Comparison of stormwater runoff from sedum, native prairie, and vegetable producing green roofs
Stormwater retention is one of the well-studied benefits of green roofs. A roof’s ability to retain stormwater depends on factors such as the intensity and duration of the rain event as well as substrate depth, substrate moisture content at the start of the rain event, and vegetation type, health, d...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Urban ecosystems 2015-03, Vol.18 (1), p.13-29 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 29 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 13 |
| container_title | Urban ecosystems |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Whittinghill, Leigh J Rowe, D. Bradley Andresen, Jeffery A Cregg, Bert M |
| description | Stormwater retention is one of the well-studied benefits of green roofs. A roof’s ability to retain stormwater depends on factors such as the intensity and duration of the rain event as well as substrate depth, substrate moisture content at the start of the rain event, and vegetation type, health, density and water use efficiency. Extensive green roofs used for crop production differ from traditional Sedum and prairie-covered extensive green roofs in plant density and water use efficiency, but their impact on stormwater retention has not been well studied. Three vegetation types (unfertilized Sedum and native prairie species mixes, and a fertilized vegetable and herb species mix) were compared for stormwater runoff quantity over three growing seasons and stormwater runoff quality during one growing season. The prairie covered green roofs had the lowest increase in runoff as precipitation increased, almost half that of Sedum or vegetable producing green roof treatments. Vegetation type had no effect on runoff nitrate-nitrogen (NO₃⁻) concentrations, but NO₃⁻concentrations decreased over the course of the growing season. Runoff phosphorus (P) concentrations also decreased over time in the Sedum and prairie treatments, which were lower than P concentrations from the vegetable green roof throughout the growing season. This is likely a result of the difference between amounts of NO₃⁻and P applied to the vegetable green roof and the needs of the crop plants in that treatment. The similarities in water retention and water quality between vegetable producing extensive green roofs and Sedum green roofs suggest that vegetable production with careful nutrient management will not have a negative impact on stormwater retention or runoff water quality. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11252-014-0386-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664208892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1664208892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-deb1ee9c9b2bbbc03ff55a6e515938aaeedbb4c4511fb0ffb2eb5e766ca20ed13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1KxDAURosoOI4-gCsDblxMNDdtOu1SBv9gwIXOOiTtTenQJmPSjvj2ZqgLceEqIZzvcnO-JLkEdguMLe8CABecMsgoS4ucFkfJDMQypZBn_DjeWZHSAoQ4Tc5C2DIWU0UxS-TK9Tvl2-AscYaEwfn-Uw3oiR-tM4YY73oSsB77BbFqaPdIdl61vsUFUbYme2xwULo7PLt6rFrbkMYjWuKdM-E8OTGqC3jxc86TzePD--qZrl-fXlb3a1oJVg60Rg2IZVVqrrWuWGqMECpHAaJMC6UQa62zKhMARjNjNEctcJnnleIMa0jnyc00N27xMWIYZN-GCrtOWXRjkJBHD_HHJY_o9R9060Zv43aREgLytOQsUjBRlXcheDRy59te-S8JTB6Uy0m5jMrlQbksYoZPmRBZ26D_Nfmf0NUUMspJ1cQq5OaNMxCxozxWyNNvC1OO8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655163920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of stormwater runoff from sedum, native prairie, and vegetable producing green roofs</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Whittinghill, Leigh J ; Rowe, D. Bradley ; Andresen, Jeffery A ; Cregg, Bert M</creator><creatorcontrib>Whittinghill, Leigh J ; Rowe, D. Bradley ; Andresen, Jeffery A ; Cregg, Bert M</creatorcontrib><description>Stormwater retention is one of the well-studied benefits of green roofs. A roof’s ability to retain stormwater depends on factors such as the intensity and duration of the rain event as well as substrate depth, substrate moisture content at the start of the rain event, and vegetation type, health, density and water use efficiency. Extensive green roofs used for crop production differ from traditional Sedum and prairie-covered extensive green roofs in plant density and water use efficiency, but their impact on stormwater retention has not been well studied. Three vegetation types (unfertilized Sedum and native prairie species mixes, and a fertilized vegetable and herb species mix) were compared for stormwater runoff quantity over three growing seasons and stormwater runoff quality during one growing season. The prairie covered green roofs had the lowest increase in runoff as precipitation increased, almost half that of Sedum or vegetable producing green roof treatments. Vegetation type had no effect on runoff nitrate-nitrogen (NO₃⁻) concentrations, but NO₃⁻concentrations decreased over the course of the growing season. Runoff phosphorus (P) concentrations also decreased over time in the Sedum and prairie treatments, which were lower than P concentrations from the vegetable green roof throughout the growing season. This is likely a result of the difference between amounts of NO₃⁻and P applied to the vegetable green roof and the needs of the crop plants in that treatment. The similarities in water retention and water quality between vegetable producing extensive green roofs and Sedum green roofs suggest