Two Approaches for Assessing Human Safety of Disperse Blue 1
Disperse Blue 1 is an anthraquinone dye used at low levels in semipermanent hair color formulations. Dietary administration of Disperse Blue 1 in a National Toxicology Program (NTP) carcinogenesis bioassay produced transitional- and squamous-cell tumors, leiomyomas, and leiomyosarcomas of the urinar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology 1994-02, Vol.19 (1), p.80-96 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 96 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Haws, L.C. Jackson, B.A. Turnbull, D. Dressler, W.E. |
description | Disperse Blue 1 is an anthraquinone dye used at low levels in semipermanent hair color formulations. Dietary administration of Disperse Blue 1 in a National Toxicology Program (NTP) carcinogenesis bioassay produced transitional- and squamous-cell tumors, leiomyomas, and leiomyosarcomas of the urinary bladders of male and female F344/N rats. The occurrence of tumors in the urinary bladder of rats was associated with urothelial hyperplasia and the presence of urinary calculi. Despite the occurrence of urinary bladder calculi and other nonneoplastic changes, there was no evidence of urinary bladder carcinogenesis in B6C3F
1 mice fed Disperse Blue in the diet for up to 2 years. A study conducted in rats of the same strain by Burnett and Squire confirmed the occurrence of calculi and transitional-cell neoplasms in the rat bladder. However, no mesenchymal-cell tumors were detected at a comparable dietary level. Further, Burnett and Squire found evidence of reversibility of the proliferative changes in the rat urinary bladder following cessation of treatment at 6 months. Disperse Blue 1 has been tested in a variety of
in vivo and
in vitro genotoxicity assays and was negative
in vivo but produced a weak and mixed pattern of genotoxic responses
in vitro which may be attributable to a constituent of the commercial preparations. Evaluation of the available data for Disperse Blue 1 and comparison with the responses observed in the urinary bladders of rats administered other rodent bladder carcinogens considered to act through a secondary mechanism indicate that a threshold approach is appropriate for assessing risk. With this approach, an uncertainty factor of 1000 applied to the no-observed-adverse-effect level in the NTP bioassay yielded a safe exposure level of 45-56 μg/kg/day. In contrast, with a conventional quantitative risk assessment approach, the exposure level corresponding to an upper limit on lifetime risk of 10
−6 to 10
−5 was 0.39 to 3.9 μg/kg/day, respectively. The safe level of Disperse Blue 1 derived using the threshold approach is approximately 20 times greater than the maximum average daily applied dose of 2.7 μg/kg/day associated with its use in semipermanent hair color formulations, while the exposure associated with the 10
−5 risk level using the linearized multistage model in the conventional approach was determined to be 1.5 times greater. Because oral absorption is substantially more than dermal absorption, the actual margin of safety is most |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/rtph.1994.1007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16638259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0273230084710075</els_id><sourcerecordid>16638259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e940ba6259bf5584e6fad2e16727019ac9a71b251e00c5842e6bff2562b5e4183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMo4_jYuhOyEHcdk7RJG3AzvgXBheM6pJkbjXTamtsq_ntbZ5idq3A5Xw6Hj5ATzmacMXURu_Z9xrXOxjPfIVPOtEqY0HKXTJnI00SkjO2TA8QPxpgoinxCJgWXuuD5lFwuvhs6b9vYWPcOSH0T6RwREEP9Rh_6la3pi_XQ_dDG05uALUQEelX1QPkR2fO2QjjevIfk9e52cf2QPD3fP17PnxKX8qxLQGestEpIXXopiwyUt0sBXOUiZ1xbp23OSyE5MOaGXIAqvRdSiVJCxov0kJyve4eZnz1gZ1YBHVSVraHp0XCl0mKoH8DZGnSxQYzgTRvDysYfw5kZdZlRlxl1jWc-fDjdNPflCpZbfONnyM82uUVnKx9t7QJusVRLmf4NLNYYDBa-AkSDLkDtYBkiuM4sm_Dfgl9dY4Qv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16638259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two Approaches for Assessing Human Safety of Disperse Blue 1</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Haws, L.C. ; Jackson, B.A. ; Turnbull, D. ; Dressler, W.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haws, L.C. ; Jackson, B.A. ; Turnbull, D. ; Dressler, W.E.</creatorcontrib><description>Disperse Blue 1 is an anthraquinone dye used at low levels in semipermanent hair color formulations. Dietary administration of Disperse Blue 1 in a National Toxicology Program (NTP) carcinogenesis bioassay produced transitional- and squamous-cell tumors, leiomyomas, and leiomyosarcomas of the urinary bladders of male and female F344/N rats. The occurrence of tumors in the urinary bladder of rats was associated with urothelial hyperplasia and the presence of urinary calculi. Despite the occurrence of urinary bladder calculi and other nonneoplastic changes, there was no evidence of urinary bladder carcinogenesis in B6C3F
