Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change
Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate‐vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global change biology 2015-03, Vol.21 (3), p.1066-1077 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1077 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1066 |
container_title | Global change biology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Stanton, Jessica C Shoemaker, Kevin T Pearson, Richard G Akçakaya, H. Resit |
description | Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate‐vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or replacing because they were not developed to explicitly consider climate change. However, no assessment approach has been tested to determine its ability to provide advanced warning time for conservation action for species that might go extinct due to climate change. To test the performance of the Red List system in this capacity, we used linked niche‐demographic models with habitat dynamics driven by a ‘business‐as‐usual’ climate change scenario. We generated replicate 100‐year trajectories for range‐restricted reptiles and amphibians endemic to the United States. For each replicate, we categorized the simulated species according to IUCN Red List criteria at annual, 5‐year, and 10‐year intervals (the latter representing current practice). For replicates that went extinct, we calculated warning time as the number of years the simulated species was continuously listed in a threatened category prior to extinction. To simulate data limitations, we repeated the analysis using a single criterion at a time (disregarding other listing criteria). Results show that when all criteria can be used, the Red List system would provide several decades of warning time (median = 62 years; >20 years for 99% of replicates), but suggest that conservation actions should begin as soon as a species is listed as Vulnerable, because 50% of replicates went extinct within 20 years of becoming uplisted to Critically Endangered. When only one criterion was used, warning times were substantially shorter, but more frequent assessments increased the warning time by about a decade. Overall, we found that the Red List criteria reliably provide a sensitive and precautionary way to assess extinction risk under climate change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gcb.12721 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664203129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1664203129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5141-1f7eae80a396df096ab0fa9b761e10ad8f709b86e7d7d32ceb843f52285ec9cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1v1DAQBmALgWgpHPgDEKkXOKT12PFH1BNdwVJpVZCg2qPlOOPFJZssdiLaf4-XtD1UQsKXmcMzr-SXkNdATyC_041rToApBk_IIXApSlZp-XS_i6oECvyAvEjpmlLKGZXPyQETTHIt5CE5W9vYh35TjGGLqfBDLNIOXcg73oyhd2MY-lS0ExbjULgubO2Ihfth-w2-JM-87RK-uptH5OrTx--Lz-Xqy_Ji8WFVOgEVlOAVWtTU8lq2ntbSNtTbulESEKhttVe0brRE1aqWM4eNrrgXjGmBrnaeH5F3c-4uDr8mTKPZhuSw62yPw5QMSFkxyoHV_0GF4iCpEpkeP6LXwxT7_JG9EhWnqqqyej8rF4eUInqzi7mDeGuAmn35Jpdv_paf7Zu7xKnZYvsg79vO4HQGv0OHt_9OMsvF-X1kOV-ENOLNw4WNP41UXAmzvlyar5da69Wam1X2b2fv7WDsJoZkrr4xCoJSqKVUjP8BEHOj7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655430744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stanton, Jessica C ; Shoemaker, Kevin T ; Pearson, Richard G ; Akçakaya, H. Resit</creator><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Jessica C ; Shoemaker, Kevin T ; Pearson, Richard G ; Akçakaya, H. Resit</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate‐vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or replacing because they were not developed to explicitly consider climate change. However, no assessment approach has been tested to determine its ability to provide advanced warning time for conservation action for species that might go extinct due to climate change. To test the performance of the Red List system in this capacity, we used linked niche‐demographic models with habitat dynamics driven by a ‘business‐as‐usual’ climate change scenario. We generated replicate 100‐year trajectories for range‐restricted reptiles and amphibians endemic to the United States. For each replicate, we categorized the simulated species according to IUCN Red List criteria at annual, 5‐year, and 10‐year intervals (the latter representing current practice). For replicates that went extinct, we calculated warning time as the number of years the simulated species was continuously listed in a threatened category prior to extinction. To simulate data limitations, we repeated the analysis using a single criterion at a time (disregarding other listing criteria). Results show that when all criteria can be used, the Red List system would provide several decades of warning time (median = 62 years; >20 years for 99% of replicates), but suggest that conservation actions should begin as soon as a species is listed as Vulnerable, because 50% of replicates went extinct within 20 years of becoming uplisted to Critically Endangered. When only one criterion was used, warning times were substantially shorter, but more frequent assessments increased the warning time by about a decade. Overall, we found that the Red List criteria reliably provide a sensitive and precautionary way to assess extinction risk under climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12721</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25263856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Science</publisher><subject>amphibians ; Amphibians - physiology ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Climate Change ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Endangered & extinct species ; extinction ; Extinction, Biological ; habitats ; IUCN Red List ; linked demographic-habitat models ; probability of extinction ; Red List Categories and Criteria ; reptiles ; Reptiles - physiology ; risk ; threatened species ; United States</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2015-03, Vol.21 (3), p.1066-1077</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5141-1f7eae80a396df096ab0fa9b761e10ad8f709b86e7d7d32ceb843f52285ec9cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5141-1f7eae80a396df096ab0fa9b761e10ad8f709b86e7d7d32ceb843f52285ec9cf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3789-3856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.12721$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.12721$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25263856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Jessica C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, Kevin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçakaya, H. Resit</creatorcontrib><title>Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Change Biol</addtitle><description>Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate‐vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or replacing because they were not developed to explicitly consider climate change. However, no assessment approach has been tested to determine its ability to provide advanced warning time for conservation action for species that might go extinct due to climate