Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm III: Enduring methods, open geography, participatory research, and the fourth paradigm
In our third and final report, we again prioritize the open embrace of methodological differences, seeking to span the qualitative-quantitative chasm in different ways. Amid broad focus on methodological newness, we review the importance of enduring methods such as interviewing and mapping. Amid eff...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Progress in human geography 2014-04, Vol.38 (2), p.294-307 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 307 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 294 |
container_title | Progress in human geography |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | DeLyser, Dydia Sui, Daniel |
description | In our third and final report, we again prioritize the open embrace of methodological differences, seeking to span the qualitative-quantitative chasm in different ways. Amid broad focus on methodological newness, we review the importance of enduring methods such as interviewing and mapping. Amid efforts to make data and publications openly available, we review efforts to include communities in participatory research. Amid the emergence of data-extensive studies, which some call the fourth paradigm, we highlight the continuing importance of ‘small’ data and methodological pluralism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0309132513479291 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1663899552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0309132513479291</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1663899552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-35e6a3a2fbe08644f1ae3089e192a63a18cb789eeab52124b84753803974a45a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHgNevKzu7Oxmd49S_AgUvOg5TMKmTUmTNpsI_vduaA9SEE8zw_u9B_MYuwXxAGDMo0DhAKUGVMZJB2dsBsoYLqS152w2yXzSL9lVCBshhDZSz9jjou9CqNtVMqx9sh-pqQca6i_P494OxyMp1xS2SZZl1-yioib4m-Ocs8-X54_FG1--v2aLpyUvUdqBo_YpIcmq8MKmSlVAHoV1HpykFAlsWZh4eiq0BKkKq4xGK9AZRUoTztn9IXfXd_vRhyHf1qH0TUOt78aQQ5qidU5r-T-qERwCKBHRuxN00419Gx-JlDCoU6tNpMSBKqduel_lu77eUv-dg8insvPTsqOFHyyBVv5X6F_8D41Seww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1507356857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm III: Enduring methods, open geography, participatory research, and the fourth paradigm</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>DeLyser, Dydia ; Sui, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>DeLyser, Dydia ; Sui, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>In our third and final report, we again prioritize the open embrace of methodological differences, seeking to span the qualitative-quantitative chasm in different ways. Amid broad focus on methodological newness, we review the importance of enduring methods such as interviewing and mapping. Amid efforts to make data and publications openly available, we review efforts to include communities in participatory research. Amid the emergence of data-extensive studies, which some call the fourth paradigm, we highlight the continuing importance of ‘small’ data and methodological pluralism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0309132513479291</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHGEDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Action Research ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Geodemographics ; Geography ; Human geography ; Humanities ; Interviews ; Mapping ; Methodology ; Ontology ; Participatory research ; Pluralism ; Professional relationships ; Qualitative analysis ; Research methodology ; Social sciences ; Storytelling</subject><ispartof>Progress in human geography, 2014-04, Vol.38 (2), p.294-307</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>SAGE Publications © Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-35e6a3a2fbe08644f1ae3089e192a63a18cb789eeab52124b84753803974a45a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0309132513479291$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309132513479291$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27343,27923,27924,33773,33774,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeLyser, Dydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sui, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm III: Enduring methods, open geography, participatory research, and the fourth paradigm</title><title>Progress in human geography</title><description>In our third and final report, we again prioritize the open embrace of methodological differences, seeking to span the qualitative-quantitative chasm in different ways. Amid broad focus on methodological newness, we review the importance of enduring methods such as interviewing and mapping. Amid efforts to make data and publications openly available, we review efforts to include communities in participatory research. Amid the emergence of data-extensive studies, which some call the fourth paradigm, we highlight the continuing importance of ‘small’ data and methodological pluralism.</description><subject>Action Research</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Geodemographics</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Pluralism</subject><subject>Professional relationships</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Storytelling</subject><issn>0309-1325</issn><issn>1477-0288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHgNevKzu7Oxmd49S_AgUvOg5TMKmTUmTNpsI_vduaA9SEE8zw_u9B_MYuwXxAGDMo0DhAKUGVMZJB2dsBsoYLqS152w2yXzSL9lVCBshhDZSz9jjou9CqNtVMqx9sh-pqQca6i_P494OxyMp1xS2SZZl1-yioib4m-Ocs8-X54_FG1--v2aLpyUvUdqBo_YpIcmq8MKmSlVAHoV1HpykFAlsWZh4eiq0BKkKq4xGK9AZRUoTztn9IXfXd_vRhyHf1qH0TUOt78aQQ5qidU5r-T-qERwCKBHRuxN00419Gx-JlDCoU6tNpMSBKqduel_lu77eUv-dg8insvPTsqOFHyyBVv5X6F_8D41Seww</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>DeLyser, Dydia</creator><creator>Sui, Daniel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm III</title><author>DeLyser, Dydia ; Sui, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-35e6a3a2fbe08644f1ae3089e192a63a18cb789eeab52124b84753803974a45a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Action Research</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Geodemographics</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Pluralism</topic><topic>Professional relationships</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Storytelling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeLyser, Dydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sui, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Progress in human geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeLyser, Dydia</au><au>Sui, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm III: Enduring methods, open geography, participatory research, and the fourth paradigm</atitle><jtitle>Progress in human geography</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>294</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>294-307</pages><issn>0309-1325</issn><eissn>1477-0288</eissn><coden>PHGEDN</coden><abstract>In our third and final report, we again prioritize the open embrace of methodological differences, seeking to span the qualitative-quantitative chasm in different ways. Amid broad focus on methodological newness, we review the importance of enduring methods such as interviewing and mapping. Amid efforts to make data and publications openly available, we review efforts to include communities in participatory research. Amid the emergence of data-extensive studies, which some call the fourth paradigm, we highlight the continuing importance of ‘small’ data and methodological pluralism.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0309132513479291</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-1325 |
ispartof | Progress in human geography, 2014-04, Vol.38 (2), p.294-307 |
issn | 0309-1325 1477-0288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1663899552 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Action Research Data analysis Data collection Geodemographics Geography Human geography Humanities Interviews Mapping Methodology Ontology Participatory research Pluralism Professional relationships Qualitative analysis Research methodology Social sciences Storytelling |
title | Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm III: Enduring methods, open geography, participatory research, and the fourth paradigm |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A04%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crossing%20the%20qualitative-quantitative%20chasm%20III:%20Enduring%20methods,%20open%20geography,%20participatory%20research,%20and%20the%20fourth%20paradigm&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20human%20geography&rft.au=DeLyser,%20Dydia&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=294&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=294-307&rft.issn=0309-1325&rft.eissn=1477-0288&rft.coden=PHGEDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0309132513479291&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1663899552%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1507356857&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0309132513479291&rfr_iscdi=true |