Quality and reporting of publications by Indonesian researchers: a literature survey
Objectives To evaluate the quality of reporting of the risk of bias of the Indonesian medical research. Methods Publications from PubMed and non‐PubMed indexed Indonesian medical journals between January 2008 to December 2010 were assessed for risk of bias based on criterion combination from Hedges‐...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of evidence-based medicine 2014-08, Vol.7 (3), p.163-171 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 171 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 163 |
| container_title | Journal of evidence-based medicine |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Widyahening, Indah S. Wangge, Grace Saldi, Siti Rizny F. Lestari, Bony Wiem Apriani, Lika Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo Glasziou, Paul van der Graaf, Yolanda van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G. |
| description | Objectives
To evaluate the quality of reporting of the risk of bias of the Indonesian medical research.
Methods
Publications from PubMed and non‐PubMed indexed Indonesian medical journals between January 2008 to December 2010 were assessed for risk of bias based on criterion combination from Hedges‐criteria and the Oxford Center for Evidence‐Based Medicine. We assessed whether the publications addressed the risk of bias adequately (quality of reporting) and whether the risk of bias criterion was fulfilled (quality of methods). The quality (both of reporting and of methods) of a study was classified as “high” if, for at least two‐thirds of the criteria were adequately reported and fulfilled. It was classified as “low” when only one‐third of the criteria were reported and or fulfilled.
Results
Of the 1753 publications, 29% (n = 507) were original medical research. For 21% (109/507) the quality of reporting was high; for 15% (77/507) the quality of methods was high. The proportion of high quality was significantly higher among PubMed than non‐PubMed, with difference between proportions: (95%CI of difference: 3 to 23).
Conclusion
A small proportion of Indonesian studies have high quality of reporting or methods. When international reporting guidelines are endorsed and followed, the quality of future studies may improve. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jebm.12112 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664779255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1664779255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3102-58c3a8319f86368814b25d9688d202aff0f01e17b4ab457e73f0b11936876dfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhi3UChDl0gdAlnqpkEI9dmwnvZUtpVTQComKo2UnYzDNJoudFPL2NV3YQw-dy8zh-3-NPkLeAjuCPB_u0C2PgAPwLbILWqpCihpebe5K7JD9lIJjoEEwKdk22eESpKpLvkuuLifbhXGmtm9pxNUQx9Df0MHT1eS60NgxDH2ibqZnfTv0mILtM5fQxuYWY_pILc15jHacItI0xd84vyGvve0S7j_vPfLzy8nV4mtx_uP0bPHpvGgEMF7IqhG2ElD7SglVVVA6Lts6Xy1n3HrPPAME7UrrSqlRC88cQJ1ZrVrfij3yft27isP9hGk0y5Aa7Drb4zAlA0qVWtdcyoy--we9G6bY5-9MVsGZBq4gU4drqolDShG9WcWwtHE2wMyTbvOk2_zVneGD58rJLbHdoC9yMwBr4CF0OP-nynw7Ob54KS3WmZBGfNxkbPxllBZamuvvp0ZdVPXl4rMyXPwB81iX1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562071261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality and reporting of publications by Indonesian researchers: a literature survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><creator>Widyahening, Indah S. ; Wangge, Grace ; Saldi, Siti Rizny F. ; Lestari, Bony Wiem ; Apriani, Lika ; Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo ; Glasziou, Paul ; van der Graaf, Yolanda ; van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Widyahening, Indah S. ; Wangge, Grace ; Saldi, Siti Rizny F. ; Lestari, Bony Wiem ; Apriani, Lika ; Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo ; Glasziou, Paul ; van der Graaf, Yolanda ; van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To evaluate the quality of reporting of the risk of bias of the Indonesian medical research.
