Barn Owl Reproduction: Patterns and Variation near the Limit of the Species' Distribution

I studied reproduction of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in irrigated farmlands of northern Utah for 16 years documenting 391 nesting attempts. Most Barn Owls began nesting at one year of age and produced one brood per year. The owls rarely produced second broods or replaced failed first clutches. Complet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 1994-05, Vol.96 (2), p.468-484
1. Verfasser: Marti, Carl D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 484
container_issue 2
container_start_page 468
container_title The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)
container_volume 96
creator Marti, Carl D.
description I studied reproduction of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in irrigated farmlands of northern Utah for 16 years documenting 391 nesting attempts. Most Barn Owls began nesting at one year of age and produced one brood per year. The owls rarely produced second broods or replaced failed first clutches. Complete first clutches averaged 7.17 eggs (n = 275). Replacement (x̄ = 5.81, n = 16) and second clutches (x̄ = 5.79, n = 19) were significantly smaller than first clutches, but first (x̄ = 5.45) and second broods (x̄ = 5.37) did not differ significantly. Replacement broods (x̄ 3.83) were significantly smaller than first. Of all nesting attempts 88% produced full clutches and 71% yielded at least one fledgling. Successful nests on average produced 5.09 fledglings per first brood, 4.94 per second brood, and 3.60 per replacement brood. Second attempts were more likely to produce fledglings than either first or replacement attempts. Sixty-three percent of all eggs laid hatched and 55% produced fledglings. Of eggs that hatched, 87% survived to fledging. March 13 was the mean date for initiation of egg laying and latest second clutches hatched on 4 October. Persistent snow cover and low winter temperatures significantly delayed onset of egg laying and reduced the number and success of breeding attempts. Clutch size, however, did not differ significantly among years or among nest sites.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1369329
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16627922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1369329</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1369329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-99c899d4b339504749e8b65fcc240bf6eced085fdc165f4ca312dd2b51c117a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10NtKxDAQBuAgCq6r-ApBRK-qmRzaxjvPCgsrnsCrkqYpZumma5Iivr1ZXRQEr4Z_-PgZBqFdIEeUkeIYWC4ZlWtoBJKVmQAq19GIECCZ4JRuoq0QZiRlyukIvZwp7_D0vcP3ZuH7ZtDR9u4E36kYjXcBK9fgZ-WtWu6xM8rj-GrwxM5txH37FR4WRlsTDvGFDdHbeljabbTRqi6YndUco6ery8fzm2wyvb49P51kmjEZMyl1KWXD65QE4QWXpqxz0WpNOanb3GjTkFK0jYa05VoxoE1DawEaoFA5G6OD7950_ttgQqzmNmjTdcqZfggV5DktJKUJ7v2Bs37wLt1WUQBaCg48ocNvpH0fgjdttfB2rvxHBaRa_rda_TfJ_VWdClp1rVdO2_DDOYCUovhlsxB7_2_bJ3VXg2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211285414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barn Owl Reproduction: Patterns and Variation near the Limit of the Species' Distribution</title><source>SORA - Searchable Ornithological Research Archive</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Marti, Carl D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marti, Carl D.</creatorcontrib><description>I studied reproduction of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in irrigated farmlands of northern Utah for 16 years documenting 391 nesting attempts. Most Barn Owls began nesting at one year of age and produced one brood per year. The owls rarely produced second broods or replaced failed first clutches. Complete first clutches averaged 7.17 eggs (n = 275). Replacement (x̄ = 5.81, n = 16) and second clutches (x̄ = 5.79, n = 19) were significantly smaller than first clutches, but first (x̄ = 5.45) and second broods (x̄ = 5.37) did not differ significantly. Replacement broods (x̄ 3.83) were significantly smaller than first. Of all nesting attempts 88% produced full clutches and 71% yielded at least one fledgling. Successful nests on average produced 5.09 fledglings per first brood, 4.94 per second brood, and 3.60 per replacement brood. Second attempts were more likely to produce fledglings than either first or replacement attempts. Sixty-three percent of all eggs laid hatched and 55% produced fledglings. Of eggs that hatched, 87% survived to fledging. March 13 was the mean date for initiation of egg laying and latest second clutches hatched on 4 October. Persistent snow cover and low winter temperatures significantly delayed onset of egg laying and reduced the number and success of breeding attempts. Clutch size, however, did not differ significantly among years or among nest sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-5422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1369329</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNDRAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Santa Clara, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal nesting ; Animal reproduction ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Aves ; Barns ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds of prey ; Breeding ; Clutch size ; Eggs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hatching ; Irrigated farming ; Nesting ; Ornithology ; Owls ; Snow cover ; Tyto alba ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1994-05, Vol.96 (2), p.468-484</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 The Cooper Ornithological Society</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cooper Ornithological Society May 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-99c899d4b339504749e8b65fcc240bf6eced085fdc165f4ca312dd2b51c117a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-99c899d4b339504749e8b65fcc240bf6eced085fdc165f4ca312dd2b51c117a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1369329$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1369329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4119957$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marti, Carl D.