1 mice fed Disperse Blue in the diet for up to 2 years. A study conducted in rats of the same strain by Burnett and Squire confirmed the occurrence of calculi and transitional-cell neoplasms in the rat bladder. However, no mesenchymal-cell tumors were detected at a comparable dietary level. Further, Burnett and Squire found evidence of reversibility of the proliferative changes in the rat urinary bladder following cessation of treatment at 6 months. Disperse Blue 1 has been tested in a variety of
in vivo and
in vitro genotoxicity assays and was negative
in vivo but produced a weak and mixed pattern of genotoxic responses
in vitro which may be attributable to a constituent of the commercial preparations. Evaluation of the available data for Disperse Blue 1 and comparison with the responses observed in the urinary bladders of rats administered other rodent bladder carcinogens considered to act through a secondary mechanism indicate that a threshold approach is appropriate for assessing risk. With this approach, an uncertainty factor of 1000 applied to the no-observed-adverse-effect level in the NTP bioassay yielded a safe exposure level of 45-56 μg/kg/day. In contrast, with a conventional quantitative risk assessment approach, the exposure level corresponding to an upper limit on lifetime risk of 10
−6 to 10
−5 was 0.39 to 3.9 μg/kg/day, respectively. The safe level of Disperse Blue 1 derived using the threshold approach is approximately 20 times greater than the maximum average daily applied dose of 2.7 μg/kg/day associated with its use in semipermanent hair color formulations, while the exposure associated with the 10
−5 risk level using the linearized multistage model in the conventional approach was determined to be 1.5 times greater. Because oral absorption is substantially more than dermal absorption, the actual margin of safety is most likely much greater than either of these comparisons suggests. The difference in the estimates derived using the two approaches demonstrates the importance of incorporating information on the mechanism of action into the risk assessment process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-2300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/rtph.1994.1007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8159817</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RTOPDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthraquinones - toxicity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinogenicity Tests - methods ; Coloring Agents - toxicity ; Domestic and cosmetic products toxicology ; Female ; Hair Dyes - toxicity ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mutagenicity Tests - methods ; Rats ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 1994-02, Vol.19 (1), p.80-96</ispartof><rights>1994 Academic Press</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e940ba6259bf5584e6fad2e16727019ac9a71b251e00c5842e6bff2562b5e4183</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230084710075$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3955318$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8159817$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haws, L.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, B.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dressler, W.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Two Approaches for Assessing Human Safety of Disperse Blue 1</title><title>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Disperse Blue 1 is an anthraquinone dye used at low levels in semipermanent hair color formulations. Dietary administration of Disperse Blue 1 in a National Toxicology Program (NTP) carcinogenesis bioassay produced transitional- and squamous-cell tumors, leiomyomas, and leiomyosarcomas of the urinary bladders of male and female F344/N rats. The occurrence of tumors in the urinary bladder of rats was associated with urothelial hyperplasia and the presence of urinary calculi. Despite the occurrence of urinary bladder calculi and other nonneoplastic changes, there was no evidence of urinary bladder carcinogenesis in B6C3F
