Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers

Summary Background Chemoprophylaxis against falciparum malaria is recommended for travellers from non-endemic countries to malarious destinations, but debate continues on benefit, especially with regard to mefloquine. Quantification of benefit for travellers from the United Kingdom (UK) was modelled...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Travel medicine and infectious disease 2014-11, Vol.12 (6), p.726-732
Hauptverfasser: Toovey, Stephen, Nieforth, Keith, Smith, Patrick, Schlagenhauf, Patricia, Adamcova, Miriam, Tatt, Iain, Tomianovic, Danitza, Schnetzler, Gabriel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 732
container_issue 6
container_start_page 726
container_title Travel medicine and infectious disease
container_volume 12
creator Toovey, Stephen
Nieforth, Keith
Smith, Patrick
Schlagenhauf, Patricia
Adamcova, Miriam
Tatt, Iain
Tomianovic, Danitza
Schnetzler, Gabriel
description Summary Background Chemoprophylaxis against falciparum malaria is recommended for travellers from non-endemic countries to malarious destinations, but debate continues on benefit, especially with regard to mefloquine. Quantification of benefit for travellers from the United Kingdom (UK) was modelled to assist clinical and public health decision making. Methods The model was constructed utilising: World Tourism Organization data showing total number of arrivals from the UK in countries with moderate or high malaria risk; data from a retrospective UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) drug utilisation study; additional information on chemoprophylaxis, case fatality and tolerability were derived from the travel medicine literature. Chemoprophylaxis with the following agents was considered: atovaquone-proguanil (AP), chloroquine with and without proguanil (C ± P), doxycycline (Dx), mefloquine (Mq). The model was validated for the most recent year with temporally matched datasets for UK travel destinations and imported malaria (2007) against UK Health Protection Agency data on imported malaria. Results The median (mean) duration of chemoprophylaxis for each agent in weeks (CPRD) was: AP 3.3 (3.5), C ± P 9 (12.1), Dx 8 (10.3), Mq 9 (12.3): the maximum duration of use of all regimens was 52 weeks. The model correctly predicted falciparum malaria deaths and gave a robust estimate of total cases – model: 5 deaths from 1118 cases; UK Health Protection Agency: 5 deaths from 1153 cases. The number needed to take chemoprophylaxis (NNP) to prevent a case of malaria considered against the ‘background’ reported incidence in non-users of chemoprophylaxis deemed in need of chemoprophylaxis was: C ± P 272, Dx 269, Mq 260, AP 252; the NNP to prevent a UK traveller malaria death was: C ± P 62613, Dx 61923, Mq 59973, AP 58059; increasing the ‘background’ rate by 50% yielded NNPs of: C ± P 176, Dx 175, Mq 171, AP 168. The impact of substituting atovaquone-proguanil for all mefloquine usage resulted in a 2.3% decrease in estimated infections. The number of travellers experiencing moderate adverse events (AE) or those requiring medical attention or drug withdrawal per case prevented is as follows: C ± P 170, Mq 146, Dx 114, AP 103. Conclusions The model correctly predicted the number of malaria deaths, providing a robust and reliable estimate of the number of imported malaria cases in the UK, and giving a measure of benefit derived from chemoprophylaxis use against the lik
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.08.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1661335232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1477893914001574</els_id><sourcerecordid>3559679721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3e3316924c6c9bf830d27df67f3c2f47e401b0aeba1d0c9f99a39ee1e6cd7af03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwC5BQJC5cEsYfieMDldCKAqISB9iz5djj1ksSL3Z2xf77Ot1SpF7KySP5eefrnaJ4TaAmQNr3m3oetbc1BcJr6GqA5klxSjrBKuCcPs0xF6LqJJMnxYuUNgCs6Th7XpzQhnMmpTgt1qswbnXUs99j2eOEzs9lcOWoBx29Ls01jmEbw_b6MOg_PpVjsDgMaEs_levJzzn65qcrG8Zyjnq__MX0snjm9JDw1d17VqwvPv1cfakuv3_-uvp4WRkumrliyBhpJeWmNbJ3HQNLhXWtcMxQxwVyID1o7DWxYKSTUjOJSLA1VmgH7Kx4d8ybO_y9wzSr0SeTe9AThl1SpG0JYw1l9D_QZSFS3qJvH6CbsItTHiRTvJFEQCsyxY6UiSGliE5tox91PCgCajFIbdStQWoxSEGnskFZ9eYu964f0d5r_jqSgQ9HAPPe9h6jSsbjZND6iGZWNvhHCpw_0JvBT97o4RceMP2bRCWqQP1YbmQ5EcIBSCM4uwHmObeL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1645917067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Toovey, Stephen ; Nieforth, Keith ; Smith, Patrick ; Schlagenhauf, Patricia ; Adamcova, Miriam ; Tatt, Iain ; Tomianovic, Danitza ; Schnetzler, Gabriel</creator><creatorcontrib>Toovey, Stephen ; Nieforth, Keith ; Smith, Patrick ; Schlagenhauf, Patricia ; Adamcova, Miriam ; Tatt, Iain ; Tomianovic, Danitza ; Schnetzler, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Chemoprophylaxis against falciparum malaria is recommended for travellers from non-endemic countries to malarious destinations, but debate continues on benefit, especially with regard to mefloquine. Quantification of benefit for travellers from the United Kingdom (UK) was modelled to assist clinical and public health decision making. Methods The model was constructed utilising: World Tourism Organization data showing total number of arrivals from the UK in countries with moderate or high malaria risk; data from a retrospective UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) drug utilisation study; additional information on chemoprophylaxis, case fatality and tolerability were derived from the travel medicine literature. Chemoprophylaxis with the following agents was considered: atovaquone-proguanil (AP), chloroquine with and without proguanil (C ± P), doxycycline (Dx), mefloquine (Mq). The model was validated for the most recent year with temporally matched datasets for UK travel destinations and imported malaria (2007) against UK Health Protection Agency data on imported malaria. Results The median (mean) duration of chemoprophylaxis for each agent in weeks (CPRD) was: AP 3.3 (3.5), C ± P 9 (12.1), Dx 8 (10.3), Mq 9 (12.3): the maximum duration of use of all regimens was 52 weeks. The model correctly predicted falciparum malaria deaths and gave a robust estimate of total cases – model: 5 deaths from 1118 cases; UK Health Protection Agency: 5 deaths from 1153 cases. The number needed to take chemoprophylaxis (NNP) to prevent a case of malaria considered against the ‘background’ reported incidence in non-users of chemoprophylaxis deemed in need of chemoprophylaxis was: C ± P 272, Dx 269, Mq 260, AP 252; the NNP to prevent a UK traveller malaria death was: C ± P 62613, Dx 61923, Mq 59973, AP 58059; increasing the ‘background’ rate by 50% yielded NNPs of: C ± P 176, Dx 175, Mq 171, AP 168. The impact of substituting atovaquone-proguanil for all mefloquine usage resulted in a 2.3% decrease in estimated infections. The number of travellers experiencing moderate adverse events (AE) or those requiring medical attention or drug withdrawal per case prevented is as follows: C ± P 170, Mq 146, Dx 114, AP 103. Conclusions The model correctly predicted the number of malaria deaths, providing a robust and reliable estimate of the number of imported malaria cases in the UK, and giving a measure of benefit derived from chemoprophylaxis use against the likely adverse events generated. Overall numbers needed to prevent a malaria infection are comparable among the four options and are sensitive to changes in the background infection rates. Only a limited impact on the number of infections can be expected if Mq is substituted by AP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-8939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.08.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25443997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antimalarials - therapeutic use ; Atovaquone - adverse effects ; Atovaquone - therapeutic use ; Atovaquone-proguanil ; Calendars ; Chemoprevention - methods ; Chloroquine ; Chloroquine - adverse effects ; Chloroquine - therapeutic use ; Doxycycline ; Doxycycline - adverse effects ; Doxycycline - therapeutic use ; Drug Combinations ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Fatalities ; Health risks ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious Disease ; Malaria ; Malaria - epidemiology ; Malaria - mortality ; Malaria - prevention &amp; control ; Malaria, Falciparum - epidemiology ; Malaria, Falciparum - mortality ; Malaria, Falciparum - prevention &amp; control ; Mefloquine ; Mefloquine - adverse effects ; Mefloquine - therapeutic use ; Models, Statistical ; Mortality ; Proguanil - adverse effects ; Proguanil - therapeutic use ; Prophylaxis ; Public health ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Studies ; Tourism ; Travel ; Travel medicine ; United Kingdom ; Vector-borne diseases</subject><ispartof>Travel medicine and infectious disease, 2014-11, Vol.12 (6), p.726-732</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3e3316924c6c9bf830d27df67f3c2f47e401b0aeba1d0c9f99a39ee1e6cd7af03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3e3316924c6c9bf830d27df67f3c2f47e401b0aeba1d0c9f99a39ee1e6cd7af03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5582-5785</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1645917067?