</creatorcontrib><title>Barn Owl Reproduction: Patterns and Variation near the Limit of the Species' Distribution</title><title>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>I studied reproduction of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in irrigated farmlands of northern Utah for 16 years documenting 391 nesting attempts. Most Barn Owls began nesting at one year of age and produced one brood per year. The owls rarely produced second broods or replaced failed first clutches. Complete first clutches averaged 7.17 eggs (n = 275). Replacement (x̄ = 5.81, n = 16) and second clutches (x̄ = 5.79, n = 19) were significantly smaller than first clutches, but first (x̄ = 5.45) and second broods (x̄ = 5.37) did not differ significantly. Replacement broods (x̄ 3.83) were significantly smaller than first. Of all nesting attempts 88% produced full clutches and 71% yielded at least one fledgling. Successful nests on average produced 5.09 fledglings per first brood, 4.94 per second brood, and 3.60 per replacement brood. Second attempts were more likely to produce fledglings than either first or replacement attempts. Sixty-three percent of all eggs laid hatched and 55% produced fledglings. Of eggs that hatched, 87% survived to fledging. March 13 was the mean date for initiation of egg laying and latest second clutches hatched on 4 October. Persistent snow cover and low winter temperatures significantly delayed onset of egg laying and reduced the number and success of breeding attempts. Clutch size, however, did not differ significantly among years or among nest sites.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Barns</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Clutch size</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Irrigated farming</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Owls</subject><subject>Snow cover</subject><subject>Tyto alba</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0010-5422</issn><issn>1938-5129</issn><issn>2732-4621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10NtKxDAQBuAgCq6r-ApBRK-qmRzaxjvPCgsrnsCrkqYpZumma5Iivr1ZXRQEr4Z_-PgZBqFdIEeUkeIYWC4ZlWtoBJKVmQAq19GIECCZ4JRuoq0QZiRlyukIvZwp7_D0vcP3ZuH7ZtDR9u4E36kYjXcBK9fgZ-WtWu6xM8rj-GrwxM5txH37FR4WRlsTDvGFDdHbeljabbTRqi6YndUco6ery8fzm2wyvb49P51kmjEZMyl1KWXD65QE4QWXpqxz0WpNOanb3GjTkFK0jYa05VoxoE1DawEaoFA5G6OD7950_ttgQqzmNmjTdcqZfggV5DktJKUJ7v2Bs37wLt1WUQBaCg48ocNvpH0fgjdttfB2rvxHBaRa_rda_TfJ_VWdClp1rVdO2_DDOYCUovhlsxB7_2_bJ3VXg2A</recordid><startdate>19940501</startdate><enddate>19940501</enddate><creator>Marti, Carl D.</creator><general>Cooper Ornithological Society</general><general>Cooper Ornithological Club</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940501</creationdate><title>Barn Owl Reproduction: Patterns and Variation near the Limit of the Species' Distribution</title><author>Marti, Carl D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-99c899d4b339504749e8b65fcc240bf6eced085fdc165f4ca312dd2b51c117a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Barns</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Clutch size</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Irrigated farming</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Owls</topic><topic>Snow cover</topic><topic>Tyto alba</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marti, Carl D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marti, Carl D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barn Owl Reproduction: Patterns and Variation near the Limit of the Species' Distribution</atitle><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>1994-05-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>468</spage><epage>484</epage><pages>468-484</pages><issn>0010-5422</issn><eissn>1938-5129</eissn><eissn>2732-4621</eissn><coden>CNDRAB</coden><abstract>I studied reproduction of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in irrigated farmlands of northern Utah for 16 years documenting 391 nesting attempts. Most Barn Owls began nesting at one year of age and produced one brood per year. The owls rarely produced second broods or replaced failed first clutches. Complete first clutches averaged 7.17 eggs (n = 275). Replacement (x̄ = 5.81, n = 16) and second clutches (x̄ = 5.79, n = 19) were significantly smaller than first clutches, but first (x̄ = 5.45) and second broods (x̄ = 5.37) did not differ significantly. Replacement broods (x̄ 3.83) were significantly smaller than first. Of all nesting attempts 88% produced full clutches and 71% yielded at least one fledgling. Successful nests on average produced 5.09 fledglings per first brood, 4.94 per second brood, and 3.60 per replacement brood. Second attempts were more likely to produce fledglings than either first or replacement attempts. Sixty-three percent of all eggs laid hatched and 55% produced fledglings. Of eggs that hatched, 87% survived to fledging. March 13 was the mean date for initiation of egg laying and latest second clutches hatched on 4 October. Persistent snow cover and low winter temperatures significantly delayed onset of egg laying and reduced the number and success of breeding attempts. Clutch size, however, did not differ significantly among years or among nest sites.</abstract><cop>Santa Clara, CA</cop><pub>Cooper Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.2307/1369329</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-5422
ispartof The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1994-05, Vol.96 (2), p.468-484
issn 0010-5422
1938-5129
2732-4621
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16627922
source SORA - Searchable Ornithological Research Archive; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Agricultural land
Animal and plant ecology
Animal nesting
Animal reproduction
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Autoecology
Aves
Barns
Biological and medical sciences
Bird nesting
Birds of prey
Breeding
Clutch size
Eggs
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hatching
Irrigated farming
Nesting
Ornithology
Owls
Snow cover
Tyto alba
Vertebrata
title Barn Owl Reproduction: Patterns and Variation near the Limit of the Species' Distribution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A53%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barn%20Owl%20Reproduction:%20Patterns%20and%20Variation%20near%20the%20Limit%20of%20the%20Species'%20Distribution&rft.jtitle=The%20Condor%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Marti,%20Carl%20D.&rft.date=1994-05-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=468&rft.epage=484&rft.pages=468-484&rft.issn=0010-5422&rft.eissn=1938-5129&rft.coden=CNDRAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1369329&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1369329%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211285414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1369329&rfr_iscdi=true