1 mice fed Disperse Blue in the diet for up to 2 years. A study conducted in rats of the same strain by Burnett and Squire confirmed the occurrence of calculi and transitional-cell neoplasms in the rat bladder. However, no mesenchymal-cell tumors were detected at a comparable dietary level. Further, Burnett and Squire found evidence of reversibility of the proliferative changes in the rat urinary bladder following cessation of treatment at 6 months. Disperse Blue 1 has been tested in a variety of
in vivo and
in vitro genotoxicity assays and was negative
in vivo but produced a weak and mixed pattern of genotoxic responses
in vitro which may be attributable to a constituent of the commercial preparations. Evaluation of the available data for Disperse Blue 1 and comparison with the responses observed in the urinary bladders of rats administered other rodent bladder carcinogens considered to act through a secondary mechanism indicate that a threshold approach is appropriate for assessing risk. With this approach, an uncertainty factor of 1000 applied to the no-observed-adverse-effect level in the NTP bioassay yielded a safe exposure level of 45-56 μg/kg/day. In contrast, with a conventional quantitative risk assessment approach, the exposure level corresponding to an upper limit on lifetime risk of 10
−6 to 10
−5 was 0.39 to 3.9 μg/kg/day, respectively. The safe level of Disperse Blue 1 derived using the threshold approach is approximately 20 times greater than the maximum average daily applied dose of 2.7 μg/kg/day associated with its use in semipermanent hair color formulations, while the exposure associated with the 10
−5 risk level using the linearized multistage model in the conventional approach was determined to be 1.5 times greater. Because oral absorption is substantially more than dermal absorption, the actual margin of safety is most likely much greater than either of these comparisons suggests. The difference in the estimates derived using the two approaches demonstrates the importance of incorporating information on the mechanism of action into the risk assessment process.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthraquinones - toxicity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinogenicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Coloring Agents - toxicity</subject><subject>Domestic and cosmetic products toxicology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hair Dyes - toxicity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mutagenicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0273-2300</issn><issn>1096-0295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMo4_jYuhOyEHcdk7RJG3AzvgXBheM6pJkbjXTamtsq_ntbZ5idq3A5Xw6Hj5ATzmacMXURu_Z9xrXOxjPfIVPOtEqY0HKXTJnI00SkjO2TA8QPxpgoinxCJgWXuuD5lFwuvhs6b9vYWPcOSH0T6RwREEP9Rh_6la3pi_XQ_dDG05uALUQEelX1QPkR2fO2QjjevIfk9e52cf2QPD3fP17PnxKX8qxLQGestEpIXXopiwyUt0sBXOUiZ1xbp23OSyE5MOaGXIAqvRdSiVJCxov0kJyve4eZnz1gZ1YBHVSVraHp0XCl0mKoH8DZGnSxQYzgTRvDysYfw5kZdZlRlxl1jWc-fDjdNPflCpZbfONnyM82uUVnKx9t7QJusVRLmf4NLNYYDBa-AkSDLkDtYBkiuM4sm_Dfgl9dY4Qv</recordid><startdate>199402</startdate><enddate>199402</enddate><creator>Haws, L.C.</creator><creator>Jackson, B.A.</creator><creator>Turnbull, D.</creator><creator>Dressler, W.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199402</creationdate><title>Two Approaches for Assessing Human Safety of Disperse Blue 1</title><author>Haws, L.C. ; Jackson, B.A. ; Turnbull, D. ; Dressler, W.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e940ba6259bf5584e6fad2e16727019ac9a71b251e00c5842e6bff2562b5e4183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthraquinones - toxicity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinogenicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Coloring Agents - toxicity</topic><topic>Domestic and cosmetic products toxicology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hair Dyes - toxicity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mutagenicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haws, L.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, B.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dressler, W.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haws, L.C.</au><au>Jackson, B.A.</au><au>Turnbull, D.</au><au>Dressler, W.