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25443997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toovey, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieforth, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamcova, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatt, Iain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomianovic, Danitza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnetzler, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers</title><title>Travel medicine and infectious disease</title><addtitle>Travel Med Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Summary Background Chemoprophylaxis against falciparum malaria is recommended for travellers from non-endemic countries to malarious destinations, but debate continues on benefit, especially with regard to mefloquine. Quantification of benefit for travellers from the United Kingdom (UK) was modelled to assist clinical and public health decision making. Methods The model was constructed utilising: World Tourism Organization data showing total number of arrivals from the UK in countries with moderate or high malaria risk; data from a retrospective UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) drug utilisation study; additional information on chemoprophylaxis, case fatality and tolerability were derived from the travel medicine literature. Chemoprophylaxis with the following agents was considered: atovaquone-proguanil (AP), chloroquine with and without proguanil (C ± P), doxycycline (Dx), mefloquine (Mq). The model was validated for the most recent year with temporally matched datasets for UK travel destinations and imported malaria (2007) against UK Health Protection Agency data on imported malaria. Results The median (mean) duration of chemoprophylaxis for each agent in weeks (CPRD) was: AP 3.3 (3.5), C ± P 9 (12.1), Dx 8 (10.3), Mq 9 (12.3): the maximum duration of use of all regimens was 52 weeks. The model correctly predicted falciparum malaria deaths and gave a robust estimate of total cases – model: 5 deaths from 1118 cases; UK Health Protection Agency: 5 deaths from 1153 cases. The number needed to take chemoprophylaxis (NNP) to prevent a case of malaria considered against the ‘background’ reported incidence in non-users of chemoprophylaxis deemed in need of chemoprophylaxis was: C ± P 272, Dx 269, Mq 260, AP 252; the NNP to prevent a UK traveller malaria death was: C ± P 62613, Dx 61923, Mq 59973, AP 58059; increasing the ‘background’ rate by 50% yielded NNPs of: C ± P 176, Dx 175, Mq 171, AP 168. The impact of substituting atovaquone-proguanil for all mefloquine usage resulted in a 2.3% decrease in estimated infections. The number of travellers experiencing moderate adverse events (AE) or those requiring medical attention or drug withdrawal per case prevented is as follows: C ± P 170, Mq 146, Dx 114, AP 103. Conclusions The model correctly predicted the number of malaria deaths, providing a robust and reliable estimate of the number of imported malaria cases in the UK, and giving a measure of benefit derived from chemoprophylaxis use against the likely adverse events generated. Overall numbers needed to prevent a malaria infection are comparable among the four options and are sensitive to changes in the background infection rates. Only a limited impact on the number of infections can be expected if Mq is substituted by AP.</description><subject>Antimalarials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Atovaquone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Atovaquone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Atovaquone-proguanil</subject><subject>Calendars</subject><subject>Chemoprevention - methods</subject><subject>Chloroquine</subject><subject>Chloroquine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Chloroquine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Doxycycline</subject><subject>Doxycycline - adverse effects</subject><subject>Doxycycline - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Malaria - epidemiology</subject><subject>Malaria - mortality</subject><subject>Malaria - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Malaria, Falciparum - epidemiology</subject><subject>Malaria, Falciparum - mortality</subject><subject>Malaria, Falciparum - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Mefloquine</subject><subject>Mefloquine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mefloquine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Proguanil - adverse effects</subject><subject>Proguanil - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel medicine</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><issn>1477-8939</issn><issn>1873-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwC5BQJC5cEsYfieMDldCKAqISB9iz5djj1ksSL3Z2xf77Ot1SpF7KySP5eefrnaJ4TaAmQNr3m3oetbc1BcJr6GqA5klxSjrBKuCcPs0xF6LqJJMnxYuUNgCs6Th7XpzQhnMmpTgt1qswbnXUs99j2eOEzs9lcOWoBx29Ls01jmEbw_b6MOg_PpVjsDgMaEs_levJzzn65qcrG8Zyjnq__MX0snjm9JDw1d17VqwvPv1cfakuv3_-uvp4WRkumrliyBhpJeWmNbJ3HQNLhXWtcMxQxwVyID1o7DWxYKSTUjOJSLA1VmgH7Kx4d8ybO_y9wzSr0SeTe9AThl1SpG0JYw1l9D_QZSFS3qJvH6CbsItTHiRTvJFEQCsyxY6UiSGliE5tox91PCgCajFIbdStQWoxSEGnskFZ9eYu964f0d5r_jqSgQ9HAPPe9h6jSsbjZND6iGZWNvhHCpw_0JvBT97o4RceMP2bRCWqQP1YbmQ5EcIBSCM4uwHmObeL</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Toovey, Stephen</creator><creator>Nieforth, Keith</creator><creator>Smith, Patrick</creator><creator>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</creator><creator>Adamcova, Miriam</creator><creator>Tatt, Iain</creator><creator>Tomianovic, Danitza</creator><creator>Schnetzler, Gabriel</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-5785</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers</title><author>Toovey, Stephen ; Nieforth, Keith ; Smith, Patrick ; Schlagenhauf, Patricia ; Adamcova, Miriam ; Tatt, Iain ; Tomianovic, Danitza ; Schnetzler, Gabriel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3e3316924c6c9bf830d27df67f3c2f47e401b0aeba1d0c9f99a39ee1e6cd7af03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Antimalarials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Atovaquone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Atovaquone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Atovaquone-proguanil</topic><topic>Calendars</topic><topic>Chemoprevention - methods</topic><topic>Chloroquine</topic><topic>Chloroquine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Chloroquine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Doxycycline</topic><topic>Doxycycline - adverse effects</topic><topic>Doxycycline - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Malaria - epidemiology</topic><topic>Malaria - mortality</topic><topic>Malaria - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Malaria, Falciparum - epidemiology</topic><topic>Malaria, Falciparum - mortality</topic><topic>Malaria, Falciparum - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Mefloquine</topic><topic>Mefloquine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mefloquine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Proguanil - adverse effects</topic><topic>Proguanil - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel medicine</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toovey, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieforth, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamcova, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatt, Iain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomianovic, Danitza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnetzler, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Travel medicine and infectious disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toovey, Stephen</au><au>Nieforth, Keith</au><au>Smith, Patrick</au><au>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</au><au>Adamcova, Miriam</au><au>Tatt, Iain</au><au>Tomianovic, Danitza</au><au>Schnetzler, Gabriel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers</atitle><jtitle>Travel medicine and infectious disease</jtitle><addtitle>Travel Med Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>726</spage><epage>732</epage><pages>726-732</pages><issn>1477-8939</issn><eissn>1873-0442</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Chemoprophylaxis against falciparum malaria is recommended for travellers from non-endemic countries to malarious destinations, but debate continues on benefit, especially with regard to mefloquine. Quantification of benefit for travellers from the United Kingdom (UK) was modelled to assist clinical and public health decision making. Methods The model was constructed utilising: World Tourism Organization