Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis

Abstract Bone scaffolds for tissue regeneration require an optimal trade-off between biological and mechanical criteria. Optimal designs may be obtained using topology optimization (homogenization approach) and prototypes produced using additive manufacturing techniques. However, the process from de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical engineering & physics 2015-03, Vol.37 (3), p.287-296
Hauptverfasser: Coelho, Pedro G, Hollister, Scott J, Flanagan, Colleen L, Fernandes, Paulo R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 296
container_issue 3
container_start_page 287
container_title Medical engineering & physics
container_volume 37
creator Coelho, Pedro G
Hollister, Scott J
Flanagan, Colleen L
Fernandes, Paulo R
description Abstract Bone scaffolds for tissue regeneration require an optimal trade-off between biological and mechanical criteria. Optimal designs may be obtained using topology optimization (homogenization approach) and prototypes produced using additive manufacturing techniques. However, the process from design to manufacture remains a research challenge and will be a requirement of FDA design controls to engineering scaffolds. This work investigates how the design to manufacture chain affects the reproducibility of complex optimized design characteristics in the manufactured product. The design and prototypes are analyzed taking into account the computational assumptions and the final mechanical properties determined through mechanical tests. The scaffold is an assembly of unit-cells, and thus scale size effects on the mechanical response considering finite periodicity are investigated and compared with the predictions from the homogenization method which assumes in the limit infinitely repeated unit cells. Results show that a limited number of unit-cells (3–5 repeated on a side) introduce some scale-effects but the discrepancies are below 10%. Higher discrepancies are found when comparing the experimental data to numerical simulations due to differences between the manufactured and designed scaffold feature shapes and sizes as well as micro-porosities introduced by the manufacturing process. However good regression correlations ( R2  > 0.85) were found between numerical and experimental values, with slopes close to 1 for 2 out of 3 designs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.01.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1661991347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1350453315000132</els_id><sourcerecordid>1661991347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-36cde5d4832c37e1acde91da480499717f4dbc94263102fe2f89bbc33bbd70af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUsuO1DAQjBCIfcAvgI8cSLBj58UBaXfFS1ppD8DZcuz2rAdPPLiTlYYzH06HWfbAiZPdVnWVq7qL4qXgleCifbOtduBg2uxvD1XNRVNxUXGuHhWnou9kqbjkj-kuG16qRsqT4gxxywmhWvm0OKmbVvGeN6fFr8uQMmDKoxkjMLTG-xQdMp8yG9MEbA6ICzASCxNADtPmLbvZz2FnInOAYTO9Zt6MOVgzh0TFDuytmaiMbAacqYGZya3UEUoMP4nLe7Az0rOJBwz4rHjiTUR4fn-eF98-vP969am8vvn4-eriurTkYS5lax00TvWytrIDYagchDOq52oYOtF55UY7qLqVgtceat8P42ilHEfXcePlefHqyLvP6cdCf9O7gBZiNBOkBbVoWzEMQqqOoN0RanNCzOD1PpPlfNCC63UEeqsfRqDXEWguNAVMnS_uRZaREA99fzMnwMURAGT1LkDWaANMFlzIFIt2KfyHyLt_OGwMfzL_DgfAbVoyZUuONNaa6y_rJqyLIBpaAiFr-RvMprPN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661991347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Coelho, Pedro G ; Hollister, Scott J ; Flanagan, Colleen L ; Fernandes, Paulo R</creator><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro G ; Hollister, Scott J ; Flanagan, Colleen L ; Fernandes, Paulo R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Bone scaffolds for tissue regeneration require an optimal trade-off between biological and mechanical criteria. Optimal designs may be obtained using topology optimization (homogenization approach) and prototypes produced using additive manufacturing techniques. However, the process from design to manufacture remains a research challenge and will be a requirement of FDA design controls to engineering scaffolds. This work investigates how the design to manufacture chain affects the reproducibility of complex optimized design characteristics in the manufactured product. The design and prototypes are analyzed taking into account the computational assumptions and the final mechanical properties determined through mechanical tests. The scaffold is an assembly of unit-cells, and thus scale size effects on the mechanical response considering finite periodicity are investigated and compared with the predictions from the homogenization method which assumes in the limit infinitely repeated unit cells. Results show that a limited number of unit-cells (3–5 repeated on a side) introduce some scale-effects but the discrepancies are below 10%. Higher discrepancies are found when comparing the experimental data to numerical simulations due to differences between the manufactured and designed scaffold feature shapes and sizes as well as micro-porosities introduced by the manufacturing process. However good regression correlations ( R2  &gt; 0.85) were found between numerical and experimental values, with slopes close to 1 for 2 out of 3 designs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4533</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.01.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25640805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biocompatible Materials ; Biofabrication ; Bone and Bones - cytology ; Bone scaffolds ; Homogenization ; Materials Testing ; Mechanical Phenomena ; Mechanical testing ; Multiscale models ; Radiology ; Tissue Engineering ; Tissue Scaffolds</subject><ispartof>Medical engineering &amp; physics, 2015-03, Vol.37 (3), p.287-296</ispartof><rights>IPEM</rights><rights>2015 IPEM</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-36cde5d4832c37e1acde91da480499717f4dbc94263102fe2f89bbc33bbd70af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-36cde5d4832c37e1acde91da480499717f4dbc94263102fe2f89bbc33bbd70af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453315000132$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25640805$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollister, Scott J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanagan, Colleen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Paulo R</creatorcontrib><title>Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis</title><title>Medical engineering &amp; physics</title><addtitle>Med Eng Phys</addtitle><description>Abstract Bone scaffolds for tissue regeneration require an optimal trade-off between biological and mechanical criteria. Optimal designs may be obtained