that vegetable production with careful nutrient management will not have a negative impact on stormwater retention or runoff water quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-8155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11252-014-0386-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Crop production ; crops ; Drought ; Ecology ; ecosystems ; Efficiency ; Environmental Management ; Green buildings ; Green roofs ; Growing season ; Horticulture ; Indigenous species ; Irrigation ; Life Sciences ; Moisture content ; Nature Conservation ; nitrate nitrogen ; Nitrates ; nutrient management ; Nutrient retention ; phosphorus ; plant density ; Planting density ; Precipitation ; Rain ; Retention ; Roofing ; Runoff ; Seasons ; Sedum ; Soil sciences ; Storm runoff ; Stormwater ; Stormwater management ; Stormwater quality ; Studies ; Urban Ecology ; vegetable growing ; Vegetables ; Vegetation ; vegetation types ; water content ; Water quality ; Water use ; Water use efficiency</subject><ispartof>Urban ecosystems, 2015-03, Vol.18 (1), p.13-29</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-deb1ee9c9b2bbbc03ff55a6e515938aaeedbb4c4511fb0ffb2eb5e766ca20ed13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-deb1ee9c9b2bbbc03ff55a6e515938aaeedbb4c4511fb0ffb2eb5e766ca20ed13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11252-014-0386-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11252-014-0386-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whittinghill, Leigh J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, D. Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andresen, Jeffery A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cregg, Bert M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of stormwater runoff from sedum, native prairie, and vegetable producing green roofs</title><title>Urban ecosystems</title><addtitle>Urban Ecosyst</addtitle><description>Stormwater retention is one of the well-studied benefits of green roofs. A roof’s ability to retain stormwater depends on factors such as the intensity and duration of the rain event as well as substrate depth, substrate moisture content at the start of the rain event, and vegetation type, health, density and water use efficiency. Extensive green roofs used for crop production differ from traditional Sedum and prairie-covered extensive green roofs in plant density and water use efficiency, but their impact on stormwater retention has not been well studied. Three vegetation types (unfertilized Sedum and native prairie species mixes, and a fertilized vegetable and herb species mix) were compared for stormwater runoff quantity over three growing seasons and stormwater runoff quality during one growing season. The prairie covered green roofs had the lowest increase in runoff as precipitation increased, almost half that of Sedum or vegetable producing green roof treatments. Vegetation type had no effect on runoff nitrate-nitrogen (NO₃⁻) concentrations, but NO₃⁻concentrations decreased over the course of the growing season. Runoff phosphorus (P) concentrations also decreased over time in the Sedum and prairie treatments, which were lower than P concentrations from the vegetable green roof throughout the growing season. This is likely a result of the difference between amounts of NO₃⁻and P applied to the vegetable green roof and the needs of the crop plants in that treatment. The similarities in water retention and water quality between vegetable producing extensive green roofs and Sedum green roofs suggest that vegetable production with careful nutrient management will not have a negative impact on stormwater retention or runoff water quality.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Green roofs</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>nitrate nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>nutrient management</subject><subject>Nutrient retention</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>plant density</subject><subject>Planting density</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Roofing</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sedum</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Storm runoff</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Stormwater management</subject><subject>Stormwater quality</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Urban Ecology</subject><subject>vegetable growing</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation types</subject><subject>water content</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water use efficiency</subject><issn>1083-8155</issn><issn>1573-1642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1KxDAURosoOI4-gCsDblxMNDdtOu1SBv9gwIXOOiTtTenQJmPSjvj2ZqgLceEqIZzvcnO-JLkEdguMLe8CABecMsgoS4ucFkfJDMQypZBn_DjeWZHSAoQ4Tc5C2DIWU0UxS-TK9Tvl2-AscYaEwfn-Uw3oiR-tM4YY73oSsB77BbFqaPdIdl61vsUFUbYme2xwULo7PLt6rFrbkMYjWuKdM-E8OTGqC3jxc86TzePD--qZrl-fXlb3a1oJVg60Rg2IZVVqrrWuWGqMECpHAaJMC6UQa62zKhMARjNjNEctcJnnleIMa0jnyc00N27xMWIYZN-GCrtOWXRjkJBHD_HHJY_o9R9060Zv43aREgLytOQsUjBRlXcheDRy59te-S8JTB6Uy0m5jMrlQbksYoZPmRBZ26D_Nfmf0NUUMspJ1cQq5OaNMxCxozxWyNNvC1OO8A</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Whittinghill, Leigh J</creator><creator>Rowe, D. Bradley</creator><creator>Andresen, Jeffery A</creator><creator>Cregg, Bert M</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Comparison of stormwater runoff from sedum, native prairie, and