Fractured root tips during dental extractions and retained root fragments. A clinical dilemma?
Key Points Discusses the present evidence base regarding the advantages and disadvantages of removing root fragments, which can occur during the extraction of teeth, compared to leaving them in situ . Outlines how a risk benefit matrix can be used by clinicians to determine the best course of action...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British dental journal 2015-03, Vol.218 (5), p.285-290 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Key Points
Discusses the present evidence base regarding the advantages and disadvantages of removing root fragments, which can occur during the extraction of teeth, compared to leaving them
in situ
.
Outlines how a risk benefit matrix can be used by clinicians to determine the best course of action relating to fractured root tips during dental extractions.
Root tip fracture can occur during the extraction of teeth. The clinician must then decide to either leave the root fragment
in situ
, or to attempt its removal. A similar decision is made when retained root fragments are found incidentally on oral radiographs. The prevalence of retained root fragments is reported as 11-37%. This article aims to highlight the risk benefit matrix of the removal or retention of retained root fragments, in light of the present evidence base. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-0610 1476-5373 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.147 |