change. To test the performance of the Red List system in this capacity, we used linked niche‐demographic models with habitat dynamics driven by a ‘business‐as‐usual’ climate change scenario. We generated replicate 100‐year trajectories for range‐restricted reptiles and amphibians endemic to the United States. For each replicate, we categorized the simulated species according to IUCN Red List criteria at annual, 5‐year, and 10‐year intervals (the latter representing current practice). For replicates that went extinct, we calculated warning time as the number of years the simulated species was continuously listed in a threatened category prior to extinction. To simulate data limitations, we repeated the analysis using a single criterion at a time (disregarding other listing criteria). Results show that when all criteria can be used, the Red List system would provide several decades of warning time (median = 62 years; >20 years for 99% of replicates), but suggest that conservation actions should begin as soon as a species is listed as Vulnerable, because 50% of replicates went extinct within 20 years of becoming uplisted to Critically Endangered. When only one criterion was used, warning times were substantially shorter, but more frequent assessments increased the warning time by about a decade. Overall, we found that the Red List criteria reliably provide a sensitive and precautionary way to assess extinction risk under climate change.</description><subject>amphibians</subject><subject>Amphibians - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Biological</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>IUCN Red List</subject><subject>linked demographic-habitat models</subject><subject>probability of extinction</subject><subject>Red List Categories and Criteria</subject><subject>reptiles</subject><subject>Reptiles - physiology</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>threatened species</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0E1v1DAQBmALgWgpHPgDEKkXOKT12PFH1BNdwVJpVZCg2qPlOOPFJZssdiLaf4-XtD1UQsKXmcMzr-SXkNdATyC_041rToApBk_IIXApSlZp-XS_i6oECvyAvEjpmlLKGZXPyQETTHIt5CE5W9vYh35TjGGLqfBDLNIOXcg73oyhd2MY-lS0ExbjULgubO2Ihfth-w2-JM-87RK-uptH5OrTx--Lz-Xqy_Ji8WFVOgEVlOAVWtTU8lq2ntbSNtTbulESEKhttVe0brRE1aqWM4eNrrgXjGmBrnaeH5F3c-4uDr8mTKPZhuSw62yPw5QMSFkxyoHV_0GF4iCpEpkeP6LXwxT7_JG9EhWnqqqyej8rF4eUInqzi7mDeGuAmn35Jpdv_paf7Zu7xKnZYvsg79vO4HQGv0OHt_9OMsvF-X1kOV-ENOLNw4WNP41UXAmzvlyar5da69Wam1X2b2fv7WDsJoZkrr4xCoJSqKVUjP8BEHOj7w</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Stanton, Jessica C</creator><creator>Shoemaker, Kevin T</creator><creator>Pearson, Richard G</creator><creator>Akçakaya, H. Resit</creator><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-3856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change</title><author>Stanton, Jessica C ; Shoemaker, Kevin T ; Pearson, Richard G ; Akçakaya, H. Resit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5141-1f7eae80a396df096ab0fa9b761e10ad8f709b86e7d7d32ceb843f52285ec9cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>amphibians</topic><topic>Amphibians - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Biological</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>IUCN Red List</topic><topic>linked demographic-habitat models</topic><topic>probability of extinction</topic><topic>Red List Categories and Criteria</topic><topic>reptiles</topic><topic>Reptiles - physiology</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>threatened species</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Jessica C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, Kevin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçakaya, H. Resit</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanton, Jessica C</au><au>Shoemaker, Kevin T</au><au>Pearson, Richard G</au><au>Akçakaya, H. Resit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Change Biol</addtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1066</spage><epage>1077</epage><pages>1066-1077</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate‐vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or replacing because they were not developed to explicitly consider climate change. However, no assessment approach has been tested to determine its ability to provide advanced warning time for conservation action for species that might go extinct due to climate change. To test the performance of the Red List system in this capacity, we used linked niche‐demographic models with habitat dynamics driven by a ‘business‐as‐usual’ climate change scenario. We generated replicate 100‐year trajectories for range‐restricted reptiles and amphibians endemic to the United States. For each replicate, we categorized the simulated species according to IUCN Red List criteria at annual, 5‐year, and 10‐year intervals (the latter representing current practice). For replicates that went extinct, we calculated warning time as the number of years the simulated species was continuously listed in a threatened category prior to extinction. To simulate data limitations, we repeated the analysis using a single criterion at a time (disregarding other listing criteria). Results show that when all criteria can be used, the Red List system would provide several decades of warning time (median = 62 years; >20 years for 99% of replicates), but suggest that conservation actions should begin as soon as a species is listed as Vulnerable, because 50% of replicates went extinct within 20 years of becoming uplisted to Critically Endangered. When only one criterion was used, warning times were substantially shorter, but more frequent assessments increased the warning time by about a decade. Overall, we found that the Red List criteria reliably provide a sensitive and precautionary way to assess extinction risk under climate change.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Science</pub><pmid>25263856</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.12721</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-3856</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-1013 |
ispartof | Global change biology, 2015-03, Vol.21 (3), p.1066-1077 |
issn | 1354-1013 1365-2486 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1664203129 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | amphibians Amphibians - physiology Animals Biodiversity Climate Change Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Endangered & extinct species extinction Extinction, Biological habitats IUCN Red List linked demographic-habitat models probability of extinction Red List Categories and Criteria reptiles Reptiles - physiology risk threatened species United States |
title | Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Warning%20times%20for%20species%20extinctions%20due%20to%20climate%20change&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Stanton,%20Jessica%20C&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1066&rft.epage=1077&rft.pages=1066-1077&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.12721&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1664203129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655430744&rft_id=info:pmid/25263856&rfr_iscdi=true |