vegetable producing green roofs</title><author>Whittinghill, Leigh J ; Rowe, D. Bradley ; Andresen, Jeffery A ; Cregg, Bert M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-deb1ee9c9b2bbbc03ff55a6e515938aaeedbb4c4511fb0ffb2eb5e766ca20ed13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Green roofs</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>nitrate nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>nutrient management</topic><topic>Nutrient retention</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>plant density</topic><topic>Planting density</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Roofing</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sedum</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Storm runoff</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Stormwater management</topic><topic>Stormwater quality</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Urban Ecology</topic><topic>vegetable growing</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation types</topic><topic>water content</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water use efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whittinghill, Leigh J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, D. Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andresen, Jeffery A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cregg, Bert M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Urban ecosystems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whittinghill, Leigh J</au><au>Rowe, D. Bradley</au><au>Andresen, Jeffery A</au><au>Cregg, Bert M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of stormwater runoff from sedum, native prairie, and vegetable producing green roofs</atitle><jtitle>Urban ecosystems</jtitle><stitle>Urban Ecosyst</stitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>13-29</pages><issn>1083-8155</issn><eissn>1573-1642</eissn><abstract>Stormwater retention is one of the well-studied benefits of green roofs. A roof’s ability to retain stormwater depends on factors such as the intensity and duration of the rain event as well as substrate depth, substrate moisture content at the start of the rain event, and vegetation type, health, density and water use efficiency. Extensive green roofs used for crop production differ from traditional Sedum and prairie-covered extensive green roofs in plant density and water use efficiency, but their impact on stormwater retention has not been well studied. Three vegetation types (unfertilized Sedum and native prairie species mixes, and a fertilized vegetable and herb species mix) were compared for stormwater runoff quantity over three growing seasons and stormwater runoff quality during one growing season. The prairie covered green roofs had the lowest increase in runoff as precipitation increased, almost half that of Sedum or vegetable producing green roof treatments. Vegetation type had no effect on runoff nitrate-nitrogen (NO₃⁻) concentrations, but NO₃⁻concentrations decreased over the course of the growing season. Runoff phosphorus (P) concentrations also decreased over time in the Sedum and prairie treatments, which were lower than P concentrations from the vegetable green roof throughout the growing season. This is likely a result of the difference between amounts of NO₃⁻and P applied to the vegetable green roof and the needs of the crop plants in that treatment. The similarities in water retention and water quality between vegetable producing extensive green roofs and Sedum green roofs suggest that vegetable production with careful nutrient management will not have a negative impact on stormwater retention or runoff water quality.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s11252-014-0386-8</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1083-8155 |
| ispartof | Urban ecosystems, 2015-03, Vol.18 (1), p.13-29 |
| issn | 1083-8155 1573-1642 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664208892 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Agricultural production Agriculture Analysis Biomedical and Life Sciences Crop production crops Drought Ecology ecosystems Efficiency Environmental Management Green buildings Green roofs Growing season Horticulture Indigenous species Irrigation Life Sciences Moisture content Nature Conservation nitrate nitrogen Nitrates nutrient management Nutrient retention phosphorus plant density Planting density Precipitation Rain Retention Roofing Runoff Seasons Sedum Soil sciences Storm runoff Stormwater Stormwater management Stormwater quality Studies Urban Ecology vegetable growing Vegetables Vegetation vegetation types water content Water quality Water use Water use efficiency |
| title | Comparison of stormwater runoff from sedum, native prairie, and vegetable producing green roofs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A56%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20stormwater%20runoff%20from%20sedum,%20native%20prairie,%20and%20vegetable%20producing%20green%20roofs&rft.jtitle=Urban%20ecosystems&rft.au=Whittinghill,%20Leigh%20J&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=13-29&rft.issn=1083-8155&rft.eissn=1573-1642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11252-014-0386-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1664208892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655163920&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |