Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?
Introduction Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The British journal of occupational therapy 2015-02, Vol.78 (2), p.85-95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | The British journal of occupational therapy |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Smith, Matthew Mole, Callum D Kountouriotis, Georgios K Chisholm, Catharine Bhakta, Bipin Wilkie, Richard M |
description | Introduction
Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment and rehabilitation of driving-related visual-motor function.
Method
We developed novel computerised assessments: visual search; simple reaction and decision reaction to appearing pedestrians; and pedestrian detection during simulated driving. We tested 12 patients with stroke (seven left, five right field loss) and 12 controls.
Results
The homonymous visual field defect group was split into adequately compensated or inadequately compensated groups based on visual search performance. The inadequately compensated group had problems with stimuli in their affected field: they tended to react more slowly than controls and in the driving task they failed to detect a number of pedestrians. In contrast, the adequately compensated group were better at detecting pedestrians, though reaction times were slightly slower than controls.
Conclusion
We suggest that our search task can predict, to a limited extent, whether a person with stroke compensates for visual field loss, and may potentially identify suitability for specific rehabilitation to promote return to driving. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0308022614562786 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1661621904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0308022614562786</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1661621904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb9161bf4fa5343c7c60b974a6e7ec26d96dba4bfef70ac0c7bebb76c44dde413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAUxC0EEqWwM3pkCdiOazcsCLV8SZVYYI788dy4SuJgJ0XlrydVEQMS05PufvekO4QuKbmmVMobkpM5YUxQPhNMzsURmlAuZSYIEcdosrezvX-KzlLaEMKInLMJMsvot75d40_fV7gKTWh3TRgS3vo0qBo7D7XFdUjpFi8D_OoJVDQV7iC6EBvVGsBdBOtNjyv1paLFFnowvQ_t3Tk6capOcPFzp-j98eFt8ZytXp9eFverzOQz0WdaF1RQ7bhTs5znRhpBdCG5EiDBMGELYbXi2oGTRBlipAatpTCcWwuc5lN0dfjbxfAxQOrLxicDda1aGCuVVAgqGC0IH1FyQE0cq0VwZRd9o-KupKTc71n-3XOMZIdIUmsoN2GI7Vjmf_4btQt3dw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661621904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Smith, Matthew ; Mole, Callum D ; Kountouriotis, Georgios K ; Chisholm, Catharine ; Bhakta, Bipin ; Wilkie, Richard M</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Matthew ; Mole, Callum D ; Kountouriotis, Georgios K ; Chisholm, Catharine ; Bhakta, Bipin ; Wilkie, Richard M</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment and rehabilitation of driving-related visual-motor function.
Method
We developed novel computerised assessments: visual search; simple reaction and decision reaction to appearing pedestrians; and pedestrian detection during simulated driving. We tested 12 patients with stroke (seven left, five right field loss) and 12 controls.
Results
The homonymous visual field defect group was split into adequately compensated or inadequately compensated groups based on visual search performance. The inadequately compensated group had problems with stimuli in their affected field: they tended to react more slowly than controls and in the driving task they failed to detect a number of pedestrians. In contrast, the adequately compensated group were better at detecting pedestrians, though reaction times were slightly slower than controls.
Conclusion
We suggest that our search task can predict, to a limited extent, whether a person with stroke compensates for visual field loss, and may potentially identify suitability for specific rehabilitation to promote return to driving.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0226</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-6006</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0308022614562786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>The British journal of occupational therapy, 2015-02, Vol.78 (2), p.85-95</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb9161bf4fa5343c7c60b974a6e7ec26d96dba4bfef70ac0c7bebb76c44dde413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb9161bf4fa5343c7c60b974a6e7ec26d96dba4bfef70ac0c7bebb76c44dde413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0308022614562786$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308022614562786$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mole, Callum D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kountouriotis, Georgios K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisholm, Catharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhakta, Bipin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkie, Richard M</creatorcontrib><title>Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?</title><title>The British journal of occupational therapy</title><description>Introduction
Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment and rehabilitation of driving-related visual-motor function.