Methods
Publications from PubMed and non‐PubMed indexed Indonesian medical journals between January 2008 to December 2010 were assessed for risk of bias based on criterion combination from Hedges‐criteria and the Oxford Center for Evidence‐Based Medicine. We assessed whether the publications addressed the risk of bias adequately (quality of reporting) and whether the risk of bias criterion was fulfilled (quality of methods). The quality (both of reporting and of methods) of a study was classified as “high” if, for at least two‐thirds of the criteria were adequately reported and fulfilled. It was classified as “low” when only one‐third of the criteria were reported and or fulfilled.
Results
Of the 1753 publications, 29% (n = 507) were original medical research. For 21% (109/507) the quality of reporting was high; for 15% (77/507) the quality of methods was high. The proportion of high quality was significantly higher among PubMed than non‐PubMed, with difference between proportions: (95%CI of difference: 3 to 23).
Conclusion
A small proportion of Indonesian studies have high quality of reporting or methods. When international reporting guidelines are endorsed and followed, the quality of future studies may improve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-5383</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-5391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-5391</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12112</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25156942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bias ; Biomedical Research ; Financial reporting ; Indonesia ; medical research ; Publishing - supply & distribution ; quality of research ; Research Personnel ; Risk</subject><ispartof>Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2014-08, Vol.7 (3), p.163-171</ispartof><rights>2014 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3102-58c3a8319f86368814b25d9688d202aff0f01e17b4ab457e73f0b11936876dfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3102-58c3a8319f86368814b25d9688d202aff0f01e17b4ab457e73f0b11936876dfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjebm.12112$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjebm.12112$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25156942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Widyahening, Indah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wangge, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saldi, Siti Rizny F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lestari, Bony Wiem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apriani, Lika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasziou, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Graaf, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Quality and reporting of publications by Indonesian researchers: a literature survey</title><title>Journal of evidence-based medicine</title><addtitle>Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine</addtitle><description>Objectives
To evaluate the quality of reporting of the risk of bias of the Indonesian medical research.
Methods
Publications from PubMed and non‐PubMed indexed Indonesian medical journals between January 2008 to December 2010 were assessed for risk of bias based on criterion combination from Hedges‐criteria and the Oxford Center for Evidence‐Based Medicine. We assessed whether the publications addressed the risk of bias adequately (quality of reporting) and whether the risk of bias criterion was fulfilled (quality of methods). The quality (both of reporting and of methods) of a study was classified as “high” if, for at least two‐thirds of the criteria were adequately reported and fulfilled. It was classified as “low” when only one‐third of the criteria were reported and or fulfilled.
Results
Of the 1753 publications, 29% (n = 507) were original medical research. For 21% (109/507) the quality of reporting was high; for 15% (77/507) the quality of methods was high. The proportion of high quality was significantly higher among PubMed than non‐PubMed, with difference between proportions: (95%CI of difference: 3 to 23).
Conclusion
A small proportion of Indonesian studies have high quality of reporting or methods. When international reporting guidelines are endorsed and followed, the quality of future studies may improve.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biomedical Research</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>medical research</subject><subject>Publishing - supply & distribution</subject><subject>quality of research</subject><subject>Research Personnel</subject><subject>Risk</subject><issn>1756-5383</issn><issn>1756-5391</issn><issn>1756-5391</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhi3UChDl0gdAlnqpkEI9dmwnvZUtpVTQComKo2UnYzDNJoudFPL2NV3YQw-dy8zh-3-NPkLeAjuCPB_u0C2PgAPwLbILWqpCihpebe5K7JD9lIJjoEEwKdk22eESpKpLvkuuLifbhXGmtm9pxNUQx9Df0MHT1eS60NgxDH2ibqZnfTv0mILtM5fQxuYWY_pILc15jHacItI0xd84vyGvve0S7j_vPfLzy8nV4mtx_uP0bPHpvGgEMF7IqhG2ElD7SglVVVA6Lts6Xy1n3HrPPAME7UrrSqlRC88cQJ1ZrVrfij3yft27isP9hGk0y5Aa7Drb4zAlA0qVWtdcyoy--we9G6bY5-9MVsGZBq4gU4drqolDShG9WcWwtHE2wMyTbvOk2_zVneGD58rJLbHdoC9yMwBr4CF0OP-nynw7Ob54KS3WmZBGfNxkbPxllBZamuvvp0ZdVPXl4rMyXPwB81iX1g</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>Widyahening, Indah S.