Diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance in cattle in Brazil: A comparison of different methodologies

•Resistance to ivermectin was detected in all herds evaluated.•Efficacy estimated from pre- and post-treatment egg counts in the same group presented smaller confidence intervals.•The faecal egg count reduction confidence intervals were usually wider when based on data obtained using the McMaster me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary parasitology 2014-12, Vol.206 (3-4), p.216-226
Hauptverfasser: Neves, José Henrique das, Carvalho, Nadino, Rinaldi, Laura, Cringoli, Giuseppe, Amarante, Alessandro F.T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 226
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 216
container_title Veterinary parasitology
container_volume 206
creator Neves, José Henrique das
Carvalho, Nadino
Rinaldi, Laura
Cringoli, Giuseppe
Amarante, Alessandro F.T.
description •Resistance to ivermectin was detected in all herds evaluated.•Efficacy estimated from pre- and post-treatment egg counts in the same group presented smaller confidence intervals.•The faecal egg count reduction confidence intervals were usually wider when based on data obtained using the McMaster method than when data were obtained using the FLOTAC method. The occurrence of anthelmintic resistance to levamisole, albendazole, ivermectin and moxidectin was investigated in cattle from 10 farms located in São Paulo State, Brazil, using two techniques for counting eggs in faeces: McMaster with a sensitivity of 50 eggs per gram (EPG) and FLOTAC with a sensitivity of two EPG. We also evaluated the use of different mathematical and test design approaches to determine the efficacy of the anthelmintic treatments: one formula/design that compares post-treatment arithmetic mean EPG counts for the treated and control groups (FECRT1) and two methods to analyse data from pre- and post-treatment EPG counts in the same group (FECRT2 and FECRT3, respectively). Treatment groups received either ivermectin (0.2mg/kg of body weight (BW); moxidectin (0.2mg/kg BW); albendazole (2.5mg/kg BW); levamisole (4.7mg/kg BW); or no treatment (control group). The number of animals in each group ranged from 8 to 11. Faecal samples from each animal were collected 2 days before the treatment and again 10 and 28 days post-treatment. The FEC reduction (FECR) confidence intervals were usually wider when based on data obtained using the McMaster method than when data were obtained using the FLOTAC method. Efficacy estimated from pre- and post-treatment EPG counts in the same group presented smaller confidence intervals. Ivermectin proved to be totally ineffective in all herds evaluated. Cooperia spp. was the major parasite displaying resistance, followed by Haemonchus spp. The results also indicated the presence of Oesophagostomum spp. and Trichostrongylus spp., meaning they, too, were resistant to ivermectin. Resistance to moxidectin was found on nine of the 10 farms investigated; however, only three farms had previously used moxidectin. In contrast, albendazole and levamisole demonstrated high efficacy on the majority of farms. In surveys for anthelmintic resistance in cattle, the use of a diagnostic method with higher sensitivity to detect eggs is recommended, as is the case with the FLOTAC method. This study indicates that by using techniques with high sensitivity and by testing the same anim
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.10.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1662430922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304401714005421</els_id><sourcerecordid>1662430922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-435b82984b91f10aa524b0cfa904fbde692bf447882fa0305bfb13551a45d513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBwhlySZl7NhpwgKJN0hIbNhbjjNuXSVxsd1K8PW4tLBkNaOre-dxCDmjMKFAy8vFZI1xqfyEAeVJmgAVe2RMq2mRMyFgn4yhAJ5zoNMROQphAQAcyukhGTHBywoYHRN1b9VscMGGzJlMDXGOXW-HaHXmMalRDRozO2Raxdj9dLdefdnuKrvJtOvTATa4YRNurTHocYhZj3HuWte5mcVwQg6M6gKe7uoxeX98eL97zl_fnl7ubl5zzQsWc16IpmJ1xZuaGgpKCcYb0EbVwE3TYlmzxnA-rSpmVHpMNKahhRBUcdEKWhyTi-3YpXcfKwxR9jZo7Do1oFsFScuS8QJqxpKVb63auxA8Grn0tlf-U1KQG7ZyIbds5YbtRk1sU-x8t2HV9Nj-hX5hJsP11oDpzbVFL4O2mPi11qOOsnX2_w3fMmmNDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1662430922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance in cattle in Brazil: A comparison of different methodologies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Neves, José Henrique das ; Carvalho, Nadino ; Rinaldi, Laura ; Cringoli, Giuseppe ; Amarante, Alessandro F.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Neves, José Henrique das ; Carvalho, Nadino ; Rinaldi, Laura ; Cringoli, Giuseppe ; Amarante, Alessandro F.T.</creatorcontrib><description>•Resistance to ivermectin was detected in all herds evaluated.•Efficacy estimated from pre- and post-treatment egg counts in the same group presented smaller confidence intervals.