Method
We developed novel computerised assessments: visual search; simple reaction and decision reaction to appearing pedestrians; and pedestrian detection during simulated driving. We tested 12 patients with stroke (seven left, five right field loss) and 12 controls.
Results
The homonymous visual field defect group was split into adequately compensated or inadequately compensated groups based on visual search performance. The inadequately compensated group had problems with stimuli in their affected field: they tended to react more slowly than controls and in the driving task they failed to detect a number of pedestrians. In contrast, the adequately compensated group were better at detecting pedestrians, though reaction times were slightly slower than controls.
Conclusion
We suggest that our search task can predict, to a limited extent, whether a person with stroke compensates for visual field loss, and may potentially identify suitability for specific rehabilitation to promote return to driving.</description><issn>0308-0226</issn><issn>1477-6006</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAUxC0EEqWwM3pkCdiOazcsCLV8SZVYYI788dy4SuJgJ0XlrydVEQMS05PufvekO4QuKbmmVMobkpM5YUxQPhNMzsURmlAuZSYIEcdosrezvX-KzlLaEMKInLMJMsvot75d40_fV7gKTWh3TRgS3vo0qBo7D7XFdUjpFi8D_OoJVDQV7iC6EBvVGsBdBOtNjyv1paLFFnowvQ_t3Tk6capOcPFzp-j98eFt8ZytXp9eFverzOQz0WdaF1RQ7bhTs5znRhpBdCG5EiDBMGELYbXi2oGTRBlipAatpTCcWwuc5lN0dfjbxfAxQOrLxicDda1aGCuVVAgqGC0IH1FyQE0cq0VwZRd9o-KupKTc71n-3XOMZIdIUmsoN2GI7Vjmf_4btQt3dw</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Smith, Matthew</creator><creator>Mole, Callum D</creator><creator>Kountouriotis, Georgios K</creator><creator>Chisholm, Catharine</creator><creator>Bhakta, Bipin</creator><creator>Wilkie, Richard M</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?</title><author>Smith, Matthew ; Mole, Callum D ; Kountouriotis, Georgios K ; Chisholm, Catharine ; Bhakta, Bipin ; Wilkie, Richard M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb9161bf4fa5343c7c60b974a6e7ec26d96dba4bfef70ac0c7bebb76c44dde413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mole, Callum D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kountouriotis, Georgios K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisholm, Catharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhakta, Bipin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkie, Richard M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>The British journal of occupational therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Matthew</au><au>Mole, Callum D</au><au>Kountouriotis, Georgios K</au><au>Chisholm, Catharine</au><au>Bhakta, Bipin</au><au>Wilkie, Richard M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection?</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of occupational therapy</jtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>85-95</pages><issn>0308-0226</issn><eissn>1477-6006</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment and rehabilitation of driving-related visual-motor function.
Method
We developed novel computerised assessments: visual search; simple reaction and decision reaction to appearing pedestrians; and pedestrian detection during simulated driving. We tested 12 patients with stroke (seven left, five right field loss) and 12 controls.
Results
The homonymous visual field defect group was split into adequately compensated or inadequately compensated groups based on visual search performance. The inadequately compensated group had problems with stimuli in their affected field: they tended to react more slowly than controls and in the driving task they failed to detect a number of pedestrians. In contrast, the adequately compensated group were better at detecting pedestrians, though reaction times were slightly slower than controls.
Conclusion
We suggest that our search task can predict, to a limited extent, whether a person with stroke compensates for visual field loss, and may potentially identify suitability for specific rehabilitation to promote return to driving.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0308022614562786</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-0226 |
ispartof | The British journal of occupational therapy, 2015-02, Vol.78 (2), p.85-95 |
issn | 0308-0226 1477-6006 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1661621904 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A10%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Driving%20with%20homonymous%20visual%20field%20loss:%20Does%20visual%20search%20performance%20predict%20hazard%20detection?&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20occupational%20therapy&rft.au=Smith,%20Matthew&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=85-95&rft.issn=0308-0226&rft.eissn=1477-6006&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0308022614562786&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1661621904%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661621904&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0308022614562786&rfr_iscdi=true |