Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?

Introduction Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The British journal of occupational therapy 2015-02, Vol.78 (2), p.85-95
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Matthew, Mole, Callum D, Kountouriotis, Georgios K, Chisholm, Catharine, Bhakta, Bipin, Wilkie, Richard M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95
container_issue 2
container_start_page 85
container_title The British journal of occupational therapy
container_volume 78
creator Smith, Matthew
Mole, Callum D
Kountouriotis, Georgios K
Chisholm, Catharine
Bhakta, Bipin
Wilkie, Richard M
description Introduction Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment and rehabilitation of driving-related visual-motor function. Method We developed novel computerised assessments: visual search; simple reaction and decision reaction to appearing pedestrians; and pedestrian detection during simulated driving. We tested 12 patients with stroke (seven left, five right field loss) and 12 controls. Results The homonymous visual field defect group was split into adequately compensated or inadequately compensated groups based on visual search performance. The inadequately compensated group had problems with stimuli in their affected field: they tended to react more slowly than controls and in the driving task they failed to detect a number of pedestrians. In contrast, the adequately compensated group were better at detecting pedestrians, though reaction times were slightly slower than controls. Conclusion We suggest that our search task can predict, to a limited extent, whether a person with stroke compensates for visual field loss, and may potentially identify suitability for specific rehabilitation to promote return to driving.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0308022614562786
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1661621904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0308022614562786</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1661621904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb9161bf4fa5343c7c60b974a6e7ec26d96dba4bfef70ac0c7bebb76c44dde413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAUxC0EEqWwM3pkCdiOazcsCLV8SZVYYI788dy4SuJgJ0XlrydVEQMS05PufvekO4QuKbmmVMobkpM5YUxQPhNMzsURmlAuZSYIEcdosrezvX-KzlLaEMKInLMJMsvot75d40_fV7gKTWh3TRgS3vo0qBo7D7XFdUjpFi8D_OoJVDQV7iC6EBvVGsBdBOtNjyv1paLFFnowvQ_t3Tk6capOcPFzp-j98eFt8ZytXp9eFverzOQz0WdaF1RQ7bhTs5znRhpBdCG5EiDBMGELYbXi2oGTRBlipAatpTCcWwuc5lN0dfjbxfAxQOrLxicDda1aGCuVVAgqGC0IH1FyQE0cq0VwZRd9o-KupKTc71n-3XOMZIdIUmsoN2GI7Vjmf_4btQt3dw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661621904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Smith, Matthew ; Mole, Callum D ; Kountouriotis, Georgios K ; Chisholm, Catharine ; Bhakta, Bipin ; Wilkie, Richard M</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Matthew ; Mole, Callum D ; Kountouriotis, Georgios K ; Chisholm, Catharine ; Bhakta, Bipin ; Wilkie, Richard M</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment and rehabilitation of driving-related visual-motor function. Method We developed novel computerised assessments: visual search; simple reaction and decision reaction to appearing pedestrians; and pedestrian detection during simulated driving. We tested 12 patients with stroke (seven left, five right field loss) and 12 controls. Results The homonymous visual field defect group was split into adequately compensated or inadequately compensated groups based on visual search performance. The inadequately compensated group had problems with stimuli in their affected field: they tended to react more slowly than controls and in the driving task they failed to detect a number of pedestrians. In contrast, the adequately compensated group were better at detecting pedestrians, though reaction times were slightly slower than controls. Conclusion We suggest that our search task can predict, to a limited extent, whether a person with stroke compensates for visual field loss, and may potentially identify suitability for specific rehabilitation to promote return to driving.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0226</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-6006</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0308022614562786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>The British journal of occupational therapy, 2015-02, Vol.78 (2), p.85-95</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb9161bf4fa5343c7c60b974a6e7ec26d96dba4bfef70ac0c7bebb76c44dde413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb9161bf4fa5343c7c60b974a6e7ec26d96dba4bfef70ac0c7bebb76c44dde413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0308022614562786$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308022614562786$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mole, Callum D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kountouriotis, Georgios K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisholm, Catharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhakta, Bipin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkie, Richard M</creatorcontrib><title>Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?