Comparison of the Acute Metabolic Responses to Traditional Resistance, Body-Weight, and Battling Rope Exercises

ABSTRACTRatamess, NA, Rosenberg, JG, Klei, S, Dougherty, BM, Kang, J, Smith, CR, Ross, RE, and Faigenbaum, AD. Comparison of the acute metabolic responses to traditional resistance, body-weight, and battling rope exercises. J Strength Cond Res 29(1)47–57, 2015—The purpose of this study was to quanti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2015-01, Vol.29 (1), p.47-57
Hauptverfasser: Ratamess, Nicholas A, Rosenberg, Joseph G, Klei, Samantha, Dougherty, Brian M, Kang, Jie, Smith, Charles R, Ross, Ryan E, Faigenbaum, Avery D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 29
creator Ratamess, Nicholas A
Rosenberg, Joseph G
Klei, Samantha
Dougherty, Brian M
Kang, Jie
Smith, Charles R
Ross, Ryan E
Faigenbaum, Avery D
description ABSTRACTRatamess, NA, Rosenberg, JG, Klei, S, Dougherty, BM, Kang, J, Smith, CR, Ross, RE, and Faigenbaum, AD. Comparison of the acute metabolic responses to traditional resistance, body-weight, and battling rope exercises. J Strength Cond Res 29(1)47–57, 2015—The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the acute metabolic responses to resistance exercise protocols comprising free-weight, body-weight, and battling rope (BR) exercises. Ten resistance-trained men (age = 20.6 ± 1.3 years) performed 13 resistance exercise protocols on separate days in random order consisting of only one exercise per session. For free-weight exercise protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of up to 10 repetitions with 75% of their 1 repetition maximum. For the push-up (PU) and push-up on a BOSU ball protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 20 repetitions. For the burpee and PU with lateral crawl protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 10 repetitions. For the plank and BR circuit protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 30-second bouts. A standard 2-minute rest interval (RI) was used in between all sets for each exercise. Data were averaged for the entire protocol including work and RIs. Mean oxygen consumption was significantly greatest during the BR (24.6 ± 2.6 ml·kg·min) and burpee (22.9 ± 2.1 ml·kg·min) protocols. For the free-weight exercises, highest mean values were seen in the squat (19.6 ± 1.8 ml·kg·min), deadlift (18.9 ± 3.0 ml·kg·min), and lunge (17.3 ± 2.6 ml·kg·min). No differences were observed between PUs performed on the floor vs. on a BOSU ball. However, adding a lateral crawl to the PU significantly increased mean oxygen consumption (19.5 ± 2.9 ml·kg·min). The lowest mean value was seen during the plank exercise (7.9 ± 0.7 ml·kg·min). These data indicate performance of exercises with BRs and a body-weight burpee exercise elicit relatively higher acute metabolic demands than traditional resistance exercises performed with moderately heavy loading.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000584
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664208851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1640328930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-e1e9bd8a67f3ecf4df50a81d76f623e36c2b9e244ebc8396cc000f88186ae9ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LHTEUxYO0-FX_AymBbrpwbL4ns9SHVoulYC1dDpnMHV9s3mRMMlj_--bxVIqL0ru5F-7vnMU5CB1SckwlbT59-b44Jn-P1GIL7VLJeSWYrt-UmyhRaULpDtpL6Y4QJqXk22iHiUYwWotdFBZhNZnoUhhxGHBeAj6xcwb8FbLpgncWX0Oawpgg4RzwTTS9yy6Mxq8fLmUzWjjCp6F_rH6Cu13mI2zGHp-anL0bb_F1mACf_YZoXfF4h94Oxic4eNr76Mf52c3iorr69vlycXJVWckaUQGFpuu1UfXAwQ6iHyQxmva1GhTjwJVlXQNMCOis5o2ytgQwaE21MtBYw_fRx43vFMP9DCm3K5cseG9GCHNqqVKCEa0l_Q9UEM50w0lBP7xC78IcSxZrStbrTGtZKLGhbAwpRRjaKbqViY8tJe26u7Z0177ursjeP5nP3Qr6F9FzWQXQG-Ah-Awx_fLzA8R2Ccbn5b-9_wBPrKTf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1657421775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Acute Metabolic Responses to Traditional Resistance, Body-Weight, and Battling Rope Exercises</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Ratamess, Nicholas A ; Rosenberg, Joseph G ; Klei, Samantha ; Dougherty, Brian M ; Kang, Jie ; Smith, Charles R ; Ross, Ryan E ; Faigenbaum, Avery D</creator><creatorcontrib>Ratamess, Nicholas A ; Rosenberg, Joseph G ; Klei, Samantha ; Dougherty, Brian M ; Kang, Jie ; Smith, Charles R ; Ross, Ryan E ; Faigenbaum, Avery D</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTRatamess, NA, Rosenberg, JG, Klei, S, Dougherty, BM, Kang, J, Smith, CR, Ross, RE, and Faigenbaum, AD. Comparison of the acute metabolic responses to traditional resistance, body-weight, and battling rope exercises. J Strength Cond Res 29(1)47–57, 2015—The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the acute metabolic responses to resistance exercise protocols comprising free-weight, body-weight, and battling rope (BR) exercises. Ten resistance-trained men (age = 20.6 ± 1.3 years) performed 13 resistance exercise protocols on separate days in random order consisting of only one exercise per session. For free-weight exercise protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of up to 10 repetitions with 75% of their 1 repetition maximum. For the push-up (PU) and push-up on a BOSU ball protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 20 