Effects of varying mandibular protrusion and degrees of vertical opening on upper airway dimensions in apneic dentate subjects

Introduction Despite numerous studies investigating the dimensional and therapeutic effects of mandibular advancement splints (MASs), data regarding the effects of differently designed individual and non-adjustable MASs on the upper airway in fully dentate apneic subjects in the sagittal plane inclu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orofacial orthopedics 2015, Vol.76 (1), p.51-65
Hauptverfasser: Piskin, B., Karakoc, O., Genc, H., Akay, S., Sipahi, C., Erdem, M., Karaman, B., Gorgulu, S., Yetkin, S., Ayyildiz, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Despite numerous studies investigating the dimensional and therapeutic effects of mandibular advancement splints (MASs), data regarding the effects of differently designed individual and non-adjustable MASs on the upper airway in fully dentate apneic subjects in the sagittal plane including comparison of these effects with a placebo device are sparse. The present study aimed to determine the dimensional changes in the sagittal plane created by differently designed MASs in the upper airway in fully dentate apneic subjects and to compare these changes with the effects of a placebo device. Materials and methods Magnetic resonance (MR) images of 9 dentate apneic subjects with 5 differently designed MASs and without a MAS were obtained. We measured the area of the entire pharynx (velopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx) on these MR images and compared the dimensional changes. Results The dimensional changes triggered by two specific MASs (75 % of the maximum mandibular protrusion with 5 mm vertical opening, and 75 % of the maximum mandibular protrusion with 10 mm of vertical opening) in the entire pharynx in the sagittal plane were statistically significant compared to the other MASs (p 
ISSN:1434-5293
1615-6714
DOI:10.1007/s00056-014-0259-z