</title><title>The British journal of occupational therapy</title><description>Introduction Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment and rehabilitation of driving-related visual-motor function. Method We developed novel computerised assessments: visual search; simple reaction and decision reaction to appearing pedestrians; and pedestrian detection during simulated driving. We tested 12 patients with stroke (seven left, five right field loss) and 12 controls. Results The homonymous visual field defect group was split into adequately compensated or inadequately compensated groups based on visual search performance. The inadequately compensated group had problems with stimuli in their affected field: they tended to react more slowly than controls and in the driving task they failed to detect a number of pedestrians. In contrast, the adequately compensated group were better at detecting pedestrians, though reaction times were slightly slower than controls. Conclusion We suggest that our search task can predict, to a limited extent, whether a person with stroke compensates for visual field loss, and may potentially identify suitability for specific rehabilitation to promote return to driving.</description><issn>0308-0226</issn><issn>1477-6006</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAUxC0EEqWwM3pkCdiOazcsCLV8SZVYYI788dy4SuJgJ0XlrydVEQMS05PufvekO4QuKbmmVMobkpM5YUxQPhNMzsURmlAuZSYIEcdosrezvX-KzlLaEMKInLMJMsvot75d40_fV7gKTWh3TRgS3vo0qBo7D7XFdUjpFi8D_OoJVDQV7iC6EBvVGsBdBOtNjyv1paLFFnowvQ_t3Tk6capOcPFzp-j98eFt8ZytXp9eFverzOQz0WdaF1RQ7bhTs5znRhpBdCG5EiDBMGELYbXi2oGTRBlipAatpTCcWwuc5lN0dfjbxfAxQOrLxicDda1aGCuVVAgqGC0IH1FyQE0cq0VwZRd9o-KupKTc71n-3XOMZIdIUmsoN2GI7Vjmf_4btQt3dw</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Smith, Matthew</creator><creator>Mole, Callum D</creator><creator>Kountouriotis, Georgios K</creator><creator>Chisholm, Catharine</creator><creator>Bhakta, Bipin</creator><creator>Wilkie, Richard M</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?</title><author>Smith, Matthew ; Mole, Callum D ; Kountouriotis, Georgios K ; Chisholm, Catharine ; Bhakta, Bipin ; Wilkie, Richard M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb9161bf4fa5343c7c60b974a6e7ec26d96dba4bfef70ac0c7bebb76c44dde413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mole, Callum D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kountouriotis, Georgios K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisholm, Catharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhakta, Bipin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkie, Richard M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>The British journal of occupational therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Matthew</au><au>Mole, Callum D</au><au>Kountouriotis, Georgios K</au><au>Chisholm, Catharine</au><au>Bhakta, Bipin</au><au>Wilkie, Richard M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of occupational therapy</jtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>85-95</pages><issn>0308-0226</issn><eissn>1477-6006</eissn><abstract>Introduction Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment and rehabilitation of driving-related visual-motor function. Method We developed novel computerised assessments: visual search; simple reaction and decision reaction to appearing pedestrians; and pedestrian detection during simulated driving. We tested 12 patients with stroke (seven left, five right field loss) and 12 controls. Results The homonymous visual field defect group was split into adequately compensated or inadequately compensated groups based on visual search performance. The inadequately compensated group had problems with stimuli in their affected field: they tended to react more slowly than controls and in the driving task they failed to detect a number of pedestrians. In contrast, the adequately compensated group were better at detecting pedestrians, though reaction times were slightly slower than controls. Conclusion We suggest that our search task can predict, to a limited extent, whether a person with stroke compensates for visual field loss, and may potentially identify suitability for specific rehabilitation to promote return to driving.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0308022614562786</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-0226
ispartof The British journal of occupational therapy, 2015-02, Vol.78 (2), p.85-95
issn 0308-0226
1477-6006
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1661621904
source Access via SAGE
title Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A10%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Driving%20with%20homonymous%20visual%20field%20loss:%20Does%20visual%20search%20performance%20predict%20hazard%20detection?&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20occupational%20therapy&rft.au=Smith,%20Matthew&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=85-95&rft.issn=0308-0226&rft.eissn=1477-6006&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0308022614562786&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1661621904%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661621904&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0308022614562786&rfr_iscdi=true