Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management
Self-deception and impression-management comprise two types of deceptive, but generally socially acceptable behaviours, which are common in everyday life as well as being present in a number of psychiatric disorders. We sought to establish and dissociate the ‘normal’ brain substrates of self-decepti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuropsychologia 2015-01, Vol.67, p.159-174 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 174 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | Neuropsychologia |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Farrow, Tom F.D. Burgess, Jenny Wilkinson, Iain D. Hunter, Michael D. |
description | Self-deception and impression-management comprise two types of deceptive, but generally socially acceptable behaviours, which are common in everyday life as well as being present in a number of psychiatric disorders. We sought to establish and dissociate the ‘normal’ brain substrates of self-deception and impression-management. Twenty healthy participants underwent fMRI scanning at 3T whilst completing the ‘Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding’ test under two conditions: ‘fake good’, giving the most desirable impression possible and ‘fake bad’ giving an undesirable impression. Impression-management scores were more malleable to manipulation via ‘faking’ than self-deception scores. Response times to self-deception questions and ‘fake bad’ instructions were significantly longer than to impression-management questions and ‘fake good’ instructions respectively. Self-deception and impression-management manipulation and ‘faking bad’ were associated with activation of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC). Impression-management manipulation was additionally associated with activation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left posterior middle temporal gyrus. ‘Faking bad’ was additionally associated with activation of right vlPFC, left temporo-parietal junction and right cerebellum. There were no supra-threshold activations associated with ‘faking good’. Our neuroimaging data suggest that manipulating self-deception and impression-management and more specifically ‘faking bad’ engages a common network comprising mPFC and left vlPFC. Shorter response times and lack of dissociable neural activations suggests that ‘faking good’, particularly when it comes to impression-management, may be our most practiced ‘default’ mode.
•Self-deception and impression-management are behaviourally and neurally dissociable.•Reported activations are similar to previous fMRI studies of ‘other’ deception.•Impression-management specifically invokes memory and conspecific related brain regions.•‘Faking good’ at impression-management may be our ‘default’ mode. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660432379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002839321400476X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1652424523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-61b07113d33a3a849712ee04609e354ec51656a5bd6c3bf4845f913f21e2fe493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-BclJvCTu7EeaHBSkqBWKXvS8bDeTuiXJxt1U6L93S9WDp56GYZ55X3gIuQKaAYX8Zp11uPGuD1vz4Rq3sjpjFEQGLIvnIzKGYspTLkEckzGlrEh5ydmInIWwppQKyYpTMmJSsikAG5Pblxinm8Q477HRA4bE1UnApk4rNNgP1nWJ7qrEtr3HEOKatrrTK2yxG87JSa2bgBc_c0LeHx_eZvN08fr0PLtfpEYwOaQ5LGms4xXnmutClFNgiFTktEQuBRoJucy1XFa54ctaFELWJfCaAbIaRckn5Hqf23v3ucEwqNYGg02jO3SboCDPqeCMTw9BJRMseuARvdujxrsQPNaq97bVfquAqp1ttVb_baudbQVMxXMMuPzp2ixbrP7ef_VGYL4HMMr5suhVMBY7g5X1aAZVOXto1zfP7Zpf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652424523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Farrow, Tom F.D. ; Burgess, Jenny ; Wilkinson, Iain D. ; Hunter, Michael D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farrow, Tom F.D. ; Burgess, Jenny ; Wilkinson, Iain D. ; Hunter, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><description>Self-deception and impression-management comprise two types of deceptive, but generally socially acceptable behaviours, which are common in everyday life as well as being present in a number of psychiatric disorders. We sought to establish and dissociate the ‘normal’ brain substrates of self-deception and impression-management. Twenty healthy participants underwent fMRI scanning at 3T whilst completing the ‘Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding’ test under two conditions: ‘fake good’, giving the most desirable impression possible and ‘fake bad’ giving an undesirable impression. Impression-management scores were more malleable to manipulation via ‘faking’ than self-deception scores. Response times to self-deception questions and ‘fake bad’ instructions were significantly longer than to impression-management questions and ‘fake good’ instructions respectively. Self-deception and impression-management manipulation and ‘faking bad’ were associated with activation of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC). Impression-management manipulation was additionally associated with activation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left posterior middle temporal gyrus. ‘Faking bad’ was additionally associated with activation of right vlPFC, left temporo-parietal junction and right cerebellum. There were no supra-threshold activations associated with ‘faking good’. Our neuroimaging data suggest that manipulating self-deception and impression-management and more specifically ‘faking bad’ engages a common network comprising mPFC and left vlPFC. Shorter response times and lack of dissociable neural activations suggests that ‘faking good’, particularly when it comes to impression-management, may be our most practiced ‘default’ mode.
