Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change

Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate‐vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2015-03, Vol.21 (3), p.1066-1077
Hauptverfasser: Stanton, Jessica C, Shoemaker, Kevin T, Pearson, Richard G, Akçakaya, H. Resit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1077
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1066
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 21
creator Stanton, Jessica C
Shoemaker, Kevin T
Pearson, Richard G
Akçakaya, H. Resit
description Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate‐vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or replacing because they were not developed to explicitly consider climate change. However, no assessment approach has been tested to determine its ability to provide advanced warning time for conservation action for species that might go extinct due to climate change. To test the performance of the Red List system in this capacity, we used linked niche‐demographic models with habitat dynamics driven by a ‘business‐as‐usual’ climate change scenario. We generated replicate 100‐year trajectories for range‐restricted reptiles and amphibians endemic to the United States. For each replicate, we categorized the simulated species according to IUCN Red List criteria at annual, 5‐year, and 10‐year intervals (the latter representing current practice). For replicates that went extinct, we calculated warning time as the number of years the simulated species was continuously listed in a threatened category prior to extinction. To simulate data limitations, we repeated the analysis using a single criterion at a time (disregarding other listing criteria). Results show that when all criteria can be used, the Red List system would provide several decades of warning time (median = 62 years; >20 years for 99% of replicates), but suggest that conservation actions should begin as soon as a species is listed as Vulnerable, because 50% of replicates went extinct within 20 years of becoming uplisted to Critically Endangered. When only one criterion was used, warning times were substantially shorter, but more frequent assessments increased the warning time by about a decade. Overall, we found that the Red List criteria reliably provide a sensitive and precautionary way to assess extinction risk under climate change.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.12721
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664203129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1664203129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5141-1f7eae80a396df096ab0fa9b761e10ad8f709b86e7d7d32ceb843f52285ec9cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1v1DAQBmALgWgpHPgDEKkXOKT12PFH1BNdwVJpVZCg2qPlOOPFJZssdiLaf4-XtD1UQsKXmcMzr-SXkNdATyC_041rToApBk_IIXApSlZp-XS_i6oECvyAvEjpmlLKGZXPyQETTHIt5CE5W9vYh35TjGGLqfBDLNIOXcg73oyhd2MY-lS0ExbjULgubO2Ihfth-w2-JM-87RK-uptH5OrTx--Lz-Xqy_Ji8WFVOgEVlOAVWtTU8lq2ntbSNtTbulESEKhttVe0brRE1aqWM4eNrrgXjGmBrnaeH5F3c-4uDr8mTKPZhuSw62yPw5QMSFkxyoHV_0GF4iCpEpkeP6LXwxT7_JG9EhWnqqqyej8rF4eUInqzi7mDeGuAmn35Jpdv_paf7Zu7xKnZYvsg79vO4HQGv0OHt_9OMsvF-X1kOV-ENOLNw4WNP41UXAmzvlyar5da69Wam1X2b2fv7WDsJoZkrr4xCoJSqKVUjP8BEHOj7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655430744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stanton, Jessica C ; Shoemaker, Kevin T ; Pearson, Richard G ; Akçakaya, H. Resit</creator><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Jessica C ; Shoemaker, Kevin T ; Pearson, Richard G ; Akçakaya, H. Resit</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate‐vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or replacing because they were not developed to explicitly consider climate change. However, no assessment approach has been tested to determine its ability to provide advanced warning time for conservation action for species that might go extinct due to climate change. To test the performance of the Red List system in this capacity, we used linked niche‐demographic models with habitat dynamics driven by a ‘business‐as‐usual’ climate change scenario. We generated replicate 100‐year trajectories for range‐restricted reptiles and amphibians endemic to the United States. For each replicate, we categorized the simulated species according to IUCN Red List criteria at annual, 5‐year, and 10‐year intervals (the latter representing current practice). For replicates that went extinct, we calculated warning time as the number of years the simulated species was continuously listed in a threatened category prior to extinction. To simulate data limitations, we repeated the analysis using a single criterion at a time (disregarding other listing criteria). Results show that when all criteria can be used, the Red List system would provide several decades of warning time (median = 62 years; &gt;20 years for 99% of replicates), but suggest that conservation actions should begin as soon as a species is listed as Vulnerable, because 50% of replicates went extinct within 20 years of becoming uplisted to Critically Endangered. When only one criterion was used, warning times were substantially shorter, but more frequent assessments increased the warning time by about a decade. Overall, we found that the Red List criteria reliably provide a sensitive and precautionary way to assess extinction risk under climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12721</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25263856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Science</publisher><subject>amphibians ; Amphibians - physiology ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Climate Change ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; extinction ; Extinction, Biological ; habitats ; IUCN Red List ; linked demographic-habitat models ; probability of extinction ; Red List Categories and Criteria ; reptiles ; Reptiles - physiology ; risk ; threatened species ; United States</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2015-03, Vol.21 (3), p.1066-1077</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5141-1f7eae80a396df096ab0fa9b761e10ad8f709b86e7d7d32ceb843f52285ec9cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5141-1f7eae80a396df096ab0fa9b761e10ad8f709b86e7d7d32ceb843f52285ec9cf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3789-3856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.12721$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.12721$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25263856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Jessica C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, Kevin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçakaya, H. Resit</creatorcontrib><title>Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Change Biol</addtitle><description>Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate‐vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or replacing because they were not developed to explicitly consider climate change. However, no assessment approach has been tested to determine its ability to provide advanced warning time for conservation action for