Operationalizing protocol differences for EADC-ADNI manual hippocampal segmentation

Abstract Background Hippocampal volumetry on magnetic resonance imaging is recognized as an Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker, and manual segmentation is the gold standard for measurement. However, a standard procedure is lacking. We operationalize and quantitate landmark differences to help a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2015-02, Vol.11 (2), p.184-194
Hauptverfasser: Boccardi, Marina, Bocchetta, Martina, Ganzola, Rossana, Robitaille, Nicolas, Redolfi, Alberto, Duchesne, Simon, Jack, Clifford R, Frisoni, Giovanni B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 194
container_issue 2
container_start_page 184
container_title Alzheimer's & dementia
container_volume 11
creator Boccardi, Marina
Bocchetta, Martina
Ganzola, Rossana
Robitaille, Nicolas
Redolfi, Alberto
Duchesne, Simon
Jack, Clifford R
Frisoni, Giovanni B
description Abstract Background Hippocampal volumetry on magnetic resonance imaging is recognized as an Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker, and manual segmentation is the gold standard for measurement. However, a standard procedure is lacking. We operationalize and quantitate landmark differences to help a Delphi panel converge on a set of landmarks. Methods One hundred percent of anatomic landmark variability across 12 different protocols for manual segmentation was reduced into four segmentation units (the minimum hippocampus, the alveus/fimbria, the tail, and the subiculum), which were segmented on magnetic resonance images by expert raters to estimate reliability and AD-related atrophy. Results Intra- and interrater reliability were more than 0.96 and 0.92, respectively, except for the alveus/fimbria, which were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. Of all AD-related atrophy, the minimum hippocampus contributed to 67%; tail, 24%; alveus/fimbria, 4%; and the subiculum, 5%. Conclusions Anatomic landmark variability in available protocols can be reduced to four discrete and measurable segmentation units. Their quantitative assessment will help a Delphi panel to define a set of landmarks for a harmonized protocol.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.03.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660661554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1552526013000782</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660661554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6491-ca3d9d1fd04e639bc577c5b6bc7a9d0874ca05fa6197cba5670a6ec8ce459fe63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhi0EomXhBTigHLlkGSexvZEQUrQt0GpFD4ULF8txJsXBiVM7AW2fHoeUHjggJMszsv75Z_R5CHlJYUuB8jfdtlP2bpsBzbcQD9BH5JQylqUsE-Xjh5zDCXkWQgdQwI6yp-QkywVwRtkpub4a0avJuEFZc2eGm2T0bnLa2aQxbYseB40haZ1PzquzfVqdfbpIejXMyibfzDg6rfox5gFvehym307PyZNW2YAv7uOGfHl__nn_MT1cfbjYV4dU86KkqVZ5Uza0baBAnpe1ZkJoVvNaC1U2sBOFVsBaxWkpdK0YF6A46p3GgpVtLNmQ16tvHPl2xjDJ3gSN1qoB3Rwk5Rw4jxCKKM1WqfYuBI-tHL3plT9KCnKBKTu5wJQLTAnxxLghr-7957rH5qHkD70oqFbBT2Px-B-Wsjp8vbyM1_IG-drk7eqBkdQPg14GbRbojfGoJ9k48-8Z3_1Vrq0ZjFb2Ox4xdG728WcjCxkyCfJ6WYllI2J7ALHL8l8Rzq7i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660661554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Operationalizing protocol differences for EADC-ADNI manual hippocampal segmentation</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Boccardi, Marina ; Bocchetta, Martina ; Ganzola, Rossana ; Robitaille, Nicolas ; Redolfi, Alberto ; Duchesne, Simon ; Jack, Clifford R ; Frisoni, Giovanni B</creator><creatorcontrib>Boccardi, Marina ; Bocchetta, Martina ; Ganzola, Rossana ; Robitaille, Nicolas ; Redolfi, Alberto ; Duchesne, Simon ; Jack, Clifford R ; Frisoni, Giovanni B ; EADC-ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative ; EADC‐ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Hippocampal volumetry on magnetic resonance imaging is recognized as an Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker, and manual segmentation is the gold standard for measurement. However, a standard procedure is lacking. We operationalize and quantitate landmark differences to help a Delphi panel converge on a set of landmarks. Methods One hundred percent of anatomic landmark variability across 12 different protocols for manual segmentation was reduced into four segmentation units (the minimum hippocampus, the alveus/fimbria, the tail, and the subiculum), which were segmented on magnetic resonance images by expert raters to estimate reliability and AD-related atrophy. Results Intra- and interrater reliability were more than 0.96 and 0.92, respectively, except for the alveus/fimbria, which were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. Of all AD-related atrophy, the minimum hippocampus contributed to 67%; tail, 24%; alveus/fimbria, 4%; and the subiculum, 5%. Conclusions Anatomic landmark variability in available protocols can be reduced to four discrete and measurable segmentation units. Their quantitative assessment will help a Delphi panel to define a set of landmarks for a harmonized protocol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.03.