repetitions. For the burpee and PU with lateral crawl protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 10 repetitions. For the plank and BR circuit protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 30-second bouts. A standard 2-minute rest interval (RI) was used in between all sets for each exercise. Data were averaged for the entire protocol including work and RIs. Mean oxygen consumption was significantly greatest during the BR (24.6 ± 2.6 ml·kg·min) and burpee (22.9 ± 2.1 ml·kg·min) protocols. For the free-weight exercises, highest mean values were seen in the squat (19.6 ± 1.8 ml·kg·min), deadlift (18.9 ± 3.0 ml·kg·min), and lunge (17.3 ± 2.6 ml·kg·min). No differences were observed between PUs performed on the floor vs. on a BOSU ball. However, adding a lateral crawl to the PU significantly increased mean oxygen consumption (19.5 ± 2.9 ml·kg·min). The lowest mean value was seen during the plank exercise (7.9 ± 0.7 ml·kg·min). These data indicate performance of exercises with BRs and a body-weight burpee exercise elicit relatively higher acute metabolic demands than traditional resistance exercises performed with moderately heavy loading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000584</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24942174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Body Weight ; Comparative analysis ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Oxygen ; Oxygen Consumption ; Random Allocation ; Resistance Training - methods ; Sports training ; Weight ; Weight Lifting - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2015-01, Vol.29 (1), p.47-57</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Jan 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-e1e9bd8a67f3ecf4df50a81d76f623e36c2b9e244ebc8396cc000f88186ae9ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-e1e9bd8a67f3ecf4df50a81d76f623e36c2b9e244ebc8396cc000f88186ae9ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24942174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ratamess, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Joseph G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klei, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougherty, Brian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Charles R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Ryan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faigenbaum, Avery D</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Acute Metabolic Responses to Traditional Resistance, Body-Weight, and Battling Rope Exercises</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTRatamess, NA, Rosenberg, JG, Klei, S, Dougherty, BM, Kang, J, Smith, CR, Ross, RE, and Faigenbaum, AD. Comparison of the acute metabolic responses to traditional resistance, body-weight, and battling rope exercises. J Strength Cond Res 29(1)47–57, 2015—The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the acute metabolic responses to resistance exercise protocols comprising free-weight, body-weight, and battling rope (BR) exercises. Ten resistance-trained men (age = 20.6 ± 1.3 years) performed 13 resistance exercise protocols on separate days in random order consisting of only one exercise per session. For free-weight exercise protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of up to 10 repetitions with 75% of their 1 repetition maximum. For the push-up (PU) and push-up on a BOSU ball protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 20 repetitions. For the burpee and PU with lateral crawl protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 10 repetitions. For the plank and BR circuit protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 30-second bouts. A standard 2-minute rest interval (RI) was used in between all sets for each exercise. Data were averaged for the entire protocol including work and RIs. Mean oxygen consumption was significantly greatest during the BR (24.6 ± 2.6 ml·kg·min) and burpee (22.9 ± 2.1 ml·kg·min) protocols. For the free-weight exercises, highest mean values were seen in the squat (19.6 ± 1.8 ml·kg·min), deadlift (18.9 ± 3.0 ml·kg·min), and lunge (17.3 ± 2.6 ml·kg·min). No differences were observed between PUs performed on the floor vs. on a BOSU ball. However, adding a lateral crawl to the PU significantly increased mean oxygen consumption (19.5 ± 2.9 ml·kg·min). The lowest mean value was seen during the plank exercise (7.9 ± 0.7 ml·kg·min). These data indicate performance of exercises with BRs and a body-weight burpee exercise elicit relatively higher acute metabolic demands than traditional resistance exercises performed with moderately heavy loading.