Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers
Summary Background Chemoprophylaxis against falciparum malaria is recommended for travellers from non-endemic countries to malarious destinations, but debate continues on benefit, especially with regard to mefloquine. Quantification of benefit for travellers from the United Kingdom (UK) was modelled...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Travel medicine and infectious disease 2014-11, Vol.12 (6), p.726-732 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 732 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 726 |
container_title | Travel medicine and infectious disease |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Toovey, Stephen Nieforth, Keith Smith, Patrick Schlagenhauf, Patricia Adamcova, Miriam Tatt, Iain Tomianovic, Danitza Schnetzler, Gabriel |
description | Summary Background Chemoprophylaxis against falciparum malaria is recommended for travellers from non-endemic countries to malarious destinations, but debate continues on benefit, especially with regard to mefloquine. Quantification of benefit for travellers from the United Kingdom (UK) was modelled to assist clinical and public health decision making. Methods The model was constructed utilising: World Tourism Organization data showing total number of arrivals from the UK in countries with moderate or high malaria risk; data from a retrospective UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) drug utilisation study; additional information on chemoprophylaxis, case fatality and tolerability were derived from the travel medicine literature. Chemoprophylaxis with the following agents was considered: atovaquone-proguanil (AP), chloroquine with and without proguanil (C ± P), doxycycline (Dx), mefloquine (Mq). The model was validated for the most recent year with temporally matched datasets for UK travel destinations and imported malaria (2007) against UK Health Protection Agency data on imported malaria. Results The median (mean) duration of chemoprophylaxis for each agent in weeks (CPRD) was: AP 3.3 (3.5), C ± P 9 (12.1), Dx 8 (10.3), Mq 9 (12.3): the maximum duration of use of all regimens was 52 weeks. The model correctly predicted falciparum malaria deaths and gave a robust estimate of total cases – model: 5 deaths from 1118 cases; UK Health Protection Agency: 5 deaths from 1153 cases. The number needed to take chemoprophylaxis (NNP) to prevent a case of malaria considered against the ‘background’ reported incidence in non-users of chemoprophylaxis deemed in need of chemoprophylaxis was: C ± P 272, Dx 269, Mq 260, AP 252; the NNP to prevent a UK traveller malaria death was: C ± P 62613, Dx 61923, Mq 59973, AP 58059; increasing the ‘background’ rate by 50% yielded NNPs of: C ± P 176, Dx 175, Mq 171, AP 168. The impact of substituting atovaquone-proguanil for all mefloquine usage resulted in a 2.3% decrease in estimated infections. The number of travellers experiencing moderate adverse events (AE) or those requiring medical attention or drug withdrawal per case prevented is as follows: C ± P 170, Mq 146, Dx 114, AP 103. Conclusions The model correctly predicted the number of malaria deaths, providing a robust and reliable estimate of the number of imported malaria cases in the UK, and giving a measure of benefit derived from chemoprophylaxis use against the lik |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.08.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1661335232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1477893914001574</els_id><sourcerecordid>3559679721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3e3316924c6c9bf830d27df67f3c2f47e401b0aeba1d0c9f99a39ee1e6cd7af03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwC5BQJC5cEsYfieMDldCKAqISB9iz5djj1ksSL3Z2xf77Ot1SpF7KySP5eefrnaJ4TaAmQNr3m3oetbc1BcJr6GqA5klxSjrBKuCcPs0xF6LqJJMnxYuUNgCs6Th7XpzQhnMmpTgt1qswbnXUs99j2eOEzs9lcOWoBx29Ls01jmEbw_b6MOg_PpVjsDgMaEs_levJzzn65qcrG8Zyjnq__MX0snjm9JDw1d17VqwvPv1cfakuv3_-uvp4WRkumrliyBhpJeWmNbJ3HQNLhXWtcMxQxwVyID1o7DWxYKSTUjOJSLA1VmgH7Kx4d8ybO_y9wzSr0SeTe9AThl1SpG0JYw1l9D_QZSFS3qJvH6CbsItTHiRTvJFEQCsyxY6UiSGliE5tox91PCgCajFIbdStQWoxSEGnskFZ9eYu964f0d5r_jqSgQ9HAPPe9h6jSsbjZND6iGZWNvhHCpw_0JvBT97o4RceMP2bRCWqQP1YbmQ5EcIBSCM4uwHmObeL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1645917067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Toovey, Stephen ; Nieforth, Keith ; Smith, Patrick ; Schlagenhauf, Patricia ; Adamcova, Miriam ; Tatt, Iain ; Tomianovic, Danitza ; Schnetzler, Gabriel</creator><creatorcontrib>Toovey, Stephen ; Nieforth, Keith ; Smith, Patrick ; Schlagenhauf, Patricia ; Adamcova, Miriam ; Tatt, Iain ; Tomianovic, Danitza ; Schnetzler, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Chemoprophylaxis against falciparum malaria is recommended for travellers from non-endemic countries to malarious destinations, but debate continues on benefit, especially with regard to mefloquine. Quantification of benefit for travellers from the United Kingdom (UK) was modelled to assist clinical and public health decision making. Methods The model was constructed utilising: World Tourism Organization data showing total number of arrivals from the UK in countries with moderate or high malaria risk; data from a retrospective UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) drug utilisation study; additional information on chemoprophylaxis, case fatality and tolerability were derived from the travel medicine literature. Chemoprophylaxis with the following agents was considered: atovaquone-proguanil (AP), chloroquine with and without proguanil (C ± P), doxycycline (Dx), mefloquine (Mq). The model was validated for the most recent year with temporally matched datasets for UK travel destinations and imported malaria (2007) against UK Health Protection Agency data on imported malaria. Results The median (mean) duration of chemoprophylaxis for each agent in weeks (CPRD) was: AP 3.3 (3.5), C ± P 9 (12.1), Dx 8 (10.3), Mq 9 (12.3): the maximum duration of use of all regimens was 52 weeks. The model correctly predicted falciparum malaria deaths and gave a robust estimate of total cases – model: 5 deaths from 1118 cases; UK Health Protection Agency: 5 deaths from 1153 cases. The number needed to take chemoprophylaxis (NNP) to prevent a case of malaria considered against the ‘background’ reported incidence in non-users of chemoprophylaxis deemed in need of chemoprophylaxis was: C ± P 272, Dx 269, Mq 260, AP 252; the NNP to prevent a UK traveller malaria death was: C ± P 62613, Dx 61923, Mq 59973, AP 58059; increasing the ‘background’ rate by 50% yielded NNPs of: C ± P 176, Dx 175, Mq 171, AP 168. The impact of substituting atovaquone-proguanil for all mefloquine usage resulted in a 2.3% decrease in estimated infections. The number of travellers experiencing moderate adverse events (AE) or those requiring medical attention or drug withdrawal per case prevented is as follows: C ± P 170, Mq 146, Dx 114, AP 103. Conclusions The model correctly predicted the number of malaria deaths, providing a robust and reliable estimate of the number of imported malaria cases in the UK, and giving a measure of benefit derived from chemoprophylaxis use against the likely adverse events generated. Overall numbers needed to prevent a malaria infection are comparable among the four options and are sensitive to changes in the background infection rates. Only a limited impact on the number of infections can be expected if Mq is substituted by AP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-8939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.08.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25443997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antimalarials - therapeutic use ; Atovaquone - adverse effects ; Atovaquone - therapeutic use ; Atovaquone-proguanil ; Calendars ; Chemoprevention - methods ; Chloroquine ; Chloroquine - adverse effects ; Chloroquine - therapeutic use ; Doxycycline ; Doxycycline - adverse effects ; Doxycycline - therapeutic use ; Drug Combinations ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Drug Utilization - statistics & numerical data ; Fatalities ; Health risks ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious Disease ; Malaria ; Malaria - epidemiology ; Malaria - mortality ; Malaria - prevention & control ; Malaria, Falciparum - epidemiology ; Malaria, Falciparum - mortality ; Malaria, Falciparum - prevention & control ; Mefloquine ; Mefloquine - adverse effects ; Mefloquine - therapeutic use ; Models, Statistical ; Mortality ; Proguanil - adverse effects ; Proguanil - therapeutic use ; Prophylaxis ; Public health ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Studies ; Tourism ; Travel ; Travel medicine ; United Kingdom ; Vector-borne diseases</subject><ispartof>Travel medicine and infectious disease, 2014-11, Vol.12 (6), p.726-732</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3e3316924c6c9bf830d27df67f3c2f47e401b0aeba1d0c9f99a39ee1e6cd7af03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3e3316924c6c9bf830d27df67f3c2f47e401b0aeba1d0c9f99a39ee1e6cd7af03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5582-5785</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1645917067?