Knee arthroplasty with a medial rotating total knee replacement. Midterm clinical findings: A district general experience of 38 cases

Abstract Background The Medial Rotating Knee replacement (MRK) was first used in 1994, reporting high rates of satisfaction. It is designed to replicate natural knee kinematics and improve stability and function. There are limited studies on the mid-term clinical outcomes, in particular in a distric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The knee 2015-03, Vol.22 (2), p.122-125
Hauptverfasser: Jonas, Sam C, Argyropoulos, Miltiadis, Al-Hadithy, Nawfal, Korycki, Marius, Lotz, Benedict, Deo, Sunny D, Satish, Venkat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 125
container_issue 2
container_start_page 122
container_title The knee
container_volume 22
creator Jonas, Sam C
Argyropoulos, Miltiadis
Al-Hadithy, Nawfal
Korycki, Marius
Lotz, Benedict
Deo, Sunny D
Satish, Venkat
description Abstract Background The Medial Rotating Knee replacement (MRK) was first used in 1994, reporting high rates of satisfaction. It is designed to replicate natural knee kinematics and improve stability and function. There are limited studies on the mid-term clinical outcomes, in particular in a district general hospital (DGH) environment. This is the first study that we are aware of that evaluates the learning curve of the implementation of this knee system in this environment. Patients/method Between 2007 and 2009 we performed 38 consecutive MRK replacements (MAT ORTHO, UK) in 36 patients. The mean follow-up was four years. Patients were evaluated clinically, using OKS and patient questionnaire and radiographically (good/acceptable/poor) to assess outcome. Results Mean age was 73.0 years. Mean pre-operative OKS was 17.7 (range 8–29), which rose to 38.1 (range 23–48) at latest follow up (p < 0.005). Overall 71% of the patients were either satisfied (29%) or very satisfied (42%). 81% felt an improvement of the ability to go up or down stairs and 92% felt stable. All poor radiographic and the majority of acceptable outcomes were experienced in the first 50% of cases. Conclusion The MRK can be successfully implanted in a DGH environment. It improves pain and function comparably to standard TKRs, however, subjective improvement may be higher. Radiographic evaluation shows an acceptable learning curve. Level of evidence Level IV case series.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664779256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0968016014002750</els_id><sourcerecordid>3623855961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-1152bb29f897e556724929cd97dacb3d4e61112024d685f1d2cc4f58f8b7125b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhS0EotPCC7BAltiwSbjXiZ0EIaSqKj-iiAWwthz7pvU0kwy2B5gH4L1xmBakLljZkr9zbJ9zGXuCUCKgerEuryeiUgDWJWIJ0N5jK2ybqpAtwH22gk61RSbhiB3HuAYA1dXyITsSUlaVQFixXx-yBTchXYV5O5qY9vyHT1fc8A05b0Ye5mSSny55ypuRLzfyQBm1tKEplfyjd4nChtvRT95mZPCTy4L4kp9y52MK3iZ-SROFfEg_txQ8TZb4PPCq5dZEio_Yg8GMkR7frCfs65vzL2fviotPb9-fnV4UVkKXCkQp-l50Q9s1JKVqRN2Jzrquccb2latJIaIAUTvVygGdsLYeZDu0fYNC9tUJe37w3Yb5245i0hsfLY2jmWjeRY1K1U3TCaky-uwOup53YcqvW6iqko1qF0ocKBvmGAMNehv8xoS9RtBLSXqtl8j0UpJG1LmkLHp6Y73rc8p_JbetZODVAaCcxXdPQUf7JzPnA9mk3ez_7__6jvy2m2vaU_z3Dx2FBv15GZNlSrAGEI2E6jcQs7ec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1663357686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knee arthroplasty with a medial rotating total knee replacement. Midterm clinical findings: A district general experience of 38 cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Jonas, Sam C ; Argyropoulos, Miltiadis ; Al-Hadithy, Nawfal ; Korycki, Marius ; Lotz, Benedict ; Deo, Sunny D ; Satish, Venkat</creator><creatorcontrib>Jonas, Sam C ; Argyropoulos, Miltiadis ; Al-Hadithy, Nawfal ; Korycki, Marius ; Lotz, Benedict ; Deo, Sunny D ; Satish, Venkat</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The Medial Rotating Knee replacement (MRK) was first used in 1994, reporting high rates of satisfaction. It is designed to replicate natural knee kinematics and improve stability and function. There are limited studies on the mid-term clinical outcomes, in particular in a district general hospital (DGH) environment. This is the first study that we are aware of that evaluates the learning curve of the implementation of this knee system in this environment. Patients/method Between 2007 and 2009 we performed 38 consecutive MRK replacements (MAT ORTHO, UK) in 36 patients. The mean follow-up was four years. Patients were evaluated clinically, using OKS and patient questionnaire and radiographically (good/acceptable/poor) to assess outcome. Results Mean age was 73.0 years. Mean pre-operative OKS was 17.7 (range 8–29), which rose to 38.1 (range 23–48) at latest follow up (p &lt; 0.005). Overall 71% of the patients were either satisfied (29%) or very satisfied (42%). 