Choosing to be trained: Do behavioral traits matter?
•We examine determinants of self-selection into a labor market training program.•We design a field experiment and a survey to study who participates.•Competitiveness and risk-taking attitudes influence participation decision.•Results can help us understand heterogeneity in policy outcomes. In this p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic behavior & organization 2015-02, Vol.110, p.145-159 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 159 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 145 |
container_title | Journal of economic behavior & organization |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Dasgupta, Utteeyo Gangadharan, Lata Maitra, Pushkar Mani, Subha Subramanian, Samyukta |
description | •We examine determinants of self-selection into a labor market training program.•We design a field experiment and a survey to study who participates.•Competitiveness and risk-taking attitudes influence participation decision.•Results can help us understand heterogeneity in policy outcomes.
In this paper, we examine the determinants of self-selection into a vocational training program in India. To do this we combine data from an artefactual field experiment with survey data collected from the targeted community. We find that applicants and non-applicants differ in terms of socio-economic characteristics (measured using a survey), as well as selected behavioral traits (elicited using an artefactual field experiment). Even after controlling for a range of socio-economic characteristics, we find that individuals who have higher tolerance for risk, and are more competitive, are more likely to apply to the training program. This suggests that focusing only on the socio-economic and demographic characteristics might not be sufficient to fully explain selection into the program. Participants’ behavioral traits are also crucial in influencing take-up rates in such programs. Our results suggest that as a methodology, there is valuable information to be gained by dissecting the black box of unobservables using data on behavioral traits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1663904129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167268114003266</els_id><sourcerecordid>3577731641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-5aa303cb7fab21626c563f9f2ef083bd4550a8197c09b558f957916ba184b05d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8FL15aM2mTNiKIrJ-w4EXPIUlTN6XbrEl2wX9v6nryYC5DhucdZh6EzgEXgIFd9UVvlCsIhqoAUmAoD9AMmprnUFM4RLME1TlhDRyjkxB6nF5N-AxVi5VzwY4fWXSZMln00o6mvc7up-9K7qzzcvhpx5CtZYzG356io04OwZz91jl6f3x4Wzzny9enl8XdMtcV4zGnUpa41KrupCLACNOUlR3viOlwU6q2ohTLBnitMVeUNh2nNQemJDSVwrQt5-hyP3fj3efWhCjWNmgzDHI0bhsEMFZyXAHhCb34g_Zu68e0XaIoZg2nmCSK7CntXQjedGLj7Vr6LwFYTCJFLyaRYhIpgIgkMoVu9iGTTt1Z40XQ1ozatNYbHUXr7H_xb5y8eVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1650689502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choosing to be trained: Do behavioral traits matter?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Dasgupta, Utteeyo ; Gangadharan, Lata ; Maitra, Pushkar ; Mani, Subha ; Subramanian, Samyukta</creator><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Utteeyo ; Gangadharan, Lata ; Maitra, Pushkar ; Mani, Subha ; Subramanian, Samyukta</creatorcontrib><description>•We examine determinants of self-selection into a labor market training program.•We design a field experiment and a survey to study who participates.•Competitiveness and risk-taking attitudes influence participation decision.•Results can help us understand heterogeneity in policy outcomes.
In this paper, we examine the determinants of self-selection into a vocational training program in India. To do this we combine data from an artefactual field experiment with survey data collected from the targeted community. We find that applicants and non-applicants differ in terms of socio-economic characteristics (measured using a survey), as well as selected behavioral traits (elicited using an artefactual field experiment). Even after controlling for a range of socio-economic characteristics, we find that individuals who have higher tolerance for risk, and are more competitive, are more likely to apply to the training program. This suggests that focusing only on the socio-economic and demographic characteristics might not be sufficient to fully explain selection into the program. Participants’ behavioral traits are also crucial in influencing take-up rates in such programs. Our results suggest that as a methodology, there is valuable information to be gained by dissecting the black box of unobservables using data on behavioral traits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-2681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1751</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBOD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Artefactual field experiment ; Behavioral traits ; Competitiveness ; Demographics ; Economic behaviour ; Household survey ; India ; Methodology ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational behaviour ; Personality traits ; Selection ; Socioeconomic factors ; Studies ; Tolerance ; Training ; Training program ; Vocational training</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic behavior & organization, 2015-02, Vol.110, p.145-159</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Feb 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-5aa303cb7fab21626c563f9f2ef083bd4550a8197c09b558f957916ba184b05d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-5aa303cb7fab21626c563f9f2ef083bd4550a8197c09b558f957916ba184b05d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0247-4069 ; 0000-0003-4187-0494</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,30980,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Utteeyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gangadharan, Lata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maitra, Pushkar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mani, Subha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subramanian, Samyukta</creatorcontrib><title>Choosing to be trained: Do behavioral traits matter?</title><title>Journal of economic behavior & organization</title><description>•We examine determinants of self-selection into a labor market training program.•We design a field experiment and a survey to study who participates.•Competitiveness and risk-taking attitudes influence participation decision.•Results can help us understand heterogeneity in policy outcomes.