•The faecal egg count reduction confidence intervals were usually wider when based on data obtained using the McMaster method than when data were obtained using the FLOTAC method. The occurrence of anthelmintic resistance to levamisole, albendazole, ivermectin and moxidectin was investigated in cattle from 10 farms located in São Paulo State, Brazil, using two techniques for counting eggs in faeces: McMaster with a sensitivity of 50 eggs per gram (EPG) and FLOTAC with a sensitivity of two EPG. We also evaluated the use of different mathematical and test design approaches to determine the efficacy of the anthelmintic treatments: one formula/design that compares post-treatment arithmetic mean EPG counts for the treated and control groups (FECRT1) and two methods to analyse data from pre- and post-treatment EPG counts in the same group (FECRT2 and FECRT3, respectively). Treatment groups received either ivermectin (0.2mg/kg of body weight (BW); moxidectin (0.2mg/kg BW); albendazole (2.5mg/kg BW); levamisole (4.7mg/kg BW); or no treatment (control group). The number of animals in each group ranged from 8 to 11. Faecal samples from each animal were collected 2 days before the treatment and again 10 and 28 days post-treatment. The FEC reduction (FECR) confidence intervals were usually wider when based on data obtained using the McMaster method than when data were obtained using the FLOTAC method. Efficacy estimated from pre- and post-treatment EPG counts in the same group presented smaller confidence intervals. Ivermectin proved to be totally ineffective in all herds evaluated. Cooperia spp. was the major parasite displaying resistance, followed by Haemonchus spp. The results also indicated the presence of Oesophagostomum spp. and Trichostrongylus spp., meaning they, too, were resistant to ivermectin. Resistance to moxidectin was found on nine of the 10 farms investigated; however, only three farms had previously used moxidectin. In contrast, albendazole and levamisole demonstrated high efficacy on the majority of farms. In surveys for anthelmintic resistance in cattle, the use of a diagnostic method with higher sensitivity to detect eggs is recommended, as is the case with the FLOTAC method. This study indicates that by using techniques with high sensitivity and by testing the same animals pre- and post-treatment, good precision can be achieved with group sizes from 8 to 11 animals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.10.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25468021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Albendazole - pharmacology ; Animals ; Anthelmintics - pharmacology ; Brazil - epidemiology ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - epidemiology ; Cattle Diseases - parasitology ; Cooperia ; Drug Resistance ; Faecal egg count reduction test ; Feces - parasitology ; Female ; FLOTAC ; Haemonchiasis - epidemiology ; Haemonchiasis - parasitology ; Haemonchiasis - veterinary ; Haemonchus ; Haemonchus - drug effects ; Haemonchus - isolation &amp; purification ; Ivermectin ; Ivermectin - pharmacology ; Levamisole - pharmacology ; Macrolides - pharmacology ; Male ; McMaster ; Parasite Egg Count - veterinary</subject><ispartof>Veterinary parasitology, 2014-12, Vol.206 (3-4), p.216-226</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-435b82984b91f10aa524b0cfa904fbde692bf447882fa0305bfb13551a45d513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-435b82984b91f10aa524b0cfa904fbde692bf447882fa0305bfb13551a45d513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.10.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25468021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neves, José Henrique das</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Nadino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cringoli, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amarante, Alessandro F.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance in cattle in Brazil: A comparison of different methodologies</title><title>Veterinary parasitology</title><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><description>•Resistance to ivermectin was detected in all herds evaluated.•Efficacy estimated from pre- and post-treatment egg counts in the same group presented smaller confidence intervals.