81% felt an improvement of the ability to go up or down stairs and 92% felt stable. All poor radiographic and the majority of acceptable outcomes were experienced in the first 50% of cases. Conclusion The MRK can be successfully implanted in a DGH environment. It improves pain and function comparably to standard TKRs, however, subjective improvement may be higher. Radiographic evaluation shows an acceptable learning curve. Level of evidence Level IV case series.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25533210</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Clinical outcome ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Joint surgery ; Knee ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Learning Curve ; Medial rotation knee replacement ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Patient Satisfaction ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2015-03, Vol.22 (2), p.122-125</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-1152bb29f897e556724929cd97dacb3d4e61112024d685f1d2cc4f58f8b7125b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-1152bb29f897e556724929cd97dacb3d4e61112024d685f1d2cc4f58f8b7125b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25533210$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jonas, Sam C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argyropoulos, Miltiadis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Hadithy, Nawfal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korycki, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotz, Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deo, Sunny D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satish, Venkat</creatorcontrib><title>Knee arthroplasty with a medial rotating total knee replacement. Midterm clinical findings: A district general experience of 38 cases</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The Medial Rotating Knee replacement (MRK) was first used in 1994, reporting high rates of satisfaction. It is designed to replicate natural knee kinematics and improve stability and function. There are limited studies on the mid-term clinical outcomes, in particular in a district general hospital (DGH) environment. This is the first study that we are aware of that evaluates the learning curve of the implementation of this knee system in this environment. Patients/method Between 2007 and 2009 we performed 38 consecutive MRK replacements (MAT ORTHO, UK) in 36 patients. The mean follow-up was four years. Patients were evaluated clinically, using OKS and patient questionnaire and radiographically (good/acceptable/poor) to assess outcome. Results Mean age was 73.0 years. Mean pre-operative OKS was 17.7 (range 8–29), which rose to 38.1 (range 23–48) at latest follow up (p &lt; 0.005). Overall 71% of the patients were either satisfied (29%) or very satisfied (42%). 81% felt an improvement of the ability to go up or down stairs and 92% felt stable. All poor radiographic and the majority of acceptable outcomes were experienced in the first 50% of cases. Conclusion The MRK can be successfully implanted in a DGH environment. It improves pain and function comparably to standard TKRs, however, subjective improvement may be higher. Radiographic evaluation shows an acceptable learning curve. Level of evidence Level IV case series.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Clinical outcome</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hospitals, General</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Learning Curve</subject><subject>Medial rotation knee replacement</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhS0EotPCC7BAltiwSbjXiZ0EIaSqKj-iiAWwthz7pvU0kwy2B5gH4L1xmBakLljZkr9zbJ9zGXuCUCKgerEuryeiUgDWJWIJ0N5jK2ybqpAtwH22gk61RSbhiB3HuAYA1dXyITsSUlaVQFixXx-yBTchXYV5O5qY9vyHT1fc8A05b0Ye5mSSny55ypuRLzfyQBm1tKEplfyjd4nChtvRT95mZPCTy4L4kp9y52MK3iZ-SROFfEg_txQ8TZb4PPCq5dZEio_Yg8GMkR7frCfs65vzL2fviotPb9-fnV4UVkKXCkQp-l50Q9s1JKVqRN2Jzrquccb2latJIaIAUTvVygGdsLYeZDu0fYNC9tUJe37w3Yb5245i0hsfLY2jmWjeRY1K1U3TCaky-uwOup53YcqvW6iqko1qF0ocKBvmGAMNehv8xoS9RtBLSXqtl8j0UpJG1LmkLHp6Y73rc8p_JbetZODVAaCcxXdPQUf7JzPnA9mk3ez_7__6jvy2m2vaU_z3Dx2FBv15GZNlSrAGEI2E6jcQs7ec</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Jonas, Sam C</creator><creator>Argyropoulos, Miltiadis</creator><creator>Al-Hadithy, Nawfal</creator><creator>Korycki, Marius</creator><creator>Lotz, Benedict</creator><creator>Deo, Sunny