Subforaminal bridges in Hymenoptera (Insecta), with a focus on Chalcidoidea

Variation in structures of the posterior surface of the head in Hymenoptera is compared and interpreted according to theories of head capsule evolution, with focus on understanding previously baffling conditions in the superfamily Chalcidoidea. Features are investigated separately without first clas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthropod structure & development 2015-03, Vol.44 (2), p.173-194
Hauptverfasser: Burks, R.A., Heraty, J.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Variation in structures of the posterior surface of the head in Hymenoptera is compared and interpreted according to theories of head capsule evolution, with focus on understanding previously baffling conditions in the superfamily Chalcidoidea. Features are investigated separately without first classifying subforaminal bridges into subcategories. In Proctotrupomorpha (including Chalcidoidea), Ceraphronoidea and some Ichneumonoidea, there are multiple posterior pits associated with the tentorium. In most examined Hymenoptera with a subforaminal bridge, there was a differentiated median area, typically with highly variable microtrichia. This area is elevated in Cephoidea and Pamphilioidea, but is not elevated in other Hymenoptera. Subforaminal bridges in Apocrita previously classified as hypostomal bridges are discussed in the context of A.P. Rasnitsyn's hypothesis that relative importance of adult feeding drives subforaminal bridge evolution. •subforaminal bridges in Hymenoptera proved difficult to classify as postgenal or hypostomal bridges in some Hymenoptera.•External features especially proved to be less reliable as landmarks than previously suspected.•Some Hymenoptera possess multiple posterior tentorial pits, with homology best determined by tentorial investigation.•Some subforaminal features may support monophyletic lineages in Hymenoptera, but the data are incomplete thus far.
ISSN:1467-8039
1873-5495
DOI:10.1016/j.asd.2014.12.003