•The faecal egg count reduction confidence intervals were usually wider when based on data obtained using the McMaster method than when data were obtained using the FLOTAC method. The occurrence of anthelmintic resistance to levamisole, albendazole, ivermectin and moxidectin was investigated in cattle from 10 farms located in São Paulo State, Brazil, using two techniques for counting eggs in faeces: McMaster with a sensitivity of 50 eggs per gram (EPG) and FLOTAC with a sensitivity of two EPG. We also evaluated the use of different mathematical and test design approaches to determine the efficacy of the anthelmintic treatments: one formula/design that compares post-treatment arithmetic mean EPG counts for the treated and control groups (FECRT1) and two methods to analyse data from pre- and post-treatment EPG counts in the same group (FECRT2 and FECRT3, respectively). Treatment groups received either ivermectin (0.2mg/kg of body weight (BW); moxidectin (0.2mg/kg BW); albendazole (2.5mg/kg BW); levamisole (4.7mg/kg BW); or no treatment (control group). The number of animals in each group ranged from 8 to 11. Faecal samples from each animal were collected 2 days before the treatment and again 10 and 28 days post-treatment. The FEC reduction (FECR) confidence intervals were usually wider when based on data obtained using the McMaster method than when data were obtained using the FLOTAC method. Efficacy estimated from pre- and post-treatment EPG counts in the same group presented smaller confidence intervals. Ivermectin proved to be totally ineffective in all herds evaluated. Cooperia spp. was the major parasite displaying resistance, followed by Haemonchus spp. The results also indicated the presence of Oesophagostomum spp. and Trichostrongylus spp., meaning they, too, were resistant to ivermectin. Resistance to moxidectin was found on nine of the 10 farms investigated; however, only three farms had previously used moxidectin. In contrast, albendazole and levamisole demonstrated high efficacy on the majority of farms. In surveys for anthelmintic resistance in cattle, the use of a diagnostic method with higher sensitivity to detect eggs is recommended, as is the case with the FLOTAC method. This study indicates that by using techniques with high sensitivity and by testing the same animals pre- and post-treatment, good precision can be achieved with group sizes from 8 to 11 animals.</description><subject>Albendazole - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthelmintics - pharmacology</subject><subject>Brazil - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Cooperia</subject><subject>Drug Resistance</subject><subject>Faecal egg count reduction test</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>FLOTAC</subject><subject>Haemonchiasis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Haemonchiasis - parasitology</subject><subject>Haemonchiasis - veterinary</subject><subject>Haemonchus</subject><subject>Haemonchus - drug effects</subject><subject>Haemonchus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Ivermectin</subject><subject>Ivermectin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Levamisole - pharmacology</subject><subject>Macrolides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>McMaster</subject><subject>Parasite Egg Count - veterinary</subject><issn>0304-4017</issn><issn>1873-2550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBwhlySZl7NhpwgKJN0hIbNhbjjNuXSVxsd1K8PW4tLBkNaOre-dxCDmjMKFAy8vFZI1xqfyEAeVJmgAVe2RMq2mRMyFgn4yhAJ5zoNMROQphAQAcyukhGTHBywoYHRN1b9VscMGGzJlMDXGOXW-HaHXmMalRDRozO2Raxdj9dLdefdnuKrvJtOvTATa4YRNurTHocYhZj3HuWte5mcVwQg6M6gKe7uoxeX98eL97zl_fnl7ubl5zzQsWc16IpmJ1xZuaGgpKCcYb0EbVwE3TYlmzxnA-rSpmVHpMNKahhRBUcdEKWhyTi-3YpXcfKwxR9jZo7Do1oFsFScuS8QJqxpKVb63auxA8Grn0tlf-U1KQG7ZyIbds5YbtRk1sU-x8t2HV9Nj-hX5hJsP11oDpzbVFL4O2mPi11qOOsnX2_w3fMmmNDw</recordid><startdate>20141215</startdate><enddate>20141215</enddate><creator>Neves, José Henrique das</creator><creator>Carvalho, Nadino</creator><creator>Rinaldi, Laura</creator><creator>Cringoli, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Amarante, Alessandro F.T.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141215</creationdate><title>Diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance in cattle in Brazil: A comparison of different methodologies</title><author>Neves, José Henrique das ; Carvalho, Nadino ; Rinaldi, Laura ; Cringoli, Giuseppe ; Amarante, Alessandro F.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-435b82984b91f10aa524b0cfa904fbde692bf447882fa0305bfb13551a45d513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Albendazole - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthelmintics - pharmacology</topic><topic>Brazil - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Cooperia</topic><topic>Drug Resistance</topic><topic>Faecal egg count reduction test</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>FLOTAC</topic><topic>Haemonchiasis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Haemonchiasis - parasitology</topic><topic>Haemonchiasis - veterinary</topic><topic>Haemonchus</topic><topic>Haemonchus - drug effects</topic><topic>Haemonchus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Ivermectin</topic><topic>Ivermectin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Levamisole - pharmacology</topic><topic>Macrolides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>McMaster</topic><topic>Parasite Egg Count - veterinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neves, José Henrique das</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Nadino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cringoli, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amarante, Alessandro F.