D</creator><creator>Satish, Venkat</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Knee arthroplasty with a medial rotating total knee replacement. Midterm clinical findings: A district general experience of 38 cases</title><author>Jonas, Sam C ; Argyropoulos, Miltiadis ; Al-Hadithy, Nawfal ; Korycki, Marius ; Lotz, Benedict ; Deo, Sunny D ; Satish, Venkat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-1152bb29f897e556724929cd97dacb3d4e61112024d685f1d2cc4f58f8b7125b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Clinical outcome</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hospitals, General</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Learning Curve</topic><topic>Medial rotation knee replacement</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jonas, Sam C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argyropoulos, Miltiadis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Hadithy, Nawfal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korycki, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotz, Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deo, Sunny D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satish, Venkat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jonas, Sam C</au><au>Argyropoulos, Miltiadis</au><au>Al-Hadithy, Nawfal</au><au>Korycki, Marius</au><au>Lotz, Benedict</au><au>Deo, Sunny D</au><au>Satish, Venkat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knee arthroplasty with a medial rotating total knee replacement. Midterm clinical findings: A district general experience of 38 cases</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>122-125</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The Medial Rotating Knee replacement (MRK) was first used in 1994, reporting high rates of satisfaction. It is designed to replicate natural knee kinematics and improve stability and function. There are limited studies on the mid-term clinical outcomes, in particular in a district general hospital (DGH) environment. This is the first study that we are aware of that evaluates the learning curve of the implementation of this knee system in this environment. Patients/method Between 2007 and 2009 we performed 38 consecutive MRK replacements (MAT ORTHO, UK) in 36 patients. The mean follow-up was four years. Patients were evaluated clinically, using OKS and patient questionnaire and radiographically (good/acceptable/poor) to assess outcome. Results Mean age was 73.0 years. Mean pre-operative OKS was 17.7 (range 8–29), which rose to 38.1 (range 23–48) at latest follow up (p &lt; 0.005). Overall 71% of the patients were either satisfied (29%) or very satisfied (42%). 81% felt an improvement of the ability to go up or down stairs and 92% felt stable. All poor radiographic and the majority of acceptable outcomes were experienced in the first 50% of cases. Conclusion The MRK can be successfully implanted in a DGH environment. It improves pain and function comparably to standard TKRs, however, subjective improvement may be higher. Radiographic evaluation shows an acceptable learning curve. Level of evidence Level IV case series.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25533210</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.008</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-0160
ispartof The knee, 2015-03, Vol.22 (2), p.122-125
issn 0968-0160
1873-5800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664779256
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Clinical outcome
Follow-Up Studies
Hospitals, General
Humans
Joint surgery
Knee
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint - surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Learning Curve
Medial rotation knee replacement
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Patient Satisfaction
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
title Knee arthroplasty with a medial rotating total knee replacement. Midterm clinical findings: A district general experience of 38 cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A28%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knee%20arthroplasty%20with%20a%20medial%20rotating%20total%20knee%20replacement.%20Midterm%20clinical%20findings:%20A%20district%20general%20experience%20of%2038%20cases&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Jonas,%20Sam%20C&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=122-125&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3623855961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1663357686&rft_id=info:pmid/25533210&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0968016014002750&rfr_iscdi=true