In this paper, we examine the determinants of self-selection into a vocational training program in India. To do this we combine data from an artefactual field experiment with survey data collected from the targeted community. We find that applicants and non-applicants differ in terms of socio-economic characteristics (measured using a survey), as well as selected behavioral traits (elicited using an artefactual field experiment). Even after controlling for a range of socio-economic characteristics, we find that individuals who have higher tolerance for risk, and are more competitive, are more likely to apply to the training program. This suggests that focusing only on the socio-economic and demographic characteristics might not be sufficient to fully explain selection into the program. Participants’ behavioral traits are also crucial in influencing take-up rates in such programs. Our results suggest that as a methodology, there is valuable information to be gained by dissecting the black box of unobservables using data on behavioral traits.</description><subject>Artefactual field experiment</subject><subject>Behavioral traits</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Economic behaviour</subject><subject>Household survey</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Selection</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tolerance</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Training program</subject><subject>Vocational training</subject><issn>0167-2681</issn><issn>1879-1751</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8FL15aM2mTNiKIrJ-w4EXPIUlTN6XbrEl2wX9v6nryYC5DhucdZh6EzgEXgIFd9UVvlCsIhqoAUmAoD9AMmprnUFM4RLME1TlhDRyjkxB6nF5N-AxVi5VzwY4fWXSZMln00o6mvc7up-9K7qzzcvhpx5CtZYzG356io04OwZz91jl6f3x4Wzzny9enl8XdMtcV4zGnUpa41KrupCLACNOUlR3viOlwU6q2ohTLBnitMVeUNh2nNQemJDSVwrQt5-hyP3fj3efWhCjWNmgzDHI0bhsEMFZyXAHhCb34g_Zu68e0XaIoZg2nmCSK7CntXQjedGLj7Vr6LwFYTCJFLyaRYhIpgIgkMoVu9iGTTt1Z40XQ1ozatNYbHUXr7H_xb5y8eVk</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Dasgupta, Utteeyo</creator><creator>Gangadharan, Lata</creator><creator>Maitra, Pushkar</creator><creator>Mani, Subha</creator><creator>Subramanian, Samyukta</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0247-4069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4187-0494</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Choosing to be trained: Do behavioral traits matter?</title><author>Dasgupta, Utteeyo ; Gangadharan, Lata ; Maitra, Pushkar ; Mani, Subha ; Subramanian, Samyukta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-5aa303cb7fab21626c563f9f2ef083bd4550a8197c09b558f957916ba184b05d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Artefactual field experiment</topic><topic>Behavioral traits</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Economic behaviour</topic><topic>Household survey</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Selection</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tolerance</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Training program</topic><topic>Vocational training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Utteeyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gangadharan, Lata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maitra, Pushkar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mani, Subha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subramanian, Samyukta</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic behavior & organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dasgupta, Utteeyo</au><au>Gangadharan, Lata</au><au>Maitra, Pushkar</au><au>Mani, Subha</au><au>Subramanian, Samyukta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Choosing to be trained: Do behavioral traits matter?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic behavior & organization</jtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>145</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>145-159</pages><issn>0167-2681</issn><eissn>1879-1751</eissn><coden>JEBOD9</coden><abstract>•We examine determinants of self-selection into a labor market training program.•We design a field experiment and a survey to study who participates.•Competitiveness and risk-taking attitudes influence participation decision.•Results can help us understand heterogeneity in policy outcomes.
In this paper, we examine the determinants of self-selection into a vocational training program in India. To do this we combine data from an artefactual field experiment with survey data collected from the targeted community. We find that applicants and non-applicants differ in terms of socio-economic characteristics (measured using a survey), as well as selected behavioral traits (elicited using an artefactual field experiment). Even after controlling for a range of socio-economic characteristics, we find that individuals who have higher tolerance for risk, and are more competitive, are more likely to apply to the training program. This suggests that focusing only on the socio-economic and demographic characteristics might not be sufficient to fully explain selection into the program. Participants’ behavioral traits are also crucial in influencing take-up rates in such programs. Our results suggest that as a methodology, there is valuable information to be gained by dissecting the black box of unobservables using data on behavioral traits.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.013</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0247-4069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4187-0494</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-2681 |
ispartof | Journal of economic behavior & organization, 2015-02, Vol.110, p.145-159 |
issn | 0167-2681 1879-1751 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1663904129 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Artefactual field experiment Behavioral traits Competitiveness Demographics Economic behaviour Household survey India Methodology Organizational behavior Organizational behaviour Personality traits Selection Socioeconomic factors Studies Tolerance Training Training program Vocational training |
title | Choosing to be trained: Do behavioral traits matter? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A49%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choosing%20to%20be%20trained:%20Do%20behavioral%20traits%20matter?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20behavior%20&%20organization&rft.au=Dasgupta,%20Utteeyo&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=145-159&rft.issn=0167-2681&rft.eissn=1879-1751&rft.coden=JEBOD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3577731641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1650689502&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167268114003266&rfr_iscdi=true |