Evaluation of a new geriatric foot versus the Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity amputees
Background: It is always a challenge to rehabilitate geriatric amputees to perform self-care skills at home with limited ambulation. A new geriatric foot (with a lower effective foot length) has been specifically designed to reduce residual limb stress and to ease the step completion. Objectives: Th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Prosthetics and orthotics international 2015-04, Vol.39 (2), p.112-118 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 118 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 112 |
| container_title | Prosthetics and orthotics international |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Bonnet, Xavier Adde, Jean N Blanchard, François Gedouin-Toquet, Annick Eveno, Dominique |
| description | Background:
It is always a challenge to rehabilitate geriatric amputees to perform self-care skills at home with limited ambulation. A new geriatric foot (with a lower effective foot length) has been specifically designed to reduce residual limb stress and to ease the step completion.
Objectives:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of a new geriatric foot versus a Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity persons with transtibial amputation.
Study design:
Crossover study.
Methods:
A total of 12 patients were included in this study. Outcome measures: 2-min walking test, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 questionnaire and pressure socket measurements.
Results:
The geriatric foot allows for greater patient satisfaction. The maximal pressure was significantly lower in the proximal anterior stump area. No statistical differences were obtained from the 2-min walking test.
Conclusion:
A geriatric foot designed with a low effective foot length improves the satisfaction and reduces proximal anterior socket pressures for poor-performing persons with transtibial amputation.
Clinical relevance
The development and evaluation of feet specifically designed for geriatric persons with transtibial amputation could improve their specific requirements and satisfaction. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0309364613515492 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664441908</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0309364613515492</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1664441908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-27d328aa2e3e08f7f47a5f74f549a09507ab88c151f6910fa79c3f9f68e4df023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EoqWwMyGPLAE7duJ4rKpCkSoxAHPkJs-tSxIX22nVf0-iFAYkphvuu5PuELql5IFSIR4JI5KlPKUsoQmX8RkaU8HTiCYJO0fj3o56f4SuvN8SwoSU5BKNYs5pJhkfI5jvVdWqYGyDrcYKN3DAa3BGBWcKrK0NeA_Otx6HDeA3W5kST5vPCvCs9Zs-tgCoBlBbhyt7iFQRzN6EI1b1rg0A_hpdaFV5uDnpBH08zd9ni2j5-vwymy6jgjERoliULM6UioEBybTQXKhEC667bYrIhAi1yrKCJlSnkhKthCyYljrNgJeaxGyC7ofenbNfLfiQ18YXUFWqAdv6nKYp76ZLknUoGdDCWe8d6HznTK3cMack78_N_57bRe5O7e2qhvI38PNmB0QD4NUa8q1tXdOt_b_wG9V-gWI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1664441908</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a new geriatric foot versus the Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity amputees</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sage Journals</source><creator>Bonnet, Xavier ; Adde, Jean N ; Blanchard, François ; Gedouin-Toquet, Annick ; Eveno, Dominique</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Xavier ; Adde, Jean N ; Blanchard, François ; Gedouin-Toquet, Annick ; Eveno, Dominique</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
It is always a challenge to rehabilitate geriatric amputees to perform self-care skills at home with limited ambulation. A new geriatric foot (with a lower effective foot length) has been specifically designed to reduce residual limb stress and to ease the step completion.
Objectives:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of a new geriatric foot versus a Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity persons with transtibial amputation.
Study design:
Crossover study.
Methods:
A total of 12 patients were included in this study. Outcome measures: 2-min walking test, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 questionnaire and pressure socket measurements.
Results:
The geriatric foot allows for greater patient satisfaction. The maximal pressure was significantly lower in the proximal anterior stump area. No statistical differences were obtained from the 2-min walking test.
Conclusion:
A geriatric foot designed with a low effective foot length improves the satisfaction and reduces proximal anterior socket pressures for poor-performing persons with transtibial amputation.
Clinical relevance
The development and evaluation of feet specifically designed for geriatric persons with transtibial amputation could improve their specific requirements and satisfaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-3646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-1553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0309364613515492</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24418934</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amputees - rehabilitation ; Cross-Over Studies ; Female ; Foot - surgery ; Health Services for the Aged ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prostheses and Implants - adverse effects ; Prostheses and Implants - classification ; Prosthesis Design ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2015-04, Vol.39 (2), p.112-118</ispartof><rights>The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2014</rights><rights>The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2014.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-27d328aa2e3e08f7f47a5f74f549a09507ab88c151f6910fa79c3f9f68e4df023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-27d328aa2e3e08f7f47a5f74f549a09507ab88c151f6910fa79c3f9f68e4df023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0309364613515492$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309364613515492$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24418934$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adde, Jean N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gedouin-Toquet, Annick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eveno, Dominique</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a new geriatric foot versus the Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity amputees</title><title>Prosthetics and orthotics international</title><addtitle>Prosthet Orthot Int</addtitle><description>Background:
It is always a challenge to rehabilitate geriatric amputees to perform self-care skills at home with limited ambulation. A new geriatric foot (with a lower effective foot length) has been specifically designed to reduce residual limb stress and to ease the step completion.