</creator><creator>Wangge, Grace</creator><creator>Saldi, Siti Rizny F.</creator><creator>Lestari, Bony Wiem</creator><creator>Apriani, Lika</creator><creator>Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo</creator><creator>Glasziou, Paul</creator><creator>van der Graaf, Yolanda</creator><creator>van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Quality and reporting of publications by Indonesian researchers: a literature survey</title><author>Widyahening, Indah S. ; Wangge, Grace ; Saldi, Siti Rizny F. ; Lestari, Bony Wiem ; Apriani, Lika ; Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo ; Glasziou, Paul ; van der Graaf, Yolanda ; van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3102-58c3a8319f86368814b25d9688d202aff0f01e17b4ab457e73f0b11936876dfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biomedical Research</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>medical research</topic><topic>Publishing - supply & distribution</topic><topic>quality of research</topic><topic>Research Personnel</topic><topic>Risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Widyahening, Indah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wangge, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saldi, Siti Rizny F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lestari, Bony Wiem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apriani, Lika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasziou, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Graaf, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evidence-based medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Widyahening, Indah S.</au><au>Wangge, Grace</au><au>Saldi, Siti Rizny F.</au><au>Lestari, Bony Wiem</au><au>Apriani, Lika</au><au>Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo</au><au>Glasziou, Paul</au><au>van der Graaf, Yolanda</au><au>van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality and reporting of publications by Indonesian researchers: a literature survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evidence-based medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>163-171</pages><issn>1756-5383</issn><issn>1756-5391</issn><eissn>1756-5391</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To evaluate the quality of reporting of the risk of bias of the Indonesian medical research.
Methods
Publications from PubMed and non‐PubMed indexed Indonesian medical journals between January 2008 to December 2010 were assessed for risk of bias based on criterion combination from Hedges‐criteria and the Oxford Center for Evidence‐Based Medicine. We assessed whether the publications addressed the risk of bias adequately (quality of reporting) and whether the risk of bias criterion was fulfilled (quality of methods). The quality (both of reporting and of methods) of a study was classified as “high” if, for at least two‐thirds of the criteria were adequately reported and fulfilled. It was classified as “low” when only one‐third of the criteria were reported and or fulfilled.
Results
Of the 1753 publications, 29% (n = 507) were original medical research. For 21% (109/507) the quality of reporting was high; for 15% (77/507) the quality of methods was high. The proportion of high quality was significantly higher among PubMed than non‐PubMed, with difference between proportions: (95%CI of difference: 3 to 23).
Conclusion
A small proportion of Indonesian studies have high quality of reporting or methods. When international reporting guidelines are endorsed and followed, the quality of future studies may improve.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25156942</pmid><doi>10.1111/jebm.12112</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1756-5383 |
| ispartof | Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2014-08, Vol.7 (3), p.163-171 |
| issn | 1756-5383 1756-5391 1756-5391 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664779255 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection |
| subjects | Bias Biomedical Research Financial reporting Indonesia medical research Publishing - supply & distribution quality of research Research Personnel Risk |
| title | Quality and reporting of publications by Indonesian researchers: a literature survey |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T21%3A28%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20and%20reporting%20of%20publications%20by%20Indonesian%20researchers:%20a%20literature%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evidence-based%20medicine&rft.au=Widyahening,%20Indah%20S.&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=163-171&rft.issn=1756-5383&rft.eissn=1756-5391&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jebm.12112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1664779255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562071261&rft_id=info:pmid/25156942&rfr_iscdi=true |