•Self-deception and impression-management are behaviourally and neurally dissociable.•Reported activations are similar to previous fMRI studies of ‘other’ deception.•Impression-management specifically invokes memory and conspecific related brain regions.•‘Faking good’ at impression-management may be our ‘default’ mode.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25527112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Deception ; Faking ; Female ; fMRI ; Humans ; Impression-management ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Prefrontal Cortex - physiology ; Self-deception ; Social Perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2015-01, Vol.67, p.159-174</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-61b07113d33a3a849712ee04609e354ec51656a5bd6c3bf4845f913f21e2fe493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-61b07113d33a3a849712ee04609e354ec51656a5bd6c3bf4845f913f21e2fe493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25527112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farrow, Tom F.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Iain D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><title>Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>Self-deception and impression-management comprise two types of deceptive, but generally socially acceptable behaviours, which are common in everyday life as well as being present in a number of psychiatric disorders. We sought to establish and dissociate the ‘normal’ brain substrates of self-deception and impression-management. Twenty healthy participants underwent fMRI scanning at 3T whilst completing the ‘Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding’ test under two conditions: ‘fake good’, giving the most desirable impression possible and ‘fake bad’ giving an undesirable impression. Impression-management scores were more malleable to manipulation via ‘faking’ than self-deception scores. Response times to self-deception questions and ‘fake bad’ instructions were significantly longer than to impression-management questions and ‘fake good’ instructions respectively. Self-deception and impression-management manipulation and ‘faking bad’ were associated with activation of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC). Impression-management manipulation was additionally associated with activation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left posterior middle temporal gyrus. ‘Faking bad’ was additionally associated with activation of right vlPFC, left temporo-parietal junction and right cerebellum. There were no supra-threshold activations associated with ‘faking good’. Our neuroimaging data suggest that manipulating self-deception and impression-management and more specifically ‘faking bad’ engages a common network comprising mPFC and left vlPFC. Shorter response times and lack of dissociable neural activations suggests that ‘faking good’, particularly when it comes to impression-management, may be our most practiced ‘default’ mode.
•Self-deception and impression-management are behaviourally and neurally dissociable.•Reported activations are similar to previous fMRI studies of ‘other’ deception.•Impression-management specifically invokes memory and conspecific related brain regions.•‘Faking good’ at impression-management may be our ‘default’ mode.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>Faking</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impression-management</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Self-deception</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-BclJvCTu7EeaHBSkqBWKXvS8bDeTuiXJxt1U6L93S9WDp56GYZ55X3gIuQKaAYX8Zp11uPGuD1vz4Rq3sjpjFEQGLIvnIzKGYspTLkEckzGlrEh5ydmInIWwppQKyYpTMmJSsikAG5Pblxinm8Q477HRA4bE1UnApk4rNNgP1nWJ7qrEtr3HEOKatrrTK2yxG87JSa2bgBc_c0LeHx_eZvN08fr0PLtfpEYwOaQ5LGms4xXnmutClFNgiFTktEQuBRoJucy1XFa54ctaFELWJfCaAbIaRckn5Hqf23v3ucEwqNYGg02jO3SboCDPqeCMTw9BJRMseuARvdujxrsQPNaq97bVfquAqp1ttVb_baudbQVMxXMMuPzp2ixbrP7ef_VGYL4HMMr5suhVMBY7g5X1aAZVOXto1zfP7Zpf</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Farrow, Tom F.D.</creator><creator>Burgess, Jenny</creator><creator>Wilkinson, Iain D.</creator><creator>Hunter, Michael D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management</title><author>Farrow, Tom F.D. ; Burgess, Jenny ; Wilkinson, Iain D. ; Hunter, Michael D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-61b07113d33a3a849712ee04609e354ec51656a5bd6c3bf4845f913f21e2fe493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>Faking</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impression-management</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Self-deception</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farrow, Tom F.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Iain D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farrow, Tom F.D.</au><au>Burgess, Jenny</au><au>Wilkinson, Iain D.</au><au>Hunter, Michael D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>67</volume><spage>159</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>159-174</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><abstract>Self-deception and impression-management comprise two types of deceptive, but generally socially acceptable behaviours, which are common in everyday life as well as being present in a number of psychiatric disorders. We sought to establish and dissociate the ‘normal’ brain substrates of self-deception and impression-management. Twenty healthy participants underwent fMRI scanning at 3T whilst completing the ‘Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding’ test under two conditions: ‘fake good’, giving the most desirable impression possible and ‘fake bad’ giving an undesirable impression. Impression-management scores were more malleable to manipulation via ‘faking’ than self-deception scores. Response times to self-deception questions and ‘fake bad’ instructions were significantly longer than to impression-management questions and ‘fake good’ instructions respectively. Self-deception and impression-management manipulation and ‘faking bad’ were associated with activation of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC). Impression-management manipulation was additionally associated with activation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left posterior middle temporal gyrus. ‘Faking bad’ was additionally associated with activation of right vlPFC, left temporo-parietal junction and right cerebellum. There were no supra-threshold activations associated with ‘faking good’. Our neuroimaging data suggest that manipulating self-deception and impression-management and more specifically ‘faking bad’ engages a common network comprising mPFC and left vlPFC. Shorter response times and lack of dissociable neural activations suggests that ‘faking good’, particularly when it comes to impression-management, may be our most practiced ‘default’ mode.
•Self-deception and impression-management are behaviourally and neurally dissociable.•Reported activations are similar to previous fMRI studies of ‘other’ deception.•Impression-management specifically invokes memory and conspecific related brain regions.•‘Faking good’ at impression-management may be our ‘default’ mode.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25527112</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.016</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-3932 |
ispartof | Neuropsychologia, 2015-01, Vol.67, p.159-174 |
issn | 0028-3932 1873-3514 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660432379 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Brain - physiology Brain Mapping Deception Faking Female fMRI Humans Impression-management Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Prefrontal Cortex - physiology Self-deception Social Perception Young Adult |
title | Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T12%3A36%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neural%20correlates%20of%20self-deception%20and%20impression-management&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Farrow,%20Tom%20F.D.&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=67&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=159-174&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1652424523%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652424523&rft_id=info:pmid/25527112&rft_els_id=S002839321400476X&rfr_iscdi=true |