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25443997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toovey, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieforth, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamcova, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatt, Iain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomianovic, Danitza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnetzler, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers</title><title>Travel medicine and infectious disease</title><addtitle>Travel Med Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Summary Background Chemoprophylaxis against falciparum malaria is recommended for travellers from non-endemic countries to malarious destinations, but debate continues on benefit, especially with regard to mefloquine. Quantification of benefit for travellers from the United Kingdom (UK) was modelled to assist clinical and public health decision making. Methods The model was constructed utilising: World Tourism Organization data showing total number of arrivals from the UK in countries with moderate or high malaria risk; data from a retrospective UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) drug utilisation study; additional information on chemoprophylaxis, case fatality and tolerability were derived from the travel medicine literature. Chemoprophylaxis with the following agents was considered: atovaquone-proguanil (AP), chloroquine with and without proguanil (C ± P), doxycycline (Dx), mefloquine (Mq). The model was validated for the most recent year with temporally matched datasets for UK travel destinations and imported malaria (2007) against UK Health Protection Agency data on imported malaria. Results The median (mean) duration of chemoprophylaxis for each agent in weeks (CPRD) was: AP 3.3 (3.5), C ± P 9 (12.1), Dx 8 (10.3), Mq 9 (12.3): the maximum duration of use of all regimens was 52 weeks. The model correctly predicted falciparum malaria deaths and gave a robust estimate of total cases – model: 5 deaths from 1118 cases; UK Health Protection Agency: 5 deaths from 1153 cases. The number needed to take chemoprophylaxis (NNP) to prevent a case of malaria considered against the ‘background’ reported incidence in non-users of chemoprophylaxis deemed in need of chemoprophylaxis was: C ± P 272, Dx 269, Mq 260, AP 252; the NNP to prevent a UK traveller malaria death was: C ± P 62613, Dx 61923, Mq 59973, AP 58059; increasing the ‘background’ rate by 50% yielded NNPs of: C ± P 176, Dx 175, Mq 171, AP 168. The impact of substituting atovaquone-proguanil for all mefloquine usage resulted in a 2.3% decrease in estimated infections. The number of travellers experiencing moderate adverse events (AE) or those requiring medical attention or drug withdrawal per case prevented is as follows: C ± P 170, Mq 146, Dx 114, AP 103. Conclusions The model correctly predicted the number of malaria deaths, providing a robust and reliable estimate of the number of imported malaria cases in the UK, and giving a measure of benefit derived from chemoprophylaxis use against the likely adverse events generated. Overall numbers needed to prevent a malaria infection are comparable among the four options and are sensitive to changes in the background infection rates. Only a limited impact on the number of infections can be expected if Mq is substituted by AP.</description><subject>Antimalarials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Atovaquone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Atovaquone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Atovaquone-proguanil</subject><subject>Calendars</subject><subject>Chemoprevention - methods</subject><subject>Chloroquine</subject><subject>Chloroquine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Chloroquine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Doxycycline</subject><subject>Doxycycline - adverse effects</subject><subject>Doxycycline - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Drug Utilization - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Malaria - epidemiology</subject><subject>Malaria - mortality</subject><subject>Malaria - prevention & control</subject><subject>Malaria, Falciparum - epidemiology</subject><subject>Malaria, Falciparum - mortality</subject><subject>Malaria, Falciparum - prevention & control</subject><subject>Mefloquine</subject><subject>Mefloquine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mefloquine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Proguanil - adverse effects</subject><subject>Proguanil - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel medicine</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><issn>1477-8939</issn><issn>1873-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwC5BQJC5cEsYfieMDldCKAqISB9iz5djj1ksSL3Z2xf77Ot1SpF7KySP5eefrnaJ4TaAmQNr3m3oetbc1BcJr6GqA5klxSjrBKuCcPs0xF6LqJJMnxYuUNgCs6Th7XpzQhnMmpTgt1qswbnXUs99j2eOEzs9lcOWoBx29Ls01jmEbw_b6MOg_PpVjsDgMaEs_levJzzn65qcrG8Zyjnq__MX0snjm9JDw1d17VqwvPv1cfakuv3_-uvp4WRkumrliyBhpJeWmNbJ3HQNLhXWtcMxQxwVyID1o7DWxYKSTUjOJSLA1VmgH7Kx4d8ybO_y9wzSr0SeTe9AThl1SpG0JYw1l9D_QZSFS3qJvH6CbsItTHiRTvJFEQCsyxY6UiSGliE5tox91PCgCajFIbdStQWoxSEGnskFZ9eYu964f0d5r_jqSgQ9HAPPe9h6jSsbjZND6iGZWNvhHCpw_0JvBT97o4RceMP2bRCWqQP1YbmQ5EcIBSCM4uwHmObeL</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Toovey, Stephen</creator><creator>Nieforth, Keith</creator><creator>Smith, Patrick</creator><creator>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</creator><creator>Adamcova, Miriam</creator><creator>Tatt, Iain</creator><creator>Tomianovic, Danitza</creator><creator>Schnetzler, Gabriel</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-5785</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers</title><author>Toovey, Stephen ; Nieforth, Keith ; Smith, Patrick ; Schlagenhauf, Patricia ; Adamcova, Miriam ; Tatt, Iain ; Tomianovic, Danitza ; Schnetzler, Gabriel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3e3316924c6c9bf830d27df67f3c2f47e401b0aeba1d0c9f99a39ee1e6cd7af03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Antimalarials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Atovaquone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Atovaquone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Atovaquone-proguanil</topic><topic>Calendars</topic><topic>Chemoprevention - methods</topic><topic>Chloroquine</topic><topic>Chloroquine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Chloroquine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Doxycycline</topic><topic>Doxycycline - adverse effects</topic><topic>Doxycycline - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Drug Utilization - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Malaria - epidemiology</topic><topic>Malaria - mortality</topic><topic>Malaria - prevention & control</topic><topic>Malaria, Falciparum - epidemiology</topic><topic>Malaria, Falciparum - mortality</topic><topic>Malaria, Falciparum - prevention & control</topic><topic>Mefloquine</topic><topic>Mefloquine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mefloquine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Proguanil - adverse effects</topic><topic>Proguanil - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel medicine</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toovey, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieforth, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamcova, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatt, Iain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomianovic, Danitza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnetzler, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Travel medicine and infectious disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toovey, Stephen</au><au>Nieforth, Keith</au><au>Smith, Patrick</au><au>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</au><au>Adamcova, Miriam</au><au>Tatt, Iain</au><au>Tomianovic, Danitza</au><au>Schnetzler, Gabriel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers</atitle><jtitle>Travel medicine and infectious disease</jtitle><addtitle>Travel Med Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>726</spage><epage>732</epage><pages>726-732</pages><issn>1477-8939</issn><eissn>1873-0442</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Chemoprophylaxis against falciparum malaria is recommended for travellers from non-endemic countries to malarious destinations, but debate continues on benefit, especially with regard to mefloquine. Quantification of benefit for travellers from the United Kingdom (UK) was modelled to assist clinical and public health decision