using topology optimization (homogenization approach) and prototypes produced using additive manufacturing techniques. However, the process from design to manufacture remains a research challenge and will be a requirement of FDA design controls to engineering scaffolds. This work investigates how the design to manufacture chain affects the reproducibility of complex optimized design characteristics in the manufactured product. The design and prototypes are analyzed taking into account the computational assumptions and the final mechanical properties determined through mechanical tests. The scaffold is an assembly of unit-cells, and thus scale size effects on the mechanical response considering finite periodicity are investigated and compared with the predictions from the homogenization method which assumes in the limit infinitely repeated unit cells. Results show that a limited number of unit-cells (3–5 repeated on a side) introduce some scale-effects but the discrepancies are below 10%. Higher discrepancies are found when comparing the experimental data to numerical simulations due to differences between the manufactured and designed scaffold feature shapes and sizes as well as micro-porosities introduced by the manufacturing process. However good regression correlations ( R2  &gt; 0.85) were found between numerical and experimental values, with slopes close to 1 for 2 out of 3 designs.</description><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Biofabrication</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - cytology</subject><subject>Bone scaffolds</subject><subject>Homogenization</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Mechanical testing</subject><subject>Multiscale models</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds</subject><issn>1350-4533</issn><issn>1873-4030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUsuO1DAQjBCIfcAvgI8cSLBj58UBaXfFS1ppD8DZcuz2rAdPPLiTlYYzH06HWfbAiZPdVnWVq7qL4qXgleCifbOtduBg2uxvD1XNRVNxUXGuHhWnou9kqbjkj-kuG16qRsqT4gxxywmhWvm0OKmbVvGeN6fFr8uQMmDKoxkjMLTG-xQdMp8yG9MEbA6ICzASCxNADtPmLbvZz2FnInOAYTO9Zt6MOVgzh0TFDuytmaiMbAacqYGZya3UEUoMP4nLe7Az0rOJBwz4rHjiTUR4fn-eF98-vP969am8vvn4-eriurTkYS5lax00TvWytrIDYagchDOq52oYOtF55UY7qLqVgtceat8P42ilHEfXcePlefHqyLvP6cdCf9O7gBZiNBOkBbVoWzEMQqqOoN0RanNCzOD1PpPlfNCC63UEeqsfRqDXEWguNAVMnS_uRZaREA99fzMnwMURAGT1LkDWaANMFlzIFIt2KfyHyLt_OGwMfzL_DgfAbVoyZUuONNaa6y_rJqyLIBpaAiFr-RvMprPN</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Coelho, Pedro G</creator><creator>Hollister, Scott J</creator><creator>Flanagan, Colleen L</creator><creator>Fernandes, Paulo R</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis</title><author>Coelho, Pedro G ; Hollister, Scott J ; Flanagan, Colleen L ; Fernandes, Paulo R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-36cde5d4832c37e1acde91da480499717f4dbc94263102fe2f89bbc33bbd70af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Biofabrication</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - cytology</topic><topic>Bone scaffolds</topic><topic>Homogenization</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Mechanical testing</topic><topic>Multiscale models</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollister, Scott J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanagan, Colleen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Paulo R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical engineering &amp; physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coelho, Pedro G</au><au>Hollister, Scott J</au><au>Flanagan, Colleen L</au><au>Fernandes, Paulo R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medical engineering &amp; physics</jtitle><addtitle>Med Eng Phys</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>287-296</pages><issn>1350-4533</issn><eissn>1873-4030</eissn><abstract>Abstract Bone scaffolds for tissue regeneration require an optimal trade-off between biological and mechanical criteria. Optimal designs may be obtained using topology optimization (homogenization approach) and prototypes produced using additive manufacturing techniques. However, the process from design to manufacture remains a research challenge and will be a requirement of FDA design controls to engineering scaffolds. This work investigates how the design to manufacture chain affects the reproducibility of complex optimized design characteristics in the manufactured product. The design and prototypes are analyzed taking into account the computational assumptions and the final mechanical properties determined through mechanical tests. The scaffold is an assembly of unit-cells, and thus scale size effects on the mechanical response considering finite periodicity are investigated and compared with the predictions from the homogenization method which assumes in the limit infinitely repeated unit cells. Results show that a limited number of unit-cells (3–5 repeated on a side) introduce some scale-effects but the discrepancies are below 10%. Higher discrepancies are found when comparing the experimental data to numerical simulations due to differences between the manufactured and designed scaffold feature shapes and sizes as well as micro-porosities introduced by the manufacturing process. However good regression correlations ( R2  &gt; 0.85) were found between numerical and experimental values, with slopes close to 1 for 2 out of 3 designs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25640805</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.01.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-4533
ispartof Medical engineering & physics, 2015-03, Vol.37 (3), p.287-296
issn 1350-4533
1873-4030
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1661991347
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biocompatible Materials
Biofabrication
Bone and Bones - cytology
Bone scaffolds
Homogenization
Materials Testing
Mechanical Phenomena
Mechanical testing
Multiscale models
Radiology
Tissue Engineering
Tissue Scaffolds
title Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T10%3A03%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioresorbable%20scaffolds%20for%20bone%20tissue%20engineering:%20Optimal%20design,%20fabrication,%20mechanical%20testing%20and%20scale-size%20effects%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Medical%20engineering%20&%20physics&rft.au=Coelho,%20Pedro%20G&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=287-296&rft.issn=1350-4533&rft.eissn=1873-4030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1661991347%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661991347&rft_id=info:pmid/25640805&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1350453315000132&rfr_iscdi=true