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neves, José Henrique das</au><au>Carvalho, Nadino</au><au>Rinaldi, Laura</au><au>Cringoli, Giuseppe</au><au>Amarante, Alessandro F.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance in cattle in Brazil: A comparison of different methodologies</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><date>2014-12-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>206</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>216-226</pages><issn>0304-4017</issn><eissn>1873-2550</eissn><abstract>•Resistance to ivermectin was detected in all herds evaluated.•Efficacy estimated from pre- and post-treatment egg counts in the same group presented smaller confidence intervals.•The faecal egg count reduction confidence intervals were usually wider when based on data obtained using the McMaster method than when data were obtained using the FLOTAC method. The occurrence of anthelmintic resistance to levamisole, albendazole, ivermectin and moxidectin was investigated in cattle from 10 farms located in São Paulo State, Brazil, using two techniques for counting eggs in faeces: McMaster with a sensitivity of 50 eggs per gram (EPG) and FLOTAC with a sensitivity of two EPG. We also evaluated the use of different mathematical and test design approaches to determine the efficacy of the anthelmintic treatments: one formula/design that compares post-treatment arithmetic mean EPG counts for the treated and control groups (FECRT1) and two methods to analyse data from pre- and post-treatment EPG counts in the same group (FECRT2 and FECRT3, respectively). Treatment groups received either ivermectin (0.2mg/kg of body weight (BW); moxidectin (0.2mg/kg BW); albendazole (2.5mg/kg BW); levamisole (4.7mg/kg BW); or no treatment (control group). The number of animals in each group ranged from 8 to 11. Faecal samples from each animal were collected 2 days before the treatment and again 10 and 28 days post-treatment. The FEC reduction (FECR) confidence intervals were usually wider when based on data obtained using the McMaster method than when data were obtained using the FLOTAC method. Efficacy estimated from pre- and post-treatment EPG counts in the same group presented smaller confidence intervals. Ivermectin proved to be totally ineffective in all herds evaluated. Cooperia spp. was the major parasite displaying resistance, followed by Haemonchus spp. The results also indicated the presence of Oesophagostomum spp. and Trichostrongylus spp., meaning they, too, were resistant to ivermectin. Resistance to moxidectin was found on nine of the 10 farms investigated; however, only three farms had previously used moxidectin. In contrast, albendazole and levamisole demonstrated high efficacy on the majority of farms. In surveys for anthelmintic resistance in cattle, the use of a diagnostic method with higher sensitivity to detect eggs is recommended, as is the case with the FLOTAC method. This study indicates that by using techniques with high sensitivity and by testing the same animals pre- and post-treatment, good precision can be achieved with group sizes from 8 to 11 animals.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25468021</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.10.015</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-4017
ispartof Veterinary parasitology, 2014-12, Vol.206 (3-4), p.216-226
issn 0304-4017
1873-2550
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1662430922
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Albendazole - pharmacology
Animals
Anthelmintics - pharmacology
Brazil - epidemiology
Cattle
Cattle Diseases - epidemiology
Cattle Diseases - parasitology
Cooperia
Drug Resistance
Faecal egg count reduction test
Feces - parasitology
Female
FLOTAC
Haemonchiasis - epidemiology
Haemonchiasis - parasitology
Haemonchiasis - veterinary
Haemonchus
Haemonchus - drug effects
Haemonchus - isolation & purification
Ivermectin
Ivermectin - pharmacology
Levamisole - pharmacology
Macrolides - pharmacology
Male
McMaster
Parasite Egg Count - veterinary
title Diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance in cattle in Brazil: A comparison of different methodologies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A50%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20of%20anthelmintic%20resistance%20in%20cattle%20in%20Brazil:%20A%20comparison%20of%20different%20methodologies&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20parasitology&rft.au=Neves,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Henrique%20das&rft.date=2014-12-15&rft.volume=206&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=216-226&rft.issn=0304-4017&rft.eissn=1873-2550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.10.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1662430922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1662430922&rft_id=info:pmid/25468021&rft_els_id=S0304401714005421&rfr_iscdi=true