data showing total number of arrivals from the UK in countries with moderate or high malaria risk; data from a retrospective UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) drug utilisation study; additional information on chemoprophylaxis, case fatality and tolerability were derived from the travel medicine literature. Chemoprophylaxis with the following agents was considered: atovaquone-proguanil (AP), chloroquine with and without proguanil (C ± P), doxycycline (Dx), mefloquine (Mq). The model was validated for the most recent year with temporally matched datasets for UK travel destinations and imported malaria (2007) against UK Health Protection Agency data on imported malaria. Results The median (mean) duration of chemoprophylaxis for each agent in weeks (CPRD) was: AP 3.3 (3.5), C ± P 9 (12.1), Dx 8 (10.3), Mq 9 (12.3): the maximum duration of use of all regimens was 52 weeks. The model correctly predicted falciparum malaria deaths and gave a robust estimate of total cases – model: 5 deaths from 1118 cases; UK Health Protection Agency: 5 deaths from 1153 cases. The number needed to take chemoprophylaxis (NNP) to prevent a case of malaria considered against the ‘background’ reported incidence in non-users of chemoprophylaxis deemed in need of chemoprophylaxis was: C ± P 272, Dx 269, Mq 260, AP 252; the NNP to prevent a UK traveller malaria death was: C ± P 62613, Dx 61923, Mq 59973, AP 58059; increasing the ‘background’ rate by 50% yielded NNPs of: C ± P 176, Dx 175, Mq 171, AP 168. The impact of substituting atovaquone-proguanil for all mefloquine usage resulted in a 2.3% decrease in estimated infections. The number of travellers experiencing moderate adverse events (AE) or those requiring medical attention or drug withdrawal per case prevented is as follows: C ± P 170, Mq 146, Dx 114, AP 103. Conclusions The model correctly predicted the number of malaria deaths, providing a robust and reliable estimate of the number of imported malaria cases in the UK, and giving a measure of benefit derived from chemoprophylaxis use against the likely adverse events generated. Overall numbers needed to prevent a malaria infection are comparable among the four options and are sensitive to changes in the background infection rates. Only a limited impact on the number of infections can be expected if Mq is substituted by AP.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25443997</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.08.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-5785</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-8939
ispartof Travel medicine and infectious disease, 2014-11, Vol.12 (6), p.726-732
issn 1477-8939
1873-0442
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1661335232
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Antimalarials - therapeutic use
Atovaquone - adverse effects
Atovaquone - therapeutic use
Atovaquone-proguanil
Calendars
Chemoprevention - methods
Chloroquine
Chloroquine - adverse effects
Chloroquine - therapeutic use
Doxycycline
Doxycycline - adverse effects
Doxycycline - therapeutic use
Drug Combinations
Drug Therapy, Combination
Drug Utilization - statistics & numerical data
Fatalities
Health risks
Humans
Infections
Infectious Disease
Malaria
Malaria - epidemiology
Malaria - mortality
Malaria - prevention & control
Malaria, Falciparum - epidemiology
Malaria, Falciparum - mortality
Malaria, Falciparum - prevention & control
Mefloquine
Mefloquine - adverse effects
Mefloquine - therapeutic use
Models, Statistical
Mortality
Proguanil - adverse effects
Proguanil - therapeutic use
Prophylaxis
Public health
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Studies
Tourism
Travel
Travel medicine
United Kingdom
Vector-borne diseases
title Comparative benefit of malaria chemoprophylaxis modelled in United Kingdom travellers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T17%3A05%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20benefit%20of%20malaria%20chemoprophylaxis%20modelled%20in%20United%20Kingdom%20travellers&rft.jtitle=Travel%20medicine%20and%20infectious%20disease&rft.au=Toovey,%20Stephen&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=726&rft.epage=732&rft.pages=726-732&rft.issn=1477-8939&rft.eissn=1873-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.08.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3559679721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1645917067&rft_id=info:pmid/25443997&rft_els_id=S1477893914001574&rfr_iscdi=true