species that might go extinct due to climate change. To test the performance of the Red List system in this capacity, we used linked niche‐demographic models with habitat dynamics driven by a ‘business‐as‐usual’ climate change scenario. We generated replicate 100‐year trajectories for range‐restricted reptiles and amphibians endemic to the United States. For each replicate, we categorized the simulated species according to IUCN Red List criteria at annual, 5‐year, and 10‐year intervals (the latter representing current practice). For replicates that went extinct, we calculated warning time as the number of years the simulated species was continuously listed in a threatened category prior to extinction. To simulate data limitations, we repeated the analysis using a single criterion at a time (disregarding other listing criteria). Results show that when all criteria can be used, the Red List system would provide several decades of warning time (median = 62 years; &gt;20 years for 99% of replicates), but suggest that conservation actions should begin as soon as a species is listed as Vulnerable, because 50% of replicates went extinct within 20 years of becoming uplisted to Critically Endangered. When only one criterion was used, warning times were substantially shorter, but more frequent assessments increased the warning time by about a decade. Overall, we found that the Red List criteria reliably provide a sensitive and precautionary way to assess extinction risk under climate change.</description><subject>amphibians</subject><subject>Amphibians - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Biological</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>IUCN Red List</subject><subject>linked demographic-habitat models</subject><subject>probability of extinction</subject><subject>Red List Categories and Criteria</subject><subject>reptiles</subject><subject>Reptiles - physiology</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>threatened species</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0E1v1DAQBmALgWgpHPgDEKkXOKT12PFH1BNdwVJpVZCg2qPlOOPFJZssdiLaf4-XtD1UQsKXmcMzr-SXkNdATyC_041rToApBk_IIXApSlZp-XS_i6oECvyAvEjpmlLKGZXPyQETTHIt5CE5W9vYh35TjGGLqfBDLNIOXcg73oyhd2MY-lS0ExbjULgubO2Ihfth-w2-JM-87RK-uptH5OrTx--Lz-Xqy_Ji8WFVOgEVlOAVWtTU8lq2ntbSNtTbulESEKhttVe0brRE1aqWM4eNrrgXjGmBrnaeH5F3c-4uDr8mTKPZhuSw62yPw5QMSFkxyoHV_0GF4iCpEpkeP6LXwxT7_JG9EhWnqqqyej8rF4eUInqzi7mDeGuAmn35Jpdv_paf7Zu7xKnZYvsg79vO4HQGv0OHt_9OMsvF-X1kOV-ENOLNw4WNP41UXAmzvlyar5da69Wam1X2b2fv7WDsJoZkrr4xCoJSqKVUjP8BEHOj7w</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Stanton, Jessica C</creator><creator>Shoemaker, Kevin T</creator><creator>Pearson, Richard G</creator><creator>Akçakaya, H. Resit</creator><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-3856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change</title><author>Stanton, Jessica C ; Shoemaker, Kevin T ; Pearson, Richard G ; Akçakaya, H. Resit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5141-1f7eae80a396df096ab0fa9b761e10ad8f709b86e7d7d32ceb843f52285ec9cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>amphibians</topic><topic>Amphibians - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Biological</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>IUCN Red List</topic><topic>linked demographic-habitat models</topic><topic>probability of extinction</topic><topic>Red List Categories and Criteria</topic><topic>reptiles</topic><topic>Reptiles - physiology</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>threatened species</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Jessica C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, Kevin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçakaya, H. Resit</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanton, Jessica C</au><au>Shoemaker, Kevin T</au><au>Pearson, Richard G</au><au>Akçakaya, H. Resit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Change Biol</addtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1066</spage><epage>1077</epage><pages>1066-1077</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate‐vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or replacing because they were not developed to explicitly consider climate change. However, no assessment approach has been tested to determine its ability to provide advanced warning time for conservation action for species that might go extinct due to climate change. To test the performance of the Red List system in this capacity, we used linked niche‐demographic models with habitat dynamics driven by a ‘business‐as‐usual’ climate change scenario. We generated replicate 100‐year trajectories for range‐restricted reptiles and amphibians endemic to the United States. For each replicate, we categorized the simulated species according to IUCN Red List criteria at annual, 5‐year, and 10‐year intervals (the latter representing current practice). For replicates that went extinct, we calculated warning time as the number of years the simulated species was continuously listed in a threatened category prior to extinction. To simulate data limitations, we repeated the analysis using a single criterion at a time (disregarding other listing criteria). Results show that when all criteria can be used, the Red List system would provide several decades of warning time (median = 62 years; &gt;20 years for 99% of replicates), but suggest that conservation actions should begin as soon as a species is listed as Vulnerable, because 50% of replicates went extinct within 20 years of becoming uplisted to Critically Endangered. When only one criterion was used, warning times were substantially shorter, but more frequent assessments increased the warning time by about a decade. Overall, we found that the Red List criteria reliably provide a sensitive and precautionary way to assess extinction risk under climate change.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Science</pub><pmid>25263856</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.12721</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-3856</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2015-03, Vol.21 (3), p.1066-1077
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664203129
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects amphibians
Amphibians - physiology
Animals
Biodiversity
Climate Change
Conservation of Natural Resources - methods
Endangered & extinct species
extinction
Extinction, Biological
habitats
IUCN Red List
linked demographic-habitat models
probability of extinction
Red List Categories and Criteria
reptiles
Reptiles - physiology
risk
threatened species
United States
title Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Warning%20times%20for%20species%20extinctions%20due%20to%20climate%20change&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Stanton,%20Jessica%20C&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1066&rft.epage=1077&rft.pages=1066-1077&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.12721&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1664203129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655430744&rft_id=info:pmid/25263856&rfr_iscdi=true