Davis, Ryan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-3ad20f643a83f6c54a6c0b632116dce54e52161d7767e528a2f18c151980bdb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>09 BIOMASS FUELS</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biofuels - microbiology</topic><topic>Biotechnology - economics</topic><topic>Biotechnology - methods</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Microalgae</topic><topic>Microalgae - metabolism</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Natural Resources</topic><topic>Productivity potential</topic><topic>Techno-economic assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Jason C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Bioresource Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quinn, Jason C.</au><au>Davis, Ryan</au><aucorp>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The potentials and challenges of algae based biofuels: A review of the techno-economic, life cycle, and resource assessment modeling</atitle><jtitle>Bioresource Technology</jtitle><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>184</volume><spage>444</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>444-452</pages><issn>0960-8524</issn><eissn>1873-2976</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Lipid growth modeling ranges between 2.3 and 136.9m3ha−1yr−1.•Economic assessments report selling cost of fuel between $1.64 and over $30gal−1.•Life cycle assessments report GHGs of −95.7 to 534g-CO2-eqMJ−1.•Resource assessments show need for multi-resource consideration.•Need for harmonization of resource, life cycle and techno-economic assessments.
Microalgae biofuel production has been extensively evaluated through resource, economic and life cycle assessments. Resource assessments consistently identify land as non-limiting and highlight the need to consider siting based on combined geographical constraints of land and other critical resources such as water and carbon dioxide. Economic assessments report a selling cost of fuel that ranges between $1.64 and over $30gal−1 consistent with large variability reported in the life cycle literature, −75 to 534gCO2-eqMJ−1. Large drivers behind such variability stem from differences in productivity assumptions, pathway technologies, and system boundaries. Productivity represents foundational units in these assessments with current assumed yields in various assessments varying by a factor of 60. A review of the literature in these areas highlights the need for harmonized assessments such that direct comparisons of alternative processing technologies can be made on the metrics of resource requirements, economic feasibility, and environmental impact.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25453439</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.075</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-8524 |
ispartof | Bioresource Technology, 2015-05, Vol.184, p.444-452 |
issn | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1665495303 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | 09 BIOMASS FUELS Biofuels Biofuels - microbiology Biotechnology - economics Biotechnology - methods Environment Life cycle assessment Microalgae Microalgae - metabolism Models, Theoretical Natural Resources Productivity potential Techno-economic assessment |
title | The potentials and challenges of algae based biofuels: A review of the techno-economic, life cycle, and resource assessment modeling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T07%3A16%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20potentials%20and%20challenges%20of%20algae%20based%20biofuels:%20A%20review%20of%20the%20techno-economic,%20life%20cycle,%20and%20resource%20assessment%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Bioresource%20Technology&rft.au=Quinn,%20Jason%20C.&rft.aucorp=National%20Renewable%20Energy%20Lab.%20(NREL),%20Golden,%20CO%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=184&rft.spage=444&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=444-452&rft.issn=0960-8524&rft.eissn=1873-2976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1665495303%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1665495303&rft_id=info:pmid/25453439&rft_els_id=S0960852414014977&rfr_iscdi=true |