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23706515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Alzheimer Disease - pathology ; Alzheimer's disease ; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative ; Anatomic landmark ; Atrophy ; Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology ; Degeneration ; Delphi Technique ; Female ; Harmonization ; Hippocampal atrophy ; Hippocampal volumetry ; Hippocampus ; Hippocampus - anatomy &amp; histology ; Hippocampus - pathology ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Magnetic resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Manual segmentation protocol ; Manual tracing ; Medial temporal lobes ; Neuroimaging ; Neuroimaging - methods ; Neurology ; Organ Size ; Reproducibility of Results ; Standard operating procedures</subject><ispartof>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia, 2015-02, Vol.11 (2), p.184-194</ispartof><rights>The Alzheimer's Association</rights><rights>2015 The Alzheimer's Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6491-ca3d9d1fd04e639bc577c5b6bc7a9d0874ca05fa6197cba5670a6ec8ce459fe63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6491-ca3d9d1fd04e639bc577c5b6bc7a9d0874ca05fa6197cba5670a6ec8ce459fe63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.jalz.2013.03.001$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.jalz.2013.03.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23706515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boccardi, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocchetta, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganzola, Rossana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robitaille, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redolfi, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchesne, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jack, Clifford R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisoni, Giovanni B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EADC-ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EADC‐ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><title>Operationalizing protocol differences for EADC-ADNI manual hippocampal segmentation</title><title>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</title><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Hippocampal volumetry on magnetic resonance imaging is recognized as an Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker, and manual segmentation is the gold standard for measurement. However, a standard procedure is lacking. We operationalize and quantitate landmark differences to help a Delphi panel converge on a set of landmarks. Methods One hundred percent of anatomic landmark variability across 12 different protocols for manual segmentation was reduced into four segmentation units (the minimum hippocampus, the alveus/fimbria, the tail, and the subiculum), which were segmented on magnetic resonance images by expert raters to estimate reliability and AD-related atrophy. Results Intra- and interrater reliability were more than 0.96 and 0.92, respectively, except for the alveus/fimbria, which were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. Of all AD-related atrophy, the minimum hippocampus contributed to 67%; tail, 24%; alveus/fimbria, 4%; and the subiculum, 5%. Conclusions Anatomic landmark variability in available protocols can be reduced to four discrete and measurable segmentation units. Their quantitative assessment will help a Delphi panel to define a set of landmarks for a harmonized protocol.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - pathology</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</subject><subject>Anatomic landmark</subject><subject>Atrophy</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology</subject><subject>Degeneration</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Harmonization</subject><subject>Hippocampal atrophy</subject><subject>Hippocampal volumetry</subject><subject>Hippocampus</subject><subject>Hippocampus - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Hippocampus - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manual segmentation protocol</subject><subject>Manual tracing</subject><subject>Medial temporal lobes</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Neuroimaging - methods</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Standard operating procedures</subject><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhi0EomXhBTigHLlkGSexvZEQUrQt0GpFD4ULF8txJsXBiVM7AW2fHoeUHjggJMszsv75Z_R5CHlJYUuB8jfdtlP2bpsBzbcQD9BH5JQylqUsE-Xjh5zDCXkWQgdQwI6yp-QkywVwRtkpub4a0avJuEFZc2eGm2T0bnLa2aQxbYseB40haZ1PzquzfVqdfbpIejXMyibfzDg6rfox5gFvehym307PyZNW2YAv7uOGfHl__nn_MT1cfbjYV4dU86KkqVZ5Uza0baBAnpe1ZkJoVvNaC1U2sBOFVsBaxWkpdK0YF6A46p3GgpVtLNmQ16tvHPl2xjDJ3gSN1qoB3Rwk5Rw4jxCKKM1WqfYuBI-tHL3plT9KCnKBKTu5wJQLTAnxxLghr-7957rH5qHkD70oqFbBT2Px-B-Wsjp8vbyM1_IG-drk7eqBkdQPg14GbRbojfGoJ9k48-8Z3_1Vrq0ZjFb2Ox4xdG728WcjCxkyCfJ6WYllI2J7ALHL8l8Rzq7i</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Boccardi, Marina</creator><creator>Bocchetta, Martina</creator><creator>Ganzola, Rossana</creator><creator>Robitaille, Nicolas</creator><creator>Redolfi, Alberto</creator><creator>Duchesne, Simon</creator><creator>Jack, Clifford R</creator><creator>Frisoni, Giovanni B</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Operationalizing protocol differences for EADC-ADNI manual hippocampal segmentation</title><author>Boccardi, Marina ; Bocchetta, Martina ; Ganzola, Rossana ; Robitaille, Nicolas ; Redolfi, Alberto ; Duchesne, Simon ; Jack, Clifford R ; Frisoni, Giovanni