Objectives:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of a new geriatric foot versus a Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity persons with transtibial amputation.
Study design:
Crossover study.
Methods:
A total of 12 patients were included in this study. Outcome measures: 2-min walking test, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 questionnaire and pressure socket measurements.
Results:
The geriatric foot allows for greater patient satisfaction. The maximal pressure was significantly lower in the proximal anterior stump area. No statistical differences were obtained from the 2-min walking test.
Conclusion:
A geriatric foot designed with a low effective foot length improves the satisfaction and reduces proximal anterior socket pressures for poor-performing persons with transtibial amputation.
Clinical relevance
The development and evaluation of feet specifically designed for geriatric persons with transtibial amputation could improve their specific requirements and satisfaction.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amputees - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot - surgery</subject><subject>Health Services for the Aged</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants - classification</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>0309-3646</issn><issn>1746-1553</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EoqWwMyGPLAE7duJ4rKpCkSoxAHPkJs-tSxIX22nVf0-iFAYkphvuu5PuELql5IFSIR4JI5KlPKUsoQmX8RkaU8HTiCYJO0fj3o56f4SuvN8SwoSU5BKNYs5pJhkfI5jvVdWqYGyDrcYKN3DAa3BGBWcKrK0NeA_Otx6HDeA3W5kST5vPCvCs9Zs-tgCoBlBbhyt7iFQRzN6EI1b1rg0A_hpdaFV5uDnpBH08zd9ni2j5-vwymy6jgjERoliULM6UioEBybTQXKhEC667bYrIhAi1yrKCJlSnkhKthCyYljrNgJeaxGyC7ofenbNfLfiQ18YXUFWqAdv6nKYp76ZLknUoGdDCWe8d6HznTK3cMack78_N_57bRe5O7e2qhvI38PNmB0QD4NUa8q1tXdOt_b_wG9V-gWI</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Bonnet, Xavier</creator><creator>Adde, Jean N</creator><creator>Blanchard, François</creator><creator>Gedouin-Toquet, Annick</creator><creator>Eveno, Dominique</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a new geriatric foot versus the Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity amputees</title><author>Bonnet, Xavier ; Adde, Jean N ; Blanchard, François ; Gedouin-Toquet, Annick ; Eveno, Dominique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-27d328aa2e3e08f7f47a5f74f549a09507ab88c151f6910fa79c3f9f68e4df023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amputees - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot - surgery</topic><topic>Health Services for the Aged</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants - classification</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adde, Jean N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gedouin-Toquet, Annick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eveno, Dominique</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prosthetics and orthotics international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonnet, Xavier</au><au>Adde, Jean N</au><au>Blanchard, François</au><au>Gedouin-Toquet, Annick</au><au>Eveno, Dominique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a new geriatric foot versus the Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity amputees</atitle><jtitle>Prosthetics and orthotics international</jtitle><addtitle>Prosthet Orthot Int</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>112-118</pages><issn>0309-3646</issn><eissn>1746-1553</eissn><abstract>Background:
It is always a challenge to rehabilitate geriatric amputees to perform self-care skills at home with limited ambulation. A new geriatric foot (with a lower effective foot length) has been specifically designed to reduce residual limb stress and to ease the step completion.
Objectives:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of a new geriatric foot versus a Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity persons with transtibial amputation.
Study design:
Crossover study.
Methods:
A total of 12 patients were included in this study. Outcome measures: 2-min walking test, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 questionnaire and pressure socket measurements.
Results:
The geriatric foot allows for greater patient satisfaction. The maximal pressure was significantly lower in the proximal anterior stump area. No statistical differences were obtained from the 2-min walking test.
Conclusion:
A geriatric foot designed with a low effective foot length improves the satisfaction and reduces proximal anterior socket pressures for poor-performing persons with transtibial amputation.
Clinical relevance
The development and evaluation of feet specifically designed for geriatric persons with transtibial amputation could improve their specific requirements and satisfaction.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>24418934</pmid><doi>10.1177/0309364613515492</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0309-3646 |
| ispartof | Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2015-04, Vol.39 (2), p.112-118 |
| issn | 0309-3646 1746-1553 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664441908 |
| source | MEDLINE; Sage Journals |
| subjects | Activities of Daily Living Aged Aged, 80 and over Amputees - rehabilitation Cross-Over Studies Female Foot - surgery Health Services for the Aged Humans Male Middle Aged Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Patient Satisfaction Prostheses and Implants - adverse effects Prostheses and Implants - classification Prosthesis Design Surveys and Questionnaires Walking - physiology |
| title | Evaluation of a new geriatric foot versus the Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity amputees |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T15%3A56%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20new%20geriatric%20foot%20versus%20the%20Solid%20Ankle%20Cushion%20Heel%20foot%20for%20low-activity%20amputees&rft.jtitle=Prosthetics%20and%20orthotics%20international&rft.au=Bonnet,%20Xavier&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=112-118&rft.issn=0309-3646&rft.eissn=1746-1553&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0309364613515492&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1664441908%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1664441908&rft_id=info:pmid/24418934&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0309364613515492&rfr_iscdi=true |