</description><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Resistance Training - methods</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Weight Lifting - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1LHTEUxYO0-FX_AymBbrpwbL4ns9SHVoulYC1dDpnMHV9s3mRMMlj_--bxVIqL0ru5F-7vnMU5CB1SckwlbT59-b44Jn-P1GIL7VLJeSWYrt-UmyhRaULpDtpL6Y4QJqXk22iHiUYwWotdFBZhNZnoUhhxGHBeAj6xcwb8FbLpgncWX0Oawpgg4RzwTTS9yy6Mxq8fLmUzWjjCp6F_rH6Cu13mI2zGHp-anL0bb_F1mACf_YZoXfF4h94Oxic4eNr76Mf52c3iorr69vlycXJVWckaUQGFpuu1UfXAwQ6iHyQxmva1GhTjwJVlXQNMCOis5o2ytgQwaE21MtBYw_fRx43vFMP9DCm3K5cseG9GCHNqqVKCEa0l_Q9UEM50w0lBP7xC78IcSxZrStbrTGtZKLGhbAwpRRjaKbqViY8tJe26u7Z0177ursjeP5nP3Qr6F9FzWQXQG-Ah-Awx_fLzA8R2Ccbn5b-9_wBPrKTf</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Ratamess, Nicholas A</creator><creator>Rosenberg, Joseph G</creator><creator>Klei, Samantha</creator><creator>Dougherty, Brian M</creator><creator>Kang, Jie</creator><creator>Smith, Charles R</creator><creator>Ross, Ryan E</creator><creator>Faigenbaum, Avery D</creator><general>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Acute Metabolic Responses to Traditional Resistance, Body-Weight, and Battling Rope Exercises</title><author>Ratamess, Nicholas A ; Rosenberg, Joseph G ; Klei, Samantha ; Dougherty, Brian M ; Kang, Jie ; Smith, Charles R ; Ross, Ryan E ; Faigenbaum, Avery D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-e1e9bd8a67f3ecf4df50a81d76f623e36c2b9e244ebc8396cc000f88186ae9ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Resistance Training - methods</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Weight Lifting - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ratamess, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Joseph G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klei, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougherty, Brian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Charles R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Ryan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faigenbaum, Avery D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ratamess, Nicholas A</au><au>Rosenberg, Joseph G</au><au>Klei, Samantha</au><au>Dougherty, Brian M</au><au>Kang, Jie</au><au>Smith, Charles R</au><au>Ross, Ryan E</au><au>Faigenbaum, Avery D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Acute Metabolic Responses to Traditional Resistance, Body-Weight, and Battling Rope Exercises</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>47-57</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTRatamess, NA, Rosenberg, JG, Klei, S, Dougherty, BM, Kang, J, Smith, CR, Ross, RE, and Faigenbaum, AD. Comparison of the acute metabolic responses to traditional resistance, body-weight, and battling rope exercises. J Strength Cond Res 29(1)47–57, 2015—The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the acute metabolic responses to resistance exercise protocols comprising free-weight, body-weight, and battling rope (BR) exercises. Ten resistance-trained men (age = 20.6 ± 1.3 years) performed 13 resistance exercise protocols on separate days in random order consisting of only one exercise per session. For free-weight exercise protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of up to 10 repetitions with 75% of their 1 repetition maximum. For the push-up (PU) and push-up on a BOSU ball protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 20 repetitions. For the burpee and PU with lateral crawl protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 10 repetitions. For the plank and BR circuit protocols, subjects performed 3 sets of 30-second bouts. A standard 2-minute rest interval (RI) was used in between all sets for each exercise. Data were averaged for the entire protocol including work and RIs. Mean oxygen consumption was significantly greatest during the BR (24.6 ± 2.6 ml·kg·min) and burpee (22.9 ± 2.1 ml·kg·min) protocols. For the free-weight exercises, highest mean values were seen in the squat (19.6 ± 1.8 ml·kg·min), deadlift (18.9 ± 3.0 ml·kg·min), and lunge (17.3 ± 2.6 ml·kg·min). No differences were observed between PUs performed on the floor vs. on a BOSU ball. However, adding a lateral crawl to the PU significantly increased mean oxygen consumption (19.5 ± 2.9 ml·kg·min). The lowest mean value was seen during the plank exercise (7.9 ± 0.7 ml·kg·min). These data indicate performance of exercises with BRs and a body-weight burpee exercise elicit relatively higher acute metabolic demands than traditional resistance exercises performed with moderately heavy loading.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>24942174</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000000584</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2015-01, Vol.29 (1), p.47-57
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664208851
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Body Weight
Comparative analysis
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Humans
Male
Oxygen
Oxygen Consumption
Random Allocation
Resistance Training - methods
Sports training
Weight
Weight Lifting - physiology
Young Adult
title Comparison of the Acute Metabolic Responses to Traditional Resistance, Body-Weight, and Battling Rope Exercises
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A33%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Acute%20Metabolic%20Responses%20to%20Traditional%20Resistance,%20Body-Weight,%20and%20Battling%20Rope%20Exercises&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Ratamess,%20Nicholas%20A&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=47-57&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000584&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1640328930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1657421775&rft_id=info:pmid/24942174&rfr_iscdi=true