B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6491-ca3d9d1fd04e639bc577c5b6bc7a9d0874ca05fa6197cba5670a6ec8ce459fe63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - pathology</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</topic><topic>Anatomic landmark</topic><topic>Atrophy</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology</topic><topic>Degeneration</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Harmonization</topic><topic>Hippocampal atrophy</topic><topic>Hippocampal volumetry</topic><topic>Hippocampus</topic><topic>Hippocampus - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Hippocampus - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manual segmentation protocol</topic><topic>Manual tracing</topic><topic>Medial temporal lobes</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Neuroimaging - methods</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Standard operating procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boccardi, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocchetta, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganzola, Rossana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robitaille, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redolfi, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchesne, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jack, Clifford R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisoni, Giovanni B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EADC-ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EADC‐ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boccardi, Marina</au><au>Bocchetta, Martina</au><au>Ganzola, Rossana</au><au>Robitaille, Nicolas</au><au>Redolfi, Alberto</au><au>Duchesne, Simon</au><au>Jack, Clifford R</au><au>Frisoni, Giovanni B</au><aucorp>EADC-ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</aucorp><aucorp>EADC‐ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Operationalizing protocol differences for EADC-ADNI manual hippocampal segmentation</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement</addtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>184</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>184-194</pages><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Hippocampal volumetry on magnetic resonance imaging is recognized as an Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker, and manual segmentation is the gold standard for measurement. However, a standard procedure is lacking. We operationalize and quantitate landmark differences to help a Delphi panel converge on a set of landmarks. Methods One hundred percent of anatomic landmark variability across 12 different protocols for manual segmentation was reduced into four segmentation units (the minimum hippocampus, the alveus/fimbria, the tail, and the subiculum), which were segmented on magnetic resonance images by expert raters to estimate reliability and AD-related atrophy. Results Intra- and interrater reliability were more than 0.96 and 0.92, respectively, except for the alveus/fimbria, which were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. Of all AD-related atrophy, the minimum hippocampus contributed to 67%; tail, 24%; alveus/fimbria, 4%; and the subiculum, 5%. Conclusions Anatomic landmark variability in available protocols can be reduced to four discrete and measurable segmentation units. Their quantitative assessment will help a Delphi panel to define a set of landmarks for a harmonized protocol.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23706515</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jalz.2013.03.001</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5260
ispartof Alzheimer's & dementia, 2015-02, Vol.11 (2), p.184-194
issn 1552-5260
1552-5279
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660661554
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Aged
Alzheimer Disease - pathology
Alzheimer's disease
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Anatomic landmark
Atrophy
Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology
Degeneration
Delphi Technique
Female
Harmonization
Hippocampal atrophy
Hippocampal volumetry
Hippocampus
Hippocampus - anatomy & histology
Hippocampus - pathology
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Magnetic resonance
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Manual segmentation protocol
Manual tracing
Medial temporal lobes
Neuroimaging
Neuroimaging - methods
Neurology
Organ Size
Reproducibility of Results
Standard operating procedures
title Operationalizing protocol differences for EADC-ADNI manual hippocampal segmentation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T18%3A26%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Operationalizing%20protocol%20differences%20for%20EADC-ADNI%20manual%20hippocampal%20segmentation&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Boccardi,%20Marina&rft.aucorp=EADC-ADNI%20Working%20Group%20on%20The%20Harmonized%20Protocol%20for%20Manual%20Hippocampal%20Segmentation%20and%20for%20the%20Alzheimer's%20Disease%20Neuroimaging%20Initiative&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=184&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=184-194&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jalz.2013.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660661554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660661554&rft_id=info:pmid/23706515&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1552526013000782&rfr_iscdi=true