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two Approaches for Assessing Human Safety of Disperse Blue 1</atitle><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><date>1994-02</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>80-96</pages><issn>0273-2300</issn><eissn>1096-0295</eissn><coden>RTOPDW</coden><abstract>Disperse Blue 1 is an anthraquinone dye used at low levels in semipermanent hair color formulations. Dietary administration of Disperse Blue 1 in a National Toxicology Program (NTP) carcinogenesis bioassay produced transitional- and squamous-cell tumors, leiomyomas, and leiomyosarcomas of the urinary bladders of male and female F344/N rats. The occurrence of tumors in the urinary bladder of rats was associated with urothelial hyperplasia and the presence of urinary calculi. Despite the occurrence of urinary bladder calculi and other nonneoplastic changes, there was no evidence of urinary bladder carcinogenesis in B6C3F
1 mice fed Disperse Blue in the diet for up to 2 years. A study conducted in rats of the same strain by Burnett and Squire confirmed the occurrence of calculi and transitional-cell neoplasms in the rat bladder. However, no mesenchymal-cell tumors were detected at a comparable dietary level. Further, Burnett and Squire found evidence of reversibility of the proliferative changes in the rat urinary bladder following cessation of treatment at 6 months. Disperse Blue 1 has been tested in a variety of
in vivo and
in vitro genotoxicity assays and was negative
in vivo but produced a weak and mixed pattern of genotoxic responses
in vitro which may be attributable to a constituent of the commercial preparations. Evaluation of the available data for Disperse Blue 1 and comparison with the responses observed in the urinary bladders of rats administered other rodent bladder carcinogens considered to act through a secondary mechanism indicate that a threshold approach is appropriate for assessing risk. With this approach, an uncertainty factor of 1000 applied to the no-observed-adverse-effect level in the NTP bioassay yielded a safe exposure level of 45-56 μg/kg/day. In contrast, with a conventional quantitative risk assessment approach, the exposure level corresponding to an upper limit on lifetime risk of 10
−6 to 10
−5 was 0.39 to 3.9 μg/kg/day, respectively. The safe level of Disperse Blue 1 derived using the threshold approach is approximately 20 times greater than the maximum average daily applied dose of 2.7 μg/kg/day associated with its use in semipermanent hair color formulations, while the exposure associated with the 10
−5 risk level using the linearized multistage model in the conventional approach was determined to be 1.5 times greater. Because oral absorption is substantially more than dermal absorption, the actual margin of safety is most likely much greater than either of these comparisons suggests. The difference in the estimates derived using the two approaches demonstrates the importance of incorporating information on the mechanism of action into the risk assessment process.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8159817</pmid><doi>10.1006/rtph.1994.1007</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-2300 |
ispartof | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 1994-02, Vol.19 (1), p.80-96 |
issn | 0273-2300 1096-0295 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16638259 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Anthraquinones - toxicity Biological and medical sciences Carcinogenicity Tests - methods Coloring Agents - toxicity Domestic and cosmetic products toxicology Female Hair Dyes - toxicity Humans Male Medical sciences Mutagenicity Tests - methods Rats Toxicology |
title | Two Approaches for Assessing Human Safety of Disperse Blue 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T00%3A25%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20Approaches%20for%20Assessing%20Human%20Safety%20of%20Disperse%20Blue%201&rft.jtitle=Regulatory%20toxicology%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Haws,%20L.C.&rft.date=1994-02&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=80-96&rft.issn=0273-2300&rft.eissn=1096-0295&rft.coden=RTOPDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/rtph.1994.1007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16638259%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16638259&rft_id=info:pmid/8159817&rft_els_id=S0273230084710075&rfr_iscdi=true |