making. Methods The model was constructed utilising: World Tourism Organization data showing total number of arrivals from the UK in countries with moderate or high malaria risk; data from a retrospective UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) drug utilisation study; additional information on chemoprophylaxis, case fatality and tolerability were derived from the travel medicine literature. Chemoprophylaxis with the following agents was considered: atovaquone-proguanil (AP), chloroquine with and without proguanil (C ± P), doxycycline (Dx), mefloquine (Mq). The model was validated for the most recent year with temporally matched datasets for UK travel destinations and imported malaria (2007) against UK Health Protection Agency data on imported malaria. Results The median (mean) duration of chemoprophylaxis for each agent in weeks (CPRD) was: AP 3.3 (3.5), C ± P 9 (12.1), Dx 8 (10.3), Mq 9 (12.3): the maximum duration of use of all regimens was 52 weeks. The model correctly predicted falciparum malaria deaths and gave a robust estimate of total cases – model: 5 deaths from 1118 cases; UK Health Protection Agency: 5 deaths from 1153 cases. The number needed to take chemoprophylaxis (NNP) to prevent a case of malaria considered against the ‘background’ reported incidence in non-users of chemoprophylaxis deemed in need of chemoprophylaxis was: C ± P 272, Dx 269, Mq 260, AP 252; the NNP to prevent a UK traveller malaria death was: C ± P 62613, Dx 61923, Mq 59973, AP 58059; increasing the ‘background’ rate by 50% yielded NNPs of: C ± P 176, Dx 175, Mq 171, AP 168. The impact of substituting atovaquone-proguanil for all mefloquine usage resulted in a 2.3% decrease in estimated infections. The number of travellers experiencing moderate adverse events (AE) or those requiring medical attention or drug withdrawal per case prevented is as follows: C ± P 170, Mq 146, Dx 114, AP 103. Conclusions The model correctly predicted the number of malaria deaths, providing a robust and reliable estimate of the number of imported malaria cases in the UK, and giving a measure of benefit derived from chemoprophylaxis use against the likely adverse events generated. Overall numbers needed to prevent a malaria infection are comparable among the four options and are sensitive to changes in the background infection rates. Only a limited impact on the number of infections can be expected if Mq is substituted by AP.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25443997</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.08.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-5785</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-8939 |
ispartof | Travel medicine and infectious disease, 2014-11, Vol.12 (6), p.726-732 |
issn | 1477-8939 1873-0442 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1661335232 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Antimalarials - therapeutic use Atovaquone - adverse effects Atovaquone - therapeutic use Atovaquone-proguanil Calendars Chemoprevention - methods Chloroquine Chloroquine - adverse effects Chloroquine - therapeutic use Doxycycline Doxycycline - adverse effects Doxycycline - therapeutic use Drug Combinations Drug Therapy, Combination Drug Utilization - statistics & numerical data Fatalities Health risks Humans Infections Infectious Disease Malaria Malaria - epidemiology Malaria - mortality Malaria - prevention & control Malaria, Falciparum - epidemiology Malaria, Falciparum - mortality Malaria, Falciparum - prevention & control Mefloquine Mefloquine - adverse effects Mefloquine - therapeutic use Models, Statistical Mortality Proguanil - adverse effects Proguanil - therapeutic use Prophylaxis Public health Retrospective Studies Risk Studies Tourism Travel Travel medicine United Kingdom Vector-borne diseases |
title | Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T17%3A05%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20benefit%20of%20malaria%20chemoprophylaxis%20modelled%20in%20United%20Kingdom%20travellers&rft.jtitle=Travel%20medicine%20and%20infectious%20disease&rft.au=Toovey,%20Stephen&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=726&rft.epage=732&rft.pages=726-732&rft.issn=1477-8939&rft.eissn=1873-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.08.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3559679721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1645917067&rft_id=info:pmid/25443997&rft_els_id=S1477893914001574&rfr_iscdi=true |